-
1
-
-
55349101247
-
Social Loafing on Group Projects: Structural Antecedents and Effect on Student Satisfaction
-
Aggarwal, Praveen, and Connie L., O'Brien. 2008. “Social Loafing on Group Projects: Structural Antecedents and Effect on Student Satisfaction.” Journal of Marketing Education 30 (3): 255–264. doi:10.1177/0273475308322283.
-
(2008)
Journal of Marketing Education
, vol.30
, Issue.3
, pp. 255-264
-
-
Aggarwal, P.1
O'Brien, C.L.2
-
2
-
-
84872337077
-
Assessment of Individual Student Performance in Online Team Projects
-
Alden, J., 2011. “Assessment of Individual Student Performance in Online Team Projects.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 15 (3): 5–20. doi:10.24059/olj.v15i3.193.
-
(2011)
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks
, vol.15
, Issue.3
, pp. 5-20
-
-
Alden, J.1
-
3
-
-
84945208745
-
Peer Assessment in Higher Education–Twenty-First Century Practices, Challenges and the Way Forward
-
Aschenafi, M. M., 2017. “Peer Assessment in Higher Education–Twenty-First Century Practices, Challenges and the Way Forward.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2): 226–251. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1100711.
-
(2017)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.42
, Issue.2
, pp. 226-251
-
-
Aschenafi, M.M.1
-
4
-
-
0035348813
-
Problem-Based Learning. Challenges, Barriers and Outcome Issues
-
Azer, S. A., 2001. “Problem-Based Learning. Challenges, Barriers and Outcome Issues.” Saudi Medical Journal 22 (5): 389–397.
-
(2001)
Saudi Medical Journal
, vol.22
, Issue.5
, pp. 389-397
-
-
Azer, S.A.1
-
5
-
-
84990370537
-
The Effect of Group Projects on Content-Related Learning
-
–,. :10.1177%2F1052562904263729
-
Bacon, D. R., 2005. “The Effect of Group Projects on Content-Related Learning.” Journal of Management Education 29 (2): 248–267. doi:10.1177%2F1052562904263729.
-
(2005)
Journal of Management Education
, vol.29
, Issue.2
, pp. 248-267
-
-
Bacon, D.R.1
-
6
-
-
10044298347
-
Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process
-
Ballantyne, R., K., Hughes, and A., Mylonas. 2002. “Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (5): 427–441. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009302.
-
(2002)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.27
, Issue.5
, pp. 427-441
-
-
Ballantyne, R.1
Hughes, K.2
Mylonas, A.3
-
7
-
-
33749366889
-
Understanding the Rules of the Game: Marking Peer Assessment as a Medium for Developing Students’ Conceptions of Assessment
-
Bloxham, S., and A., West. 2004. “Understanding the Rules of the Game: Marking Peer Assessment as a Medium for Developing Students’ Conceptions of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (6): 721–733. doi:10.1080/0260293042000227254.
-
(2004)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.29
, Issue.6
, pp. 721-733
-
-
Bloxham, S.1
West, A.2
-
8
-
-
0000575949
-
Peer Earning and Assessment
-
Boud, D., R., Cohen, and J., Sampson. 1999. “Peer Earning and Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (4): 413–427. doi:10.1080/0260293990240405.
-
(1999)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.24
, Issue.4
, pp. 413-427
-
-
Boud, D.1
Cohen, R.2
Sampson, J.3
-
9
-
-
0002419736
-
Peer Assessment in Undergraduate Programmes
-
Brindley, C., and S., Scoffield. 1998. “Peer Assessment in Undergraduate Programmes.” Teaching in Higher Education 3 (1): 79–89. doi:10.1080/1356215980030106.
-
(1998)
Teaching in Higher Education
, vol.3
, Issue.1
, pp. 79-89
-
-
Brindley, C.1
Scoffield, S.2
-
10
-
-
84887559503
-
Free Riding in Group Projects and the Effects of Timing, Frequency, and Specificity of Criteria in Peer Assessments
-
Brooks, C. M., and J. L., Ammons. 2003. “Free Riding in Group Projects and the Effects of Timing, Frequency, and Specificity of Criteria in Peer Assessments.” Journal of Education for Business 78 (5): 263–268. doi:10.1080/08832320309598613.
-
(2003)
Journal of Education for Business
, vol.78
, Issue.5
, pp. 263-268
-
-
Brooks, C.M.1
Ammons, J.L.2
-
11
-
-
33748786820
-
Developing Employability Skills: Peer Assessment in Higher Education
-
Cassidy, S., 2006. “Developing Employability Skills: Peer Assessment in Higher Education.” Education + Training 48 (7): 508–517. doi:10.1108/00400910610705890.
-
(2006)
Education + Training
, vol.48
, Issue.7
, pp. 508-517
-
-
Cassidy, S.1
-
12
-
-
57849146455
-
Effects of High Level Prompts and Peer Assessment on Online Learners’ Reflection Levels
-
Chen, N. S., C. W., Wei, K. T., Wu, and L., Uden. 2009. “Effects of High Level Prompts and Peer Assessment on Online Learners’ Reflection Levels.” Computers & Education 52 (2): 283–291. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.007.
-
(2009)
Computers & Education
, vol.52
, Issue.2
, pp. 283-291
-
-
Chen, N.S.1
Wei, C.W.2
Wu, K.T.3
Uden, L.4
-
13
-
-
33847656694
-
Student Involvement in Assessment: A Project Designed to Assess Class Participation Fairly and Reliably
-
Dancer, D., and P., Kamvounias. 2005. “Student Involvement in Assessment: A Project Designed to Assess Class Participation Fairly and Reliably.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (4): 445–454. doi:10.1080/02602930500099235.
-
(2005)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.30
, Issue.4
, pp. 445-454
-
-
Dancer, D.1
Kamvounias, P.2
-
14
-
-
0031845555
-
Self and Tutor Evaluations in Problem- Based Learning Tutorials: Is There a Relationship?
-
Das, M., D., Mpofu, E., Dunn, and J. H., Lanphear. 1998. “Self and Tutor Evaluations in Problem- Based Learning Tutorials: Is There a Relationship?” Medical Education 32 (4): 411–418. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00217.x.
-
(1998)
Medical Education
, vol.32
, Issue.4
, pp. 411-418
-
-
Das, M.1
Mpofu, D.2
Dunn, E.3
Lanphear, J.H.4
-
15
-
-
0023681399
-
Use of Peer Ratings in a Pediatric Residency
-
Davis, J. K., and S., Inamdar. 1988. “Use of Peer Ratings in a Pediatric Residency.” Academic Medicine 63: 647–649. doi:10.1097/00001888-198808000-00011.
-
(1988)
Academic Medicine
, vol.63
, pp. 647-649
-
-
Davis, J.K.1
Inamdar, S.2
-
16
-
-
21244505333
-
Problem‐Based Learning: Future Challenges for Educational Practice and Research
-
Dolmans, D. H., W., De Grave, I. H., Wolfhagen, and C. P., Van Der Vleuten. 2005. “Problem‐Based Learning: Future Challenges for Educational Practice and Research.” Medical Education 39 (7): 732–741. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02205.x.
-
(2005)
Medical Education
, vol.39
, Issue.7
, pp. 732-741
-
-
Dolmans, D.H.1
De Grave, W.2
Wolfhagen, I.H.3
Van Der Vleuten, C.P.4
-
17
-
-
77955764789
-
Product Comparisons and Process Benefits of Collaborative Peer Group and Self Assessments
-
Falchikov, N., 1986. “Product Comparisons and Process Benefits of Collaborative Peer Group and Self Assessments.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 11: 146–166. doi:10.1080/0260293860110206.
-
(1986)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.11
, pp. 146-166
-
-
Falchikov, N.1
-
18
-
-
0037262271
-
Scaffolding Students’ Problem-Solving Processes in an Ill-Structured Task Using Question Prompts and Peer Interactions
-
Ge, X., and S. M., Land. 2003. “Scaffolding Students’ Problem-Solving Processes in an Ill-Structured Task Using Question Prompts and Peer Interactions.” Educational Technology Research and Development 51 (1): 21–38. doi:10.1007/BF02504515.
-
(2003)
Educational Technology Research and Development
, vol.51
, Issue.1
, pp. 21-38
-
-
Ge, X.1
Land, S.M.2
-
19
-
-
84936747679
-
Structuring Peer Assessment: Comparing the Impact of the Degree of Structure on Peer Feedback Content
-
Gielen, M., and B., De Wever. 2015. “Structuring Peer Assessment: Comparing the Impact of the Degree of Structure on Peer Feedback Content.” Computers in Human Behavior 52: 315–325. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019.
-
(2015)
Computers in Human Behavior
, vol.52
, pp. 315-325
-
-
Gielen, M.1
De Wever, B.2
-
20
-
-
0002689016
-
Assessing Self- and Peer-Assessment: The Students’ View
-
Hanrahan, S. J., and G., Issacs. 2001. “Assessing Self- and Peer-Assessment: The Students’ View.” Higher Education Research & Development 20 (1): 53. doi:10.1080/07924360120043658.
-
(2001)
Higher Education Research & Development
, vol.20
, Issue.1
, pp. 53
-
-
Hanrahan, S.J.1
Issacs, G.2
-
21
-
-
28244469203
-
Assessing Contributions to Group Assignments
-
Johnston, L., and L., Miles. 2004. “Assessing Contributions to Group Assignments.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (6): 751–768. doi:10.1080/0260293042000227272.
-
(2004)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.29
, Issue.6
, pp. 751-768
-
-
Johnston, L.1
Miles, L.2
-
22
-
-
85018257831
-
Students’ Group Work Contribution: Influence of Work Preference, Gender, and Individual Assessment
-
Joo, M., 2017. “Students’ Group Work Contribution: Influence of Work Preference, Gender, and Individual Assessment.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 45 (1): 19–28. doi:10.2224/sbp.5385.
-
(2017)
Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal
, vol.45
, Issue.1
, pp. 19-28
-
-
Joo, M.1
-
23
-
-
84873500503
-
-
Australia:. ? Paper Presented at the Meeting for the Australasian Computing Education Conference January
-
Kennedy, G. F., 2006. “Peer-Assessment in Group Projects: Is It Worth It?” Paper Presented at the Meeting for the Australasian Computing Education Conference, 59–65. Australia, January.
-
(2006)
Peer-Assessment in Group Projects: Is It Worth It
, pp. 59-65
-
-
Kennedy, G.F.1
-
24
-
-
11144276100
-
Can We Support CSCL? Educational, Social and Technological Affordances for Learning
-
Kirschner P., (ed), Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands,. edited by
-
Kirschner, P. A., 2002. “Can We Support CSCL? Educational, Social and Technological Affordances for Learning.” In Three Worlds of CSCL: Can We Support CSCL, edited by P., Kirschner, 7–47. Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.
-
(2002)
Three Worlds of CSCL: Can We Support CSCL
, pp. 7-47
-
-
Kirschner, P.A.1
-
26
-
-
84873864990
-
Peer Evaluation in Blended Team Project-Based Learning: What Do Students Find Important?
-
Lee, H., and C., Lim. 2012. “Peer Evaluation in Blended Team Project-Based Learning: What Do Students Find Important?” Educational Technology & Society 15 (4): 214–224.
-
(2012)
Educational Technology & Society
, vol.15
, Issue.4
, pp. 214-224
-
-
Lee, H.1
Lim, C.2
-
27
-
-
84898852956
-
Assessing Teamwork Skills for Assurance of Learning Using CATME Team Tools
-
–,. :10.1177%2F0273475313499023
-
Loughry, M. L., M. W., Ohland, and D. J., Woehr. 2014. “Assessing Teamwork Skills for Assurance of Learning Using CATME Team Tools.” Journal of Marketing Education 36 (1): 5–19. doi:10.1177%2F0273475313499023.
-
(2014)
Journal of Marketing Education
, vol.36
, Issue.1
, pp. 5-19
-
-
Loughry, M.L.1
Ohland, M.W.2
Woehr, D.J.3
-
28
-
-
10044242449
-
The Effect of Scoring Criteria Specificity on Peer and Self-Assessment
-
Miller, P. J., 2003. “The Effect of Scoring Criteria Specificity on Peer and Self-Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (4): 383–394. doi:10.1080/0260293032000066218.
-
(2003)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.28
, Issue.4
, pp. 383-394
-
-
Miller, P.J.1
-
29
-
-
84890351536
-
Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective
-
Nicol, D., A., Thomson, and C., Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122. doi:10.1080/0260293032000066218.
-
(2014)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.39
, Issue.1
, pp. 102-122
-
-
Nicol, D.1
Thomson, A.2
Breslin, C.3
-
30
-
-
78349301493
-
Group Projects: More Learning? Less Fair? A Conundrum in Assessing Postgraduate Business Education
-
Nordberg, D., 2008. “Group Projects: More Learning? Less Fair? A Conundrum in Assessing Postgraduate Business Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (5): 481–492. doi:10.1080/02602930701698835.
-
(2008)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.33
, Issue.5
, pp. 481-492
-
-
Nordberg, D.1
-
31
-
-
79955527123
-
The Importance of Making Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment
-
Orsmond, P., S., Merry, and K., Reiling. 1996. “The Importance of Making Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 21 (3): 239–250. doi:10.1080/0260293960210304.
-
(1996)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.21
, Issue.3
, pp. 239-250
-
-
Orsmond, P.1
Merry, S.2
Reiling, K.3
-
32
-
-
33847609696
-
Peer Assessment in Problem-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study
-
Papinczak, T., L., Young, and M., Groves. 2007. “Peer Assessment in Problem-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 12 (2): 169–186. doi:10.1007/s10459-005-5046-6.
-
(2007)
Advances in Health Sciences Education
, vol.12
, Issue.2
, pp. 169-186
-
-
Papinczak, T.1
Young, L.2
Groves, M.3
-
33
-
-
84857771688
-
Student Experiences of Peer Review Marking of Team Projects
-
Pond, K., D., Coates, and O., Palermo. 2007. “Student Experiences of Peer Review Marking of Team Projects.” International Journal of Management Education 6 (2): 30–43. doi:10.3794/ijme.62.190.
-
(2007)
International Journal of Management Education
, vol.6
, Issue.2
, pp. 30-43
-
-
Pond, K.1
Coates, D.2
Palermo, O.3
-
34
-
-
0036400592
-
Communication Skills Assessment: The Perceptions of Medical Students at the University of Nottingham
-
Rees, C., C., Sheard, and A., McPherson. 2002. “Communication Skills Assessment: The Perceptions of Medical Students at the University of Nottingham.” Medical Education 36 (9): 868–878. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01300.x.
-
(2002)
Medical Education
, vol.36
, Issue.9
, pp. 868-878
-
-
Rees, C.1
Sheard, C.2
McPherson, A.3
-
35
-
-
0036338029
-
Worked-out Examples: Instructional Explanations Support Learning by Self-Explanations
-
Renkl, A., 2002. “Worked-out Examples: Instructional Explanations Support Learning by Self-Explanations.” Learning and Instruction 12 (5): 529–556. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00030-5.
-
(2002)
Learning and Instruction
, vol.12
, Issue.5
, pp. 529-556
-
-
Renkl, A.1
-
36
-
-
79955569491
-
Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal
-
Sadler, D. R., 2010. “Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 535–550. doi:10.1080/02602930903541015.
-
(2010)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.35
, Issue.5
, pp. 535-550
-
-
Sadler, D.R.1
-
37
-
-
84872340730
-
Peer Assessment: A Complementary Instrument to Recognize Individual Contributions in is Student Group Projects
-
Scott, E., N., van der Merwe, and D., Smith. 2005. “Peer Assessment: A Complementary Instrument to Recognize Individual Contributions in is Student Group Projects.” The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 8 (1): 61–70.
-
(2005)
The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation
, vol.8
, Issue.1
, pp. 61-70
-
-
Scott, E.1
van der Merwe, N.2
Smith, D.3
-
38
-
-
84857114206
-
Baccalaureate Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Peer Assessment of Individual Contributions to a Group Project: A Case Study
-
and A. N
-
Shiu, A., T. Y., Chan, C. W., Lam, P., Lee, J., Kwong. and A. N. 2012. “Baccalaureate Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Peer Assessment of Individual Contributions to a Group Project: A Case Study.” Nurse Education Today 32 (3): 214–218. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.03.008.
-
(2012)
Nurse Education Today
, vol.32
, Issue.3
, pp. 214-218
-
-
Shiu, A.1
Chan, T.Y.2
Lam, C.W.3
Lee, P.4
Kwong, J.5
-
39
-
-
0035605780
-
Peer Assessment in Problem-Based Learning
-
Sluijmans, D. M. A., G., Moerkerke, J. J., Van Merrienboer, and F. J., Dochy. 2001. “Peer Assessment in Problem-Based Learning.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 27 (2): 153–173. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(01)00019-0.
-
(2001)
Studies in Educational Evaluation
, vol.27
, Issue.2
, pp. 153-173
-
-
Sluijmans, D.M.A.1
Moerkerke, G.2
Van Merrienboer, J.J.3
Dochy, F.J.4
-
41
-
-
79955560652
-
Student Participation in the Evaluation of Cooperative Learning
-
Strom, R. D., and P. S., Strom. 1998. “Student Participation in the Evaluation of Cooperative Learning.” Community College Journal of Research and Practice 22 (3): 265–278. doi:10.1080/1066892980220306.
-
(1998)
Community College Journal of Research and Practice
, vol.22
, Issue.3
, pp. 265-278
-
-
Strom, R.D.1
Strom, P.S.2
-
42
-
-
0042734232
-
Formative Peer Assessment of Writing between Postgraduate Students
-
Topping, K. J., E. F., Smith, I., Swanson, and A., Elliot. 2000. “Formative Peer Assessment of Writing between Postgraduate Students.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (2): 149–169. doi:10.1080/713611428.
-
(2000)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.25
, Issue.2
, pp. 149-169
-
-
Topping, K.J.1
Smith, E.F.2
Swanson, I.3
Elliot, A.4
-
43
-
-
73649131648
-
Not All Interactive Engagement is the Same: Variations in Physics Professors’ Implementation of Peer Instruction
-
Turpen, C., and N. D., Finkelstein. 2009. “Not All Interactive Engagement is the Same: Variations in Physics Professors’ Implementation of Peer Instruction.” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 5 (2): 020101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020101.
-
(2009)
Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
, vol.5
, Issue.2
, pp. 020101
-
-
Turpen, C.1
Finkelstein, N.D.2
-
44
-
-
50049125663
-
Peer & Self Evaluations as Means to Improve the Assessment of Project Based Learning
-
Milwaukee, WI:, and, and,. Opportunities Without Passports, October, S1G-12-SIG-18
-
Van Den Bogaard, M. E. D., and, and G. N., Saunders-Smits. 2007. “Peer & Self Evaluations as Means to Improve the Assessment of Project Based Learning.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting for the Frontiers in Education Conference-Global Engineering: Knowledge without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports, Milwaukee, WI, October, S1G-12-SIG-18. doi:10.1109/FIE.2007.4417988.
-
(2007)
Paper presented at the Annual Meeting for the Frontiers in Education Conference-Global Engineering: Knowledge without Borders
-
-
Van Den Bogaard, M.E.D.1
Saunders-Smits, G.N.2
-
46
-
-
85079830533
-
Changing Student’s Perceptions of Self and Peer Assessment
-
Palm Cove, QLD, Australia
-
Willey, K., and A., Gardner. 2010. “Changing Student’s Perceptions of Self and Peer Assessment.” Paper presented at the Research Engineering Education Symposium, Palm Cove, QLD, Australia.
-
(2010)
Paper presented at the Research Engineering Education Symposium
-
-
Willey, K.1
Gardner, A.2
-
47
-
-
0036760389
-
Small-Group Work and Assessment in a PBL Curriculum: A Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Student Perceptions of the Process of Working in Small Groups and Its Assessment
-
Willis, S. C., A., Jones, C., Bundy, K., Burdett, C. R., Whitehouse, and P. A., O'Neill. 2002. “Small-Group Work and Assessment in a PBL Curriculum: A Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Student Perceptions of the Process of Working in Small Groups and Its Assessment.” Medical Teacher 24 (5): 495–501. doi:10.1080/0142159021000012531.
-
(2002)
Medical Teacher
, vol.24
, Issue.5
, pp. 495-501
-
-
Willis, S.C.1
Jones, A.2
Bundy, C.3
Burdett, K.4
Whitehouse, C.R.5
O'Neill, P.A.6
|