-
1
-
-
84951745775
-
Relative Second Language Proficiency and the Giving and Receiving of Written Peer Feedback
-
Allen, D., and A., Katayama. 2016. “Relative Second Language Proficiency and the Giving and Receiving of Written Peer Feedback.” System 56: 96–106. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.12.002.
-
(2016)
System
, vol.56
, pp. 96-106
-
-
Allen, D.1
Katayama, A.2
-
2
-
-
33749366889
-
Understanding the Rules of the Game: Marking Peer Assessment as a Medium for Developing Students’ Conceptions of Assessment
-
Bloxham, S., and A., West. 2004. “Understanding the Rules of the Game: Marking Peer Assessment as a Medium for Developing Students’ Conceptions of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29: 721–733. doi:10.1080/0260293042000227254.
-
(2004)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.29
, pp. 721-733
-
-
Bloxham, S.1
West, A.2
-
3
-
-
84879665126
-
Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design
-
Boud, D., and E., Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38: 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
-
(2013)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.38
, pp. 698-712
-
-
Boud, D.1
Molloy, E.2
-
4
-
-
84924175383
-
The Calibration of Student Judgement through Self-Assessment: Disruptive Effects of Assessment Patterns
-
Boud, D., R., Lawson, and D., Thompson. 2015. “The Calibration of Student Judgement through Self-Assessment: Disruptive Effects of Assessment Patterns.” Higher Education Research & Development 34: 45–59. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.934328.
-
(2015)
Higher Education Research & Development
, vol.34
, pp. 45-59
-
-
Boud, D.1
Lawson, R.2
Thompson, D.3
-
5
-
-
85046462404
-
The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback
-
Carless, D., and D., Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43: 1315–1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
-
(2018)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.43
, pp. 1315-1325
-
-
Carless, D.1
Boud, D.2
-
6
-
-
79959432842
-
Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices
-
Carless, D., D., Salter, M., Yang, and J., Lam. 2011. “Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36(4): 395–407. doi:10.1080/03075071003642449.
-
(2011)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.36
, Issue.4
, pp. 395-407
-
-
Carless, D.1
Salter, D.2
Yang, M.3
Lam, J.4
-
7
-
-
0002380079
-
Chinese Students’ Perceptions of ESL Peer Response Group Interaction
-
Carson, J. G., and G. L., Nelson. 1996. “Chinese Students’ Perceptions of ESL Peer Response Group Interaction.” Journal of Second Language Writing 5(1): 1–19. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0.
-
(1996)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.5
, Issue.1
, pp. 1-19
-
-
Carson, J.G.1
Nelson, G.L.2
-
8
-
-
84928314841
-
Teacher Modeling on EFL Reviewers’ Audience-Aware Feedback and Affectivity in L2 Peer Review
-
Chang. Y. C., 2015. “Teacher Modeling on EFL Reviewers’ Audience-Aware Feedback and Affectivity in L2 Peer Review.” Assessing Writing 25: 2–21. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.04.001.
-
(2015)
Assessing Writing
, vol.25
, pp. 2-21
-
-
Chang, Y.C.1
-
9
-
-
84955170931
-
Technology-Supported Peer Feedback in ESL/EFL Writing Classes: A Research Synthesis
-
Chen. T., 2016. “Technology-Supported Peer Feedback in ESL/EFL Writing Classes: A Research Synthesis.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 29(2): 365–397. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.960942.
-
(2016)
Computer Assisted Language Learning
, vol.29
, Issue.2
, pp. 365-397
-
-
Chen, T.1
-
10
-
-
79961167787
-
Peer Reviewers Learn from Giving Comments
-
Cho, Y. H., and K., Cho. 2011. “Peer Reviewers Learn from Giving Comments.” Instructional Science 39(5): 629–643. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1.
-
(2011)
Instructional Science
, vol.39
, Issue.5
, pp. 629-643
-
-
Cho, Y.H.1
Cho, K.2
-
11
-
-
85031907850
-
Instructional Scaffolds for Learning from Formative Peer Assessment: Effects of Core Task, Peer Feedback, and Dialogue
-
Deiglmayr, A., 2018. “Instructional Scaffolds for Learning from Formative Peer Assessment: Effects of Core Task, Peer Feedback, and Dialogue.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 33(1): 185–198. doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0355-8.
-
(2018)
European Journal of Psychology of Education
, vol.33
, Issue.1
, pp. 185-198
-
-
Deiglmayr, A.1
-
12
-
-
85019810130
-
Students’ Perspectives on the Role of Peer Feedback in Supporting Learning
-
Evans. C., 2015. “Students’ Perspectives on the Role of Peer Feedback in Supporting Learning.” Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 14(1): 110–124. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.14.1.110.
-
(2015)
Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology
, vol.14
, Issue.1
, pp. 110-124
-
-
Evans, C.1
-
13
-
-
85070237309
-
Student Feedback Literacy and Engagement with Feedback: A Case Study of Chinese Undergraduate Students
-
Han, Y., and Y., Xu. 2019. “Student Feedback Literacy and Engagement with Feedback: A Case Study of Chinese Undergraduate Students.” Teaching in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1648410.
-
(2019)
Teaching in Higher Education
-
-
Han, Y.1
Xu, Y.2
-
14
-
-
77953958674
-
Issues of Cultural Appropriateness and Pedagogical Efficacy: Exploring Peer Review in a Second Language Writing Class
-
Hu, G., and S. T. E., Lam. 2010. “Issues of Cultural Appropriateness and Pedagogical Efficacy: Exploring Peer Review in a Second Language Writing Class.” Instructional Science 38(4): 371–394. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1.
-
(2010)
Instructional Science
, vol.38
, Issue.4
, pp. 371-394
-
-
Hu, G.1
Lam, S.T.E.2
-
15
-
-
0003562884
-
Theoretical Framework: An Introduction to Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research
-
Lantolf J.P., Appel A., (eds), Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing, and,. edited by
-
Lantolf, J. P., and G., Appel. 1994. “Theoretical Framework: An Introduction to Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research.” In Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research, edited by J. P., Lantolf and A., Appel, 1–32. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
-
(1994)
Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research
, pp. 1-32
-
-
Lantolf, J.P.1
Appel, G.2
-
16
-
-
84941134831
-
Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing: Investigating Junior Secondary Students’ Perspectives on Inter-Feedback and Intra-Feedback
-
Lee. M., 2015. “Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing: Investigating Junior Secondary Students’ Perspectives on Inter-Feedback and Intra-Feedback.” System 55: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.08.003.
-
(2015)
System
, vol.55
, pp. 1-10
-
-
Lee, M.1
-
17
-
-
84941740762
-
Making Judgements: Investigating the Process of Composing and Receiving Peer Feedback
-
McConlogue, T., 2015. “Making Judgements: Investigating the Process of Composing and Receiving Peer Feedback.” Studies in Higher Education 40(9): 1495–1506. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.868878.
-
(2015)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.40
, Issue.9
, pp. 1495-1506
-
-
McConlogue, T.1
-
18
-
-
84890804101
-
-
3rd ed, Los Angeles: Sage
-
Miles, M. B., A. M., Huberman, and J., Saldaña. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
-
(2013)
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook
-
-
Miles, M.B.1
Huberman, A.M.2
Saldaña, J.3
-
19
-
-
20344401300
-
Training Students to Become Successful Peer Reviewers
-
Min. H.-T., 2005. “Training Students to Become Successful Peer Reviewers.” System 33(2): 293–308. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003.
-
(2005)
System
, vol.33
, Issue.2
, pp. 293-308
-
-
Min, H.-T.1
-
20
-
-
33747082968
-
The Effects of Trained Peer Review on EFL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality
-
Min. H.-T., 2006. “The Effects of Trained Peer Review on EFL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15(2): 118–141. doi:10.1016/j/jslw.2006.01.003.
-
(2006)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.15
, Issue.2
, pp. 118-141
-
-
Min, H.-T.1
-
21
-
-
84958267801
-
Effects of Teacher Modeling and Feedback on EFL Students’ Peer Review Skills in Peer Review Training
-
Min, H.-T., 2016. “Effects of Teacher Modeling and Feedback on EFL Students’ Peer Review Skills in Peer Review Training.” Journal of Second Language Writing 31: 43–57. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.004.
-
(2016)
Journal of Second Language Writing
, vol.31
, pp. 43-57
-
-
Min, H.-T.1
-
22
-
-
85019638659
-
A Journey towards Sustainable Feedback
-
Mutch, A., C., Young, T., Davey, and L., Fitzgerald. 2018. “A Journey towards Sustainable Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43: 248–259. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1332154.
-
(2018)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.43
, pp. 248-259
-
-
Mutch, A.1
Young, C.2
Davey, T.3
Fitzgerald, L.4
-
23
-
-
79955551589
-
From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education
-
Nicol. D., 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35: 501–517. doi:10.1080/02602931003786559.
-
(2010)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.35
, pp. 501-517
-
-
Nicol, D.1
-
24
-
-
84890351536
-
Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective
-
Nicol, D., A., Thomson, and C., Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39: 102–122. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
-
(2014)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.39
, pp. 102-122
-
-
Nicol, D.1
Thomson, A.2
Breslin, C.3
-
27
-
-
84864677441
-
Using Peer Feedback in a Master's Programme: A Multiple Case Study
-
Poverjuc, O., V., Brooks, and D., Wray. 2012. “Using Peer Feedback in a Master's Programme: A Multiple Case Study.” Teaching in Higher Education 17(4): 465–477. doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.641008.
-
(2012)
Teaching in Higher Education
, vol.17
, Issue.4
, pp. 465-477
-
-
Poverjuc, O.1
Brooks, V.2
Wray, D.3
-
28
-
-
84858425594
-
Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement
-
Price, M., K., Handley, and J., Millar. 2011. “Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36(8): 879–896. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.483513.
-
(2011)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.36
, Issue.8
, pp. 879-896
-
-
Price, M.1
Handley, K.2
Millar, J.3
-
29
-
-
0039921137
-
Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems
-
Sadler. D. R., 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18(2): 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714.
-
(1989)
Instructional Science
, vol.18
, Issue.2
, pp. 119-144
-
-
Sadler, D.R.1
-
30
-
-
79955569491
-
Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal
-
Sadler, D. R., 2010. “Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35: 535–550. doi:10.1080/02602930903541015.
-
(2010)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.35
, pp. 535-550
-
-
Sadler, D.R.1
-
31
-
-
84857182449
-
Conceptualizing Feedback Literacy: Knowing, Being, and Acting
-
Sutton, P., 2012. “Conceptualizing Feedback Literacy: Knowing, Being, and Acting.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49(1): 31–40. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.647781.
-
(2012)
Innovations in Education and Teaching International
, vol.49
, Issue.1
, pp. 31-40
-
-
Sutton, P.1
-
32
-
-
85038114557
-
Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions about the Quality of Work
-
Tai, J., R., Ajjawi, D., Boud, P., Dawson, and E., Panadero. 2018. “Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions about the Quality of Work.” Higher Education 76(3): 467–481. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
-
(2018)
Higher Education
, vol.76
, Issue.3
, pp. 467-481
-
-
Tai, J.1
Ajjawi, R.2
Boud, D.3
Dawson, P.4
Panadero, E.5
-
33
-
-
84994777352
-
Exploring the Value of Peer Feedback in Online Learning for the Provider
-
Van Popta, E., M., Kral, G., Camp, R. L., Martens, and P. R.-J., Simons. 2017. “Exploring the Value of Peer Feedback in Online Learning for the Provider.” Educational Research Review 20: 24–34. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003.
-
(2017)
Educational Research Review
, vol.20
, pp. 24-34
-
-
Van Popta, E.1
Kral, M.2
Camp, G.3
Martens, R.L.4
Simons, P.R.J.5
-
34
-
-
33846699999
-
Do Students Value Feedback? Student Perceptions of Tutors’ Written Responses
-
Weaver. M. R., 2006. “Do Students Value Feedback? Student Perceptions of Tutors’ Written Responses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31: 379–394. doi:10.1080/02602930500353061.
-
(2006)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.31
, pp. 379-394
-
-
Weaver, M.R.1
-
35
-
-
38049184717
-
Online Peer Assessment in an Inservice Science and Mathematics Teacher Education Course
-
Wen, M. L., and C.-C., Tsai. 2008. “Online Peer Assessment in an Inservice Science and Mathematics Teacher Education Course.” Teaching in Higher Education 13(1): 55–67. doi:10.1080/13562510701794050.
-
(2008)
Teaching in Higher Education
, vol.13
, Issue.1
, pp. 55-67
-
-
Wen, M.L.1
Tsai, C.-C.2
-
36
-
-
85066814395
-
Lower English Proficiency Means Poorer Feedback Performance? a Mixed-Methods Study
-
Wu. Z., 2019. “Lower English Proficiency Means Poorer Feedback Performance? a Mixed-Methods Study.” Assessing Writing 41: 14–24. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.05.001.
-
(2019)
Assessing Writing
, vol.41
, pp. 14-24
-
-
Wu, Z.1
-
37
-
-
84969822576
-
Teacher Assessment Literacy in Practice: A Reconceptualization
-
Xu, Y., and G. T. L., Brown. 2016. “Teacher Assessment Literacy in Practice: A Reconceptualization.” Teaching and Teacher Education 58: 149–162. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010.
-
(2016)
Teaching and Teacher Education
, vol.58
, pp. 149-162
-
-
Xu, Y.1
Brown, G.T.L.2
-
38
-
-
84984620268
-
Only True Friends Could Be Cruelly Honest’: Cognitive Scaffolding and Social-Affective Support in Teacher Feedback Literacy
-
Xu, Y., and D., Carless. 2017. “Only True Friends Could Be Cruelly Honest’: Cognitive Scaffolding and Social-Affective Support in Teacher Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42: 1082–1094. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1226759.
-
(2017)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.42
, pp. 1082-1094
-
-
Xu, Y.1
Carless, D.2
-
39
-
-
84989229058
-
Can Higher-Proficiency L2 Learners Benefit from Working with Lower-Proficiency Partners in Peer Feedback?
-
Yu, S., and G., Hu. 2017. “Can Higher-Proficiency L2 Learners Benefit from Working with Lower-Proficiency Partners in Peer Feedback?” Teaching in Higher Education 22(2): 178–192. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1221806.
-
(2017)
Teaching in Higher Education
, vol.22
, Issue.2
, pp. 178-192
-
-
Yu, S.1
Hu, G.2
-
40
-
-
84897891285
-
Investigating Teacher-Supported Peer Assessment for EFL Writing
-
Zhao. H., 2014. “Investigating Teacher-Supported Peer Assessment for EFL Writing.” ELT Journal 68(2): 155–168. doi:10.1093/elt/ccto68.
-
(2014)
ELT Journal
, vol.68
, Issue.2
, pp. 155-168
-
-
Zhao, H.1
-
41
-
-
85075178708
-
Grudges and Gratitude: The Social-Affective Impacts of Peer Assessment
-
Zhou, J., K., Zhao, and D., Dawson. 2019. “Grudges and Gratitude: The Social-Affective Impacts of Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1643449.
-
(2019)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
-
-
Zhou, J.1
Zhao, K.2
Dawson, D.3
-
42
-
-
85043334276
-
Dialogue within Peer Feedback Processes: Clarification and Negotiation of Meaning
-
Zhu, Q., and D., Carless. 2018. “Dialogue within Peer Feedback Processes: Clarification and Negotiation of Meaning.” Higher Education Research & Development 37: 883–897. doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417.
-
(2018)
Higher Education Research & Development
, vol.37
, pp. 883-897
-
-
Zhu, Q.1
Carless, D.2
|