The technology acceptance scale: Its Bayesian psychometrics assessed in a factor analysis via Markov chain Monte Carlo models

Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2022, Pages 66-88

  Schmid, Daniela ^a  

^a NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bayesian statistics; factor analysis; Markov chain Monte Carlo; reduced crew operations; single pilot operations

Indexed keywords

FLIGHT SIMULATORS; MARKOV CHAINS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS;

COMPLEX SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; FACTOR STRUCTURE; FLIGHT SIMULATION; MARKOV CHAIN-MONTE CARLO MODEL; PILOT OPERATIONS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; UNDERLYING FACTORS;

FACTOR ANALYSIS;

EID: 85103614401     PISSN: 10908471     EISSN: 15206564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20896     Document Type: Article

References (121)

1. Aczel, B., Hoekstra, R., Gelman, A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Klugkist, I. G., Rouder, J. N., Vandekerckhove, J., Lee, M. D., Morey, R. D., Vanpaemel, W., Dienes, Z., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2020). Discussion points for Bayesian inference. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 561–563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z
2. Adell, E. (2009). Driver experience and acceptance of driver support systems—A case of speed adaptation (Doctorate doctoral thesis). Lund University, Lund, Sweden (CODEN:LUTVDG/(TVTT-1038)1-171/2009).
3. Adell, E., Nilsson, L., & Várhelyi, A. (2014). How is acceptance measured? Overview of measurement issues, methods and tools. In M. A. Regan, T. Horberry, & A. Stevens (Eds.), Driver acceptance of new technology: Theory, measurement and optimisation (pp. 73–88). Ashgate.
4. Adell, E., Várhelyi, A., & Nilsson, L. (2014). The definition of acceptance and acceptability. In M. A. Regan, T. Horberry, & A. Stevens (Eds.), Driver acceptance of new technology: Theory, measurement and optimisation (pp. 11–21). Ashgate.
5. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477
6. Altin Gumussoy, C. (2016). Acceptance of the virtual item auctioning system in online games: The role of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and trust. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26(5), 627–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20682
7. Ando, R., & Li, A. (2016). An evaluation analysis on three-wheeled personal mobility vehicles. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, 14(3), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-015-0111-x
8. Apte, A., Bacolod, M., & Carmichael, R. (2020). Tradeoffs among attributes of resources in humanitarian operations: Evidence from United States navy. Production and Operations Management, 29(4), 1071–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13154
9. Beggiato, M., & Krems, J. F. (2013). The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 18, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.12.006
10. Beggiato, M., Pereira, M., Petzoldt, T., & Krems, J. (2015). Learning and development of trust, acceptance and the mental model of ACC. A longitudinal on-road study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 35, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.005
11. Bekker, P. A., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1997). Generic global indentification in factor analysis. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 264, 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3795(96)00363-1
12. Boy, G. A. (2015). Requirements for single pilot operations in commercial aviation: A first high-level cognitive function analysis. In F. Boulanger, D. Korb, G. Morel, & J.-C. Roussel (Eds.), Complex systems design & management (pp. 227–234). Springer.
13. Calisir, F., Altin Gumussoy, C., Bayraktaroglu, A. E., & Karaali, D. (2014). Predicting the intention to use a web-based learning system: Perceived content quality, anxiety, perceived system quality, image, and the technology acceptance model. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 24(5), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20548
14. Camilli, G., & Fox, J. P. (2015). An aggregate IRT procedure for exploratory factor analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 40(4), 377–401. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998615589185
15. Chen, J. (2021). A Bayesian regularized approach to exploratory factor analysis in one step. Structural Equation Modeling, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1854763
16. Chen, N.-H., & Huang, S. C.-T. (2016). Domestic technology adoption: Comparison of innovation adoption models and moderators. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20621
17. Chib, S., & Greenberg, E. (1995). Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The American Statistician, 49(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1995.10476177
18. Conti, G., Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., Heckman, J. J., & Piatek, R. (2014). Bayesian exploratory factor analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 183(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.06.008
19. Cowles, M. K., & Carlin, B. P. (1996). Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: A comparative review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 883–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476956
20. Davies, T. M. (2016). The book of R: A first course in programming and statistics. No Starch Press.
21. Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
22. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
23. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
24. Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(1), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040
25. De Waard, D., & Brookhuis, K. A. (1997). Behavioural adaptation to warning and tutoring messages. Results from an on-the-road and simulator test. Special issue ‘driver vehicle interactions'. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 2-4, 222–234.
26. De Waard, D., Brookhuis, K. A., van derHulst, M., & van derLaan, J. D. (1994). Behaviour comparator prototype test in a driving simulator (Vol. V2009/DETER/Deliverable IO (321B) to the commission of the European Union). University of Groningen, Traffic Research Centre.
27. Del Giudice, M. (2020). Effective dimensionality: A tutorial. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2020.1743631
28. Depaoli, S., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Improving transparency and replication in Bayesian statistics: The WAMBS-checklist. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000065
29. Efron, B. (1986). Why isn't everyone a Bayesian? The American Statistician, 40(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1986.10475342
30. Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R (1st ed.). Sage Publications.
31. Forster, Y., Hergeth, S., Naujoks, F., Krems, J. F., & Keinath, A. (2020). Self-report measures for the assessment of human–machine interfaces in automated driving. Cognition, Technology & Work, 22, 703–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00599-8
32. Gelman, A., Hwang, J., & Vehtari, A. (2014). Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models. Statistics and Computing, 24(6), 997–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-013-9416-2
33. Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011136
34. Ghazizadeh, M., Lee, J. D., & Boyle, L. N. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to assess automation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0194-3
35. Gielen, E., Riutort-Mayol, G., Palencia-Jiménez, J. S., & Cantarino, I. (2018). An urban sprawl index based on multivariate and Bayesian factor analysis with application at the municipality level in Valencia. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(5), 888–914. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317690148
36. Goodman, S. N. (2016). Aligning statistical and scientific reasoning. Science, 352(6290), 1180–1181. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5406
37. Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(3), 532–560. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_5
38. Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
39. Hancock, P. A., Billings, C. E., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254
40. Hastings, W. K. (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika, 57(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.1.97
41. Hitchcock, D. B. (2003). A history of the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. The American Statistician, 57(4), 254–257. https://doi.org/10.1198/0003130032413
42. Hoedemaeker, M., & Brookhuis, K. A. (1998). Behavioural adaptation to driving with an adaptive cruise control (ACC). Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(98)00008-4
43. Hogema, J. H., Horst, A. R. A., & Janssen, W. H. (1994). A simulator evaluation of different forms of intelligent cruise control. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:a3315f72-1f54-43eb-9b6f-8359662c68de
44. Hornungová, J., & Milichovský, F. (2019). Evaluations of financial performance indicators based on factor analysis in automotive. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 27(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.11328
45. Hu, P., & Yang, X. G. (2017). Multiple-factor perceived features of traffic quality influencing trip decision. Jiaotong Yunshu Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 17(2), 117–125.
46. Jansen, W. H., Brookhuis, K. A., & Kuiken, M. (1993). Simulator and fields evaluation of in-vehicle collision avoidance systems: Report of the first year of research for Nissan (Vol. Report 1993C-46). TNO Human Factors Research Institute.
47. JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14) [Computer software]. Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://jasp-stats.org/download/
48. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
49. Kabacoff, R. I. (2015). R in action: Data analysis and graphics with R (2nd ed.). Manning Publications.
50. Kaufmann, S., & Schumacher, C. (2017). Identifying relevant and irrelevant variables in sparse factor models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 32(6), 1123–1144. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2566
51. Kiers, H. A. L., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1989). Alternating least squares algorithms for simultaneous components analysis with equal component weight matrices in two or more populations. Psychometrika, 54(3), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294629
52. Koltz, M. T., Roberts, Z. S., Sweet, J., Battiste, H., Cunningham, J., Battiste, V., Vu, K. P. L., & Strybel, T. Z. (2015). An investigation of the harbor pilot concept for single pilot operations. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2937–2944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.948
53. Koustanaï, A., Cavallo, V., Delhomme, P., & Mas, A. (2012). Simulator training with a forward collision warning system: Effects on driver-system interactions and driver trust. Human Factors, 54(5), 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812441796
54. Kruschke, J. K. (2013). Posterior predictive checks can and should be Bayesian: Comment on Gelman and Shalizi, ‘Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics'. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02063.x
55. Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Elsevier.
56. Lachter, J., Brandt, S. L., Battiste, V., Matessa, M., & Johnson, W. W. (2017). Enhanced ground support: Lessons from work on reduced crew operations. Cognition, Technology & Work, 19(2-3), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0422-6
57. Ledermann, W. (1937). On the rank of the reduced correlational matrix in multiple-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 2(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288062
58. Lee, K.-W., Wu, K.-L., Kuo, H.-P., & Yuan, P.-L. (2017). Design and validation of a knowledge map system—The case of construction industry in Taiwan. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 27(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20409
59. Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087759
60. Lee, W.-I., Chiu, Y. T., Liu, C.-C., & Chen, C.-Y. (2011). Assessing the effects of consumer involvement and service quality in a self-service setting. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 21(5), 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20253
61. Lenz, H., & Schmid, D. (2019). Simulation platform for reduced crew operations—A case study. Paper presented at the IEEE/AIAA 38th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), San Diego, CA.
62. Levy, R., Xia, Y., & Green, S. B. (2020). Incorporating uncertainty into parallel analysis for choosing the number of factors via Bayesian methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420942806
63. Lindley, D. V. (1975). The future of statistics: A Bayesian 21st century. Advances in Applied Probability, 7, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/1426315
64. Loehlin, J. C., & Beaujean, A. A. (2016). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis (5th ed.). Taylor & Francis.
65. Lopes, H. (2010). Parsimonious Bayesian factor analysis when the number of factors is unknown. Working paper. Chicago: University of Chicago.
66. Maggi, D., Romano, R., & Carsten, O. (2020). Transitions between highly automated and longitudinally assisted driving: The role of the initiator in the fight for authority. Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820946183
67. Mair, P. (2018). Modern psychometrics with R. Springer.
68. Matloff, N. (2011). The art of R programming: A tour of statistical software design. No Starch Press.
69. Matthews, R., Wasserstein, R., & Spiegelhalter, D. (2017). The ASA's p-value statement, one year on. Significance, 14(2), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2017.01021.x
70. Merkle, E. C., & Wang, T. (2018). Bayesian latent variable models for the analysis of experimental psychology data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1016-7
71. Milichovský, F. (2015). Financial key performance indicators in engineering companies. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 23(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.7810
72. Nordhoff, S., de Winter, J., Madigan, R., Merat, N., van Arem, B., & Happee, R. (2018). User acceptance of automated shuttles in Berlin-Schöneberg: A questionnaire study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 843–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.024
73. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press.
74. Piatek, R. (2019). Package 'BayesFM': Bayesian inference for factor modeling (Version 0.1.3) [R package]: CRAN. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesFM
75. Piatek, R., & Pinger, P. (2016). Maintaining (locus of) control? Data combination for the identification and inference of factor structure models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 31(4), 734–755. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2456
76. Plummer, M. (2017). JAGS (Version 4.3.0) [Computer software].
77. Rahman, M. M., Lesch, M. F., Horrey, W. J., & Strawderman, L. (2017). Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 108, 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.011
78. Rahman, M. M., Strawderman, L., Lesch, M. F., Horrey, W. J., Babski-Reeves, K., & Garrison, T. (2018). Modelling driver acceptance of driver support systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 121, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.028
79. Regan, M. A., Horberry, T., & Stevens, A. (2014). Driver acceptance of new technology: Theory, measurement and optimisation. Ashgate.
80. Reinmueller, K., Kiesel, A., & Steinhauser, M. (2020). Adverse behavioral adaptation to adaptive forward collision warning systems: An investigation of primary and secondary task performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 146, 105718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105718
81. Reinmueller, K., & Steinhauser, M. (2019). Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 128, 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.012
82. Ritter, F. E., & Schooler, L. J. (2001). The learning curve, International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 8602–8605). Pergamon.
83. Rosenthal, J. S. (2011). Optimal proposal distributions and adaptive MCMC. In B. Steve, A. Gelman, G. L. Jones, & X.-L. Meng (Eds.), Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (pp. 93–111). CRC Press.
84. Rothengatter, J. A., De Waard, D., Slotegraaf, G., Carbonell, V., & Muskaug, R. (1991). Social acceptance of automatic policing and information systems. (Vol. 1033/AUTOPOLIS/Deliverable 7) Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen, Traffic Research Centre.
85. Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., Szalma, J. L., & Hancock, P. A. (2016). A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation. Human Factors, 58(3), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816634228
86. Schmid, D., Korn, B., & Stanton, N. A. (2020). Evaluating the reduced flight deck crew concept using cognitive work analysis and social network analysis: Comparing normal and data-link outage scenarios. Cognition, Technology & Work, 22, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00548-5
87. Schmid, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2019a). Exploring Bayesian analyses of a small-sample-size factorial design in Human Systems Integration: The effects of pilot incapacitation. Human-Intelligent Systems Integration, 1, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42454-020-00012-0
88. Schmid, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2019b). A future airliner's reduced-crew: Modelling pilot incapacitation and homicide-suicide with systems theory. Human-Intelligent Systems Integration, 1(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42454-019-00001-y
89. Schmid, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2020). Progressing toward airliners' reduced-crew operations: A systematic literature review. The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology, 30(1-2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/24721840.2019.1696196
90. Schuurman, N. K., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Hamaker, E. L. (2016). A comparison of Inverse-Wishart prior specifications for covariance matrices in multilevel autoregressive models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2-3), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1065398
91. Shachak, A., Kuziemsky, C., & Petersen, C. (2019). Beyond TAM and UTAUT: Future directions for HIT implementation research. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 100, 103315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103315
92. Spade, D. A. (2020). Markov chain Monte Carlo methods: Theory and practice. In A. S. R. Srinivasa Rao, & C. R. Rao (Eds.), Principles and Methods for Data Science (pp. 1–66). Elsevier.
93. Stan Development Team. (2019). Stan (Version 2.21) [Statistical software package]: Stan Development Team. https://mc-stan.org/
94. Stanton, N. A., & Young, M. S. (1999). What price ergonomics? Nature, 399, 197–198. https://doi.org/10.1038/20298
95. Stark, P. B., & Saltelli, A. (2018). Cargo-cult statistics and scientific crisis. Significance, 15(4), 40–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2018.01174.x
96. Szalma, J. L. (2014). On the application of motivation theory to Human Factors/Ergonomics: Motivational design principles for Human–Technology Interaction. Human Factors, 56(8), 1453–1471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814553471
97. Valera, I., Pradier, M. F., Lomeli, M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2020). General latent feature models for heterogeneous datasets. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(100), 1–49.
98. van de Schoot, R., & Miočević, M. (2020). Small sample size solutions: A guide for applied researchers and practitioners (1st ed.). Routledge.
99. van de Schoot, R., Veen, D., Smeets, L., Winter, S. D., & Depaoli, S. (2020). A tutorial on using the WAMBS checklist to avoid the misuse of Bayesian statistics. In R. Van de Schoot, & M. Miočević (Eds.), Small Sample Size Solutions: A Guide for Applied Researchers and Practitioners (pp. 30–49). Routledge.
100. van de Schoot, R., Winter, S. D., Ryan, O., Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., & Depaoli, S. (2017). A systematic review of Bayesian articles in psychology: The last 25 years. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000100
101. van der Laan, J. D., Heino, A., & De Waard, D. (1997). A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00025-3
102. Van Deun, K., Smilde, A. K., van der Werf, M. J., Kiers, H. A. L., & Van Mechelen, I. (2009). A structured overview of simultaneous component based data integration. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 246. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-246
103. van Ravenzwaaij, D., Cassey, P., & Brown, S. D. (2018). A simple introduction to Markov chain Monte–Carlo sampling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1015-8
104. Vandekerckhove, J., Rouder, J. N., & Kruschke, J. K. (2018). Editorial: Bayesian methods for advancing psychological science. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1443-8
105. Veen, D., & Eggberts, M. (2020). The importance of collaborations in Bayesian analyses with small samples. In R. Van de Schoot, & M. Miočević (Eds.), Small sample size solutions: A guide for applied researchers and practitioners. Routledge.
106. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
107. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
108. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
109. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2800121
110. Vlassenroot, S., Broekx, S., Mol, J. D., Panis, L. I., Brijs, T., & Wets, G. (2007). Driving with intelligent speed adaptation: Final results of the Belgian ISA-trial. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(3), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.009
111. Vlassenroot, S., Brookhuis, K., Marchau, V., & Witlox, F. (2010). Towards defining a unified concept for the acceptability of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS): A conceptual analysis based on the case of Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA). Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 13(3), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2010.02.001
112. Vu, K.-P. L., Lachter, J., Battiste, V., & Strybel, T. (2018). Single pilot operations in domestic commercial aviation. Human Factors, 60(6), 755–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818791372
113. Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Wang, X., & Meng, Z. (2019). Modeling and analysis of bus satisfaction based on improved structural equation model, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 688). IOP Publishing.
114. Warner, H. W. (2005). How does the use of ISA affect drivers’ attitude towards the system? Paper presented at the 18th ICTCT (International Cooperation on Theories and Concepts in Traffic Safety), Helsinki, Finland.
115. Warner, H. W. (2006). Factors influencing drivers' speeding behaviour. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences, 21, 93.
116. Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
117. Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: An empirical comparison using 855 t tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406923
118. Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(6), 1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0295-x
119. Wickham, H., & Grolemund, G. (2017). R for data science: Import, tidy, transform, visualize, and model data. O'Reilly Media.
120. Yang, J., Park, J., & Endo, S. (2016). What matters the most? The key factors that lead to a new service adoption. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26(6), 680–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20407
121. Zoellick, J. C., Kuhlmey, A., Schenk, L., Schindel, D., & Blüher, S. (2019). Assessing acceptance of electric automated vehicles after exposure in a realistic traffic environment. PLOS One, 14(5), e0215969. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215969