Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 128, Issue , 2019, Pages 217-229

  Reinmueller, Katharina ^a   Steinhauser, Marco ^b  

^a AUDI AG   (Germany)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF EICHSTÄTT INGOLSTADT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Behavioral adaptation; Driver distraction; Driving simulator; Forward collision warning; Rear end collision

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; BRAKES;

BEHAVIORAL ADAPTATION; DRIVER DISTRACTIONS; DRIVING SIMULATOR; FORWARD COLLISION WARNINGS; REAR-END COLLISIONS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADULT; ADVERSE DEVICE EFFECT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISTRACTED DRIVING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY; TECHNOLOGY; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADULT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISTRACTED DRIVING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROTECTIVE DEVICES; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 85065091395     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Abe, G., Itoh, M., Tanaka, K., Dynamics of drivers’ trust in warning systems. Basañez, L., (eds.) IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Proceedings of the 15th Triennial World Congress of the International Federation of Automatic Control, 2002, 363–368.
2. Abe, G., Itoh, M., Yamamura, T., Effective and acceptable forward collision warning systems based on relationships between car-following behaviour and reaction to deceleration of lead vehicle. Cacciabue, P.C., Hjälmdahl, M., Luedtke, A., Riccioli, C., (eds.) Human Modelling in Assisted Transportation, 2011, Springer Milan, Milano, 155–164.
3. Adell, E., Várhelyi, A., Fontana, Md., The effects of a driver assistance system for safe speed and safe distance – a real-life field study. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 19 (2011), 145–155.
4. Amundsen, A.H., Bjørnskau, T., Utrygghet og risikokompensasjon i transportsystemet: En kunnskapsoversikt for ISIT programmet. TØI rapport 622. 2003, Transportøkonomisk institutt, Oslo.
5. Aust, M.L., Engström, J., Viström, M., Effects of forward collision warning and repeated event exposure on emergency braking. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 18 (2013), 34–46.
6. Beggiato, M., Pereira, M., Petzoldt, T., Krems, J., Learning and development of trust, acceptance and the mental model of ACC. A longitudinal on-road study. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 35 (2015), 75–84.
7. Ben-Yaacov, A., Maltz, M., Shinar, D., Effects of an in-vehicle collision avoidance warning system on short- and long-term driving performance. Hum. Factors 44 (2002), 335–342.
8. Biondi, F., Strayer, D.L., Rossi, R., Gastaldi, M., Mulatti, C., Advanced driver assistance systems: using multimodal redundant warnings to enhance road safety. Appl. Ergon. 58 (2017), 238–244.
9. Bjørnskau, T., Hypotheses on risk compensation. Proceedings of the Conference Road Safety in Europe and Strategic Highway Research Program, 1994, 84–98.
10. Blaschke, C., Breyer, F., Färber, B., Freyer, J., Limbacher, R., Driver distraction based lane-keeping assistance. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 12 (2009), 288–299.
11. Broadbent, D.E., Broadbent, M.H.P., From detection to identification: response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Percept. Psychophys. 42 (1987), 105–113.
12. Burns, P.C., Parkes, A., Burton, S., Smith, R.K., Burch, D., How Dangerous Is Driving With a mobile Phone? Benchmarking the Impairment to Alcohol. TRL Report, vol. 547, 2002, TRL Limited, Crowthorne.
13. Cai, H., Lin, Y., An Experiment to Non-intrusively Collect Physiological Parameters Towards Driver State Detection (No. 2007-01-0403). 2007, SAE Technical Paper.
14. Campbell, J.L., Richard, C.M., Brown, J.L., McCallum, M., Crash Warning System Interfaces: Human Factorsinsights and Lessons Learned (No. HS, 810, 697). 2007, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
15. Chancey, E.T., Bliss, J.P., Yamani, Y., Handley, H.A.H., Trust and the compliance-reliance paradigm: the effects of risk, error bias, and reliability on trust and dependence. Hum. Factors 59 (2017), 333–345.
16. Coelingh, E., Eidehall, A., Bengtsson, M., Collision warning with full auto brake and pedestrian detection-a practical example of automatic emergency braking. Proceedings of the 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2010), Madeira Island, Portugal, 2010, 155–160.
17. Cousineau, D., Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 1 (2005), 42–45.
18. De Rosario, H., Louredo, M., Díaz, I., Soler, A., Gil, J.J., Solaz, J.S., Jornet, J., Efficacy and feeling of a vibrotactile Frontal Collision Warning implemented in a haptic pedal. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 13 (2010), 80–91.
19. Dingus, T.A., Klauer, S.G., Neale, V.L., Petersen, A., Lee, S.E., Sudweeks, J.D., et al. The 100-car naturalistic driving study, Phase II-results of the 100-car field experiment (No. HS-810 593). 2006, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
20. Dingus, T.A., Guo, F., Lee, S., Antin, J.F., Perez, M., Buchanan-King, M., Hankey, J., Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113 (2016), 2636–2641.
21. Dixon, S.R., Wickens, C.D., Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: a reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload. Hum. Factors 48 (2006), 474–486.
22. Donmez, B., Boyle, L., Lee, J.D., October. Taxonomy of mitigation strategies for driver distraction. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting, 2003, 1865–1869.
23. Elvik, R., To what extent can theory account for the findings of road safety evaluation studies?. Accid. Anal. Prev. 36 (2004), 841–849.
24. Engström, J., Victor, T.W., Real-time distraction countermeasures. Regan, M.A., Lee, J.D., Young, K.L., (eds.) Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects and Mitigation, 2009, Taylor Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 465–484.
25. Fletcher, L., Zelinsky, A., Driver state monitoring to mitigate distraction. Proceedings of the Internal Conference on the Distractions in Driving, 2007, 487–523.
26. Gray, R., Looming auditory collision warnings for driving. Hum. Factors 53 (2011), 63–74.
27. Grembek, O., User Adaptation to Injury Protection Systems: Its Effect on Fatalities, and Possible Causes (Dissertation). 2010, University of California, Berkeley.
28. Hajek, W., Gaponova, I., Fleischer, K.H., Krems, J., Workload-adaptive cruise control – a new generation of advanced driver assistance systems. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 20 (2013), 108–120.
29. Hancock, P.A., Lesch, M., Simmons, L., The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. Accid. Anal. Prev. 35 (2003), 501–514.
30. Harbluk, J.L., Noy, Y.I., Trbovich, P.L., Eizenman, M., An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers’ visual behavior and braking performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39 (2007), 372–379.
31. Hayward, J.C., Near miss determination through use of a scale of danger. Highway Res. Rec. 384 (1972), 24–34.
32. Hedlund, J., Risky business: safety regulations, risk compensation, and individual behavior. Inj. Prev. 6 (2000), 82–89.
33. Ho, C., Tan, H.Z., Spence, C., Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 8 (2005), 397–412.
34. Ho, C., Reed, N., Spence, C., Assessing the effectiveness of “intuitive” vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38 (2006), 988–996.
35. Ho, C., Reed, N., Spence, C., Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance. Hum. Factors 49 (2007), 1107–1114.
36. Hoffmann, S., Buld, S., Darstellung und Evaluation eines Trainings zum Fahren in der Fahrsimulation. 2006, VDI-Berichte Nr. 1960.
37. Hogema, J.H., Janssen, W.H., Effects of Intelligent Cruise Control on Driving Behaviour: A Simulator Study. TNO Report TM-96-C012., 1996.
38. Horberry, T., Anderson, J., Regan, M.A., Triggs, T.J., Brown, J., Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38 (2006), 185–191.
39. Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C.H., Carsten, O.M.J., Potential benefits of an adaptive forward collision warning system. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 16 (2008), 471–484.
40. Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G., Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 4 (2000), 53–71.
41. Jonah, B.A., Sensation seeking and risky driving: a review and synthesis of the literature. Accid. Anal. Prev. 29 (1997), 651–665.
42. Kiefer, R.J., Developing a forward collision warning system timing and interface approach by placing drivers in realistic rear-end crash situations. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 44:20 (2000), 308–310.
43. Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., Sudweeks, J.D., Ramsey, D.J., The Impact of Driver Inattention on near-crash/crash Risk: An Analysis using the 100-car Naturalistic Driving Study Data (No. HS-810 594). 2006, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
44. Larsson, A.F.L., Kircher, K., Hultgren, J.A., Learning from experience: familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27 (2014), 229–237.
45. Lee, J.D., Caven, B., Haake, S., Brown, T.L., Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: the effect of speech-based E-Mail on drivers’ attention to the roadway. Hum. Factors 43 (2001), 631–640.
46. Lee, J.D., McGehee, D.V., Brown, T.L., Reyes, M.L., Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Hum. Factors 44 (2002), 314–334.
47. Levy, J., Pashler, H., Task prioritisation in multitasking during driving: opportunity to abort a concurrent task does not insulate braking responses from dual-task slowing. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 22 (2008), 507–525.
48. Liang, Y., Reyes, M.L., Lee, J.D., Real-time detection of driver cognitive distraction using support vector machines. Ieee Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 8 (2007), 340–350.
49. Lubbe, N., Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian forward collision warning systems. J. Safety Res. 61 (2017), 23–32.
50. Manser, M.P., Ward, N.J., Kuge, N., Boer, E.R., Influence of a driver support system on situation awareness and information processing in response to lead vehicle braking. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 48 (2004), 2359–2363.
51. Masood, S., Rai, A., Aggarwal, A., Doja, M.N., Ahmad, M., Detecting Distraction of Drivers using Convolutional Neural Network. Pattern Recognit. Lett. Advance online publication, 2018, 10.1016/j.patrec.2017.12.023.
52. Mbouna, R.O., Kong, S.G., Chun, M., Visual analysis of eye state and head pose for driver alertness monitoring. IEEE Trans. 14 (2013), 1462–1469.
53. Mohebbi, R., Gray, R., Tan, H.Z., Driver reaction time to tactile and auditory rear-end collision warnings while talking on a cell phone. Hum. Factors 51 (2009), 102–110.
54. Montgomery, J., Kusano, K.D., Gabler, H.C., Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-car naturalistic driving study. Traffic Inj. Prev. 15:sup1 (2014), 15–20.
55. Muhrer, E., Reinprecht, K., Vollrath, M., Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?. Hum. Factors 54 (2012), 698–708.
56. Najm, W.G., Stearns, M.D., Howarth, H., Koopmann, J., Hitz, J., Evaluation of an Automotive Rear-end Collision Avoidance System (No. HS-810-569). 2006, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
57. Naujoks, F., Totzke, I., Behavioral adaptation caused by predictive warning systems – the case of congestion tail warnings. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 26 (2014), 49–61.
58. Naujoks, F., Kiesel, A., Neukum, A., Cooperative warning systems: the impact of false and unnecessary alarms on drivers’ compliance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 97 (2016), 162–175.
59. Navarro, J., Mars, F., Forzy, J.-F., El-Jaafari, M., Hoc, J.-M., Objective and subjective evaluation of motor priming and warning systems applied to lateral control assistance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42 (2010), 904–912.
60. Nilsson, L., November. Safety effects of adaptive cruise controls in critical traffic situations. Proceedings Steps Forward, Volume III, the Second World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, 1995, 1254–1259.
61. OECD. Behavioural Adaptations to Changes in the Road Transport System: Report 92-64-13389-5., 1990, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
62. Politis, I., Brewster, S., Pollick, F., Evaluating multimodal driver displays under varying situational urgency, ACM. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2014, 4067–4076.
63. Rein, J.R., Masalonis, A.J., Messina, J., Willems, B., Meta-analysis of the effect of imperfect alert automation on system performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 57 (2013), 280–284.
64. Reinmueller, K., Koehler, L., Steinhauser, M., Adaptive warning signals adjusted to driver passenger conversation: impact of system awareness on behavioral adaptations. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 58 (2018), 242–252.
65. Rudin-Brown, C.M., Parker, H.A., Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): implications for preventive strategies. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 7 (2004), 59–76.
66. Sayed, T., Brown, G., Navin, F., Simulation of traffic conflicts at unsignalized intersections with TSC-Sim. Accid. Anal. Prev. 26 (1994), 593–607.
67. Scott, J.J., Gray, R., A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving. Hum. Factors 50 (2008), 264–275.
68. Sigari, M.H., Fathy, M., Soryani, M., A driver face monitoring system for fatigue and distraction detection. Int. J. Veh. Technol., 2013, 1–11.
69. Smith, M.R.H., Witt, G.J., Bakowski, D.L., Leblanc, D., Lee, J.D., Adapting collision warnings to real-time estimates of driver distraction. Regan, M.A., Lee, J.D., Young, K.L., (eds.) Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects, and Mitigation, 2009, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 501–518.
70. Strayer, D.L., Johnston, W.A., Driven to distraction: dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychol. Sci. 12 (2001), 462–466.
71. Strayer, D.L., Drews, F.A., Johnston, W.A., Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 9 (2003), 23–32.
72. Van der Laan, J.D., Heino, A., Waard, D.D., A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 5 (1997), 1–10.
73. Weller, G., Schlag, B., Verhaltensadaptation nach Einführung von Fahrerassistenzsystemen: Vorstellung eines Modells und Ergebnisse einer Expertenbefragung. Schlag, B., (eds.) Verkehrspsychologie. Mobilität - Sicherheit – Fahrerassistenz, 2004, Pabst Science Publ., Lengerich, 351–370.
74. Wiedemann, K., Naujoks, F., Wörle, J., Kenntner-Mabiala, R., Kaussner, Y., Neukum, A., Effect of different alcohol levels on take-over performance in conditionally automated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 115 (2018), 89–97.
75. Young, K.L., Regan, M.A., Defining the relationship between behavioural adaptation and driver distraction. Rudin-Brown, C.M., Jamson, S.L., (eds.) Behavioural Adaptation and Road Safety - Theory, Evidence and Action, 2013, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 227–243.
76. Zegeer, C.V., Traffic Conflicts, Erratic Maneuvers, and Near-Miss Accidents: State-of-the-Art., 1977, Kentucky Transportation Center Research Report, 1071.