Technology-Enhanced Feedback

The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 335-356

  Munshi, Cassim ^a   Deneen, Christopher C ^b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85096684037     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/9781316832134.017     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Attali, Y. (2004). Exploring the feedback and revision features of Criterion. National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
2. Attali, Y., and Burstein, J. (2006). Automated essay scoring with e-rater® V. 2. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(3).
3. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A metaanalysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 69-93.
4. Barry, S. (2012). A video recording and viewing protocol for student group presentations: Assisting self-assessment through a Wiki environment. Computers and Education, 59(3), 855-860.
5. Black, P., and Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappa, 92(1), 81-90.
6. Burrows, S., and Shortis, M. (2011). An evaluation of semi-automated, collaborative marking and feedback systems: Academic staff perspectives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 1135-1154.
7. Burstein, J., Kukich, K., Wolff, S., Lu, C., Chodorow, M., Braden-Harder, L., and Harris, M. D. (1998, August). Automated scoring using a hybrid feature identification technique. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 1 (pp. 206-210). Montreal: Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Cann, A. (2014). Engaging studentswith audio feedback. Bioscience Education, 22(1), 31-41.
9. Chodorow, M., Gamon, M., and Tetreault, J. (2010). The utility of article and preposition error correction systems for English language learners: Feedback and assessment. Language Testing, 27(3), 419-436.
10. Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: Acritical review of related literature. Review of EducationalResearch, 61, 107-155.
11. Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., de Gispert, I., and Barriga, F. D. (2013). Distribution of feedback among teacher and students in online collaborative learning in small groups. Digital Education Review, 23, 27-45.
12. Crook, A., Mauchline, A., Maw, S., Lawson, C., Drinkwater, R., Lundqvist, K.,… and Park, J. (2012). The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students? Computers and Education, 58(1), 386-396.
13. Deneen, C. C., Brown, G. T. L., and Carless, D. (2017). Students’ conceptions of eportfolios as assessment and technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-10. Online prepublication, retrieved from http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1281752.
14. Deneen, C. C., and Shroff R. (2014). Understanding successes and difficulties in programlevel eportfolios: A case study of two professional degree programs. Review of Higher Education and Self-Learning, 7(24), 145-160.
15. Dikli, S. (2006). An overview of automated scoring of essays. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 5(1).
16. Fink, A. (2005). Conducting research literature reviews: From the Internet to paper. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Goldberg, A., Russell, M., and Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1).
18. Gomez, S., Andersson, H., Park, J., Maw, S., Crook, A., and Orsmond, P. (2013). A digital ecosystems model of assessment feedback on student learning. Higher Education Studies, 3(2), 41-51.
19. Harrison, C. J., Könings, K. D., Molyneux, A., Schuwirth, L. W., Wass, V., and van der Vleuten, C. P. (2013). Web-based feedback after summative assessment: How do students engage? Medical Education, 47(7), 734-744.
20. Hattie, J., and Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
21. Henderson, M., and Phillips, M. (2014). Technology enhanced feedback on assessment. In Australian Computers in Education Conference, Adelaide, SA, September 30-October 3, 2014 (pp. 1-11). Retrieved from http://acec2014.acce. edu.au/session/technology- enhanced- feedback-assessment.
22. Henderson, M., and Phillips, M. (2015). Video-based feedback on student assessment: Scarily personal. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 51-66.
23. Hennessy, C., and Forrester, G. (2014). Developing a framework for effective audio feedback: A case study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 777-789.
24. Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., Parkin, H. J., and Thorpe, L. (2011). Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: A literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), 117-127.
25. Hovardas, T., Tsivitanidou, O. E., and Zacharia, Z. C. (2014). Peer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students. Computers and Education, 71, 133-152.
26. Huang, H. T. D., and Hung, S. T. A. (2013). Exploring the utility of a video-based online EFL discussion forum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), E90-E94.
27. Irwin, B., Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Parkin, H. J., and Thorpe, L. (2013). Engaging students with feedback through adaptive release. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(1), 51-61.
28. Jackson, M., and Marks, L. (2016). Improving the effectiveness of feedback by use of assessed reflections and withholding of grades. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(4), 532-547.
29. Jordan, S. (2012). Student engagement with assessment and feedback: Some lessons from short-answer free-text e-assessment questions. Computers and Education, 58(2), 818-834.
30. Jordan, S. (2013). E-assessment: Past, present and future. New Directions, 9(1), 87-106.
31. Jordan, S., and Mitchell, T. (2009). e-Assessment for learning? The potential of short answer free text questions with tailored feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 371-385.
32. Lai, C. L., and Hwang, G. J. (2015). An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students’ art design performance using handheld devices. Computers and Education, 85, 149-159.
33. Lipnevich, A. A., and Smith, J. K. (2008). Response to assessment feedback: The effects of grades, praise, and source of information. ETSResearchReport Series, 2008(1).
34. Lipnevich, A. A., and Smith, J. K. (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(4), 319.
35. Marriott, P., and Teoh, L. K. (2012). Using screencasts to enhance assessment feedback: Students’ perceptions and preferences. Accounting Education, 21(6), 583-598.
36. McCarthy, J. (2015). Evaluating written, audio and video feedback in higher education summative assessment tasks. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 153-169.
37. Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., and Melis, E. (2014). Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Computers and Education, 71, 56-76.
38. Nicol, D. (2007). E-assessment by design: Using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1), 53-64.
39. Nicol, D. J., and Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
40. Nicol, D. J., and Milligan, C. (2006). Rethinking technology-supported assessment in terms of the seven principles of good feedback practice. In C. Bryan and K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 64-77). London: Taylor and Francis Group.
41. Nino, M., and Evans, M. A. (2015). Fostering 21st-century skills in constructivist engineering classrooms with digital game-based learning. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 10(3), 143-149.
42. Parkin, H. J., Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., and Thorpe, L. (2012). A role for technology in enhancing students’ engagement with feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 963-973.
43. Phillips, M., Henderson M., and Ryan, T. (2016). Multimodal feedback is not always clearer, more useful or satisfying. In S. Barker, S. Dawson, A. Pardo, and C. Colvin (Eds.), Show me the learning: Proceedings ASCILITE 2016 Adelaide (pp. 512-522).
44. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
45. Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Shermis, M. D., Burstein, J., and Bursky, S. A. (2013). Introduction to automated essay evaluation. In M. D. Shermis, J. Burstein, and S. A. Bursky (Eds.), Handbook of automated essay evaluation: Current applications and new directions (pp. 1-15). New York: Routledge.
47. Shroff, R. H., and Deneen, C. C. (2011). Assessing online textual feedback to support student intrinsic motivation using a collaborative text-based dialogue system: A qualitative study. International Journal on E-Learning, 10(1), 87-104.
48. Shute, V., and Towle, B. (2003). Adaptive e-learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(2), 105-114.
49. Shute, V. J. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. Computer Games and Instruction, 55(2), 503-524.
50. Shute, V. J., and Ke, F. (2012). Games, learning, and assessment. In Assessment in gamebased learning (pp. 43-58). New York: Springer.
51. Timmers, C. F., Braber-Van Den Broek, J., and Van Den Berg, S. M. (2013). Motivational beliefs, student effort, and feedback behaviour in computer-based formative assessment. Computers and Education, 60(1), 25-31.
52. Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., Van Merrienboer, J. J., and Van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: Effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 551-567.
53. Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C., and Eggen, T. J. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475-511.
54. Warschauer, M., and Ware, P. (2006). Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 157-180.
55. West, J., and Turner, W. (2016). Enhancing the assessment experience: Improving student perceptions, engagement and understanding using online video feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 400-410.
56. Yuan, J., and Kim, C. (2015). Effective feedback design using free technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(3), 408-434.