Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies

Computers and Education

Volumn 71, Issue , 2014, Pages 56-76

  Narciss, Susanne ^a   Sosnovsky, Sergey ^b   Schnaubert, Lenka ^c   Andrès, Eric ^b   Eichelmann, Anja ^a   Goguadze, George ^d   Melis, Erica ^b  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^d LEUPHANA UNIVERSITY OF LÜNEBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evaluation of CAL systems; Intelligent tutoring system; Tutoring feedback strategies

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION OF CAL SYSTEMS; FEEDBACK STRATEGIES; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; PERCEIVED COMPETENCE; STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS; TUTORING FEEDBACK; WEB-BASED INTELLIGENT LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; ERROR CORRECTION; FEEDBACK CONTROL; MOTIVATION;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84886258306     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Y. Akbulut, and C.S. Cardak Adaptive educational hypermedia accommodating learning styles: a content analysis of publications from 2000 to 2011 Computers & Education 58 2 2012 835 842
2. J.R. Anderson, A.T. Corbett, K.R. Koedinger, and R. Pelletier Cognitive tutors: lessons learned The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 2 1995 167 207
3. E. Andrès Towards detailed diagnostics of unstructured learner's problem solutions Presented at the doctoral consortium of the 7th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL), Saarbrücken 2012 1 6
4. I. Arroyo, J.E. Beck, C.R. Beal, R. Wing, and B.P. Woolf Analyzing students' response to help provision in an elementary mathematics Intelligent Tutoring System R. Luckin, Papers of the AIED-2001 workshop on help provision and help seeking in interactive learning environments 2001 34 46
5. I. Arroyo, B.P. Woolf, and C.R. Beal Addressing cognitive differences and gender during problem solving International Journal of Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning 4 2006 31 63
6. I. Arroyo, B.P. Woolf, J.M. Royer, M. Tai, K. Muldner, and W. Burleson The impact of animated pedagogical agents on girls' and boys' emotions, attitudes, behaviors and learning Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) 2012 506 510 10.1109/ICALT.2011.157
7. A. Bandura Self-efficacy: the exercise of control 1997 Freeman New York
8. C. Bokhove, and P. Drijvers Effects of feedback in an online algebra intervention Technology, Knowledge and Learning 17 1-2 2012 43 59
9. T. Bouffard, and S. Narciss Benefits and risks of positive biases in self-evaluation of academic competence: introduction International Journal of Educational Research 50 4 2011 205 208
10. P. Brusilovsky, and N. Henze Open corpus adaptive educational hypermedia P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, W. Nejdl, The adaptive web 2007 Springer Heidelberg 671 696 (Pubitemid 351189214)
11. P. Brusilovsky, and J. Vassileva Course sequencing techniques for large-scale web-based education International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning 13 1 2003 75 94
12. H. Choe, Y. Bae, T. Kim, and T. Lee Work in progress-the study of Web-based adaptive feedback based on the analysis of individual differences Frontiers in education 2004 34th annual Vol. 1 2004 T2C-T25-T2C-T26
13. S.-H. Chuang, and H.F. O'Neil Role of task-specific adapted feedback on a computer-based collaborative problem-solving task (No. 684) 2006 Regents of the University of California
14. C. Conati, and M. Manske Evaluating adaptive feedback in an educational computer game Z. Ruttkay, M. Kipp, A. Nijholt, H.H. Vilhjálmsson, Intelligent virtual agents 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 146 158
15. D.A. Cook Revisiting cognitive and learning styles in computer-assisted instruction: not so useful after all Academic Medicine 87 6 2012 778 784
16. M. Dennis, J. Masthoff, and C. Mellish Adapting performance feedback to a learner's conscientiousness J. Masthoff, B. Mobasher, M.C. Desmarais, R. Nkambou, User modeling, adaptation, and personalization 2012 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 297 302
17. J.S. Eccles, and A. Wigfield Motivational beliefs, values, and goals Annual Review of Psychology 53 1 2002 109 132
18. A.A. Economides Adaptive feedback characteristics in CAT International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 3 2006 15 26
19. A. Eichelmann, S. Narciss, A. Faulhaber, and E. Melis Analyzing computer-based fraction tasks on the basis of a two-dimensional view of mathematics competences J. Zumbach, N. Schwartz, T. Seufert, L. Kester, Beyond knowledge: The legacy of competence 2008 Springer Netherlands 125 134
20. A. Eichelmann, S. Narciss, L. Schnaubert, E. Melis, and G. Goguadze Design und Evaluation von interaktiven webbasierten Bruchrechenaufgaben H. Rohland, A. Kienle, S. Friedrich, DeLFI 2011 - Die 9. e-Learning Fachtagung Informatik 2011 Köllen Verlag Bonn 31 42
21. A. Eichelmann, E. Andrès, L. Schnaubert, S. Narciss, and S. Sosnovsky Interaktive Fehler-Finde- und Korrektur-Aufgaben G. Csanyi, F. Reichl, A. Steiner, Digitale Medien - Werkzeuge für Forschung und Lehre 2012 Waxmann Münster 401 412
22. A. Eichelmann, S. Narciss, L. Schnaubert, and E. Melis Typische Fehler bei der Addition und Subtraktion von Brüchen - Ein Review zu empirischen Fehleranalysen Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik 33 1 2012 29 57
23. A.M. Gallagher, and J.C. Kaufman Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach 2004 Cambridge University Press
24. A.S. Gertner, C. Conati, and K. VanLehn Procedural help in Andes: generating hints using a Bayesian network student model J. Mostow, C. Rich, Proceedings of the 15th national conference on artificial intelligence 1998 AAAI Press Palo Alto, CA
25. A. Gimeno Sanz, and J.M. De-Siqueira Designing feedback to support language acquisition using the ingenio authoring tool Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 1 1 2009 1239 1243
26. G. Goguadze Representation for interactive exercises J. Carette, L. Dixon, C. Sacerdoti Coen, S.M. Watt, Intelligent computer mathematics 2009 294 309 (Berlin, Heidelberg)
27. I.M. Goldin, K.R. Koedinger, and V. Aleven Learner differences in hint processing K. Yacef, O. Zaïane, H. Hershkovitz, M. Yudelson, J. Stamper, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on educational data mining 2012 International Educational Data Mining Society Worcester, MA 73 80
28. J.S. Goodman, R.E. Wood, and Z. Chen Feedback specificity, information processing, and transfer of training Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 115 2 2011 253 267
29. T.E. Hancock, W.A. Stock, and R.W. Kulhavy Predicting feedback effects from response-certitude estimates Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 2 1992 173 176
30. T.E. Hancock, R.A. Thurman, and D.C. Hubbard An expanded control model for the use of instructional feedback Contemporary Educational Psychology 20 4 1995 410 425
31. J. Hattie, and M. Gan Instruction based on feedback R.E. Mayer, P.A. Alexander, Handbook of research on learning and instruction 2011 Routledge New York 249 271
32. J. Hattie, and H. Timperley The power of feedback Review of Educational Research 77 1 2007 81 112
33. H. Heckhausen Leistungsmotivation 1989 Springer Berlin, Heidelberg 231 278
34. F.M. van der Kleij, T.J.H.M. Eggen, C.F. Timmers, and B.P. Veldkamp Effects of feedback in a computer-based assessment for learning Computers & Education 58 1 2012 263 272
35. A.N. Kluger, and A. DeNisi The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory Psychological Bulletin 119 2 1996 254
36. R.W. Kulhavy, M.T. White, B.W. Topp, A.L. Chan, and J. Adams Feedback complexity and corrective efficiency Contemporary Educational Psychology 10 1985 285 291
37. L. Lin, R.K. Atkinson, R.M. Christopherson, S.S. Joseph, and C.J. Harrison Animated agents and learning: does the type of verbal feedback they provide matter? Computers & Education 67(C) 2013 239 249
38. A. Mavroudi, and T. Hadzilacos Broadening the use of e-learning standards for adaptive learning E. Popescu, Q. Li, R. Klamma, H. Leung, M. Specht, Advances in web-based learning-ICWL 2012 2012 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 215 221
39. E. Melis, G. Goguadze, M. Homik, P. Libbrecht, C. Ullrich, and S. Winterstein Semantic-aware components and services of ActiveMath British Journal of Educational Technology 37 3 2006 405 423
40. E. Melis, A. Faulhaber, and A. Eichelmann Interoperable competencies characterizing learning objects in mathematics B.P. Woolf, E. Aïmeur, R. Nkambou, S.P. Lajoie, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) 2008 Springer Berlin, Heidelberg 416 425
41. D.C. Merrill, B.J. Reiser, M. Ranney, and J.G. Trafton Effective tutoring techniques: a comparison of human tutors and intelligent tutoring systems The Journal of Learning Sciences 2 1992 277 305
42. A. Mitrovic Fifteen years of constraint-based tutors: what we have achieved and where we are going User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22 1-2 2011 39 72
43. E.H. Mory The effects of adaptive feedback on student performance, feedback study time, and lesson efficiency within computer-based instruction 1991 The Florida State University
44. E.H. Mory Feedback research revisited D.H. Jonassen, Handbook of research for educational communications and technology 2nd ed. 2004 Simon & Schuster Macmillan New York NY 745 783
45. S. Narciss Informatives tutorielles feedback 2006 Waxmann Münster
46. S. Narciss Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks J.M. Spector, M.D. Merrill, J.G. van Merrienboer, M.P. Driscoll, 2008 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahaw, NJ 125 143
47. S. Narciss Feedback in instructional contexts N.M. Seel, Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning 2012 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 1285 1289
48. S. Narciss Designing and evaluating tutoring feedback strategies for digital learning environments on the basis of the interactive tutoring feedback model Digital Education Review 23 2013 http://greav.ub.edu/der/
49. S. Narciss, and K. Huth How to design informative tutoring feedback for multi-media learning H. Niegemann, R. Brünken, D.Leutner How to design informative tutoring feedback for multi-media learning 2004 Waxmann Münster 181 196
50. S. Narciss, and K. Huth Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related tutoring feedback in a computer-based training for written subtraction Learning and Instruction 16 4 2006 310 322 (Pubitemid 44317673)
51. A.M. Olney, A.C. Graesser, and N.K. Person Tutorial dialog in natural language R. Nkambou, R. Mizoguchi, J. Bourdeau, Advances in intelligent tutoring systems 2010 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 181 206
52. S. Parvez, and G. Blank Individualizing tutoring with learning style based feedback Intelligent tutoring systems 2008 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 291 301
53. H. Pashler, M. McDaniel, D. Rohrer, and R. Bjork Learning styles: concepts and evidence Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9 2008 105 119
54. P.R. Pintrich A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts Journal of Educational Psychology 95 4 2003 667 686 (Pubitemid 37514207)
55. E. Popescu Evaluating the impact of adaptation to learning styles in a Web-based educational system M. Spaniol, Q. Li, R. Klamma, R.W.H. Lau, Advances in web based learning-ICWL 2009 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 343 352
56. A. Proske, S. Narciss, and D.S. McNamara Computer-based scaffolding to facilitate students' development of expertise in academic writing Journal of Research in Reading 35 2 2012 136 152
57. M. Puta, L. Schnaubert, and S. Narciss Erwartungs-Wert Fragebogen zur bereichsspezifischen Lernmotivation (EWF-LM): psychometrische Eigenschaften und offene Fragen 2013 (under revision)
58. I. Roll, V. Aleven, B.M. McLaren, and K.R. Koedinger Metacognitive practice makes perfect: improving students' self-assessment skills with an intelligent tutoring system G. Biswas, S. Bull, J. Kay, A. Mitrovic, Artificial intelligence in education 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
59. D.J. Schleicher, C.H. Van Iddekinge, F.P. Morgeson, and M.A. Campion If at first you don't succeed, try, try again: understanding race, age, and gender differences in retesting score improvement Journal of Applied Psychology 95 4 2010 603 617
60. C. Senko, and J.M. Harackiewicz Regulation of achievement goals: the role of competence feedback Journal of Educational Psychology 97 3 2005 320 336 (Pubitemid 41426385)
61. S.R. Serge, H.A. Priest, P.J. Durlach, and C.I. Johnson The effects of static and adaptive performance feedback in game-based training Computers in Human Behavior 2012 1 9
62. V. Shute Focus on formative feedback Review of Educational Research 78 1 2008 153 189
63. V.J. Shute, and D. Zapata-Rivera Adaptive technologies J.M. Spector, M.D. Merrill, J.G. van Merrienboer, M.P. Driscoll, Handbook of research on educational communications and technology 2008 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahaw, NJ 277 294
64. M.H. Smits, J. Boon, D.M. Sluijsmans, and T. Van Gog Content and timing of feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on learning as a function of prior knowledge Interactive Learning Environments 16 2 2008 183 193
65. S. Sosnovsky, M. Dietrich, E. Andrès, G. Goguadze, S. Winterstein, and P. Libbrecht Math-bridge: bridging the gaps in European remedial mathematics with technology-enhanced learning P. Fischer, R. Hochmuth, D. Frischemeier, T. Wassong, Using tools for learning mathematics and statistics 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 437 451
66. H. Spada, C. Plesch, M. Wiedmann, C. Kaendler, A. Deiglmayr, and D. Mullins D1.6: Final report on the STELLAR Delphi study: Future directions for TEL and TEL research: Areas of tension, core research areas, and grand challenge problems The STELLAR Network of Excellence 2012
67. M. Thurlings, M. Vermeulen, T. Bastiaens, and S. Stijnen Understanding feedback: a learning theory perspective Educational Research Review 9 2012 1 15
68. C.F. Timmers, J.B.-V. Broek den, and S.M. van den Berg Motivational beliefs, student effort, and feedback behaviour in computer-based formative assessment Computers & Education 2012 1 19
69. S. Tobias Another look at research on the adaptation of instruction to students characteristics Educational Psychologist 24 3 1989 213 227
70. S. Tobias Interest, prior knowledge, and learning Review of Educational Research 64 1 1994 37 54
71. B.W. Tuckman, and T.L. Sexton The effects of informational feedback and self-beliefs on the motivation to perform a self-regulated task Journal of Research in Personality 26 2 1992 121 127
72. M. Vandewaetere, P. Desmet, and G. Clarebout The contribution of learner characteristics in the development of computer-based adaptive learning environments Computers in Human Behavior 27 1 2011 118 130
73. K. VanLehn The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems Educational Psychologist 46 4 2011 197 221
74. E. Vasilyeva, P. De Bra, M. Pechenizkiy, and S. Puuronen Tailoring feedback in online assessment: influence of learning styles on the feedback preferences and elaborated feedback effectiveness P. Diaz, Kinshuk I. Aedo, E. Mora, 2008 Eighth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies 2008 IEEE Computer Society Los Alamitos, CA 834 838
75. E. Vasilyeva, M. Pechenizkiy, and P. De Bra Adaptation of elaborated feedback in e-learning W. Nejdl, J. Kay, P. Pu, E. Herder, Adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems 2008 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 235 244
76. J. Wittwer, and A. Renkl Why instructional explanations often do not work: a framework for understanding the effectiveness of instructional explanations Educational Psychologist 43 1 2008 49 64
77. T. Wolf Assessing student learning in a virtual laboratory environment IEEE Transactions on Education 53 2 2010 216 222
78. W. Wulfeck Adapting instruction D.D. Schmorrow, I.V. Estabrooke, M. Grootjen, Foundations of augmented cognition neuroergonomics and operational neuroscience. 5th international conference, FAC 2009 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 687 695