Video-based feedback on student assessment: Scarily personal

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 51-66

  Henderson, Michael ^a   Phillips, Michael ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929667264     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1878     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abrahamson, E. (2010). Enhancing students' understanding of formative assessment through video-feedback on an undergraduate sports rehabilitation programme. Oxford: The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from http://www-new1.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/hlst/documents/case_studies/147_abrahamson_video-feedback.pdf
2. Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers' reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187-198. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cthe20/current
3. Bellini, S., & Akullian, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self-modeling interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 73(3), 264-287. Retrieved from http://ecx.sagepub.com/
4. Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
5. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for a learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151-167. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/csce20/current#.VIVLgWSUfiI
6. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-426. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/caeh20/current#.VIVLnmSUfiI
7. Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Feedback in higher and professional education. New York, NY: Routledge.
8. Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (1998). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University.
9. Brown, S., & Knight, P. (Eds.). (1994). Assessing learners in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
10. Cann, A. J. (2007). Podcasting is dead. Long live video! Bioscience Education, 10. Retrieved from http://journals.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/beej
11. Costello, J., & Crane, D. (2010). Providing learner-centered feedback using a variety of technologies. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Liberal Arts, St. Thomas University, Fredericton, New Brunswick. Retrieved from http://w3.stu.ca/stu/academic/departments/social_work/pdfs/CostelloandCrane.pdf
12. Crisp, B. R. (2007). Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students' subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(5), 571-581. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/caeh20/current#.VIVLnmSUfiI
13. Crook, A., Mauchline, A., Mawc, S., Lawson, C., Drinkwater, R., Lundqvist, K., . . . Park, J. (2012). The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students? Computers & Education, 58(1), 386-396. Retrieved from http://www.journals.elsevier.com/computers-and-education/
14. Crook, A., Park, J., Lawson, C., Lundqvist, K., Drinkwater, R., Walsh, J., . . . Maw, S. (2010). ASSET: Moving forward through feedback (pp. 1-20). Reading: Univeristy of Reading.
15. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571. Retrieved from http://pubsonline.informs.org/journal/mnsc
16. Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M., & Rowe, P. (2008). Students' response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 486-500. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00745.x
17. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer- and co-assessment in higher education: a review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331-350. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cshe20/current#.VIVNrmSUfiI
18. Duncan, N. (2007). 'Feed-forward': Improving students' use of tutors' comments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 271. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/caeh20/current#.VIVLnmSUfiI
19. Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70-120. Retrieved from http://rer.sagepub.com/
20. Falchikov, N. (1995). Improving feedback to and from students. In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 157-166). London: Kogan Page.
21. Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3-31. Retrieved from http://insight.glos.ac.uk/tli/resources/lathe/Pages/default.aspx
22. Hase, S., & Saenger, H. (1997). Videomail-a personalised approach to providing feedback on assessment to distance learners. Distance Education, 18, 362-369. doi:10.1080/0158791970180211
23. Hattie, J. A., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. Retrieved from http://rer.sagepub.com/
24. Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2014). Technology enhanced feedback on assessment. Paper presented at the 26th Australian Computers in Eductional Conference 2014, Adelaide, South Australia. Retrieved from http://acec2014.acce.edu.au/session/technology-enhanced-feedback-assessment
25. Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., Parkin, H., & Thorpe, L. (2011). Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: A literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), 117-127. Retrieved from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt
26. Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2001). Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 269-274. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cthe20/current#.VIVRM2SUfiI
27. Hyde, E. (2013). Talking results-trialing an audio-visual feedback method for e-submissions. Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 1(3). Retrieved from http://journals.staffs.ac.uk/index.php/ipihe/index
28. Ives, J. C., Straub, W. F., & Shelley, G. A. (2002). Enhancing athletic performance using digital video in consulting. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(3), 237-245. doi:10.1080/10413200290103527
29. Joint Information Systems Committee [JISC]. (2010). Effective assessment in a digital age: A guide to technlogy-enahanced assessment and feedback. Bristol: Higher Education Funding
30. Council for England. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/digiassass_eada.pdf
31. Juwah, D., Macfarlane-Dick, B., Matthew, D., Nicol, D., & Smith, B. (2004). Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. York: The Higher Education Academy.
32. Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: students' perceptions of quality and effectiveness Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 263-275. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/caeh20/current#.VIVLnmSUfiI
33. Mathieson, K. (2012). Exploring student perceptions of audiovisual feedback via screencasting in online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 26(3), 143-156. doi:10.1080/08923647.2012.689166
34. McConnell, D. (2006). Chapter four: Assessing learning in e-groups and communities. In D. McConnell (Ed.), E-learning groups and communities (pp. 90-123). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
35. Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cshe20/current#.VIVT92SUfiI
36. Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: effective and ineffective links between tutors' and students' understanding of coursework feedback Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 125-136. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/caeh20/current#.VIVLnmSUfiI
37. Parton, B. S., Crain-Dorough, M., & Hancock, R. (2010). Using flip camcorders to create video feedback: Is it realistic for professors and beneficial to students? International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 7(1), 15-23. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/
38. Race, P., Brown, S., & Smith, B. (2005). 500 tips on assessment (2nd ed.). Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.
39. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/learning+%26+instruction/journal/11251
40. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley and Sons.
41. Stefani, L. A. J. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 69-75. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cshe20/current#.VIVT92SUfiI