Web-based feedback after summative assessment: How do students engage?

Medical Education

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 734-744

  Harrison, Christopher J ^a   Könings, Karen D ^b   Molyneux, Adrian ^a   Schuwirth, Lambert W T ^c   Wass, Valerie ^a   van der Vleuten, Cees P M ^b  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; INTERNET; LEARNING; MEDICAL STUDENT; MOTIVATION; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; REINFORCEMENT; SELF CONCEPT; SELF EVALUATION; UTILIZATION; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; GOALS; HUMANS; INTERNET; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MOTIVATION; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; SELF EFFICACY; SELF-ASSESSMENT; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 84879000036     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12209     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Dochy F, Segers M, Gijbels D, Struyven K. Assessment engineering: breaking down barriers between teaching and learning, and assessment. In: Boud D, Falchikov N, eds. Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term. Oxford: Routledge 2007; 87-100.
2. Shute V. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res 2008;78:153-89.
3. Brookhart SM. Successful students' formative and summative uses of assessment information. Assess Educ Principles Policy Pract 2001;8:153-69.
4. Wass V, van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. The assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 2001;357:945-9.
5. Norcini JJ. Setting standards on educational tests. Med Educ 2003;37:464-9.
6. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance; a historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996;119:254-84.
7. Sinclair HK, Cleland JA. Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback? Med Educ 2007;41:580-2.
8. Ashford SJ, Blatt R, VandeWalle D. Reflections on the looking glass: a review of research on feedback-seeking behaviour in organizations. J Manage 2003;29:773-99.
9. Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Sargeant J. Tensions in informed self-assessment: how the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med 2011;86:1120-7.
10. Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, Sargeant J. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ 2012;17:15-26.
11. Nicol D. From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assess Eval Higher Educ 2010;35 :501-17.
12. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ 2008;13:275-88.
13. Dweck CS, Leggett EL. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychol Rev 1988;95:256-73.
14. VandeWalle D. A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behaviour. Hum Resour Manage Rev 2003;13:581-604.
15. VandeWalle D. Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educ Psychol Measur 1997;8:995-1015.
16. Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, van der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA, Boor K, Scheele F. Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents' feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Acad Med 2009;84:910-17.
17. Maslow AH. A theory of achievement motivation. In: Harriman PL, ed. Twentieth Century Psychology: Recent Developments. Manchester: Ayer Publishing 1970; 22-48.
18. Wilkinson TJ, Wells JE, Bushnell JA. Medical student characteristics associated with time in study: is spending more time always a good thing? Med Teach 2007;29:106-10.
19. Sobral DT. What kind of motivation drives medical students' learning quests? Med Educ 2004;38:950-7.
20. Zusho A, Pintrich PR, Coppola B. Skill and will: the role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. Int J Sci Educ 2003;25:1081-94.
21. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191-215.
22. Bandura A, Locke EA. Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. J Appl Psychol 2003;88:87-99.
23. Midgley C. Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. University of Michigan. 2000 Available at: http://www.umich.edu/~pals/PALS%202000_V12Word97.pdf. [Accessed 24 March 2013.]
24. Ketter LC. High-stakes testing, achievement-goal structures, academic related perceptions, beliefs, strategies, and school belonging among selected eighth-grade students in a northwest Florida school district. Education doctorate University of West Florida 2006. Available at: http://etd.fcla.edu/WF/WFE0000029/Ketter_Lynn_Carol_200605_EdD.pdf. [Accessed 24 March 2013.]
25. Fedor DB, Rensvold RB, Adams SM. An investigation of factors expected to affect feedback seeking: a longitudinal field study. Pers Psychol 1992;45:779-805.
26. Black P, Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ Principles Policy Pract 1998;5:7-74.
27. Butler R. Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest and performance. J Educ Psychol 1987;79:474-8.
28. Srinivasan M, Hauer K, Der-Martirosian C, Wilkes M, Gesundheit N. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination. Med Educ 2007;41:857-65.
29. Lefroy J, Gay S, Gibson S, Williams S, McKinley RK. Development and face validation of an instrument to assess and improve clinical consultation skills. Int J Clin Skills 2011;5:115-25.
30. Doran GT. There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives. Manage Rev 1981;70 :35-6.
31. Anderman EM, Urdan T, Roeser R. The Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey: history, development and psychometric properties. 2003. Paper prepared for Indicators of Positive Development Conference, 2003. Available at: http://www.childtrends.org/Files/Child_Trends-2003_03_12_PD_PDConfAUR.pdf. [Accessed 24 March 2013.]
32. Wolters CA, Yu SL, Pintrich PR. The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learn Individ Diff 1996;8:211-38.
33. Ashford SJ. Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: a resource perspective. Acad Manag J 1986;29:465-87.
34. Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Blais MR, Briere NM, Senecal C, Vallieres EF. The Academic Motivation Scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivation in education. Educ Psychol Measur 1992;52:1003-17.
35. Davier VM. WINMlRA - A Program System for Analyses with the Rasch-Model, with the Latent Class Analysis and with the Mixed-Rasch Model. Kiel: IPN 1999.
36. Lazarsfeld PF, Henry NW. Latent Structure Analysis. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co. 1968.
37. Seidel T. The role of student characteristics in studying micro teaching-learning environments. Learn Environ Res 2006;9:253-71.
38. Cook DA. Revisiting cognitive and learning styles in computer-assisted instruction: not so useful after all. Acad Med 2012;87:778-84.
39. Lipnevich AA, Smith JK. Effects of differential feedback on students' examination performance. J Exp Psychol Appl 2009;15:319-33.