Games, learning, and assessment

Assessment in Game-Based Learning: Foundations, Innovations, and Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 43-58

  Shute, Valerie J ^a   Ke, Fengfeng ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885443337     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3546-4_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Alkan, S., & Cagiltay, K. (2007). Studying computer game learning experience through eye tracking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 538-542.
2. Almond, R. G., & Mislevy, R. J. (1999). Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23(3), 223-237.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1995). Learning and memory: An integrated approach. New York: Wiley.
4. Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Transformational play. Educational Researcher, 39(7), 525-536.
5. Barab, S. A., Zuiker, S., Warren, S., Hickey, D., Ingram-Goble, A., Kwon, E.-J., et al. (2007). Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts. Science Education, 91(5), 750-782.
6. Bethesda Softworks (2006). Elder schools VI: Oblivion. Retrieved April 9, 2012, from http://www.bethsoft.com/games/games_oblivion.html.
7. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, and Experience & School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
9. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optical experience. New York: Harper Perrennial.
11. Dempsey, J. V., Haynes, L. L., Lucassen, B. A., & Casey, M. S. (2002). Forty simple computer games and what they could mean to educators. Simulation & Gaming, 33(2), 157-168.
12. Dempsey, J. V., Rasmussen, K., & Lucassen, B. (1996). Instructional gaming: Implications for instructional technology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Nashville, TN.
13. Emes, C. E. (1997). Is Mr Pac Man eating our children? A review of the effect of digital games on children. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 42(4), 409-414.
14. Fabricatore, C., Nussbaum, M., & Rosas, R. (2002). Playability in action videogames: A qualitative design model. Human Computer Interaction, 17(4), 311-368.
15. Falmagne, J.-C., Cosyn, E., Doignon, J.-P., & Thiery, N. (2003). The assessment of knowledge, in theory and in practice. In R. Missaoui & J. Schmidt (Eds.), Fourth international conference on formal concept analysis (Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 3874, pp. 61-79). New York: Springer.
16. Gee, J. P. (2003). What digital games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Gee, J. P. (2009). Deep learning properties of good digital games: How far can they go? In U. Ritterfeld, M. Cody, & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Serious games: Mechanisms and effects (pp. 65-80). New York: Routledge.
18. Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context (NCES 2009-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
19. Hays, R. T. (2005). The effectiveness of instructional games: A literature review and discussion. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://adlcommunity.net/file.php/23/GrooveFiles/Instr_Game_Review_Tr_2005.pdf.
20. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
21. Hogle, J. G. (1996). Considering games as cognitive tools: In search of effective “Edutainment”. Retrieved January 12, 2005, from ERIC, ED 425-737.
22. Howard, L. F., Paul, J. H., Marisa, P. P., & Brooke, E. S. (2010). Highlights from PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-year-old students in reading, mathematics, and science literacy in an international context (NCES 2011-004). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
23. Kafai, Y. B. (2005). The classroom as “living laboratory”: Design-based research for understanding, comparing, and evaluating learning science through design. Educational Technology, 65(1), 28-34.
24. Ke, F. (2008). A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 1-32). New York: IGI Global.
25. Kiili, K. (2007). Foundation for problem-based gaming. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 394-404.
26. Kirkpatrick, G. (2007). Between art and gameness: Critical theory and computer game aesthetics. Thesis Eleven, 89, 74-93.
27. Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., & Salen, K. (2009). Moving learning games forward: Obstacles, opportunities & openness. Cambridge, MA: The Education Arcade.
28. Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(1), 23-40.
29. Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30. Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction: III. Cognitive and affective process analyses (pp. 223-253). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York: Penguin Press.
32. Mislevy, R. J. (1994). Evidence and inference in educational assessment. Psychometrika, 59, 439-483.
33. Mislevy, R. J., & Haertel, G. D. (2006). Implications of evidence-centered design for educational testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(4), 6-20.
34. Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3-62.
35. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2006). Results that matter: 21st century skills and high school reform. Retrieved from April 28, 2012. http://www.p21.org/documents/RTM2006.pdf.
36. Pellegrini, A. D. (1995). Thefuture ofplay theory: A multidisciplinary inquiry into the contributions of Brian Sutton-Smith. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
37. Pillay, H. (2002). An investigation of cognitive processes engaged in by recreational computer game players: Implications for skills of the future. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 336-350.
38. Pillay, H., Brownlee, J., & Wilss, L. (1999). Cognition and recreational computer games: Implications for educational technology. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 203.
39. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Prensky, M. (2006). Don’t bother me mom, I’m learning!: How computer and digital games are preparing your kids for 21st century success and how you can help! St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
41. Quinn, C. (2005). Engaging learning: Designing e-learning simulation games. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
42. Randel, J. M., Morris, B. A., Wetzel, C. D., & Whitehil, B. V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23(3), 261-276.
43. Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(1), 43-58.
44. Rupp, A. A., Gushta, M., Mislevy, R. J., & Shaffer, D. W. (2010). Evidence-centered design of epistemic games: Measurement principles for complex learning environments. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 5(4). Retrieved April 9, 2012, from http://escholarship. bc.edu/jtla/vol8/4.
45. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2005). Game design and meaningful play. In J. Raessens & J. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of computer game studies (pp. 59-80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Shaffer, D. W. (2005). Studio mathematics: The epistemology and practice of design pedagogy as a model for mathematics learning. Wisconsin Center for Education Research Working paper, No. 2005-3.
47. Shaffer, D. W. (2007). How computer games help children learn. New York: Palgrave.
48. Shaffer, D. W., Squire, K. A., Halverson, R., & Gee, J. P. (2005). Digital games and the future of learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 57(2), 104-111.
49. Shute, V. J. (2007). Tensions, trends, tools, and technologies: Time for an educational sea change. In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 139-187). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
50. Shute, V. J. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 503-524). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
51. Shute, V. J., Rieber, L., & Van Eck, R. (2011). Games… and… learning. In R. Reiser & J. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed., pp. 321-332). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
52. Shute, V. J., Ventura, M., Bauer, M. I., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2009). Melding the power of serious games and embedded assessment to monitor and foster learning: Flow and grow. In U. Ritterfeld, M. Cody, & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Serious games: Mechanisms and effects (pp. 295-321). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
53. Squire, K. (2004). Replaying history: Learning world history through playing Civilization III. ProQuest Dissertations, Indiana University.
54. Steinberg, L. S., & Gitomer, D. G. (1996). Intelligent tutoring and assessment built on an understanding of a technical problem-solving task. Instructional Science, 24, 223-258.
55. Suits, B. H. (1978). Thegrasshopper: Games, lifeandutopia. Toronto, ON: University ofToronto Press.
56. Sweetser, P., & Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 3(3), 1-24.
57. Torres, R. J. (2009). Using Gamestar Mechanic within a nodal learning ecology to learn systems thinking: A worked example. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 1-11.
58. Vogel, J. F., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 229-243.
59. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development ofhighermentalprocesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works ofL. S. Vygotsky. New York: Plenum.
61. Wolfe, J. (1997). The effectiveness of business games in strategic management course work. Simulation & Gaming, 28(4), 360-376.
62. Yee, N. (2006). The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15(3), 309-329.
63. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.