Multimodal feedback is not always clearer, more useful or satisfying

ASCILITE 2016 - Conference Proceedings - 33rd International Conference of Innovation, Practice and Research in the Use of Educational Technologies in Tertiary Education: Show Me the Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 514-522

  Phillips, Michael ^a   Henderson, Michael ^a   Ryan, Tracii ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assessment; Feedback; Higher education; Multimodal feedback; Tutor differences

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FEEDBACK;

ASSESSMENT; HIGHER EDUCATION; LEARNING EXPERIENCES; MULTIMODAL FEEDBACK; ONLINE SURVEYS; SECONDARY VARIABLES; SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENTS; TUTOR DIFFERENCES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85063902455     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Adcroft, A. (2011). The mythology of feedback. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(4), 405-419.
2. Anson, I. G. (2015). Assessment Feedback using Screencapture Technology in Political Science. Journal of Political Science Education, 11(4), 375-390.
3. Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Feedback in Higher and Professional Education. New York: Routledge.
4. Crisp, B. R. (2007). Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(5), 571-581.
5. Crook, A., Park, J., Lawson, C., Lundqvist, K., Drinkwater, R., Walsh, J., et al. (2010). ASSET: Moving Forward Through Feedback: Univeristy of Reading.
6. Fawcett, H., & Oldfield, J. (2016). Investigating expectations and experiences of audio and written assignment feedback in first-year undergraduate students. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(1), 79-93.
7. Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics using SPSS (3rd Edition ed.). London: Sage.
8. Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2014). Technology enhanced feedback on assessment. Paper presented at the Australian Computers in Eductional Conference 2013. Retrieved from http://acec2014.acce.edu.au
9. Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2015). Video-based feedback on student assessment: scarily personal. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 51-66.
10. Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 263-275.
11. Luongo, N. (2015). Missing the Chalkboard: Using Screencasting in the Online Classroom. Computers in the Schools, 32(2), 144-151.
12. McCarthy, J. (2015). Evaluating written, audio and video feedback in higher education summative assessment tasks. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 153-169.
13. McConnell, D. (2006). Chapter four: Assessing learning in e-groups and communities. In D. McConnell (Ed.), E-Learning Groups and communities. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
14. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2016). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
15. Pitt, E., & Norton, L. (2016). ‘Now that’s the feedback I want!’Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-18.
16. Porras-Hernández, L. H., & Salinas-Amescua, B. (2013). Strengthening TPACK: A Broader Notion of Context and the Use of Teacher's Narratives to Reveal Knowledge Construction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 223-244.
17. Rosenberg, J., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and Teaching with Technology in the Digital Age.
18. Zimbardi, K., Colthorpe, K., Dekker, A., Engstrom, C., Bugarcic, A., Worthy, P., et al. (2016). Are they using my feedback? The extent of students’ feedback use has a large impact on subsequent academic performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-20.