Students’ conceptions of eportfolios as assessment and technology

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 487-496

  Deneen, Christopher Charles ^a   Brown, Gavin Thomas Lumsden ^b   Carless, David ^c  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Assessment; eportfolios; higher education; technology enabled assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009751186     PISSN: 14703297     EISSN: 14703300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2017.1281752     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ayala, J. I., (2006). Electronic portfolios for whom? Educause Quarterly, 29, 12–13.
2. Boud, D., & Soler, R., (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 400–413. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
3. Brown, G. T. L., (2011). Self-regulation of assessment beliefs and attitudes: A review of the students’ conceptions of assessment inventory. Educational Psychology, 31, 731–748. doi:10.1080/01443410.2011.599836
4. Brown, G. T. L., (2013). Student conceptions of assessment across cultural and contextual differences: University student perspectives of assessment from Brazil, China, Hong Kong, and New Zealand. In G. A. D., Liem & A. B. I., Bernardo (Eds.), Advancing cross-cultural perspectives on educational psychology: A Festschrift for Dennis McInerney (pp. 143–167). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
5. Brown, G. T. L., & Hirschfeld, G. H. F., (2008). Students’ conceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 15, 3–17. doi:10.1080/09695940701876003
6. Brown, G. T. L., Irving, S. E., Peterson, E. R., & Hirschfeld, G. H. F., (2009). Use of interactive-informal assessment practices: New Zealand secondary students’ conceptions of assessment. Learning and Instruction, 19, 97–111. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.02.003
7. Brown, G. T. L., Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E., (2009). Beliefs that make a difference: Adaptive and maladaptive self-regulation in students’ conceptions of assessment. In D. M., McInerney, G. T. L., Brown, & G. A. D., Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 159–186). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
8. Brown, G. T. L., & Wang, Z., (2013). Illustrating assessment: How Hong Kong university students conceive of the purposes of assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 1037–1057. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.616955
9. Brown, G. T. L., & Wang, Z., (2016). Understanding Chinese university student conceptions of assessment: Cultural similarities and jurisdictional differences between Hong Kong and China. Social Psychology of Education, 19, 151–173. doi:10.1007/s11218-015-9322-x
10. Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R., (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 261–304. doi:10.1177/0049124104268644
11. Cheng, S. I., Chen, S. C., & Yen, D. C., (2015). Continuance intention of E-portfolio system: A confirmatory and multigroup invariance analysis of technology acceptance model. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 42, 17–23.10.1016/j.csi.2015.03.002
12. Cohen, J., (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
13. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W., (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–9.
14. Courtney, M. G. R., (2013). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: Using the SPSS R-Menu v2.0 to make more judicious estimations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18, 1–14.
15. Cummings, R., & Maddux, C. D., (2010). The use of e-portfolios as a component of assessment and accreditation in higher education. In N., Buzzetto-More (Ed.), The e-portfolio paradigm: Informing, educating, assessing and managing with e-portfolios (pp. 207–223). Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press.
16. Deneen, C. C., (2013). Eportfolios in a higher education context: Preliminary findings on assessment and technology issues. Journal of Information Systems Technology & Planning, 6, 17.
17. Deneen, C. C., & Boud, D., (2014). Patterns of resistance in managing assessment change. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 577–591.10.1080/02602938.2013.859654
18. Deneen, C., Brown, G. T., Bond, T. G., & Shroff, R., (2013). Understanding outcome-based education changes in teacher education: Evaluation of a new instrument with preliminary findings. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 441–456.10.1080/1359866X.2013.787392
19. Deneen, C. C., & Shroff, R., (2014). Understanding successes and difficulties in program-level eportfolios: A case study of two professional degree programs. Review of Higher Education and Self-Learning, 7, 145–160.
20. Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A., (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 509–529.10.1080/00273170701382864
21. Lam, T. C. M., & Klockars, A. J., (1982). Anchor point effects on the equivalence of questionnaire items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19, 317–322.10.1111/jedm.1982.19.issue-4
22. Macdonald, R., & Joughin, G., (2009). Changing assessment in higher education: A model in support of institution-wide improvement. In G., Joughin (Ed.), Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education (pp. 193–213). Dordrecht: Springer.
23. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T., (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275–300.10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.275
24. Ralston, A., (2015). ePortfolio development and the potential relationship to learning theories. In M. Ally & B. H. Khan (Eds.), International handbook of e-learning volume 2: Implementation and case studies (pp. 105). New York: Routledge.
25. Redecker, C., & Johannessen, Ø., (2013). Changing assessment: Towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48, 79–96.10.1111/ejed.12018
26. Sadler, D. R., (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 535–550.10.1080/02602930903541015
27. Shroff, R. H., Deneen, C. D., & Ng, E. M., (2011). Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students’ behavioural intention to use an e-portfolio system. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 600–618.
28. Smith, C. D., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R., & McPhail, R., (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: The case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 44–60. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.598636
29. Teo, T., (2009). Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52, 302–312.10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
30. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D., (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 27, 425–478.
31. Wang, Z., & Brown, G. T. L., (2014). Hong Kong tertiary students’ conceptions of assessment of academic ability. Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 1063–1077. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.890565
32. Yang, M., Tai, M., & Lim, C. P., (2015). The role of e-portfolios in supporting productive learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 1276–1286. doi:10.1111/bjet.12316