The effect of Scoring criteria Specificity on peer and Self-assessment

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 383-394

  Miller, Peter J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10044242449     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0260293032000066218     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ARTHUR, H. (1995) Student self-evaluations: how useful? How valid? International Journal of Nursing Studies, 32, pp. 271-276.
2. BAILEY, D.M. (1997) Research for the Health Professional, 2nd edn (Philadelphia, PA, F.A. Davis).
3. BREITMEYER, B. J., AYRES, L. & KNAFL, K. A. (1993) Triangulation in qualitative research: evaluation of completeness and confirmation purposes, IMAGE Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25, pp. 237-243.
4. CHENG, W. & WARREN, M. (1999) Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, pp. 301-314.
5. CONWAY, R., KEMBER, D., SIVAN, A. & WU, M. (1993) Peer assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, pp. 45-56.
6. CULBERTSON, V. L., KALE, M. & JARVI, E. J. (1997) Problem-based learning: a tutorial model incorporating pharmaceutical diagnosis, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 61, pp. 18-26.
7. DAS, M., MPOFU, D., DUNN, E. & LANPHEAR, J. H. (1998) Self and tutor evaluations in problem-based learning tutorials: is there a relationship?, Medical Education, 32, pp. 411-418.
8. DESMARCHAIS, J. E. & VU, N. V. (1996) Developing and evaluating the student assessment system in the preclinical problem-based curriculum at Sherbrooke, Academic Medicine, 71, pp. 274-283.
9. DENZIN, N. K. (1989) The Research Act. A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, 3rd edn (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall).
10. DENZIN, N. K. & LINCOLN, Y. S. (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage).
11. FALCHIKOV, N. (1995) Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessmentl, Innovations in Education & Training International, 32, pp. 175-187.
12. FALCHIKOV, N. & GOLDFINCH, J. (2000) Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks, Review of Educational Research, 70, pp. 287-322.
13. HANRAHAN, S. J. & ISAACS, G. (2001) Assessing self-and peer assessment: the students' views, Higher Education Research and Development, 20, pp. 53-69.
14. HEYLINGS, D. J. & STEFANI, L. A. (1997) Peer assessment feedback marking in a large medical anatomy class, Medical Education, 31, pp. 281-286.
15. LEJK, M. & WYVILL, M. (2001) Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a comparison of holistic and category-based approaches, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, pp. 61-72.
16. LI, L. K. (2001) Some refinements on peer assessment of group projects, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, pp. 6-18.
17. LONGHURST, N. & NORTON, L. S. (1997) Self-assessment in coursework essays, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, pp. 319-330.
18. LOPEZ-REAL, F. & CHAN, Y. R. (1999) Peer assessment of a group project in a primary mathematics education course, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, pp. 67-79.
19. MACALPINE, J. M. (1999) Improving and encouraging peer assessment of student presentations, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, pp. 15-25.
20. MACPHERSON, K. (1999) The development of critical thinking skills in undergraduate supervisory management units: efficacy of student peer assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, pp. 273-284.
21. MAGIN, D. J. (2001) A novel technique for comparing the reliability of multiple peer assessments with that of single teacher assessments of group process work, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, pp. 139-152.
22. MILLER, P. J. (1999) The agreement of peer assessment and self-assessment of learning processes in problem-based learning, Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 13, pp. 26-30.
23. OLDFIELD, K. A. & MACALPINE, J. M. (1995) Peer and self-assessment at the tertiary level-an experiential report, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 20, pp. 125-132.
24. ORSMOND, P., MERRY, S. & REILING, K. (1996) The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, pp. 239-250.
25. ORSMOND, P., MERRY, S. & REILING, K. (2000) The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, pp. 24-38.
26. POND, K. & UL-HAQ, R. (1997) Learning to assess students using peer review, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, pp. 331-348.
27. PORTNEY, L. G. & WATKINS, M. P. (1993) Foundations of Clinical Research. Applications to practice (Norwalk, CT, Appleton & Lange).
28. PURCHASE, H. C. (2000) Learning about interface design through peer assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, pp. 341-352.
29. REZLER, A. G. (1989) Self-assessment in problem-based groups, Medical Teacher, 11, pp. 151-156.
30. SIM, J. & SHARP, K. (1998) A critical appraisal of the role of triangulation in nursing research, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 35, pp. 23-31.
31. SLUIJSMANS, D. M., MOERKERKE, G., MERRIENBOER, J. J. & DOCHY, F. J. (2001) Peer assessment in problem-based learning, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, pp. 153-173.
32. SULLIVAN, M. E., HITCHCOCK, M. A. & DUNNINGTON, G. L. (1999) Peer and self-assessment during problem-based tutorials, American Journal of Surgery, 177, pp. 266-269.
33. THOMAS, R. E. (1997) Problem-based learning: measurable outcomes, Medical Education, 31, pp. 320-329.
34. TOPPING, K. (1998) Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research, 68, pp. 249-276.
35. VAN DUZER, E. & MCMARTIN, F. (2000) Methods to improve the validity and sensitivity of a self/peer assessment instrument, IEEE Transactions on Education, 43, pp. 153-158.