Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 427-441

  Ballantyne, Roy ^a   Hughes, Karen ^a   Mylonas, Aliisa ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10044298347     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0260293022000009302     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BILLINGTON, H. L. (1997) Poster presentations and peer assessment: Novel forms of evaluation and assessment, Journal of Biological Education, 31 (3), pp. 218-220.
2. BOUD, D. (1995) Enhanced learning through self assessment (London, Kogan Page).
3. BRINDLEY, C. & SCOFFIELD, S. (1998) Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes, Teaching in Higher Education, 3 (1), pp. 79-89.
4. CHENG, W. & WARREN, M. (1997) Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise, Studies in Higher Education, 22 (2), pp. 233-240.
5. CHENG, W. & WARREN, M. (1999) Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24 (3), pp. 301-314.
6. DAVIES, P. (2000) Computerized peer assessment, Innovations in Education and Training International, 37 (4), pp. 346-355.
7. DOCHY, F., SEGERS, M. & SLUIJSMANS, D. (1999) The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review, Studies in Higher Education, 24 (3), pp. 331-350.
8. FALCHIKOV, N. (1995) Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment, Innovation in Education and Training, 32 (2), pp. 175-187.
9. FALCHIKOV, N. (1998) Involving students in feedback and assessment: A report from the Assessment Strategies in Scottish Higher Education (ASSHE) project, in: S. BROWN (Ed.) Peer assessment in practice, SEDA Paper 102, Birmingham, SEDA.
10. GIBBS, G., LUCAS, L. & SPOUSE, J. (1997) The effects of class size and form of assessment on nursing students' performance, approaches to study and course perceptions, Nurse Education Today, 17 (4), pp. 311-318.
11. HANRAHAN, S. J. & ISAACS, G. (2001) Assessing self- and peer-assessment: the students' views, Higher Education Research & Development, 20 (1), pp. 53-68.
12. KEMMIS, S & WILKINSON, M. (1998) Participatory action research and the study of practice, in: B. ATWEH, S. KEMMIS & P.WEEKS (Eds) Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice in education (London, Routledge).
13. MCDOWELL, L. (1995) The impact of innovative assessment on student learning, Innovation in Education and Training International, 32 (4), pp. 302-313.
14. MOWL, G. & PAIN, R. (1995) Using self and peer assessment to improve students' essay writing: A case study from geography, Innovation in Education and Training International, 32 (4), pp. 324-335.
15. OLDFIELD, K. A., MARK, J. & MACALPINE, K. (1995) Peer and self-assessment at tertiary level-an experiential report, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20 (1), pp. 125-132.
16. ORSMOND, P. & MERRY, S. (1996) The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21 (3), pp. 239-250.
17. POND, K., UL-HAQ, R. & WADE, W. (1995) Peer review: A precursor to peer assessment, Innovations in Education and Training International, 32 (4), pp. 314-323.
18. RACE, P. (1998) Practical pointers on peer-assessment, in: S. BROWN (Ed.) Peer assessment in practice, SEDA Paper 102, Birmingham, SEDA.
19. SEARBY, M. & EWERS, T. (1997) An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: A case study in the School of Music, Kingston University, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22 (4), pp. 371-383.
20. TOPPING, K. J. (1998) Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research, 68 (3), pp. 249-276.
21. TOPPING, K. J., SMITH, E. F., SWANSON, I. & ELLIOT, A. (2000) Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25 (2), pp. 146-169.