Peer evaluation in blended team project-based learning: What do students find important?

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 214-224

  Lee, Hye Jung ^a   Lim, Cheolil ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Blended team project based learning; Group learning evaluation; Peer evaluation; Students' evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873864990     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Balint, M., Bodner, D., & Evans-Nachi, H. (2002). Self- and Peer- Evaluation of Group Discussion. Proceedings of JALT 2001 (Shizuoka).
2. Blanche, P. (1988). Self-assessment of foreign language skills: Implications for teachers and researchers. RELC Journal, 19, 75-96.
3. Brindley, C., & Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), 79-89.
4. Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1-32.
5. Chang, C.-C., Tseng, K.-H., Chou, P.-N., & Chen, Y.-H. (2011). Reliability and validity of Web-based portfolio peer assessment: A case study for a senior high school's students taking computer course. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1306-1316.
6. Cookson, P. S. & Chang, Yu-bi. (1995). The Multidimensional Audioconferencing Classification System (MACS). The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(1), 18-36.
7. De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6-28.
8. Dunlap, J. C. (2005). Workload reduction in online courses: Getting some shuteye. Performance and Improvement,44(5), 18-25.
9. Ertmer, P.A., Richardson, J.C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., Lei, K., & Mong, C. (2010). Impact and Perceived Value of Peer Feedback in Online Learning Environments. Retrieved June 7, 2010, from http://www.edci.purdue.edu/ertmer/docs/AECT05_Proc.pdf.
10. Fahy, P.J. (2001). Addressing some common problems in transcript analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(2), Retrieved June 23, 2010, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/321/530.
11. Falchikov, N. & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322.
12. Fulford, D. P., & Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interaction; the critical predictor in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8-21.
13. Gerard, R, J. (2002). Peer evaluation as a predictor of future success. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
14. Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global on-line debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 395-429.
15. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp.117-136). London: Springer-Verlag.
16. Jung, S. (2001). Effects of Basic Thinking Skills and Project Method on Creativity and Project Performance Ability of Elementary School Children. Doctoral Dissertation, Kyungsung university Press.
17. Kane, J., & Lawler, E. (1978). Methods of peer assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 85(3), 555-586.
18. Karau, S. J. & Williams, K. D. (1993). "Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (4), 681-706.
19. Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78-94.
20. Korean Human Resources Research Center Report (2009). Core competencies to be nurtured in college education: stated by employers and professors. Seoul National University.
21. Lee, H.-J. (2008). A Learning Process Mechanism in CSCL(Computer Supported Collaborative Learning). Proceedings of ICCE(International Conference of Computers in Education) 2008 (Taiwan).
22. Lee, H.-J. & Kim, I. (2011). Development of a Content Analysis Framework in Online Group-Based Learning. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 7(3), 109-127.
23. Lee, H.-J., Kim, H., & Byun, H. (2011). How are high-achieving college students doing in team project-based learning?: An institution-wide analysis at a Korean top University. Proceedings of (ICER) International Conference of Educational Research.
24. Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Alternatives to instructor assessment: A case study of comparing self and peer assessment with instructor assessment under a networked innovative assessment procedures. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 10.
25. Moursund, D. G. (2003). Project-based learning using information technology. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
26. Newman, D., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 3(2), 56-77.
27. Oren, A., Mioduser, D. & Nachmias, R. (2002). The development of social climate in virtual learning discussion groups. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1). Retrieved March 15, 2011, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/80/154
28. Pena-Perez, J. (2000). Participation, interaction and meaning construction in a university-level course using a computer bulletin board as a supplement to regular class discussions: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
29. Pena-Shaff, J., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in Computer Bulletin Board (BBS) discussions. Computers and Education, 42, 243-265.
30. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12.
31. Salomon, G. & Globerson, T. (1987). When teams do not function they way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89-100.
32. Stahl, G. (2000). A Model of Collaborative Knowledge-Building. In B. Fishman & S. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 70-77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., Chang, T.-H., & Yu, W.-C. (2010). How many heads are better than one? The reliability and validity of teenagers' self- and peer assessments. Journal of Adolescence, 33(1), 135-145.
34. Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing Between Postgraduate Students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169.
35. Von Kotze, A., & Cooper, L. (2000). Exploring the transformative potential of project-based learning in university adult education. Studies in the Education of Adults, 32(2), 212.
36. Wang, J. (2011). Work in progress - A feedback system for peer evaluation of engineering student teams to enhance team effectiveness. Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp.S4C-1-S4C-5.
37. Wever B. D., Keer, H. V., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2011). Assessing collaboration in a wiki: The reliability of university students' peer assessment. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 201-206.
38. Yonhap News (2012, February 17). SNU students lack sociability. Retrieved from February 17, 2012, from http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=101&oid=001&aid=0005518315.
39. Zhu, E. (1996). Meaning negotiation, knowledge construction, and mentoring in a distance learning course. Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Indianapolis: Available from ERIC Documents: ED 397 849.