Student involvement in assessment: A project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 445-454

  Dancer, Diane ^a   Kamvounias, Patty ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847656694     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930500099235     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. L. C., Kulik, J. A. & Morgan, M. T. (1991) The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events, Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
2. Biggs, J. (1999) Teaching for quality learning at university (Buckingham, Open University Press).
3. Burchfield, C. M. & Sappington, J. (1999) Participation in classroom discussions, Teaching of Psychology, 26(4), 290-291.
4. Butler, S. (2004) Question: when is a comment not worth the paper it's written on? Answer: when it is accompanied by a level, grade or mark! Teaching History, 115, 37-41.
5. Clarke, E. G. (1985) Grading seminar performance, College Teacher, 33, 129-133.
6. Cardozo, L. F. (1994) Getting a word in edgeways: does 'not talking' mean 'not learning'? TESOL Journal, 4(1), 24-27.
7. Dancer, D. & Kamvounias, P. (2004) Student involvement in assessment: a project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably. Report number: ECMT2004-1 (Sydney, Sydney University, School of Economics and Political Science). Available online at: www. econ.usyd.edu.au/content.php?pageid=13579 (accessed 4 August 2004).
8. Dancer, D. & Tremayne, A. (in press) R-squared and prediction in regression with ordered quantitative response, Journal of Applied Statistics.
9. Dweck, C. S. & Bush, E. S. (1976) Sex differences in learned helplessness: differential debilitation with peer and adult evaluators, Developmental Psychology, 12(2), 147-156.
10. Hayes, S. L. & Hayes, R. A. (1973) Towards objective assessment of class participation, The Journal of the Society of the Public Teachers of Law, 12, 323-332.
11. Henry, S. E. (1979) Sex and locus of control as determinants of children's responses to peer versus adult praise, Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(5), 605-612.
12. Heywood, J. (1989) Assessment in higher education (London, John Wiley).
13. Kamvounias, P. (1996) Assessment of class participation in Commercial Law courses, Current Commercial Law, 4(2), 128-139.
14. Le Brun, M. & Johnstone, R. (1994) The quiet (r)evolution: Improving student learning in law (Sydney, Law Book Company).
15. Lyons, P. R. (1989) Assessing classroom participation, College Teaching, 37(1), 36-38.
16. Natriello, G. (1987) The impact of evaluation processes on students, Educational Psychologist, 22, 155-175.
17. Nightingale, P., Te Wiata, I., Toohey, S., Ryan, G., Hughes, C. & Magin, D. (1996) Assessing learning in universities (Kensington, NSW, University of New South Wales).
18. Orsmond, P., Merry, S. & Reiling, K. (2000) The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 23-38.
19. Ramsden, P. (1992) Learning to teach in higher education (London, Routledge).
20. Rowntree, D. (1987) Assessing students: how shall we know them? (London, Harper & Row).
21. Searby, M. & Ewers, T. (1997) An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: a case study in the School of Music, Kingston University, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 371-383.
22. Teekell, D. M. (1990) Effectiveness of peer feedback in helping skills training of nonprofessionals, Masters Abstracts International, 28, p. 164.
23. Vandrick, S. (2000) Language, culture, class, gender and class participation, paper presented at TESOL Annual International Convention, Vancouver, Canada.