Conceptualizing the domain of automated feedback for learners

XXII Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering, CIbSE 2019

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 223-236

  Serral, Estefanía ^a   Ruiz, Jenny ^b   Elen, Jan ^a   Snoeck, Monique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE HOLGUÍN   (Cuba)

Author keywords

Automated feedback; Framework; Technology enhanced learning

Indexed keywords

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

AUTOMATED FEEDBACK; CRITICAL REVIEW; DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATIONS; FRAMEWORK; LEARNING PROCESS; SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTIONS; TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85068445671     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. V. J. Shute, “Focus on formative feedback,” Rev. Educ. Res., 78, 1, pp. 153–89, 2008.
2. D. Boud and E. Molloy, “Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., 38, 6, pp. 1–15, 2012.
3. G.-J. Hwang, “Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments - a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective,” Smart Learn. Environ., 1,1, pp. 1–14, 2014.
4. L. Gerard, C. Matuk, K. McElhaney, and M. C. Linn, “Automated, adaptive guidance for K-12 education,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 15, pp. 41–58, 2015.
5. J. Ruiz, E. Serral, and M. Snoeck, "Technology Enhanced Support for Learning Interactive Software Systems," In MODELSWARD, 2018, pp. 185–210.
6. A. Devi and K. Revathi, “A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature,” ReCALL, vol. 3, no. 0975-2935, pp. 262–268, 2016.
7. J. Yuan and C. Kim, “Effective feedback design using free technologies,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 408–434, 2015.
8. T. Srivastava, L. S. Waghmare, and S. J. Vagha, “Revisiting feedback practices in formative assessment of Indian Medical Schools,” Natl. J. Physiol. Pharm. Pharmacol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2015.
9. S. Gedye, “Formative assessment and feedback: A review,” Planet, 23, 1, pp. 40–45, 2010.
10. S. Narciss, “Designing and evaluating tutoring feedback strategies for digital learning environments on the basis of the interactive tutoring feedback model,” Digit. Educ. Rev., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 7–26, 2013.
11. M. D. M. Sánchez-Vera, J. T. Fernández-Breis, D. Castellanos-Nieves, F. Frutos-Morales, and M. P. Prendes-Espinosa, “Semantic Web technologies for generating feedback in online assessment environments,” Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 33, pp. 152–165, 2012.
12. J. W. Gikandi, D. Morrow, and N. E. Davis, “Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature,” Comput. Educ., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2333–2351, 2011.
13. F. M. Van Der Kleij, C. F. Timmers, and T. J. H. M. Eggen, “The effectiveness of methods for providing written feedback through a computer-based assessment for learning: A systematic review,” Cadmo, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 21–38, 2011.
14. S. Hepplestone, G. Holden, B. Irwin, H. Parkin, and L. P. Thorpe, “Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: a literature review,” Res. Learn. Technol., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 117–127, 2011.
15. E. Serral and M. Snoeck, “Conceptual framework for feedback automation in SLEs,” SEEL 2016, Springer.
16. J. A. Holton, “The coding process and its challenges,” in The Sage handbook of grounded theory, & K. C. A. Bryant, Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. nges., 2007, pp. 265–289.
17. D. S. Campos, A. J. Mendes, M. J. Marcelino, D. J. Ferreira, and L. M. Alves, “A multinational case study on using diverse feedback types applied to introductory programming learning,” 42nd Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE’12, 2012, pp. 1–6.
18. A. Jones et al., “Creating Coherent Incidental Learning Journeys on Smartphones Using Feedback and Progress Indicators,” Int. J. Mob. Blended Learn., 6, 4, pp. 75–92, 2014.
19. M. J. Martínez-Argüelles, D. Plana-Erta, C. Hintzmann-Colominas, M. Badia-Miró, and J. M. Batalla-Busquets, “Usefulness of feedback in e-Learning from the students’ perspective,” ECEL, pp. 283–292, 2013.
20. Z. Tanes, K. E. Arnold, A. S. King, and M. A. Remnet, “Using Signals for appropriate feedback: Perceptions and practices,” Comput. Educ., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2414–2422, 2011.
21. J. L. Owen and J. E. Dudley, “A Content Analysis of the Treatment of Informative and Reinforcing Feedback in Contemporary Communication Theory Textbooks,” 9, 4, 2007.
22. J. A. Stone, “Using reflective blogs for pedagogical feedback in CS1,” in SIGCSE, 2012, pp. 259–264.
23. I. Roll, V. Aleven, B. M. McLaren, and K. R. Koedinger, “Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system,” Learn. Instr., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 267–280, 2011.
24. J. Hattie and H. Timperley, “The power of feedback,” Rev. Educ. Res., 77, 1, pp. 16–7, 2007.
25. A. Mitrovic, S. Ohlsson, and D. Barrow, “The effect of positive feedback in a constraint-based intelligent tutoring system,” Comput. Educ., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 264–272, 2013.
26. P. Black and D. Wiliam, “Developing the theory of formative assessment,” Educ. Assessment, Eval. Account., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 5–31, 2009.
27. M. R. Weaver, “Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 379–394, 2006.
28. Y. H. P. Iskandar, L. Gilbert, G. B. Wills, and N. Basir, “The Development of Semantic Feedback for Teaching and Learning in Physical Education,” in ICALT, 2013, pp. 385–387.
29. A. Pears, J. Harland, M. Hamilton, and R. Hadgraft, “What is feedback? connecting student perceptions to assessment practices,” in LaTiCE 2013, 2013, 2015, pp. 106–113.
30. Andreu Grimalt-reynes Mark Inverno, “Designing Educational Social Machines for Effective Feedback,” in International Conference e-Learning, 2014, pp. 239–248.
31. K. Ludvigsen, R. Krumsvik, and B. Furnes, “Creating formative feedback spaces in large lectures,” Comput. Educ., vol. 88, pp. 48–63, 2015.
32. M. Vandewaetere, P. Desmet, and G. Clarebout, “The contribution of learner characteristics in the development of computer-based adaptive learning environments,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 118–130, 2011.
33. A. Jonsson, “Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education,” Act. Learn. High. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 63–76, 2013.
34. I. Rasmussen, A. Lund, and O. Smørdal, “Visualisation of trajectories of participation in a wiki: A basis for feedback and assessment?,” Nord. J. Digit. Lit., pp. 20–35, 2012.
35. P. Van Rosmalen, D. Börner, J. Schneider, O. Petukhova, and J. Van Helvert, “Feedback Design in Multimodal Dialogue Systems,” in CSEDU, 2015, pp. 209–217.
36. D. R. Pridemore and J. D. Klein, “Control of Feedback in Computer-Assisted Instruction,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 27–32, 2013.
37. K. Verbert et al., “Context-aware recommender systems for learning: a survey and future challenges,” IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 318–335, 2012.
38. J. Segedy, J. S. Kinnebrew, and G. Biswas, “Supporting student learning using conversational agents in a teachable agent environment,” in ICLS, 2012, pp. 251–255.
39. G. Gibbs, “The importance of context in understanding teaching and learning: reflections on thirty five years of pedagogic research,” in Keynote at the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2012.
40. S. Bull, M. D. Johnson, C. D. Epp, D. Masci, M. Alotaibi, and S. Girard, “Formative Assessment and Meaningful Learning Analytics,” in 14th ICALT, 2014, pp. 327–329.
41. P. Lehsten, R. Zender, U. Lucke, and D. Tavangarian, “A service-oriented approach towards context-aware mobile learning management systems,” in PERCOM Workshops, 2010, pp. 268–273.
42. G. Sedrakyan, J. De Weerdt, and M. Snoeck, “Process-mining enabled feedback: ‘Tell me what I did wrong’ vs. ‘tell me how to do it right,’” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 57, pp. 352–376, Apr. 2016.
43. J. J. G. van Merriënboer, P. A. Kirschner, and L. Kester, “Taking the Load Off a Learner’s Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning,” Educ. Psychol., 38, 1, pp. 5–13, 2003.
44. C. Furnborough and M. Truman, “Adult beginner distance language learner perceptions and use of assignment feedback.,” Distance Educ., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 399–418, 2009.
45. K. Holmes and G. Papageorgiou, “Good, bad and insufficient: Students’ expectations, perceptions and uses of feedback,” J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ., 8, 1, pp. 85–96, 2009.
46. H. Pokorny and P. Pickford, “Complexity, cues and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback,” Act. Learn. High. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2010.