Apprenticeship learning

International Handbook of the Learning Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 44-53

  Eberle, Julia ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85049288212     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315617572     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096-1097.
2. Bannert, M., Sonnenberg, C., Mengelkamp, C., & Pieger, E. (2015). Short- and long-term effects of students’ self-directed metacognitive prompts on navigation behavior and learning performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 293-306. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.038
3. Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 25-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., & Scheckler, R. (2003). Designing system dualities: Characterizing a web-supported professional development community. The Information Society, 19(3), 237-256. doi: 10.1080/01972240309466
5. Bell, P. (1997). Using argumentation representation to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 10-19). Toronto, ON: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
6. Bolzer, M., Strijbos, J. W., & Fischer, F. (2015). Inferring mindful cognitive-processing of peer-feedback via eye-tracking: Role of feedback-characteristics, fixation-durations and transitions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(5), 422-434. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12091
7. Chan, C., & van Aalst, J. (2018). Knowledge building: Theory, design, and analysis. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 295-307). New York: Routledge.
8. Collins, A. (2015). Cognitive apprenticeship: NAPLeS Webinar. Retrieved from http://isls-naples.psy.lmu.de/intro/all-webinars/collins/index.html
9. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 8(1), 2-10.
10. Collins, A., & Kapur, M. (2014). Cognitive apprenticeship. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 109-127). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Danish, J., & Gresalfi, M. (2018). Cognitive and sociocultural perspective on learning: Tensions and synergy in the Learning Sciences. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 34-43). New York: Routledge.
12. de Jong, T., Lazonder, A., Pedaste, M., & Zacharia, Z. (2018). Simulations, games, and modeling tools for learning. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Routledge.
13. Eberle, J., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2014). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice: Participation support structures for newcomers in faculty student councils. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 216-244. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2014.883978
14. Eberle, J., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2015). Moving beyond case studies: Applying social network analysis to study learning-as-participation. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(2), 100-112. doi: 10.1080/23735082.2015.1028712
15. Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2015). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.001
16. Goldman, S. R., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2018) Learning from multiple sources in a digital society, In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 86-95). New York: Routledge.
17. Graesser, A. C., Hu, X., & Sottilare, R. (2018). Intelligent tutoring systems. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 246-255). New York: Routledge.
18. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
19. Halverson, E., & Peppler, K. (2018). The Maker Movement and learning. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.). International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 285-294). New York: Routledge.
20. Heitzmann, N., Fischer, F., Kühne-Eversmann, L., & Fischer, M. R. (2015). Enhancing diagnostic competence with self-explanation prompts and adaptable feedback. Medical Education, 49(10), 993-1003. doi: 10.1111/medu.12778
21. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Kapur, M., & Hamstra, M. (2018) Learning through problem solving. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 210-220). New York: Routledge.
22. Hoadley, C., & van Heneghan, J. P. (2012). The Learning Sciences: Where they came from and what it means for instructional designers. In R. A. Reiser (Ed.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed., pp. 53-63). Boston, MA: Pearson.
23. Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Productive failure in learning from generation and invention activities. Instructional Science, 40(4), 645-650. doi: 10.1007/s11251-012-9235-4
24. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teach-ing. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
25. Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2013). Orchestration is nothing without conducting-but arranging ties the two together! A response to Dillenbourg (2011). Computers & Education, 69, 507-509.
26. Kollar, I., Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2018). Scaffolding and scripting (computer-supported) collaborative learn-ing. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 340-350). New York: Routledge.
27. Lambson, D. (2010). Novice teachers learning through participation in a teacher study group. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1660-1668. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.017
28. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Lindkvist, L. (2005). Knowledge communities and knowledge collectivities: A typology of knowledge work in groups. Journal of Management Review, 42(6), 1189-1210.
30. Linn, M. C., McElhaney, K. W., Gerard, L., & Matuk, C. (2018). Inquiry learning and opportunities for tech-nology. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 221-233). New York: Routledge.
31. Loibl, K., Roll, I., & Rummel, N. (2016). Towards a theory of when and how problem solving followed by instruction supports learning. Educational Psychology Review, 26(4), 435. doi: 10.1007/s10648-016-9379-x
32. Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2015). Productive failure as strategy against the double curse of incompetence. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(2), 113-121. doi: 10.1080/23735082.2015.1071231
33. Merriam, S. B., Courtenay, B., & Baumgartner, L. (2003). On becoming a witch: Learning in a marginalized community of practice. Adult Education Quarterly, 53(3), 170-188.
34. Mulder, Y. G., Lazonder, A. W., & Jong, T. de. (2014). Using heuristic worked examples to promote inquiry-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.08.001
35. Nistor, N. (2016). Quantitative analysis of newcomer integration in MMORPG communities. In Y. Li, M. Chang, M. Kravcik, E. Popescu, R. Huang, Kinshuk, & N.-S. Chen (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. State-of-the-Art and Future Directions of Smart Learning (pp. 131-136). Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-868-7_15
36. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557-576. doi: 10.3102/00346543074004557
37. Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2015). Successful learning with multiple graphical representations and self-explanation prompts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 30-46. doi: 10.1037/a0037211
38. Reimann, P., & Markauskaite, L. (2018). Expertise. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 54-63). New York: Routledge.
39. Rogoff, B. (1991). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Rogoff, B., Mystry, J., Göncü, A., & Mosier, C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 236.
42. Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Arauz, R. M., Correa-Chavez, M., & Angelillo, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175-203. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145118
43. Safran, L. (2010). Legitimate peripheral participation and home education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.002
44. Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Burlington: Elsevier Science.
45. Schwarz, B. B. (2018). Computer-supported argumentation and learning. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 318-329). New York: Routledge.
46. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X027002004
47. Slotta, J. D., Quintana, R., & Moher, T. (2018). Collective inquiry in communities of learners. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 308-317). New York: Routledge.
48. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31(5), 24-33.
49. Tabak, I., & Kyza., E. (2018). Research on scaffolding in the learning sciences: A methodological perspective. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 191-200). New York: Routledge.
50. Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2016). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7