Computer-supported argumentation and learning

International Handbook of the Learning Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 318-329

  Schwarz, Baruch B ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85049268386     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315617572     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). York, UK: Dialogos.
2. Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S.-Y., Reznitskaya, A., & Gilbert, L. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of chil-dren. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 1-46.
3. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Eds.) (2003). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
4. Asterhan, C. S. C. (2012). Facilitating classroom argumentation with computer technology. In R. Gillies (Ed.), Pedagogies: New developments in the learning sciences (pp. 105-129). New York: Nova Science.
5. Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2010). Online moderation of synchronous e-argumentation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 259-282.
6. Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B., & Gil, J. (2012). Guiding computer-mediated discussions in the classroom: Epistemic and interactional human guidance for small-group argumentation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 375-397.
7. Bodemer, D., Janssen, J., & Schnaubert, L. (2018) Group awareness tools for computer-supported collaborative learning. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 351-358). New York: Routledge.
8. Borge, M., Ong, Y. S. & Rosé, C. (2015). Activity design models to support the development of high quality collaborative processes in online settings. The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference Proceedings (pp. 427-434).
9. Brown, A. L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52(4), 399-413.
10. Chan, C., & van Aalst, J. (2018). Knowledge building: Theory, design, and analysis. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 295-307). New York: Routledge.
11. Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (2014). Developing dialogic argumentation skills: A three-year intervention study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 363-381.
12. de Vries, E., Lund, K., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumen-tation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 63-103.
13. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instruc-tional design. In P. A. Kirschner (ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61-91). Heerlen, Netherlands: Open Universiteit Nederland.
14. Dillenbourg, P., Prieto, L. P., & Olsen, J. K. (2018) Classroom orchestration. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 180-190). New York: Routledge.
15. Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
16. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56-66.
17. Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1), Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.
18. Iordanou, K. (2013). Developing face-to-face argumentation skills: Does arguing on the computer help? Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(2), 292-320.
19. Jadallah, M., Anderson, R.C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Miller, M., Kim, I.-H., Kuo, L.-J., et al. (2011). Influence of a teacher’s scaffolding moves during child-led small-group discussions. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 194-230.
20. Kollar, I., Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2018). Scaffolding and scripting (computer-supported) collaborative learn-ing. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 340-350). New York: Routledge.
21. Kuhn, D., Goh, W., Iordanou, K., & Shaenfield, D. (2008). Arguing on the computer: A microgenetic study of developing argument skills in a computer-supported environment. Child Development, 79, 1310-1328. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01190.x
22. McLaren, B. M., Scheuer, O., & Mikšátko, J. (2010). Supporting collaborative learning and e-discussions using artificial intelligence techniques. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 20, 1-46.
23. Mercer, N. (1995). The Guided Construction of Knowledge: talk amongst teachers and Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
24. Mercer, N., Warwick, P., Kershner, R., & Staarman, J. K. (2010). Can the interactive whiteboard help to pro-vide “dialogic space” for children’s collaborative activity? Language and Education, 24(5), 367-384.
25. Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. (2007). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 27, 283-297.
26. Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M. & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79-106.
27. Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Computers & Education, 61, 59-76.
28. Pifarré, M., & Staarman, J. K. (2011). Wiki-supported collaborative learning in primary education: How a dia-logic space is created for thinking together. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 187-205.
29. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37-68.
30. Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., & McLaren, B. M. (2010). Computer-supported argumentation: a review of the state-of-the-art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 43-102.
31. Schwarz, B. B., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2011). E-moderation of synchronous discussions in educational settings: A nascent practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 395-442.
32. Schwarz, B. B., & Baker, M. J. (2016). Dialogue, argumentation and education: History, theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Schwarz, B. B., & De Groot, R. (2007). Argumentation in a changing world. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 297-313.
34. Schwarz, B. B., Schur, Y., Pensso, H., & Tayer, N. (2011). Perspective taking and argumentation for learning the day/night cycle. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 113-138.
35. Schwarz, B. B., & Shahar, N. (2017). Combining the dialogic and the dialectic: Putting argumentation into practice for classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 12, 113-132.
36. Slakmon, B., & Schwarz, B. B. (2014). Disengaged students and dialogic learning: The role of CSCL affor-dances. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(2), 157-183.
37. Slakmon, B., & Schwarz, B. B. (2017). “You will be a polis”: Political (democratic?) education, public space and CSCL discussions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(2), 184-225.
38. Suthers, D. D. (2003). Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 27-46). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
39. Suthers, D. D., & Weiner, A. (1995). Groupware for developing critical discussion skills. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL '95, the First International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 341-348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum/University of Minnesota Press.
40. Tchounikine, P. (2016). Designing for appropriation: A theoretical account. Human Computer Interaction. doi: 10.1080/07370024.2016.1203263
41. Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Van Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 485-521.
43. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Henkenmans, F. S., Blair, J. A., Johnson, R. H., et al. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical background and contemporary developments. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Van Leeuwen, A., Van Wermeskerken, M., Erkens, G., & Rummel, N. (2017). Measuring teacher sense mak-ing strategies of learning analytics: a case study. Learning: Research and Practice, 3(1), 42-58. doi: 10.1080/23735082.2017.1284252
45. Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2011). From guided to self-regulated performance of domain-general skills: The role of peer monitoring during the fading of instructional scripts. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 746-756.
46. Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2014). Where is the evidence? A meta-analysis on the role of argumentation for the acquisition of domain-specific knowledge in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 75, 218-228.
47. Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic, educational and technology: Expanding the space of learning. New York: Springer-Verlag.
48. Wegerif, R. B., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empiri-cal investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9(6), 493-516.
49. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1-30.
50. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 416-426.