Expertise

International Handbook of the Learning Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 54-63

  Reimann, Peter ^a   Markauskaite, Lina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85049288438     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315617572     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisiton of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychological Review, 94, 192-210.
3. Bereiter, C. (2014). Principled practical knowledge: Not a bridge but a ladder. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 4-17.
4. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
5. Billett, S. (2001). Knowing in practice: Re-conceptualising vocational expertise. Learning and Instruction, 11(6), 431-452.
6. Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473-498.
7. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. C. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
9. Charness, N. (1976). Memory for chess positions: Resistance to interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 641-653.
10. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
11. Chi, M. T. H. (2011). Theoretical perspectives, methodological approaches, and trends in the study of expertise. In Y. Li & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Expertise in mathematics instruction: An international perspective (pp. 17-39). Boston, MA: Springer.
12. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, P. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
13. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Chi, M. T. H., & Koeske, R. (1983). Network representation of a child’s dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 19, 29-39.
15. Clark, A. (2011). Supersizing the mind. Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18. Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2018) Defining collective knowledge construction. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Routledge.
19. Danish, J., & Gresalfi, M. (2018). Cognitive and sociocultural perspective on learning: Tensions and synergy in the Learning Sciences. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 34-43). New York: Routledge.
20. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.) (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21. DeGroot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Haag, Netherlands: Mouton.
22. Eisenstadt, M., & Kareev, Y. (1979). Aspects of human problem solving: The use of internal representations. In D. A. Norman & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Exploration in cognition. San Francisco, CA: W H. Freeman.
23. Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, M. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 683-703). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24. Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.) (2009). Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25. Ericsson, K. A., Charness, M. N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26. Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adapta-tion to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273-305.
27. Feltovich, P. J., Prietula, M. J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In K. A. Ericsson, M. N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 41-68). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28. Fincher, S., & Tenenberg, J. (2005). Making sense of card sorting data. Expert Systems, 22(3), 89-93.
29. Glaser, R., & Chi, M. T. H. (1988). Overview. In M. T. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv-xxviii). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
31. Greeno, J. G., & Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 128-147). New York, NY: Cambride University Press.
32. Gupta, A., Hammer, D., & Redish, E. F. (2010). The case for dynamic models of learners’ ontologies in physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 285-321.
33. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. A. H. Stevenson & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262-272). New York, NY: Freeman.
34. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127.
35. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
36. Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31-68.
37. Klein, G., Calderwood, R., & Clinton-Cirocco, A. (1985). Rapid decision making on the fire ground (KATR-84-41-7). Yellow Springs, OH: Klein Associates Inc. Prepared under contract MDA903-85-G-0O99 for the US Army Research Institute, Alexandria, VA.
38. Lachner, A., & Nückles, M. (2016). Tell me why! Content knowledge predicts process-orientation of math researchers’ and math teachers’ explanations. Instructional Science, 44(3), 221-242.
39. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambride University Press.
40. Leinhardt, G. (1989). Math lessons: A contrast of novice and expert competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 52-75.
41. Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 247-271.
42. Li, Y., & Kaiser, G. (Eds.). (2011). Expertise in mathematics instruction: an international perspective. New York, NY: Springer.
43. Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014). Tapping into the mental resources of teachers’ working knowl-edge: Insights into the generative power of intuitive pedagogy. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(4), 237-251.
44. Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2017). Epistemic fluency and professional education: innovation, knowledgeable action and actionable knowledge. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
45. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus minus two. Some limits on our capacity to process infor-mation. Psychological Review, 63, 81-87.
46. Perry, L. R. (1965). Commonsense thought, knowledge and judgement and their importance for education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 13(2), 125-138.
47. Reimann, P., & Chi, M. T. H. (1989). Human expertise. In K. J. Gilhooly (Ed.), Human and machine problem solving (pp. 161-192). London, UK: Plenum Press.
48. Renninger, K. A., Ren, Y., & Kern, H. M. (2018). Motivation, engagement, and interest: “In the end, it came down to you and how you think of the problem.” In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 116-126). New York: Routledge.
49. Schmidt, H. G. (1993). Foundation of problem-based learning: Some explanatory notes. Medical Education. 27 (5), 422-432.
50. Seidel, T., & Stürmer, K. (2014). Modeling and measuring the structure of professional vision in preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 739-771.
51. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
52. Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257-271.
53. Simon, H. A., & Chase, W. G. (1973). Skill in chess. American Scientist, 61, 394-403.
54. Someren, M. W. v., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London, UK: Academic Press.
55. Torff, B. (1999). Tacit knowledge in teaching: Folk pedagogy and teacher education. In R. J. Sternberg & J. A. Horvath (Eds.), Tacit knowledge in professional practice: Researcher and practitioner perspectives (pp. 195-213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Torff, B., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2001). Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: Student and teacher learn-ing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., van den Bogert, N., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). Teacher vision: Expert and novice teachers’ perception of problematic classroom management scenes. Instructional Science, 44(3), 243-265.
58. Yinger, R., & Hendricks-Lee, M. (1993). Working knowledge in teaching. In C. Day, J. Calderhead, & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Research on teacher thinking: Understanding professional development (pp. 100-123). London, UK: Falmer Press.
59. Young, M., & Muller, J. (Eds.). (2014). Knowledge, expertise and the professions. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
60. Zeitz, C. M. (1997). Some concrete advantages of abstraction: How experts` representations facilitate reasoning. In P. J. Feltovich, K. M. Ford, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context: Human and machine. (pp. 43-65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.