Cognitive apprenticeship

The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 109-127

  Collins, Allan ^a   Kapur, Manu ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954116729     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Aronson, E. (1978). The Jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 269-292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
4. Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Vye, N. J., & Sherwood, R. D. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can’t be told. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 470-497). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
7. Burton, R., Brown, J. S., & Fischer, G. (1984). Skiing as a model of instruction. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its developmental and social context (pp. 139-150). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W, Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). SelfExplanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. CognitiveScience, 13, 145-182.
9. Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.) (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Collins, A., & Brown, J. S. (1988). The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issuesfor intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 1-18). New York: Springer.
12. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Collins, A., & Smith, E. E. (1982). Teaching the process of reading comprehension. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), How much and how can intelligence be increased? (pp. 173-185). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Collins, A., & Stevens, A. L. (1983). A cognitive theory of interactive teaching. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview (pp. 247-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Cuban, L. (1984). How teachers taught. New York: Longman.
16. Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (Eds.) (2004). Special issue: Scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265-451.
17. Gardner, H. (1991). Assessment in context: The alternative to standardized testing. In B. Gifford & C. O’Connor (Eds.), Future assessments: Changing views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction (pp. 77-120). Boston: Kluwer.
18. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. In L. Resnick, J. Levin, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 331-348). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition andInstruction, 26(3), 379-424.
20. Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science, 40 (4), 651-672.
21. Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21 (1), 45-83.
22. Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Productive failure in learning and problem solving. Instructional Science, 40 (4), 645-650.
23. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning-by-design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547.
24. Lampert, M., Rittenhouse, P., & Crumbaugh, C. (1996). Agreeing to disagree: Developing sociable mathematical discourse. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Handbook of Education and Human Development (pp. 731-764). Oxford: Blackwell ‘s Press.
25. Lave, J. (1988). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding (Report № IRL88-0007). Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.
26. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (1979). The hidden costs of reward. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Norman, D. A. (1973). Memory, knowledge, and the answering of questions. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Contemporary issues in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium (pp. 135-165). Washington, DC: Winston.
29. Nowakowski, A., Campbell, R., Monson, D., Montgomery, J., Moffett, C., Acovelli, M., Schank, R., & Collins, A. (1994). Goal-based scenarios: A new approach to professional education. Educational Technology, 34 (9), 3-32.
30. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
31. Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., & Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (3), 337-386.
32. Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (3), 273-304.
33. Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 345-372.
34. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
35. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Steinbach, R. (1984). Teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive Science, 8, 173-190.
36. Schank, R. C., Fano, A., Bell, B., & Jona, M. (1994). The design of goal-based scenarios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(4), 305-346.
37. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
38. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
39. Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. CognitionandInstruction, 22(2), 129-184.
40. Smith, F. (1988). Joining the literacy club. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
41. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideasfrom the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
42. Van Lehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., & Baggett, W B. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition and Instruction, 21(3), 209-249.
43. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. White, B. Y (1984). Designing computer games to help physics students understand Newton’s laws of motion. Cognition and Instruction, 1(1), 69-108.
46. White, B. Y, & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16 (1), 3-118.
47. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89-100.