Enhancing diagnostic competence with self-explanation prompts and adaptable feedback

Medical Education

Volumn 49, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 993-1003

  Heitzmann, Nicole ^a,b   Fischer, Frank ^b   Kühne Eversmann, Lisa ^a   Fischer, Martin R ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PROCEDURES; TEACHING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84942019878     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12778     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Charlin B, Tardif J, Boshuizen HPA. Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Acad Med 2000;75:182-90.
2. Charlin B, Boshuizen HPA, Custers EJ, Feltovich PJ. Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2007;41:1178-84.
3. Charlin B, Lubarsky S, Millette B, Crevier F, Audétat M-C, Charbonneau A, Claire Fon N, Hoff L, Bourdy C. Clinical reasoning processes: unravelling complexity through graphical representation. Med Educ 2012;46:454-63.
4. Patel VL, Evans DA, Groen GJ. Reconciling basic science and clinical reasoning. Teach Learn Med 1989;1:116-21.
5. Kaufman D, Yoskowitz A, Patel VL. Clinical reasoning and biomedical knowledge: implications for teaching. In: (Jones M, Loftus S, Christensen N, eds). Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences 2008;137-50.
6. Mamede S, van Gog T, Moura AS, de Faria RMD, Peixoto JM, Rikers RMJP, Schmidt H. Reflection as a strategy to foster medical students' acquisition of diagnostic competence. Med Educ 2012;46:464-72.
7. Schmidt HG, Rikers RMJP. How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ 2007;41:1133-9.
8. Woods NN. Science is fundamental: the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2007;41:1173-7.
9. Gräsel C, Mandl H. Förderung des Erwerbs diagnostischer Strategien in fallbasierten Lernumgebungen [Promoting the acquisition of diagnostic strategies in case-based learning environments]. Unterrichtswissenschaft 1993;21:355-69.
10. Stark R, Kopp V, Fischer MR. Case-based learning with worked examples in complex domains: to experimental studies in undergraduate medical education. Learn Instr 2011;21:22-33.
11. Kopp V, Stark R, Fischer MR. Fostering diagnostic knowledge through computer-supported, case-based worked examples: effects of erroneous examples and feedback. Med Educ 2008;42:823-9.
12. Paris SG, Lipson MY, Wixson KK. Becoming a strategic reader. Contemp Educ Psychol 1983;8:293-316.
13. van Gog T, Paas F, van Merriënboer JJG. Process-oriented worked examples: improving transfer performance through enhanced understanding. Instr Sci Int J Learn Cogn 2004;32:83-98.
14. Rittle-Johnson B, Siegler RS, Alibali MW. Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: an iterative process. J Educ Psychol 2001;93:346-62.
15. Eva KW. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2004;39:98-106.
16. Norman GR. Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends. Med Educ 2005;39:418-27.
17. Mamede S, van Gog T, Sampaio AM, de Faria RMD, Maria JP, Schmidt HG. How can students' diagnostic competence benefit most from practice with clinical cases? the effects of structured reflection on future diagnosis of the same and novel diseases. Acad Med 2014;89:121-7.
18. Kirschner PA, Sweller J, Clark RE. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educ Psychol 2006;41:75-86.
19. van Merriënboer JJG. Perspectives on problem solving and instruction. Comput Educ 2013;64:153-60.
20. Renkl A, Atkinson RK. Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving. In: Plass JL, Moreno R, Brünken R, eds. Cognitive Load Theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press 2010;91-108.
21. Stark R. Lernen mit Lösungsbeispielen. [Learning by Worked Examples]. Göttingen: Hogrefe-Verlag 1999.
22. Schworm S, Renkl A. Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. J Educ Psychol 2007;99:285-96.
23. Renkl A. Learning from worked-out examples: a study on individual differences. Cogn Sci Multidiscip J 1997;21:1-29.
24. Booth JL, Lange KE, Koedinger KR, Newton KJ. Using example problems to improve student learning in algebra: differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learn Instr 2013;25:24-34.
25. Grosse CS, Renkl A. Learning from worked examples: what happens if errors are included? In: Gerjet P, Elen J, Joiner R, Kirschner PA, eds. Instructional Design for Effective and Enjoyable Computer-supported Learning. Tübingen: Knowledge Media Research Center 2004;356-64.
26. Grosse CS, Renkl A. Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: can this foster learning outcomes? Learn Instr 2007;17:612-34.
27. Kopp V, Stark R, Kühne-Eversmann L, Fischer MR. Do worked examples foster medical students' diagnostic knowledge of hyperthyroidism? Med Educ 2009;43:1210-7.
28. Holmes NG, Day J, Park AHK, Bonn DA, Roll I. Making the failure more productive: scaffolding the invention process to improve inquiry behaviours and outcomes in invention activities. Instr Sci 2014;42:523-38.
29. Loibl K, Rummel N. The impact of guidance during problem-solving prior to instruction on students' inventions and learning outcomes. Instr Sci 2014;42:305-26.
30. Quintana C, Reiser BJ, Davis EA, Krajcik J, Fretz E, Duncan RG, Kyza E, Edelson D, Soloway E. A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. J Learn Sci 2004;13:337-86.
31. Chamberland M, St-Onge C, Setrakian J, Lanthier L, Bergeron L, Bourget A, Mamede S, Schmidt H, Rikers RMJP. The influence of medical students' self-explanations on diagnostic performance. Med Educ 2011;45:688-95.
32. Chamberland M, Mamede S, St-Onge C, Rivard M-A, Setrakian J, Lévesque A, Lanthier L, Schmidt HG, Rikers RMJP. Students' self-explanations while solving unfamiliar cases: the role of biomedical knowledge. Med Educ 2013;47:1109-16.
33. Chamberland M, Mamede S, St-Onge C, Setrakian J, Bergeron L, Schmidt H. Self-explanation in learning clinical reasoning: the added value of examples and prompts. Med Educ 2015;49:193-202.
34. Berthold K, Eysink THS, Renkl A. Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instr Sci 2009;37:345-63.
35. Ohlsson S. Learning from error and the design of task environments. Int J Educ Res 1996;25:419-48.
36. Schank RC. Dynamic Memory Revisited, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999.
37. Kolodner JL. Case-based reasoning. In: Sawyer RK, ed. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press 2006;225-42.
38. Strijbos J-W, Narciss S, Dünnebier K. Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learn Instr 2010;20:291-303.
39. Kalyuga S, Ayres P, Chandler P, Sweller J. The expertise reversal effect. Educ Psychol 2003;38:23-31.
40. van Gog T, Paas F, van Merriënboer JJG. Effects of studying sequences of process-oriented and product-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer efficiency. Learn Instr 2008;18:211-22.
41. Aleven V, Stahl E, Schworm S, Fischer F, Wallace R. Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Rev Educ Res 2003;73:277-320.
42. Narciss S, Proske A, Koerndle H. Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Comput Hum Behav 2007;23:1126-44.
43. Wittwer J, Renkl A. Why instructional explanations often do not work: a framework for understanding the effectiveness of instructional explanations. Educ Psychol 2008;43:49-64.
44. Chi MTH. Self-explaining: the dual processes of generating inference and repairing mental models. In: Glaser R, ed. Advances in Instructional Psychology: Educational Design and Cognitive Science, vol 5. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2000;161-238.
45. Richey JE, Nokes-Malach TJ. How much is too much? Learning and motivation effects of adding instructional explanations to worked examples. Learn Instr 2013;25:104-24.
46. Fischer MR. CASUS - an authoring and learning tool supporting diagnostic reasoning. Zeitschr Hochschuldidaktik 2000;1:87-98.
47. Farmer EA, Page G. A practical guide to assessing clinical decision-making skills using the key features approach. Med Educ 2005;39:1188-94.
48. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1988.
49. Pearson ES, Hartley HO. Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, vol I. London: Biometrika Trust 1976.
50. Corbett AT, Anderson JR. Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes. In: Jacko JS, Sears A, Beaudouin-Lafon M, Jacob R, eds. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press 2001;245-52.
51. Barnett SM, Ceci SJ. When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychol Bull 2002;128:612-37.
52. Stark R, Tyroller M, Krause U-M, Mandl H. Effekte einer metakognitiven Promptingmassnahme beim situierten, beispielbasierten Lernen im Bereich Korrelationsrechnung [Effects of a prompting intervention in situated, example-based learning in the domain of correlation]. Z Pädagog Psychol 2008;22:59-71.
53. Schworm S, Renkl A. Computer-supported example-based learning: when instructional explanations reduce self-explanations. Comput Educ 2006;46:426-45.
54. Aleven V, Koedinger KR. An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cogn Sci 2002;26:147-79.
55. McLaren BM, Adams D, Durkin K, Goguadze G, Mayer RE, Rittle-Johnson B, Sosnovsky S, Isotani S, Velsen M. To err is human, to explain and correct is divine: a study of interactive erroneous examples with middle school math students. In: Ravenscroft A, Lindstaedt S, Kloos CD, Hernández-Leo D, eds. 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer 2012;222-35.
56. Ericsson K, Simon H. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, rev edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1993.