Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility

Academy of Management Annals

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 105-149

  Bansal, Pratima ^a   Song, Hee Chan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85045102593     PISSN: 19416520     EISSN: 19416067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/annals.2015.0095     Document Type: Article

References (333)

1. Acquier, A., Gond, J. P., & Pasquero, J. 2011. Rediscovering Howard R. Bowen’s legacy the unachieved agenda and continuing relevance of social responsibilities of the businessman. Business & Society, 50: 607–646.
2. Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. 1998. An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35: 641–654.
3. Adams, R. B., Licht, A. N., & Sagiv, L. 2011. Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1331–1355.
4. Adler, P. S., Forbes, L. C., & Willmott, H. 2007. Critical management studies. Academy of Management Annals, 1: 119–179.
5. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 507–525.
6. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. 2007. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32: 836–863.
7. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. 2012. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38: 932–968.
8. Ansari, S., Wijen, F., & Gray, B. 2013. Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons.” Organization Science, 24: 1014–1040.
9. Albertini, E. 2013. Does environmental management improve financial performance? A meta-analytical review. Organization & Environment, 26: 431–457.
10. Amaral, L. A. N., & Uzzi, B. 2007. Complex systems: A new paradigm for the integrative study of management, physical, and technological systems. Management Science, 53: 1033–1035.
11. Anderson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. 2000. Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in US business organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 548–570.
12. Andrew, R. S. (2008). Lehman files for bankruptcy: Merrill is sold. New York Times. September 14.
13. Aragón-Correa, J. A. 1998. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 556–567.
14. Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. 2003. A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28: 71–88.
15. Arora, S., & Cason, T. N. 1996. Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? Understanding participation in EPA’s 33/50 program. Land Economics, 72: 413–432.
16. Arya, B., & Zhang, G. 2009. Institutional reforms and investor reactions to CSR announcements: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 1089–1112.
17. Ashforth, B. E., & Reingen, P. H. 2014. Functions of dysfunction managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59: 474–516.
18. Asongu, J. J. 2007. Innovation as an argument for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business and Public Policy, 1: 1–21.
19. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. 1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 446–463.
20. Bak, P., Tang, C., & Wiesenfeld, K. 1988. Self-organized criticality. Physical Review A., 38: 364–374.
21. Banerjee, S. B. 2001. Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: Interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38: 489–513.
22. Banerjee, S. B. 2008. Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34: 51–79.
23. Banerjee, S. B. 2011. Critical perspectives on business and natural environment. In P. Bansal & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment: 572–590. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24. Bansal, P. 2002. The corporate challenges of sustainable development. Academy of Management Executive, 16: 122–131.
25. Bansal, P. 2003. From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14: 510–527.
26. Bansal, P. 2005. Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 197–218.
27. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. 2004. Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 93–103.
28. Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. R. 2014. Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12: 70–78.
29. Bansal, P., & Gao, J. 2006. Building the future by looking to the past examining research published on organizations and environment. Organization & Environment, 19: 458–478.
30. Bansal, P., Gao, J., & Qureshi, I. 2014. The extensiveness of corporate social and environmental commitment across firms over time. Organization Studies, 35: 949–966.
31. Bansal, P., & Hunter, T. 2003. Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001. Journal of Business Ethics, 46: 289–299.
32. Bansal, P., Kim, H. S. A., & Wood, M. In press. Hidden in plain sight: The importance of scale on organizational attention to issues. Academy of Management Review.
33. Bansal, P., & Knox-Hayes, J. 2013. The time and space of materiality in organizations and the natural environment. Organization & Environment, 26: 61–82.
34. Bansal, P., & McKnight, B. 2009. Looking forward, pushing back and peering sideways: Analyzing the sustainability of industrial symbiosis. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45: 26–37.
35. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 717–736.
36. Barnard, C. I. 1938. The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Barnett, M. L. 2007. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32: 794–816.
38. Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. 2012. Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 1304–1320.
39. Bartley, T., & Child, C. 2011. Movements, markets and fields: The effects of anti-sweatshop campaigns on US firms, 1993-2000. Social Forces, 90: 425–451.
40. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial micro-finance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1419–1440.
41. Battilana, J., & Lee, M. 2014. Advancing research on hybrid organizing: Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8: 397–441.
42. Berchicci, L., Dowell, G., & King, A. A. 2012. Environmental capabilities and corporate strategy: Exploring acquisitions among US manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 1053–1071.
43. Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York, NY: Macmillan.
44. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 488–506.
45. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. 2010. Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 82–113.
46. Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 2009. Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 103–126.
47. Boulding, K. E. 1956. General systems theory-the skeleton of science. Management Science, 2: 197–208.
48. Bowen, H. R. 1953. Social responsibility of the businessman. New York, NY: Harper.
49. Bowen, F. E. 2002. Organizational slack and corporate greening: Broadening the debate. British Journal of Management, 13: 305–316.
50. Brammer, S. J., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-economic Review, 10: 3–28.
51. Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. 2006. Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 435–455.
52. Brammer, S. J., Pavelin, S., & Porter, L. A. 2009. Corporate charitable giving, multinational companies and countries of concern. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 575–596.
53. Branzei, O., Ursacki-Bryant, T. J., Vertinsky, I., & Zhang, W. 2004. The formation of green strategies in Chinese firms: Matching corporate environmental responses and individual principles. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 1075–1095.
54. Brickson, S. L. 2007. Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. Academy of Management Review, 32: 864–888.
55. Briscoe, F., & Gupta, A. 2016. Social activism in and around organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10: 1–57.
56. Briscoe, F., Gupta, A., & Anner, M. S. 2015. Social activism and practice diffusion: How activist tactics affect non-targeted organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60: 300–332.
57. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. 2003. Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 453–470.
58. Byrch, C., Milne, M. J., Morgan, R., & Kearins, K. 2015. Seeds of hope? Exploring business actors’ diverse understandings of sustainable development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28: 671–705.
59. Campbell, J. L. 2007. Why would firms behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32: 946–967.
60. Carroll, A. B. 1999. Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38: 268–295.
61. Chan, R. Y. K. 2005. Does the natural-resource-based view of the firm apply in an emerging economy? A survey of foreign invested enterprises in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 625–672.
62. Chatterji, A. K., Durand, R., Levine, D. I., & Touboul, S. 2016. Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 1597–1614.
63. Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. 2009. How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18: 125–169.
64. Chen, M. J. 2008. Reconceptualizing the competition-cooperation relationship: A transparadox perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17: 288–304.
65. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1–23.
66. Chertow, M. R. 2007. “Uncovering” industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11: 11–30.
67. Chin, M., Hambrick, D. C., & Treviño, L. K. 2013. Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 197–232.
68. Chiu, S. C., & Sharfman, M. 2011. Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: An investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management, 37: 1558–1585.
69. Christmann, P. 2000. Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 663–680.
70. Christmann, P. 2004. Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 747–760.
71. Clarkson, M. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20: 92–117.
72. Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. 1984. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27: 42–56.
73. Colbert, B. A. 2004. The complex resource-based view: Implications for theory and practice in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 29: 341–358.
74. Crane, A. 2013. Modern slavery as a management practice: Exploring the conditions and capabilities for human exploitation. Academy of Management Review, 38: 49–69.
75. Crilly, D. 2011. Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A mid-range theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 42: 694–717.
76. Crilly, D., & Sloan, P. 2012. Enterprise logic: Explaining corporate attention to stakeholders from the “inside-out.” Strategic Management Journal, 33: 1174–1193.
77. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. 1955. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52: 281–302.
78. Crouch, C. 2006. Modelling the firm in its market and organizational environment: Methodologies for studying corporate social responsibility. Organization Studies, 27: 1533–1551.
79. Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. 2010. Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 1072–1094.
80. David, P., Bloom, M., & Hillman, A. J. 2007. Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 91–100.
81. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22: 20–47.
82. Davis, K., & Blomstrom, R. L. 1966. Business and its environment. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
83. Deckop, J. R., Merriman, K. K., & Gupta, S. 2006. The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 32: 329–342.
84. de la Merced, M. J., & Sorkin, A. R. (2010). Report details how Lehman hid its woes. New York Times. March 11.
85. Delmas, M. A. 2002. The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy Sciences, 35: 91–119.
86. Delmas, M. A., Russo, M. V., & Montes-Sancho, M. J. 2007. Deregulation and environmental differentiation in the electric utility industry. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 189–209.
87. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. 2004. Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13: 209–222.
88. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. 2008. Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1027–1055.
89. Delmas, M. A., & Tokat, Y. 2005. Deregulation, governance structures, and efficiency: The US electric utility sector. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 441–460.
90. Den Hond, F., & De Bakker, F. G. 2007. Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32: 901–924.
91. Dent, E. B. 1999. Complexity science: A worldview shift. Emergence, 1: 5–19.
92. DesJardins, J. 2016. Is it time to jump off the sustainability bandwagon? Business Ethics Quarterly, 26: 117–135.
93. De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & van Staden, C. J. 2011. The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37: 1636–1663.
94. Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. 2006. Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional– stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 47–73.
95. Donaldson, T. 1994. When integration fails: The logic of prescription and description in business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 157–169.
96. Donaldson, T. 2012. The epistemic fault line in corporate governance. Academy of Management Review, 37: 256–271.
97. Donaldson, T. 2015. Where the facts end: Richard De George and the rise of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 127: 783–787.
98. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65–91.
99. Donaldson, T., & Walsh, J. P. 2015. Toward a theory of business. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35: 181–207.
100. Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. 2000. Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46: 1059–1074.
101. Drucker, P. F. 1954. The practice of management. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
102. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. 2010. Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12: 8–19.
103. Eells, R. S. F. 1960. The meaning of modern business. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
104. Egri, C. P., & Herman, S. 2000. Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 571–604.
105. Ehrenfeld, R. 2008. Sustaniability by design: A subversive strategy for transforming our consumer culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
106. Ehrenfeld, R. 2011. Beyond the brave new world: Business for sustainability. In P. Bansal & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment: 611–619. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
107. Einstein, A. (1939). Science and religion. Address at Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, NJ, May 19, 1939. http://www.panarchy.org/einstein/science. religion.1939.html. Accessed August 31, 2015.
108. Einstein, A. (1941). Science and religion. In Science, philosophy and religion, a symposium. (New York: The Conference on Science, Philosophy and Religion in Their Relation to the Democratic Way of Life, Inc., 1941). http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/library/ae_scire.htm.
109. El Akremi, A., Gond, J. P., Swaen, V., De Roeck, K., & Igalens, J. (2015). How do employees perceive corporate responsibility? Development and validation of a multidimensional corporate stakeholder responsibility scale. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206315569311.
110. Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Vancouver, Canada: New Society Publishers.
111. Etzion, D. 2007. Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992–present: A review. Journal of Management, 33: 637–664.
112. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. 2005. Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30: 8–24.
113. Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. 2011. The Feynman lectures on physics. New York, NY: Basic books.
114. Flammer, C. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 758–781.
115. Flammer, C. 2015. Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 1469–1485.
116. Flammer, C., & Kacperczyk, A. J. 2015. The impact of stakeholder orientation on innovation, Evidence from a natural experiment. Management Science, 62: 1982–2001.
117. Flannery, B. L., & May, D. R. 2000. Environmental ethical decision making in the US metal-finishing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 642–662.
118. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. 2002. Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31: 437–440.
119. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 233–258.
120. Frederick, W. C. 1960. The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review, 2: 54–61.
121. Frederick, W. C. 1994a. From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business-and-society thought. Business & Society, 33: 150–164.
122. Frederick, W. C. 1994b. The virtual reality of fact vs. value: A symposium commentary. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 171–173.
123. Freeman, R. E. 1995. Stakeholder thinking: The state of the art. In J. Nasi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking: 35–46. Helsinki, Finland: LSR-Publications.
124. Freeman, R. E., Martin, K., & Parmar, B. 2007. Stakeholder capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 74: 303–314.
125. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. 2004. Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited.” Organization Science, 15: 364–369.
126. Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
127. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times. September 13, 122–126.
128. Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4: 75–91.
129. Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. 1996. Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21: 13–47.
130. Gilley, K. M., Worrell, D. L., Davidson, W. N., & El–Jelly, A. 2000. Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance: The differential effects of process-driven versus product-driven greening initiatives. Journal of Management, 26: 1199–1216.
131. Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T.-S. 1995. Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20: 874–907.
132. Glieck, J. 1987. Chaos: Making a new science. New York, NY: Viking Press.
133. Godfrey, P. C. 2005. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30: 777–798.
134. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 425–445.
135. Gond, J. P., & Crane, A. 2008. Corporate social performance disoriented: Saving the lost paradigm? Business & Society, 49: 677–703.
136. Guay, T., Doh, J. P., & Sinclair, G. 2004. Non-governmental organizations, shareholder activism, and socially responsible investments: Ethical, strategic, and governance implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 52: 125–139.
137. Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. 1994. Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1034–1046.
138. Gray, R., & Milne, M. J. 2015. It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it? Of method and madness. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 32: 51–66.
139. Grunig, J. E. 1979. A new measure of public opinion on corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 22: 738–764.
140. Gupta, A., Briscoe, F., & Hambrick, D. C. 2016. Red, blue, and purple firms: Organizational political ideology and corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal. doi: 10.1002/smj.2550.
141. Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D., & Wickert, C. 2012. Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33: 815–845.
142. Hahn, T., & Figge, F. 2011. Beyond the bounded instrumentality in current corporate sustainability research: Toward an inclusive notion of profitability. Journal of Business Ethics, 104: 325–345.
143. Hahn, T., Figge, F., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. 2015a. Advancing research on corporate sustainability: Off to pastures new or back to the roots? Business & Society. doi: 10.1177/0007650315576152.
144. Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. 2015b. Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127: 297–316.
145. Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. 2014. Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39: 463–487.
146. Haidt, J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108: 814–834.
147. Hart, S. L. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20: 986–1014.
148. Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. 1996. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5: 30–37.
149. Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. 2011. A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37: 1464–1479.
150. Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. 2003. Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17: 56–67.
151. Hasnas, J. 1998. The normative theories of business ethics: A guide for the perplexed. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8: 19–42.
152. Heald, M. 1957. Management’s responsibility to society: The growth of an idea. Business History Review, 31: 375–384.
153. Heald, M. 1970. The social responsibilities of business: Company and community, 1900-1960. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University Press.
154. Helms, W., Oliver, C., & Webb, K. 2012. Antecedents of settlement on a new institutional practice: Negotiation of the ISO 26000 standard on social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1120–1145.
155. Hiatt, S. R., Sine, W. D., & Tolbert, P. S. 2009. From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 635–667.
156. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22: 125–139.
157. Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. 1999. Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10: 199–212.
158. Hoffman, A. J. 1999. Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 351–371.
159. Hoffman, A. J., & Bansal, P. 2011. Retrospective, and perspective, and prospective: Introduction to the Oxford handbook on business and the natural environment. In P. Bansal & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment: 3–25. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
160. Holland, J. 1992. Genetic algorithms. Scientific American, 267: 66–72.
161. Holling, C. S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4: 1–23.
162. Holling, C. S. 1986. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In W. C. Clark & R. E. Munn (Eds.), Sustainable development of the biosphere: 292–317. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
163. Holling, C. S. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems (New York, N.Y.), 4: 390–405.
164. Hond, F., Rehbein, K. A., Bakker, F. G., & Kooijmans-van Lankveld, H. 2014. Playing on two chessboards: Reputation effects between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate political activity (CPA). Journal of Management Studies, 51: 790–813.
165. Hosmer, L. T. 1994. Strategic planning as if ethics mattered. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 17–34.
166. Huemer, M. 2005. Ethical intuitionism. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
167. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. 2012. What drives corporate social performance?: The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43: 834–864.
168. Jalabert, R. A., Baranger, H. U., & Stone, A. D. 1990. Conductance fluctuations in the ballistic regime: A probe of quantum chaos? Physical Review Letters, 65: 2442–2445.
169. Janney, J. J., & Gove, S. 2011. Reputation and corporate social responsibility aberrations, trends, and hypocrisy: Reactions to firm choices in the stock option backdating scandal. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 1562–1585.
170. Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. 2010. Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94: 371–394.
171. Jawahar, I. M., & McLaughlin, G. L. 2001. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26: 397–414.
172. Jay, J. 2013. Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 137–159.
173. Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. 1995. Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20: 1015–1052.
174. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. 1999. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 564–576.
175. Judge, W. Q., & Douglas, T. J. 1998. Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Journal of Management Studies, 35: 241–262.
176. Julian, S. D., &Ofori‐dankwa, J. C. 2013. Financial resource availability and corporate social responsibility expenditures in a sub‐Saharan economy: The institutional difference hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 1314–1330.
177. Kacperczyk, A. 2009. With greater power comes greater responsibility? Takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 261–285.
178. Kaltenmark, M. 1969. Lao Tzu and Taoism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
179. Kang, J. 2013. The relationship between corporate diversification and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 94–109.
180. Kant, I., Wood, A. W., & Schneewind, J. B. 2002. Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
181. Kaplan, R. 2015. Who has been regulating whom, business or society? The mid-20th-century institutionalization of “corporate responsibility” in the USA. Socioeconomic Review, 13: 125–155.
182. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. 2006. Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 145–159.
183. Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. 1972. General systems theory: Applications for organization and management. Academy of Management Journal, 15: 447–465.
184. Kauffman, S. A. 1993. The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
185. Khanna, M., & Anton, W. R. Q. 2002. Corporate environmental management: Regulatory and market-based incentives. Land Economics, 78: 539–558.
186. Khanna, T., Song, J., & Lee, K. 2011. The paradox of Sam-sung’s rise. Harvard Business Review, 89: 142–147.
187. Khavul, S., & Bruton, G. D. 2013. Harnessing innovation for change: Sustainability and poverty in developing countries. Journal of Management Studies, 50: 285–306.
188. King, B. G. 2008. A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 395–421.
189. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. 2000. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 698–716.
190. King, B. G., & Pearce, N. A. 2010. The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 36: 249–267.
191. Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42: 1199–1214.
192. Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. 1999. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 599–615.
193. Koh, P.-S., Qian, C., & Wang, H. 2014. Firm litigation risk and the insurance value of corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1464–1482.
194. Kramer, M. R. 2011. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89: 62–77.
195. Kuhn, T. S. 1962/2012. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
196. Lee, M. D. P. 2008. A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10: 53–73.
197. Lenox, M., & King, A. 2004. Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 331–345.
198. LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. 2002. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 52–65.
199. Levinthal, D. A. 1997. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43: 934–950.
200. Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. 2004. The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68: 16–32.
201. Linnenluecke, M. K., & Griffiths, A. 2013. Firms and sustainability: Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability field. Global Environmental Change, 23: 382–391.
202. Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 115–136.
203. Lounsbury, M. 2001. Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 29–56.
204. Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M., & Hirsch, P. M. 2003. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socioeconomic Review, 1: 71–104.
205. Lovins, A. B., Lovins, L. H., & Hawken, P. 2007. A road map for natural capitalism. Harvard Business Review, 85: 172–183.
206. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. 2006. Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70: 1–18.
207. Lyneis, J., & Sterman, J. 2016. How to save a leaky ship: Capability traps and the failure of win–win investments in sustainability and social responsibility. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2: 7–32.
208. Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32: 817–835.
209. Macy, J. 1991. Mutual causality in Buddhism and general systems theory: The dharma of natural systems. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
210. Mair, J., & Martí, I. 2006. Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41: 36–44.
211. Marcus, A. A., & Anderson, M. H. 2006. A general dynamic capability: Does it propagate business and social competencies in the retail food industry? Journal of Management Studies, 43: 19–46.
212. Marcus, A. A., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Pinkse, J. 2011. Firms, regulatory uncertainty, and the natural environment. California Management Review, 54: 5–16.
213. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 268–305.
214. Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. F. 2007. Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32: 925–945.
215. Matten, D., & Crane, A. 2005. Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30: 166–179.
216. Matten, D., & Moon, J. 2008. “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33: 404–424.
217. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 854–872.
218. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 603–609.
219. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26: 117–127.
220. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. 2011. Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37: 1480–1495.
221. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1–18.
222. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. 1972. The limits to growth. New York, NY: Universe Books.
223. Meadows, D. H., & Wright, D. 2008. Thinking in systems: A primer. Hartford, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
224. Mele, C., Pels, J., & Polese, F. 2010. A brief review of systems theories and their managerial applications. Service Science, 2: 126–135.
225. Melé, D. 2012. The Christian notion of Agánh (agápe): Towards a more complete view of business ethics. In P. Prastacos, F. Wang & E. Soderquist (Eds.), Leadership through the classics: Learning management and leadership from ancient East and West philosophy: 79–91. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin.
226. Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. 2013. W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118: 13–29.
227. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22: 853–886.
228. Montiel, I. 2008. Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability separate pasts, common futures. Organization & Environment, 21: 245–269.
229. Montiel, I., & Delgado-Ceballos, J. 2014. Defining and measuring corporate sustainability are we there yet? Organization & Environment, 27: 113–139.
230. Mothersill, M. 1962. Anscombe’s account of the practical syllogism. Philosophical Review, 71: 448–461.
231. Muller, A., & Kolk, A. 2010. Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: Evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 1–26.
232. Murillo-Luna, J. L., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. 2008. Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders’ pressure approach. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1225–1240.
233. Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. 2006. Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management, 32: 108–131.
234. Newton, T. J. 2002. Creating the new ecological order? Elias and actor-network theory. Academy of Management Review, 27: 523–540.
235. Nicolis, G., & Prigogine, I. 1977. Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems. New York, NY: Wiley.
236. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. 2009. Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87: 56–64.
237. Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. 2014. The financial effects of uniform and mixed corporate social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 51: 898–925.
238. Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. 2001. Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business & Society, 40: 369–396.
239. Orlitzky, M., Louche, C., Gond, J. P., & Chapple, W. 2015. Unpacking the drivers of corporate social performance: A multilevel, multistakeholder, and multimethod analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2822-y.
240. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24: 403–441.
241. Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Bansal, P. 2016. The long‐term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 1615–1631.
242. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
243. Paquin, R. L., & Howard-Grenville, J. 2012. The evolution of facilitated industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16: 83–93.
244. Parsons, T. 1949. The structure of social action. New York, NY: Free Press.
245. Peloza, J. 2009. The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35: 1518–1541.
246. Peter, J. P. 1981. Construct validity: A review of basic issues and marketing practices. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 133–145.
247. Pfeffer, J. 1993. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18: 599–620.
248. Plowman, D. A., Baker, L. T., Beck, T. E., Kulkarni, M., Solansky, S. T., & Travis, D. V. 2007. Radical change accidentally: The emergence and amplification of small change. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 515–543.
249. Polanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation: The political and economic origin of our time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
250. Preston, L. E., & Post, J. E. 1975. Private management and public policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
251. Prigogine, I. 1984. Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
252. Purser, R. E., Park, C., & Montuori, A. 1995. Limits to an-thropocentrism: Toward an ecocentric organization paradigm? Academy of Management Review, 20: 1053–1089.
253. Putnam, H. 2002. The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
254. Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. 2016. Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10: 65–171.
255. Ramchander, S., Schwebach, R. G., & Staking, K. I. M. 2012. The informational relevance of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from DS400 index re-constitutions. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 303–314.
256. Ramus, C. A., & Steger, U. 2000. The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee “ecoinitiatives” at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 605–626.
257. Rawls, J. 2009. A theory of justice. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
258. Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., & Graves, S. B. 2004. Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business & Society, 43: 239–267.
259. Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. 2009. Responding to public and private politics, corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 1157–1178.
260. Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & von Hagen, O. 2012. The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33: 791–814.
261. Repenning, N. P., & Sterman, J. D. 2002. Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 265–295.
262. Rolston, H., III. 1987. Science and religion. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
263. Roome, N. 1992. Developing environmental management strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1: 11–24.
264. Roome, N. 2011. Looking back, thinking forward: Distinguishing between weak and strong sustainability. In P. Bansal & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment: 620–629. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
265. Rowley, T. J. 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22: 887–910.
266. Russo, M. V. 2003. The emergence of sustainable industries: Building on natural capital. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 317–331.
267. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 534–559.
268. Russo, M. V., & Harrison, N. S. 2005. Organizational design and environmental performance: Clues from the electronics industry. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 582–593.
269. Russo, M. V., & Minto, A. 2011. Competitive strategy and the envrionment: A field of inquiry emerges. In P. Bansal & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment: 29–49. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
270. Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. 2016. Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10: 5–64.
271. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Seidl, D. 2013. Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 50: 259–284.
272. Schreck, P., Aaken, D. V., & Donaldson, T. 2013. Positive economics and the normativistic fallacy: Bridging the two sides of CSR. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23: 297–329.
273. Schuler, D. A., & Cording, M. 2006. A corporate social performance–corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31: 540–558.
274. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. 2001. Value hierarchies across cultures taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32: 268–290.
275. Selekman, B. 1959. A moral philosophy for business. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
276. Sen, A. 1997. Economics, business principles and moral sentiments. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7: 5–15.
277. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. 2006. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34: 158–166.
278. Senge, P. M. 2006. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.
279. Senge, P. M., Smith, B., Kruschwitz, N., Laur, J., & Schley, S. 2008. The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. Danvers, MA: Crown Business.
280. Sharfman, M. P. 1996. The construct validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg & Domini social performance ratings data. Journal of Business Ethics, 15: 287–296.
281. Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. 2008. Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 569–592.
282. Sharma, G., & Bansal, P. In press. Partners for good: How business and NGOs engage the commercial-social paradox. Organization Studies.
283. Sharma, S. 2000. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 681–697.
284. Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. 2005. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 159–180.
285. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 729–753.
286. Shrivastava, P. 1995a. Ecocentric management for a risk society. Academy of Management Review, 20: 118–137.
287. Shrivastava, P. 1995b. The role of firms in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20: 936–960.
288. Shrivastava, P., & Hart, S. 1995. Creating sustainable firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 4: 154–165.
289. Siggelkow, N. 2002. Evolution toward fit. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 125–159.
290. Slawinski, N., & Bansal, P. 2015. Short on time: Inter-temporal tensions in business sustainability. Organization Science, 26: 531–549.
291. Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. 2013. Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23: 407–442.
292. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. 2011. Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36: 381–403.
293. Snow, C. P. 1959. Two cultures. Science, 130: 419.
294. Starik, M., & Rands, G. P. 1995. Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20: 908–935.
295. Stenmark, M. 1997. An unfinished debate: What are the aims of religion and science? Zygon, 32: 491–514.
296. Sterman, J. D. 1994. Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 10: 291–330.
297. Sterman, J. D. 2000. Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, vol. 19. Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
298. Sterman, J. D. 2001. System dynamics modeling: Tools for learning in a complex world. California Management Review, 43: 8–25.
299. Suddaby, R. 2010. Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35: 346–357.
300. Surroca, J., Tribó, J., & Zahra, S. 2012. Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 549–572.
301. Swanson, D. L. 1995. Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 20: 43–64.
302. Swanson, D. L. 1999. Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24: 506–521.
303. Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. 2012. How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR–financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49: 1274–1303.
304. Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. 1994. Business ethics/ business ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 113–128.
305. Valente, M. 2012. Theorizing firm adoption of sustain-centrism. Organization Studies, 33: 563–591.
306. Van Der Byl, C. A., & Slawinski, N. 2015. Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from win–wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization & Environment, 28: 54–79.
307. Van Der Vegt, G. S., Essens, P., Wahlström, M., & George, G. 2015. Managing risk and resilience. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 971–980.
308. Venkatraman, N., & Grant, J. H. 1986. Construct measurement in organizational strategy research: A critique and proposal. Academy of Management Review, 11: 71–87.
309. Victor, B., & Stephens, C. U. 1994. Business ethics: A synthesis of normative philosophy and empirical social science. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 145–155.
310. Von Bertalanffy, L. 1972. The history and status of general systems theory. Academy of Management Journal, 15: 407–426.
311. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. 1997. The corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 8: 303–319.
312. Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., & Javidan, M. 2006. Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1703–1725.
313. Walsh, J. P., Meyer, A. D., & Schoonhoven, C. B. 2006. A future for organization theory: Living in and living with changing organizations. Organization Science, 17: 657–671.
314. Walton, C. C. 1967. Corporate social responsibilities. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
315. Wang, T., & Bansal, P. 2012. Social responsibility in new ventures: Profiting from a long‐term orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 1135–1153.
316. Weaver, G. R., & Trevino, L. K. 1994. Normative and empirical business ethics: Separation, marriage of convenience, or marriage of necessity? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 129–143.
317. Weber, M. 2002. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, and other writings. London, UK: Penguin Classics.
318. Weick, K. E., & Putnam, T. 2006. Organizing for mindfulness: Eastern wisdom and western knowledge. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15: 275–287.
319. Werhane, P. H. 1994. The normative/descriptive distinction in methodologies of business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 175–180.
320. Werner, T. 2015. Gaining access by doing good: The effect of sociopolitical reputation on firm participation in public policy making. Management Science, 61: 1989–2011.
321. Whiteman, G., & Cooper, W. H. 2000. Ecological embeddedness. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 1265–1282.
322. Whiteman, G., &Cooper, W. H. 2011. Ecological sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 889–911.
323. Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. 2013. Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50: 307–336.
324. Wicks, A. C., & Freeman, R. E. 1998. Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9: 123–140.
325. Windsor, D. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 93–114.
326. Wong, E. M., Ormiston, M. E., & Tetlock, P. E. 2011. The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 1207–1228.
327. Wood, D. J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 20: 691–718.
328. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future (Brundtland Report), vol. 383, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
329. Zald, M. N. 1993. Organization studies as a scientific and humanistic enterprise: Toward a reconceptualization of the foundations of the field. Organization Science, 4: 513–528.
330. Zenisek, T. J. 1979. Corporate social responsibility: A conceptualization based on organizational literature. Academy of Management Review, 4: 359–368.
331. Zhang, J., & Luo, X. R. 2013. Dared to care: Organizational vulnerability, institutional logics, and MNCs’ social responsiveness in emerging markets. Organization Science, 24: 1742–1764.
332. Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y. L., & Li, X. B. 2015. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 538–566.
333. Zietsma, C., & Lawrence, T. B. 2010. Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 189–221.