Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 209-222

  Delmas, Magali ^a   Toffel, Michael W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS; CORPORATE STRATEGY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 3242885208     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.409     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Anderson SW, Daly JD, Johnson MF. 1999. Why firms seek ISO 9000 certification: Regulatory compliance or competitive advantage. Production and Operations Management 8: 28-43.
2. Andrews CJ. 1998. Public policy and the geography of U.S. environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly 79: 55-73.
3. Aragón-Correa JA. 1998. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal 41: 556-567.
4. Arias ME, Guillen MF. 1998. The transfer of organizational management techniques. In The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge, Alvarez JL (ed.). Macmillan: London; 110-137.
5. Arora S, Cason TN. 1999. Do community characteristics influence environmental outcomes? Evidence from the toxics release inventory. Southern Economic Journal 65: 691-716.
6. Baron DP. 2003. Private politics. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 12: 31-66.
7. Barr PS, Stimpert JL, Huff AS. 1992. Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal 13: 15-36.
8. Bradbury H, Clair JA. 1999. Promoting sustainable organizations with Sweden's natural step. Academy of Management Executive 13: 63-74.
9. Brooks N, Sethi R. 1997. The distribution of pollution: community characteristics and exposure to air toxics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32: 233-250.
10. Brown B, Perry S. 1994. Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune's 'most admired' companies. Academy of Management Journal 37: 1347-1359.
11. Burns N, Kinder DR, Rosenstone SJ, Sapiro V, National Election Studies. 2002. American National Election Study, 2000: Pre- And Post-Election Survey, Computer file 3131, 2nd ICPSR version. University of Michigan Center for Political Studies: Ann Arbor, MI.
12. Carraro C, Katsoulacos Y, Xepapadeas A (eds). 1996. Environmental Policy and Market Structure. Kluwer: Boston, MA.
13. Christmann P. 2000. Effects of 'best practices' of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal 43: 663-680.
14. Christmann P. Taylor G. 2001. Globalization and the environment: determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies 32: 439-458.
15. Cordano M, Frieze IH. 2000. Pollution reduction preferences of US environmental managers: applying Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management Journal 43: 627-641.
16. D'Aunno T, Succi M, Alexander JA. 2000. The role of institutional and market forces in divergent organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 679-703.
17. Dean TJ, Brown RL. 1995. Pollution regulation as a barrier to new firm entry: initial evidence and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal 38: 288-303.
18. Delmas M. 2002. The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and the United States: an institutional perspective. Policy Sciences 35: 91-119.
19. Delmas M. 2003. In Search of ISO: an Institutional Perspective on the Adoption of International Management Standards, Working Paper 1784. Stanford Graduate School of Business: Stanford, CA.
20. Delmas M, Terlaak A. 2001. A framework for analyzing environmental voluntary agreements. California Management Review 43: 44-63.
21. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147-160.
22. Egri C, Herman S. 2000. Leadership in the North American environmental sector: values, leadership styles and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal 43: 571-604.
23. Florida R, Davison D. 2001. Gaining from green management: environmental management systems inside and outside the factory. California Management Review 43: 64.
24. Fombrun C, Shanley M. 1990. What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33: 233-258.
25. Freedman M, Stagliano AJ. 2002. Environmental disclosure by companies involved in initial public offerings. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15: 94-105.
26. Fryxell GE, Wang J. 1994. The Fortune corporate 'reputation' index: reputation for what? Journal of Management 20:1-14.
27. Guler I, Guillen MF, MacPherson JM. 2002. Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: the international spread of the ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 507-531.
28. Gunningham N, Kagan RA, Thornton D. 2003. Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environment. Stanford University Press: Stanford.
29. Hall B, Kerr ML. 1991. 1991-1992 Green Index: a State-by-State Guide to the Nation's Environmental Health. Island Press: Washington, DC.
30. Hamilton JT. 1993. Politics and social costs: estimating the impact of collective action on hazardous waste facilities. RAND Journal of Economics 24:101-125.
31. Hamilton JT. 1997. Taxes, torts, and the toxics release inventory: congressional voting on instruments to control pollution. Economic Inquiry 35: 745-762.
32. Hamilton JT. 1999. Exercising property rights to pollute: do cancer risks and politics affect plant emission reductions? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18: 105-124.
33. Hart SL. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20: 986-1014.
34. Hedberg C-J, von Malmborg F. 2003. The Global Reporting Initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 10: 153-164.
35. Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 1996. The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: an empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 381-395.
36. Hoffman AJ. 2001. Linking organizational and field-level analyses - the diffusion of corporate environmental practice. Organization and Environment 14: 133-156.
37. Hoffman AJ, Ventresca MJ (eds). 2002. Organizations, Policy and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives. Stanford University Press: Stanford.
38. Jennings PD, Zandbergen PA. 1995. Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach. Academy of Management Review 20: 1015-1052.
39. Kassinis G, Vafeas N. 2002. Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal 23: 399-415.
40. Khanna M, Anton WQ. 2002. Corporate environmental management: regulatory and market-based pressures. Land Economics 78: 539-558.
41. Khanna N, Vidovic M. 2001. Facility Participation in Voluntary Pollution Prevention Programs and the Role of Community Characteristics: Evidence from the 33/50 Program, Binghamton University Economics Department working paper:
42. Kim Y. 2000. Measuring the bottom-line impact of corporate public relations. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 77: 273-291.
43. King A, Lenox M. 2000. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: the chemical industry's responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal 43: 698-716.
44. Klassen RD. 2001. Plant-level environmental management orientation: the influence of management views and plant characteristics. Production and Operations Management 10: 257-275.
45. Kollman K, Prakash A. 2002. EMS-based environmental regimes as club goods: examining variations in firm-level adoption of ISO 14001 and EMAS in U.K., U.S. and Germany. Policy Sciences 35: 43-67.
46. Lawrence AT, Morell D. 1995. Leading-edge environmental management: motivation, opportunity, resources and processes. In Special Research Volume of Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Sustaining the Natural Environment: Empirical Studies on the Interface Between Nature and Organizations, Collins D, Starik M (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 99-126.
47. Levy DL, Rothenberg S. 2002. Heterogeneity and change in environmental strategy: technological and political responses to climate change in the global automobile industry. In Organizations, Policy and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives, Hoffman AJ, Ventresca MJ (eds). Stanford University Press: Stanford; 173-193.
48. Lober DJ. 1996. Evaluating the environmental performance of corporations. Journal of Managerial Issues 8: 184-205.
49. Majumdar SK, Marcus AA. 2001. Rules versus discretion: the productivity consequences of flexible regulation. Academy of Management Journal 44: 170-179.
50. Marcus AA, Nichols ML. 1999. On the edge: heeding the warnings of unusual events. Organization Science 10: 482-499.
51. Maxwell JW, Lyon TP, Hackett SC. 2000. Self-regulation and social welfare: the political economy of corporate environmentalism. The Journal of Law and Economics 43: 583-619.
52. Mazur A, Welch E. 1999. The geography of American environmentalism. Environmental Science and Policy 2: 389-396.
53. Milstein MB, Hart SL, York AS. 2002. Coercion breeds variation: the differential impact of isomorphic pressures on environmental strategies. In Organizations, Policy and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives, Hoffman AJ, Ventresca MJ (eds). Stanford University Press: Stanford; 151-172.
54. Nehrt C. 1996. Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strategic Management Journal 17: 535-547.
55. Nehrt C. 1998. Maintainability of first mover advantages when environmental regulations differ between countries. Academy of Management Review 23: 77-97.
56. Nelson J. 2002. From the margins to the mainstream: corporate social responsibility in the global economy. In Campaign Report on European CSR Excellence 2002-2003: It Simply Works Better!, Høojensgård N, Wahlberg A (eds). Copenhagen Centre-CSR Europe-International Business Leaders' Forum: Copenhagen; 14-19.
57. Patten DM. 1992. Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organization and Society 17:471-475.
58. Prakash A. 2000. Responsible Care: an assessment. Business and Society 39: 183-209.
59. Raines SS. 2002. Implementing ISO 14001 - an international survey assessing the benefits of certification. Corporate Environmental Strategy 9: 418-426.
60. Ramus CA, Steger U. 2000. The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee 'ecoinitiatives' at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal 43: 605-626.
61. Rivera J, de Leon P. 2003. Voluntary environmental performance of western ski areas: are participants of the Sustainable Slopes Program greener? Annual Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC, 2003.
62. Roberts S. 2003. Supply chain specific? Understanding the patchy success of ethical sourcing initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3): 159-170.
63. Rowe WG, Harris IC, Cannella AA Jr., Francolini T. 2003. In search of meaning: does the Fortune reputation survey alter performance expectations? Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 20: 187-195.
64. Rowley T, Berman S. 2000. A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business and Society 39:397-418.
65. Rugman AM, Verbeke A. 1998. Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal 19: 363-375.
66. Russo MV, Fouts PA. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40: 534-559.
67. Scott WR. 1992. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
68. Sharma S. 2000. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal 43:681-697.
69. Sharma S, Pablo AL, Vredenburg H. 1999. Corporate environmental responsiveness strategies: the importance of issue interpretation and organizational context. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 35: 87-108.
70. Sharma S, Vredenburg H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19: 729-753.
71. Viscusi WK, Hamilton JT. 1999. Are risk regulators rational? Evidence from hazardous waste cleanup decisions. The American Economic Review 89: 1010-1027.
72. Weick KE, Roberts KH. 1993. Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 357-381.
73. Welch EW, Mazur A, Bretschneider S. 2000. Voluntary behavior by electric utilities: levels of adoption and contribution of the climate challenge program to the reduction of carbon dioxide. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19: 407-425.
74. Wikle T. 1995. Geographical patterns of membership in US environmental organizations. The Professional Geographer 47: 41-48.
75. World Rainforest Movement. 1998. End of boycott: 'Eco-Agreement' between RAN and Mitsubishi. World Rainforest Movement Bulletin February (9).
76. Zyglidopoulos SC. 2002. The social and environmental responsibilities of multinationals: evidence from the Brent Spar case. Journal of Business Ethics 36(1/2): 141-151.