Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: Separate pasts, common futures

Organization and Environment

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 245-269

  Montiel, Ivan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility; Environmental management; Social performance; Sustainability; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SUSTAINABILITY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 49449101841     PISSN: 10860266     EISSN: 15527417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1086026608321329     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Abbott, W.F., & Monsen, R.J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosure as a method of measuring corporate social investment. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 501-515.
2. Adamowicz, V. (1995). Alternative valuation techniques: A comparison and movement to a synthesis. In K. Willis & J. Corkindale (Eds.) Environmental valuation new perspectives (pp. 144-159). Wallingford, UK: CABI.
3. Adizes, I., & Weston, J.F. (1973). Comparative models of social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 16(1), 112-127.
4. Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K., & Sonnenfeld, J.A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507-525.
5. Alexander, G.J., & Buchholz, R.A. (1978). Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21(3), 479-486.
6. Aspen Institute. (2005). Beyond grey pinstripes 2005: Preparing MBAs for social and environmental stewardship. New York: Author.
7. Aupperle, K.E., Carroll, A.B., & Hatfield, J.D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
8. Banerjee, S.B. (2001). Corporate citizenship and indigenous stakeholders: Exploring a new dynamic of organizational stakeholder relationships. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1, 39-55.
9. Banerjee, S.B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24(1), 143-180.
10. Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197-218.
11. Bansal, P., & Gao, J. (2006). Building the future by looking to the past: Examining research published on organizations and environment. Organization & Environment, 19(4), 458-478.
12. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.
13. Boal, K.B., & Peery, N. (1985). The cognitive structure of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management, 11(3), 71-82.
14. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK: A stakeholder analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1411-1434.
15. Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967.
16. Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
17. Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
18. Chan, R.Y.K. (2005). Does the natural-resource-based view of the firm apply in an emerging economy? A survey of foreign invested enterprises in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 625-672.
19. Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663-680.
20. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 439-458.
21. Clarkson, M.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
22. Cochran, P.L., & Wood, R.A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42-56.
23. Cohen, B. (2006). Journal ratings and footprints: A North American perspective of organizations and the natural environment journal quality. Business Strategy and Environment, 15(1), 1-14.
24. Crawford, R.L., & Gram, H.A. (1978). Social responsibility as interorganizational transaction. Academy of Management Review, 3(4), 880-888.
25. Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312-322.
26. Davis, K., & Blomstrom, R.L. (1971). Business, society, and environment: Social power and social response. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, 209-222.
28. Deniz-Deniz, M.C., & De Saa-Perez, P. (2003). A resource-based view of corporate responsiveness towards employees. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 299-319.
29. Elbing, A.O., Jr. (1970). The value issue of business: The responsibility of the businessman. Academy of Management Journal, 13(1), 79-89.
30. Ernst & Young. (2002). Corporate social responsibility - A survey of global companies. Sydney, Australia: Author.
31. Esrock, S.L., & Leichty, G.B. (1998). Social responsibility and corporate Web pages: Self-presentation or agenda setting. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 305-319.
32. Fogler, H.R., & Nutt, F. (1975). A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 18(1), 155-159.
33. Frederick, W.C. (1986). Toward CSR3: Why ethical analysis is indispensable and avoidable in ethical affairs. California Management Review, 28(2), 12-25.
34. Frederick, W.C. (1998). Moving to CSR4. Business and Society Review, 37(1), 40-59.
35. Frederick, W.C. (2006). Corporation, be good! The story of corporate social responsibility. Indianapolis, IN: Doe Ear.
36. Fryxell, G., & Wang, J. (1004). The Fortune corporate reputation index: Reputation for what? Journal of Management, 20(1), 1-14.
37. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51-71.
38. Gavin, J.F., & Maynard, W.S. (1975). Perceptions of corporate social responsibility. Personnel Psychology, 28, 377-387.
39. Gladwin, T.N., & Kennelly, J.J. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874-907.
40. Graves, S.B., & Waddock, S.A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034-1046.
41. Grunig, J.E. (1979). A new measure of public opinion on corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 22(4), 738-764.
42. Halme, M. (2002). Corporate environmental paradigms in shift-learning during the course of action at UPM-Kymmene. Journal of Management Studies, 39(8), 1087-1109.
43. Hart, S. (1995). A natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
44. Hay, R., & Gray, E. (1974). Social responsibilities of business managers. Academy of Management Journal, 17(1), 135-143.
45. Hoffman, A.J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351-371.
46. Holmes, S.L. (1977). Corporate social performance: Past and present areas of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 20(3), 433-438.
47. Husted, B., & Allen, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 838-849.
48. Johnson, R.A., & Greening, D.W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564-576.
49. Judge, W.Q., & Douglas, T.J. (1998). Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Journal of Management Studies, 35(2), 241-262.
50. Keim, G.D. (1978a). Corporate social responsibility: An assessment of the enlightened self-interest model. Academy of Management Review, 3(1), 32-39.
51. Keim, G.D. (1978b). Managerial behavior and the social responsibility debate: Goal versus constraints. Academy of Management Journal, 21(1), 57-68.
52. Klassen, R.D., & McLaughlin, C.P. (1996). The impact of environmental management of firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199-1214.
53. Kneese, A.V. (1973). Management science, economics and environmental science. Management Science, 19(10), 1122-1137.
54. Kpmg. (2005). KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005. Amsterdam: Author.
55. Lewis, G.J., & Harvey, B. (2001). Perceived environmental uncertainty: The extension of Miller's scale to the natural environment. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 201-233.
56. Luthans, F., & Hodgetts, R.M. (1972). Social issues in business: Poverty, civil rights, ecology, and consumerism. New York: Macmillan.
57. Maignan, I., & Ralston, D.A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses' self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497-514.
58. McGee, J. (1998). Commentary on "Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework," by A. M. Rugman and A. Verbeke. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 377-387.
59. McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.
60. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
61. Mears, P., & Smith, J. (1977). The ethics of social responsibility: A discriminant analysis. Journal of Management, 3(2), 1-5.
62. Miller, K.D. (1993). Industry and country effects on executive perceptions of environmental uncertainties. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 693-714.
63. Murray, K.B., & Montanari, J.B. (1986). Strategic management of the socially responsible firm: Integrating management and marketing theory. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 815-827.
64. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
65. Prasad, P., & Elmes, M. (2005). In the name of the practical: Unearthing the hegemony of pragmatics in the discourse of environmental management. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 845-866
66. Purcell, T.V. (1974). What are the social responsibilities for psychologists in industry? A symposium. Personnel Psychology, 27, 435-453.
67. Ramus, C.A., & Montiel, I. (2005). When are corporate environmental policies a form of "greenwashing"? Business & Society, 44(4), 377-414.
68. Ramus, C.A., & Steger, U. (2000). The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee "ecoinitiatives" at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 605-626.
69. Rothenberg, S. (2003). Knowledge content and worker participation in environmental management at NUMMI. Journal of Management Studies, 40(7), 1783-1802.
70. Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39(4), 397-418.
71. Ruf, B.M., Muralidhar, M.K., & Paul, K. (1998). The development of a systematic, aggregate measure of corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 24(1), 119-133.
72. Russo, M.V., & Harrison, N.S. (2005). Organizational design and environmental performance: Clues from the electronics industry. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 582-593.
73. Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159-180.
74. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729-753.
75. Shrivastava, P. (1995a). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 183-200.
76. Shrivastava, P. (1995b). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936-960.
77. Starik, M., & Rands, G.P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 908-935.
78. Strand, R. (1983). A systems paradigm of organizational adaptations to the social environment. Academy of Management Review, 8(1), 90-96.
79. Swanson, D.L. (1995). Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 43-64.
80. Turban, D.B., & Greening, D.W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-662.
81. Tuzzolino, F., & Armandi, B.R. (1981). A need-hierarchy framework for assessing corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 21-28.
82. Vilkka, L. (1997). The intrinsic value of nature. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
83. Waddock, S.A., & Graves, S.B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
84. Walsh, J.P., Weber, K., & Margolis, J.D. (2003). Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. Journal of Management, 29(6), 859-881.
85. Wartick, S.L., & Cochran, P.L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758-769.
86. Wced. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
87. Weaver, G.R., Trevino, L.K., & Cochran, P.L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539-552.
88. Whiteman, G., & Cooper, W.H. (2000). Ecological embeddedness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1265-1282.
89. Winn, M.I., & Angell, L.C. (2000). Towards a process model of corporate greening. Organization Studies, 21(6), 1119-1147.
90. Winter, C. (2007). The intrinsic, instrumental and spiritual values of natural area visitors and the general public: A comparative study. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(6), 599-614.
91. Wood, D.J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718.
92. Zenisek, T.J. (1979). Corporate social responsibility: A conceptualization based on organizational literature. Academy of Management Review, 4(3), 359-368.