Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise

Business Ethics Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 407-442

  Smith, Wendy K ^a   Gonin, Michael ^b   Besharov, Marya L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybrid organizations; Institutional theory; Organizational identity; Paradox theory; Social enterprise; Social entrepreneur; Stakeholder theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880448660     PISSN: 1052150X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5840/beq201323327     Document Type: Article

References (164)

1. Agle, B. R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, R. E., Jensen, M. C., Mitchell, R. K., & Wood, D. J. 2008. Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2): 153-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200818214
2. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 507-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256973
3. Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. 1985. Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 263-95.
4. Alter, S. K. 2008. Social enterprise models and their mission and money relationship. In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable social change: 205-32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. 2009. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4): 696-717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
6. Anteby, M., & Wrzesniewski, A. Forthcoming. In search of the self at work: Young adults' experiences of a dual identity organization. Research in the Sociology of Work.
7. Argenti, P. A. 2004. Collaborating with activists: How Starbucks works with NGOs. California Management Review, 47(1): 91-116. http://dx.doi.org/10. 2307/41166288
8. Argyris, C. 1988. Crafting a theory of practice: The case of organizational paradoxes. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management: 255-78. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
9. Ashforth, B. E., Reingen, P. H., & Ward, J. C. 2013. Friend and foe? The dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Administrative Science Quarterly, Provisional Accept.
10. Bartunek, J. 1988. The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management: 137-62. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
11. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6): 1419-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318391
12. Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. 2012. In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3) (Summer): 51-55.
13. Battilana, J., Pache, A. C., Sengul, M., & Model, J. 2011. Beyond organizational instability and conflict: On the challenges of remaining hybrid. Working Paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
14. -. 2013. Keeping a foot in both camps: Understanding the drivers of social performance in hybrid organizations. Working Paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
15. Baur, D., & Palazzo, G. 2011. The moral legitimacy of NGOs as partners of corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4): 579-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq201121437
16. Beech, N., Burns, H., de Caestecker, L., MacIntosh, R., & MacLean, D. 2004. Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations. Human Relations, 57(10): 1313-1332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726704048357
17. Bell, T. 2011. Being the only b. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(3): 27-28.
18. Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. 2004. Social alliances: Company/ nonprofit collaboration. California Management Review, 47: 58-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166287
19. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 488-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256972
20. Besharov, M. L. 2013. Toward a relational ecology of identification: A process model of managing identification based on divergent values. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
21. Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. 2013. Multiple logics within organizations: An integrative framework and model of organizational hybridity. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
22. Bornstein, D. 2004. How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. -. 2013. Beyond profit: A talk with Muhammad Yunus. New York Times (April 17).
24. Borzaga, C., & Santuari, A. 2001. Italy: From traditional co-operatives to innovative social enterprises. In C. Borzaga & J. Defourny (Eds.), The emergence of social enterprise: 166-81. London: Routledge.
25. Boyd, B., Henning, N., Reyna, E., Wang, D., & Welch, M. 2009. Hybrid organizations: New business models for environmental leadership. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
26. Bromberger, A. R. 2011. A new type of hybrid. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(2): 49-53.
27. Cameron, K. 1986. Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5): 539-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.539
28. Cameron, K., & Lavine, M. 2006. Making the impossible possible: Leading extraordinary performance. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
29. Chowdhury, I., & Santos, F. M. 2011. Gram vikas. In J. Hamschmidt & M. Pirson (Eds.), Case studies in social entrepreneurship and sustainability: 43-68. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
30. Cooney, K. 2012. Mission control: Examining the institutionalization of new legal forms of social enterprise in different strategic action fields. In B. Gidron & Y. Hasenfeld (Eds.), Social enterprises: An organizational perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
31. Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. 2004. Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2): 173-208.
32. Cornforth, C. 2004. The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: A paradox perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 71: 11-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00241.x
33. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34. Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. 2011. Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5): 1203-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
35. Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. 2010. Social entrepreneurship: Why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 37-57. http://dx.doi.org/10. 5465/AMP.2010.52842950
36. Davis, G. F. 1991. Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4): 583-613. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393275
37. Dees, J. G. 2001. The meaning of social entrepreneurship. http://www.caseatduke.org, Original draft: 1998, Revised 2001.
38. -. 2007. Taking social entrepreneurship seriously: Uncertainty, innovation, and social problem solving. Society, 44(3): 24-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02819936
39. -. 2012. A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3): 321-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1412-5
40. Dees, J. G., Battle Anderson, B., & Wei-Skillern, J. 2004. Scaling social enterpreneurship: Strategies for spreading social innovations. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1(4): 24-32.
41. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. 2010. Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1): 32-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053
42. Denis, J.-l., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. 2006. The power of numbers in strategizing. Strategic Organization, 4(4): 349-77. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1177/1476127006069427
43. DiMaggio, P. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: 3-21. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
44. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095101
45. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65-91.
46. Driver, M. 2012. An interview with Michael Porter: Social entrepreneurship and the transformation of capitalism. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3): 421-31.
47. Dutton, J., & Dukerich, J. 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 517-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256405
48. Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. 2010. Putting the brakes on impact: A contingency framework for measuring social impact. Academy of Management Proceedings.
49. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Westcott, B. 1988. Paradoxical demands and the creation of excellence: The case of just in time manufacturing. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management: 19-54. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
50. Elsbach, K. 1999. An expanded model of organizational identification. In R. I. Sutton & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 21: 163-99. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
51. -. 2001. Coping with hybrid organizational identities: Evidence from California legislative staff. In J. Wagner (Ed.), Advances in qualitative organizational research, vol. 3: 59-90. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
52. Epstein, M. 2008. Making sustainability work. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
53. Farjoun, M. 2010. Beyond dualism: Stability and change as duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2): 202-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010. 48463331
54. Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. 2011. Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22: 1240-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.1100.0612
55. Fiol, C. M., Pratt, M. G., & O'Connor, E. J. 2009. Managing intractable identity conflict. Academy of Management Review, 34(1): 32-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2009.35713276
56. Forcadell, F. 2005. Democracy, cooperation and business success: The case of Mondragón Corporación Cooperativa. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(3): 255-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-5094-5
57. Ford, J., & Backoff, R. 1988. Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management: 81-121. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
58. Foreman, P. O., & Whetten, D. A. 2002. Members' identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science, 13(6): 618-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.6.618.493
59. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
60. Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 191-205.
61. Galaskiewicz, J., Bielefeld, W., & Dowell, M. 2006. Networks and organizational growth: A study of community based nonprofits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3): 337-80.
62. Galaskiewicz, J., & Burt, R. S. 1991. Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1): 88-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393431
63. Glynn, M. A. 2000. When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3): 285-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.3.285.12496
64. Golden-Biddle, K., & Rao, H. 1997. Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a non profit organization. Organization Science, 8(6): 593-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.8.6.593
65. Gonin, M. 2007. Business research, self-fulfilling prophecy, and the inherent responsibility of scholars. Journal of Academic Ethics, 5(1): 33-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10805-007-9039-3
66. Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. 2010. The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2): 521-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc. 1090.0453
67. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 317-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520. 2011.590299
68. Grimes, M. 2010. Strategic sensemaking within funding relationships: The effects of performance measurement on organizational identity in the social sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4): 763-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00398.x
69. Gutierrez, B., Howard-Grenville, J., & Scully, M. A. 2010. The faithful rise up: Split identification and an unlikely change effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4): 673-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.52814362
70. Haigh, N., & Hoffman, A. J. 2012. Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2): 126-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.006
71. Hanleybrown, F., Kania, J., & Kramer, M. R. 2012. Channeling change: Making collective impact work. Stanford Social Innovation Review, blog entry. Available at http://www.ssireview.org/blog/entry/channeling-change-making- collective-impact-work.
72. Hart, K., Laville, J.-L., & Cattani, A. D. 2010. The human economy: A citizen's guide. Cambridge: Polity Press.
73. Haugh, H., & Peredo, A. M. 2010. The origins, launch and diffusion of the community interest company, Academy of Management Montreal.
74. Hoffman, A. J., Badiane, K. K., & Haigh, N. 2010. Hybrid organizations as agents of positive social change: Bridging the for-profit and non-profit divide. Working paper, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
75. Hsu, G. 2006. Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences' reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3): 420-50.
76. Jarzabkowski, P. 2008. Shaping strategy as a structuration process. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4): 621-50.
77. Jay, J. 2013. Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 137-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772
78. Jensen, M. C. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 235-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3857812
79. -. 2008. Non-rational behavior, value conflict, stakeholder theory and firm behavior in dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2): 167-71.
80. Kania, J., & Kramer, M. 2011. Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1): 36-41.
81. Karnani, A., Garrette, B., Kassalow, J., & Lee, M. 2011. Better vision for the poor. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(2) (Spring): 66-71.
82. Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 243-75. Los Angeles: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n10
83. Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. 2011. Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1): 52-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222
84. Levinthal, D., & March, J. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (Special Issue): 95-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj. 4250141009
85. Lewis, M. W. 2000. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4): 760-76.
86. Lewis, M. W., Andriopoulos, C., & Smith, W. K. Forthcoming. Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. California Management Review.
87. Light, P. C. 2009. Social entrepreneurship revisited: Not just anyone, anywhere in any organization can make breakthrough change. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7(3) (Summer): 21-22.
88. Luscher, L., & Lewis, M. 2008. Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2): 221-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.31767217
89. Mair, J., & Martí, I. 2006. Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1): 36-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
90. -. 2009. Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5): 419-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.006
91. Mair, J., Martí, I., & Ventresca, M. J. 2012. Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4): 819-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ amj.2010.0627
92. March, J. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
93. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. 2003. Misery loves company: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 268-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3556659
94. Marquis, C., & Battilana, J. 2009. Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29: 283-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009. 06.001
95. Martin, R. 2007. The opposable mind: How successful leaders win through integrative thinking. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
96. Mersland, R., & Strom, R. Ø. 2010. Microfinance mission drift? World Development, 38(1): 28-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.05. 006
97. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/226550
98. Miller, T. L., Wesley, C. L., & Williams, D. E. 2012. Educating the minds of caring hearts: Comparing the views of practitioners and educators on the importance of social entrepreneurship competencies. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3): 349-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011. 0017
99. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholer indentification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853-96.
100. Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. 2005. Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3): 429-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200515329
101. Moss, T. W., Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., & Lumpkin, G. T. 2011. Dual identities in social ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4): 805-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00372.x
102. Nag, R., Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. 2007. The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge crafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4): 821-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279173
103. Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. 2011. Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Academy of Management Review, 36(3): 479-99. http://dx.doi.org/10. 5465/AMR.2011.61031809
104. Negro, G., Kocak, O., & Hsu, G. 2010. Research on categories in the sociology of organizations. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution, 31: 3-35.
105. Nicholls, A., & Opal, C. 2004. Fair trade: Market-driven ethical consumption. London: Sage Publications.
106. Ogden, S., & Watson, R. 1999. Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K. privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 526-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256974
107. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3): 403-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
108. Pache, A. C. 2013. From caring entrepreneur to caring enterprise: Addressing the ethical challenges of scaling up social enterprises. Working paper, Insead University, Fontainebleau, France.
109. Pache, A. C., & Chowdhury, I. 2012. Social entrepreneurs as institutionally embedded entrepreneurs: Toward a new model of social entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3): 494-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0019
110. Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. 2010. When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3): 455-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010. 51142368
111. -. Forthcoming. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to conflicting institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal.
112. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
113. Phillips, R. A., & Freeman, R. E. 2008. Corporate citizenship and community stakeholders. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship: 99-115. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
114. Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. 1989. Using paradox to build management and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 562-78.
115. Porter, T. M. 1995. Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
116. Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. 2008. Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 276-98. Los Angeles: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n11
117. Prahalad, C. K. 2006. The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Delhi: Pearson Education India.
118. Pratt, M. G. 2000. The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3): 456-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2667106
119. Pratt, M. G., & Corley, K. 2007. Managing multiple organizational identities: On identity ambiguity, identity conflict, and members' reactions. In C. A. Bartel, S. Blader, & A. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Identity and the modern organization: 99-118. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
120. Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. 2000. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 18-42.
121. Pratt, M. G., & Kraatz, M. S. 2009. E pluribus unum: Multiple identities and the organizational self. In L. M. Roberts & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation: 385-410. New York: Psychology Press.
122. Pratt, M. G., & Rafaeli, A. 1997. Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4): 862-98.
123. Quinn, R., & Cameron, K. 1988. Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
124. Rothenberg, A. 1979. The emerging goddess. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
125. Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. 2003. When will stakeholder groups act? An interest-and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 204-19.
126. Seelos, C., & Mair, J. 2005. Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48: 241-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.11.006
127. -. 2007. Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A strategic view. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4): 49-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2007.27895339
128. Selznick, P. 1957. Leadership in administration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
129. Seo, M., & Creed, W. 2002. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 222-47.
130. Sisón, A. J. G., Hartman, E. M., & Fontrodona, J. 2012. Reviving tradition: Virtue and the common good in business and management. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2): 207-10.
131. Smith, K. 2002. Manna in the wilderness of AIDS: Ten lessons in abundance. Cleveland: Pilgrim Press.
132. Smith, K., & Berg, D. 1987. Paradoxes of group life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
133. Smith, W. K. 2013. Dynamic response patterns to paradoxical tensions: A model of senior leadership practices to manage ambidexterity. Working paper, University of Delaware, Newark.
134. Smith, W. K., Besharov, M. L., Wessels, A., & Chertok, M. 2012. A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3): 463-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0021
135. Smith, W. K., Leonard, H., & Epstein, M. 2007. Digital divide data: A social enterprise in action. Harvard Business School Case Study.
136. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. 2011. Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2): 381-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958
137. Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W., & Tushman, M. 2011. Organizational sustainability: Organization design and senior leadership to enable strategic paradox. In K. Cameron & G. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 798-810. New York: Oxford University Press.
138. Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. 2005. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5): 522-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
139. Snaith, I. 2007. Recent reforms to corporate legal structures for social enterprise in the UK: Opportunity or confusion. Social Enterprise Journal, 3(1): 20-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17508610780000719
140. Sonenshein, S. 2006. Crafting social issues at work. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6): 1158-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478243
141. Stohl, C., & Cheney, G. 2001. Participatory processes/paradoxical practices: Communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(3): 349-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0893318901143001
142. Stoltzfus, K., Stohl, C., & Seibold, D. R. 2011. Managing organizational change: Paradoxical problems, solutions, and consequences. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3): 349-67. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1108/09534811111132749
143. Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2): 315-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2666998
144. Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571-610.
145. Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. 2003. Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 397-415.
146. Swartz, J. 2010. How I did it: Timberland's CEO on standing up to 65,000 angry activists. Harvard Business Review, 88(9): 39-43.
147. Thompson, J. 1967. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
148. Thornton, P. H. 2002. The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 81-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069286
149. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. 2012. The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. New York: Oxford University Press.
150. Tracey, P. 2012. Introduction: Digital resources and textbooks for teaching social entrepreneurship and innovation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3): 511-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0212
151. Tracey, P., & Phillips, N. 2007. The distinctive challenge of educating social entrepreneurs: A postscript and rejoinder to the special issue on entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(2): 264-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2007.25223465
152. Tracey, P., Philips, N., & Haugh, H. 2005. Beyond philanthropy: Community enterprise as a basis for corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(4): 327-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-6944-x
153. Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. 2011. Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1): 60-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090. 0522
154. Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. 1999. The stakeholder research tradition: Converging theorists-not convergent theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 222-27.
155. Vince, R., & Broussine, M. 1996. Paradox, defense and attachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organization Studies, 17(1): 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 017084069601700101
156. Voss, G. B., Cable, D. M., & Voss, Z. G. 2008. Linking organizational values to relationships with external constituents: A study of nonprofit professional theatres. Organization Science, 11(3): 330-47. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1287/orsc.11.3.330.12497
157. Wang, J., & Dewhirst, H. D. 1992. Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(2): 115-23. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/BF00872318
158. Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. 1999. Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressure, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 539-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256975
159. Westenholz, A. 1993. Paradoxical thinking and change in frames of reference. Organization Studies, 14(1): 37-58.
160. Yunus, M. 1999. Banker to the poor. New York: Public Affairs.
161. -. 2010. Building social business : The new kind of capitalism that serves humanity's most pressing needs. New York: Public Affairs.
162. Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D., & Shulman, J. M. 2009. A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5): 519-32. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
163. Zuckerman, E. 1999. The cateogrical imperative: Securities analysis and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5): 1398-1438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/210178
164. -. 2000. Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3): 591-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2667110