Organizational design and environmental performance: Clues from the electronics industry

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 582-593

  Russo, Michael V ^a,b   Harrison, Niran S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944527378     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.17843939     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. 2000. Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in U.S. business organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 548-570.
2. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 717-736.
3. Blau, P. M. 1974. On the nature of organizations. New York: Wiley.
4. Bradach, J. 1997. Using the plural form in the management of restaurant chains. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 276-303.
5. Cairncross, F. 1991. Costing the earth: The challenge for governments, the opportunities for business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
6. Chandler, A. 1962. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Christmann, P. 2000. Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 663-680.
8. Cordano, M., & Frieze, I. H. 2000. Pollution reduction preferences of U.S. environmental managers: Applying Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 627-641.
9. Dechant, K., & Altman, B. 1994. Environmental leadership: From compliance to competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 8(3): 7-27.
10. Donaldson, L. 1996. The normal science of contingency theory. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds). Handbook of organization studies: 57-76. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. 2000. Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46: 1059-1074.
12. Florida, R. 1996. Lean and green: The move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. California Management Review, 39(19): 80-105.
13. Gabel, H. L., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. 1993. Managerial incentives and environmental compliance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24: 229-240.
14. Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47: 153-161.
15. Ilinitch, A. Y., Soderstrom, N. S., & Thomas, T. E. 1998. Measuring corporate environmental performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 17: 383-408.
16. Johnston, J., & DiNardo, J. 1997. Econometric methods (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Judge, W. Q., & Douglas, T. J. 1998. Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Journal of Management Studies, 35: 241-262.
18. Kerr, S. 1975. On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18: 769.
19. King, A. A. 1999. Retrieving and transferring embodied data: Implications for the management of interdependence within organizations. Management Science, 45: 918-935.
20. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. 2000. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's Respon-sible Care Program. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 698-716.
21. Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science. 42: 1199-1213.
22. Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. 1999. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 599-615.
23. Lober, D. J. 1996. Evaluating the environmental performance of corporations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 8: 184-205.
24. Lothe, S., Myrtveit, I., & Trapani, T. 1999. Compensation systems for improving environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8(6): 313-321.
25. Maxwell, J., Rothenberg, S., Briscoe, F., & Marcus, A. 1997. Green schemes: Corporate environmental strategies and their implementation. California Management Review, 39(3): 118-134.
26. Meyer, S. 1995. The economic impact of environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Law & Practice, 3(2): 4-15.
27. Milliman, J., Von Glinow, M. A., & Nathan, M. 1991. Organizational life cycles and strategic international human resource management in multinational companies: Implications for congruence theory. Academy of Management Review, 16: 318-339.
28. Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. 1992. Designing organizations that have good fit: A framework for understanding new architectures. In D. A. Nadler, M. Gerstein, & R. B. Shaw (Eds.), Organizational architecture: 39-56. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. 1997. Competing by design: The power of organizational architecture. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Ochsner, M. 2000. Case study: Chemical approval at HADCO corporation. Environmental Quality Management, 10(1): 37-45.
31. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 534-559.
32. Sharma, S., Pablo, A. L., & Vredenburg, H. 1999. Corporate environmental responsiveness strategies. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35: 87-108.
33. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategies and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 729-753.
34. Siggelkow, N. 2001. Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 838-857.
35. Tosi, H. L., Katz, J. P, & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 1997. Disaggregating the agency contract: The effects of monitoring, incentive alignment, and term in office on agent decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 584-602.
36. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 658-672.
37. Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. 1996. The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4): 8-30.
38. EPA Office of Environmental Information. 2002. Toxics Release Inventory (TRI): Factors to consider when using TRI data. Report no. 60-F-02-017, EPA Office of Environmental Information, Washington DC.
39. Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H. 1996. Sustainability and the corporation: Criteria for aligning economic practice with environmental protection. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(2): 104-119.