Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences

Academy of Management Review

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 887-910

  Rowley, Timothy J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031488230     PISSN: 03637425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022107     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. 1993. The social organization of conspiracy: Illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. American Sociological Review, 58: 837-860.
2. Barnard, C. L. 1938. The functions of executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Brass, D. J. 1984. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influences in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 518-539.
4. Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. 1993. Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 441-470.
5. Brenner, S. N. 1993. The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision making: Some propositions and a model. In J. Pasquero & D. Collins (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society: 205-210. San Diego.
6. Brenner, S. N., & Cochran, P. L. 1991. The stakeholder theory of the firm: Implications for business and society theory and research. In J. F. Mahon (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society: 449-467. Sundance, UT.
7. Burt, R. S. 1987. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92: 1287-1335.
8. Carroll, A. B. 1989. Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
9. Carroll, A. B. 1993. Business and society. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
10. Clarkson, M. E. 1995. A risk based model of stakeholder theory. Paper presented at the Society of Business Ethics Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia.
11. Cook, K. S. 1977. Exchange and power in networks of interorganizational relations. The Sociological Quarterly, 18: 62-82.
12. Cook, K. S., & Whitmeyer, J. M. 1992. Two approaches to social structure: Exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 18: 109-127.
13. DiMaggio, P. 1986. Structural analysis of organizational fields: A blockmodel approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8: 335-370.
14. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields. American Sociological Review, 46: 147-160.
15. Donaldson, L. 1995. American anti-management theories of organizations: A critique of paradigm proliferation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65-91.
17. Evans, W. M. 1966. The organization set: Toward a theory of interorganizational relations. In J. D. Thompson (Ed.), Approaches to organizational design: 173-188. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
18. Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarifications. Social Networks, 1: 215-239.
19. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
20. Freeman, R. E., & Evan, W. M. 1990. Ccrporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19: 337-359.
21. Galaskiewicz, J. 1996. The new network analysis' and its application to organizational theory and behavior. In D. Iacobucci (Ed.), Networks in marketing: 19-31. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. 1989. Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: An empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 454-479.
23. Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. 1994. Introduction. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.), Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences: xi-xvii. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Goffman, E. 1970. Strategic interaction. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
25. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481-510.
26. Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. 1992. Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29: 131-154.
27. Ibarra, H. 1993. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 471-501.
28. Jacobs, D. 1974. Dependency and vulnerability: An exchange approach to the control of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19: 45-59.
29. Jones, T. M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20: 404-437.
30. Knoke, D. 1994. Networks of elite structure and decision making. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.), Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences: 299. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Krackhardt, D. 1992. The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. C. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action: 216-239. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
32. Laumann, E. O., & Pappi, F. 1973. New directions in the study of elites. American Sociological Review, 38: 212-230.
33. March, J. G., & Simon, H. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
34. Marsden, P. V. 1990. Network data and measurement. In W. R. Scott (Ed.), Annual review of sociology: 435-463. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc.
35. Marsden, P. V., & Friedkin, N. E. 1994. Network studies of social influence. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.), Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences: 3-25. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. 1981. Challenging strategic planning assumptions. New York: Wiley.
37. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutional organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 80: 340-363.
38. Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., & Deal, T. E 1983. Institutional and technical sources of organizational structures: Exploring the structure of educational organizations. In J. W. Meyer and W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality: 47-67. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39. Mintzberg, H. 1983. Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40. Näsi, J. 1995. What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm. In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking: 19-32. Helsinki: LSR-Publications.
41. Nohria, N. 1992. Is a network perspective a useful way of studying organizations? In N. Nohria & R. C. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action: 1-22. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
42. Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. C. 1992. Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
43. Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16: 145-179.
44. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
45. Powell, W. W. 1988. Institutional effects on organizational structure and performance. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment: 115-136. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
46. Scott, J. 1991. Social network analysis: A handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Scott, W. R. 1991. Unpacking institutional arguments. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 164-182. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Scott, W. R. 1992. Organizations: Rational, natural, open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
49. Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. 1991. The organization of societal sectors: Propositions and early evidence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 108-140. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Starik, M. 1994. The Toronto Conference. Business and Society, 33: 89-95.
51. Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: Free Press.
52. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Wasserman, S., & Galaskiewicz, J. 1994. Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Wellman, B. 1988. Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach: 19-61. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55. Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. D. 1988. Social structures: A network approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Wood, D. J. 1991. Corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 16: 691-718.
57. Zucker, L. 1977. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42: 726-743.