Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing - Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises

Academy of Management Annals

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 397-441

  Battilana, Julie ^a   Lee, Matthew ^a  

^a HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902806888     PISSN: 19416520     EISSN: 19416067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2014.893615     Document Type: Article

References (205)

1. Adler, P. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12(2), 215-234. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.2.215.10117
2. Albert, S., & Adams, E. (2002). The hybrid identity of law firms. In G. Soenen & B. Moingeon (Eds.), Corporate and organizational identities: Integrating strategy, marketing, communication and organizational perspective (pp. 35-50). New York: Routledge.
3. Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263-295.
4. Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-670.
5. Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260-282. doi: 10.1177/0021886304266847
6. Anheier, H. K. (2000). Managing non-profit organisations: Towards a new approach. Civil Society Working Papers, Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics.
7. Anheier, H. K., & Salamon, L. M. (1997). Defining the nonprofit sector: A cross-national analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
8. Arellano-Gault, D., Demortain, D., Rouillard, C., & Thoenig, J.-C. (2013). Bringing public organization and organizing back in. Organization Studies, 34, 145-167. doi: 10.1177/0170840612473538
9. Arnold, M. L. (1997). Natural hybridization and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Austin, J., Bermudez, W., & Escobar, G. (1999). IPODERAC. Harvard Business School Case 399-016. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
11. Austin, J., & Leonard, H. (2008). Can the virtuous mouse and the wealthy elephant live happily ever after? California Management Review, 51(1), 77-102. doi: 10.2307/41166469
12. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 30(1), 1-22.
13. Battilana, J., & D'Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organization (pp. 31-58). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
14. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1419-1440. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318391
15. Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3), 51-55.
16. Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A.-C., & Model, J. (2013). Keeping a foot in both camps: Understanding the drivers of social performance in hybrid organizations. Unpublished Working Paper, Harvard Business School.
17. Ben-Ner, A. (2002). The shifting boundaries of the mixed economy and the future of the nonprofit sector. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 73, 5-40. doi: 10.1111/1467-8292.00184
18. Besharov, M. L. (2013). The relational ecology of identification: How organizational identification emerges when individuals hold divergent values. Academy of Management Journal. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0761
19. Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (in press). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review.
20. Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 37-44.
21. Billis, D. (2010). Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Binder, A. (2007). For love and money: Organizations' creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and Society, 36(6), 547-571. doi: 10.1007/s11186-007-9045-x
23. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Bovais, H. (2012). The foundations and processes of organizational integration: The French retail banking of Crédit Agricole (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université Paris Dauphine, Paris.
25. Boyd, B. (2009). Hybrid organizations: New business models for environmental leadership. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
26. Brakman Reiser, D. (2013). Theorizing forms for social enterprise. Emory Law Review, 62: 681-739.
27. Brandsen, T., & Karre, M. (2011). Hybrid organizations: No cause for concern? Journal of Public Administration, 34, 827-836. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2011.605090
28. Bugg-Levine, A., & Emerson, J. (2011). Impact investing: Transforming how we make money while making a difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29. Canales, R. (2014). Weaving straw into gold: Managing organizational tensions between standardization and flexibility in microfinance. Organization Science, 25(1), 1-28. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2013.0831
30. Carrick-Cagna, A. M., & Santos, F. (2009). Kiva versus MYC4: Business model innovation in social lending. INSEAD Case 06/2009-5595. Fontainebleau, France: INSEAD.
31. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business School Society, 38(3), 268-295. doi: 10.1177/000765039903800303
32. Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Chen, K., O'Mahony, S., & Besharov, M. L. (2014). The selective synthesis of competing logics. Working Paper.
34. Chetkovich, C., & Frumkin, P. (2003). Balancing margin and mission. Administration & Society, 35(5), 564-596. doi: 10.1177/0095399703256162
35. Christen, R. P., & Drake, D. (2002). Commercialization: The new reality of microfinance. In D. Drake & E. Rhyne (Eds.), The commercialization of microfinance, balancing business and development (pp. 2-22). Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
36. Cooney, K. (2011). An exploratory study of social purpose business models in the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 185-196. doi: 10.1177/0899764009351591
37. Corley, K., Harquail, C. V., Pratt, M. G., Glynn, M. A., Fiol, C. M., & Hatch, M. (2006). Guiding organizational identity through aged adolescence. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 85-99. doi: 10.1177/1056492605285930
38. Cornforth, C. (2004). Governance & participation development toolkit. Manchester: Co-Operatives UK.
39. Creed, W. E. D., Dejordy, R., & Lok, J. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1336-1364. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318357
40. Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Business.
41. Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
42. Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37-57. doi: 10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950
43. D'Aunno, T., Sutton, R., & Price, R. (1991). Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment units. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 636-661. doi: 10.2307/256409
44. Dees, G. J. (2001). Mobilizing resources. In G. J. Dees, J. Emerson, & P. Economy (Eds.), Enterprising nonprofits (pp. 63-102). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
45. Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2003). Sector-bending: Blurring lines between nonprofit and for-profit. Society, 40(4), 16-27. doi: 10.1007/s12115-003-1014-z
46. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2006). Social enterprise: At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society. London: Routledge.
47. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2008). Social enterprise in Europe: Recent trends and developments. Social Enterprise Journal, 4(3), 202-228. doi: 10.1108/17508610810922703
48. Desa, G. (2012). Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a mechanism of institutional transformation. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 36(4), 727-751. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00430.x
49. Dichter, T. W., & Harper, M. (2007). What's wrong with microfinance. Essex: Practical Action Publishing.
50. Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 34(4), 681-703.
51. DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: US art museums, 1920-1940. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 267-292). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
53. Dorado, S. (2006). Social entrepreneurial ventures: Different values so different process of creation, no? Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(4), 319-343. doi: 10.1142/S1084946706000453
54. Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
55. Dunn, B., & Jones, C. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 114-149. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.114
56. Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2013). Neither fish nor flesh: Governance challenges within hybrid organizations. Unpublished Working Paper, Harvard Business School.
57. Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2010). Putting the brakes on impact: A contingency framework for measuring social performance. Academy of management annual meeting proceedings, Montreal, QC, Canada, pp. 1-6.
58. Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132-140. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x
59. Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 45(4), 35-51. doi: 10.2307/41166187
60. Feldman, D. C. (1976). A contingency theory of socialization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 433-452. doi: 10.2307/2391853
61. Feldman, D. C. (2002). When you come to a fork in the road, take it: Career indecision and vocational choices of teenagers and young adults. In D. C. Feldman (Ed.), Work careers: A development perspective (pp. 93-125). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
62. Fiol, C. M., Pratt, M. G., & Connor, J. O. (2009). Managing intractable identity conflicts. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 32-55. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2009.35713276
63. Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 692-710. doi: 10.2307/2094928
64. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65. Galaskiewicz, J., & Barringer, S. (2012). Social enterprises and social categories. In J. Gidron & Y. Hasenfeld (Eds.), Social enterprises: An organizational perspective (pp. 47-70). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
66. Garrow, E., & Hasenfeld, Y. (2012). Managing conflicting institutional logics: Social service vs. market. In B. Gidron & Y. Hasenfeld (Eds.), Social enterprises: An organizational perspective (pp. 121-143). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
67. Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226. doi: 10.2307/20159573
68. Glynn, M. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 285-298. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.3.285.12496
69. Glynn, M. A. (2008). Beyond constraint: How institutions enable organizational identities. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 413-430). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70. Golden-Biddle, K., & Rao, H. (1997). Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organization Science, 8(6), 593-611. doi: 10.1287/orsc.8.6.593
71. Gómez, L. (2009). Time to socialize. Journal of Business Communication, 46(2), 179-207. doi: 10.1177/0021943608328077
72. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1988). Organizational design types, tracks and the dynamics of strategic change. Organization Theory, 9(3), 293-316.
73. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Understanding strategic change-The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 1052-1081. doi: 10.2307/256645
74. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317-371. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2011.590299
75. Greenwood, R., Diaz, A.M., Li, S.X., & Lorente, J.C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521-539. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0453
76. Guo, B. (2006). Charity for profit? Exploring factors associated with the commercialization of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 123-138. doi: 10.1177/0899764005282482
77. Haight, C. (2011). The problem with fair trade coffee. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(3), 74-79.
78. Hall, P. D. (2013). Philanthropy and the social enterprise spectrum. In T. S. Lyons (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship: How business can transform society (pp. 23-69). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
79. Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929-964. doi: 10.1086/226424
80. Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1986). Where do organizational forms come from? Sociological Forum, 1(1), 50-72. doi: 10.1007/BF01115073
81. Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2002). The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations, 55, 989-1018. doi: 10.1177/0018726702055008181
82. Haugh, H. (2006). Social enterprise: Beyond economic outcomes and individual returns. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 180-207). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
83. Haveman, H. A., & Rao, H. (2006). Hybrid forms and the evolution of thrifts. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 974-986. doi: 10.1177/0002764205285179
84. Hinings, C. R., & Greenwood, R. (2002). Disconnects and consequences in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(3), 411-424. doi: 10.2307/3094844
85. Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999). Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10(2), 199-212. doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.2.199
86. Hockerts, K. (2006). Entrepreneurial opportunity in social purpose business ventures. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 142-155). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
87. Hoffman, A., Badiane, K., & Haigh, N. (2012). Hybrid organizations as agents of positive social change: Bridging the for-profit & non-profit divide. In K. Golden-Biddle & J. Dutton (Eds.), Using a positive lens to explore social change and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 131-150). New York: Routledge.
88. Hsu, G., Koçak, Ö., & Hannan, M. T. (2009). Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 150-169. doi: 10.1177/000312240907400108
89. Husock, H. (2013). The dangers of quasi-capitalism. National Affairs, 14, 112-134.
90. Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268-298. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268
91. Independent Sector. (2013). Hybrid position statement. Retrieved July 21, 2013, from http://www.independentsector.org/hybrid_position
92. Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137-159. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0772
93. Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethnics Quarterly, 12(2), 235-256. doi: 10.2307/3857812
94. Jones, G. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers' adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 262-279. doi: 10.2307/256188
95. Jones, M. B. (2007). The multiple sources of mission drift. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 299-307. doi: 10.1177/0899764007300385
96. Kanter, R. (2009). SuperCorp: How vanguard companies create innovation, profits, growth and social good. New York: Crown Business.
97. Kanter, R., & Summers, D. (1994). Doing well while doing good: Dilemmas of performance management in nonprofit organizations and the need for multiple-Constituency approach. In D. McKevitt & A. Lawton (Eds.), Public sector management: Theory, critique and practice (pp. 220-36). London: Sage.
98. Katz, R., & Kahn, D. (1967). The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
99. Kellogg, K. C. (2009). Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 657-711. doi: 10.1086/603535
100. Kennedy, E. D., & Haigh, N. (2013). Path to hybridization: Offensive and defensive changes to legal registration. Working Paper.
101. Kerlin, J. A. (2006). Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas, 17(3), 246-262. doi: 10.1007/s11266-006-9016-2
102. Ketchen, D. J., Combs, J. G., Russell, C. J., Shook, C., Dean, M. A., Runge, J., Lamoureux, S. (1997). Organizational configurations and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 223-240. doi: 10.2307/257028
103. Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689-713. doi: 10.2307/256170
104. Kraatz, M. S. (2009). Leadership as institutional work: A bridge to the other side. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 59-91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
105. Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243-275). Thousand Oals, CA: Sage.
106. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325-340.
107. Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109-155. doi: 10.1080/19416521003691287
108. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-47. doi: 10.2307/2391211
109. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
110. Lee, M. (in press). Mission and market? The performance of hybrid social ventures. Working Paper. Harvard Business School.
111. Lee, M., & Battilana, J. (2013). How the zebra got its stripes: Imprinting of individuals and hybrid social ventures. Harvard Business School Organizational Behavior Unit Working Paper (14-005).
112. Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2010). Is doing good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 182-200.
113. Lok, J. (2010). Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1305-1335. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57317866
114. London, T. (2009). Making better investments at the base of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review, 87(5), 106-113.
115. Mair, J. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Taking stock and looking ahead. In A. Fayolle & H. Matlay (Eds.), Handbook of research and social entrepreneurship (pp. 15-28). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
116. Mair, J., Battilana, J., & Cardenas, J. (2012). Organizing for society: A typology of social entrepreneuring models. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 353-373. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1414-3
117. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
118. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
119. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305. doi: 10.2307/3556659
120. Marquis, C., & Chen, Y. (2013). Environmental reporting in China still likely to be greenwash. Chinadialogue. https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/6543-Environmental-reporting-in-China-still-likely-to-be-greenwash
121. Marquis, C., & Velez-Villa, L. (2012). Warby Parker: Vision of a "good" fashion brand. Harvard Business School Case No. 413-051. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
122. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117-127.
123. Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2010). Microfinance mission drift? World Development, 38, 28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.05.006
124. Meyer, H.-D., & Rowan, B. (2006). The new institutionalism in education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
125. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. doi: 10.1086/226550
126. Minkoff, D. C., & Powell, W. (2006). Nonprofit mission: Constancy, responsiveness, or deflection? In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The non-profit sector (pp. 591-611). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
127. Moizer, J., & Tracey, P. (2010). Strategy making in social enterprise: The role of resource allocation and its effects on organizational sustainability. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 27(3), 252-266. doi: 10.1002/sres.1006
128. Murphy, P., & Coombes, S. (2009). A model of social entrepreneurial discovery. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 325-336. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9921-y
129. Murray, F. (2010). The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. American Journal of Sociology, 116(2), 341-388. doi: 10.1086/653599
130. Murray, J. H. (2012). Choose your own master: Social enterprise, certifications, and benefit corporation statutes. American University Business Law Review, 2(2), 1-53.
131. Nadler, D., & Tushman, M. (1980). A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2), 35-51. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(80)90039-X
132. Nicholls, A. (2009). "We do good things, don't we?": "Blended value accounting" in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6), 755-769. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.008
133. Nielsen, R. P. (1986). Piggybacking strategies for nonprofits: A shared costs approach. Strategic Management Journal, 7(3), 201-215. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250070303
134. O'Donahoe, N., Leijonhufvud, C., Saltuk, Y., Bugg-Levine, A., & Brandenburg, M. (2010). Impact investments: An emerging asset class. J.P. Morgan Global Research. Research Note. November 29, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/uploads/files/2b053b2b-8feb-46ea-adbd-f89068d59785-impact.pdf
135. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145-179.
136. O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
137. O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338. doi: 10.5465/amp.2013.0025
138. Owen-Smith, J. (2003). From separate system to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at research one universities. Research Policy, 32, 1081-1104. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00111-7
139. Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455-476. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.51142368
140. Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2012). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to conflicting institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972-1001. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0405
141. Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39, 3-35. doi: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039B014
142. Padgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. (2012). The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
143. Paton, R. (2003). Managing and measuring social enterprise. London: Sage.
144. Pederson, J. S., & Dobbin, F. (2006). In search of identity and legitimation: Bridging organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 897-907. doi: 10.1177/0002764205284798
145. Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007
146. Perrini, F., & Vurro, C. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: Innovation and social change across theory and practice. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 57-85). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
147. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
148. Podolny, J. M., Khurana, R., & Besharov, M. L. (2010). Revisiting the meaning of leadership. In N. Nohria & R. Khurana (Eds.), Handbook of leadership theory and practice (pp. 65-105). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
149. Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 57-77. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.57
150. Pólos, L., Hannan, M. T., & Carroll, G. R. (2002). Foundations of a theory of social forms. Industrial & Corporate Change, 11, 85-115. doi: 10.1093/icc/11.1.85
151. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.
152. Powell, W. W., & Sandholtz, K. W. (2012). Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of organizational forms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6, 94-115. doi: 10.1002/sej.1129
153. Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18-42.
154. Pratt, M. G., & Rafaeli, A. (1997). Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 862-898. doi: 10.2307/256951
155. Rangan, V. K. (1993). The Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India: In service for sight. Harvard Business School Case 9-593-098. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
156. Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. (2000). Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 237-281. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22007-8
157. Reay, T., & Hinings, C. (2005). The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26, 349-382. doi: 10.1177/0170840605050872
158. Reiser, D., & Dean, S. (2013). Hunting stag with fly paper: A hybrid financial instrument for social enterprise. Boston College Law Review, 5r B.C.L. Rev. 1495.
159. Robinson, J. (2006). Navigating social and institutional barriers to markets: How social entrepreneurs identify and evaluate opportunities. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 95-121). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
160. Ruef, M., & Patterson, K. (2009). Credit and classification: The impact of industry boundaries in 19th century America. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(3), 486-520. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.486
161. Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877-904. doi: 10.2307/2393619
162. Sabeti, H. (2011). The for-benefit enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 89(11), 99-103.
163. Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50, 395-426. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00913.x
164. Schein, E. (2006). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
165. Schneiberg, M. (2002). Organizational heterogeneity and the production of new forms: Politics, social movements and mutual companies in American fire insurance, 1900-1930. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 19, 39-89. doi: 10.1016/S0733-558X(02)19002-1
166. Schneiberg, M. (2011). Toward an organizationally diverse American Capitalism? Cooperative, mutual, and local, state-owned enterprise. Seattle University Law Review, 34(4), 1409-1434.
167. Schneiberg, M., King, M., & Smith, T. (2008). Social movements and organizational form: Cooperative alternatives to corporations in the American insurance, dairy and grain industries. American Sociological Review, 73, 635-667. doi: 10.1177/000312240807300406
168. Scott, R. A. (1967). The factory as a social service organization: Goal displacement in workshops for the blind. Social Problems, 15(2), 160-175. doi: 10.2307/799510
169. Scott, W. R. (1981). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
170. Scott, W. R. (2004). Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 1-21. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110644
171. Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open systems perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
172. Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The organization of societal sectors: Propositions and early evidence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 108-140). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
173. Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2004). Social entrepreneurship: The contribution of individual entrepreneurs to sustainable development. Working Paper 553. IESE Business School.
174. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
175. Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. E. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222-247.
176. Sharir, M., & Lerner, M. (2006). Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 6-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.004
177. Short, J. C., Moss, T. W., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2009). Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 161-194. doi: 10.1002/sej.69
178. Simon, H. (1948). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. New York: Macmillan.
179. Simon, J., Dale, H., & Chisolm, L. (2006). The federal tax treatment of charitable organizations. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 267-306). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
180. Simons, T., & Ingram, P. (1997). Organization and ideology: Kibbutzim and hired labor, 1951-1965. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 784-813. doi: 10.2307/2393657
181. Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407-442. doi: 10.5840/beq201323327
182. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381-403. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958
183. Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522-536. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
184. Stark, D. (1999). Heterarchy: Distributed authority and organizing of diversity. In J. H. Clippinger (Ed.), The biology of business: Decoding the natural laws of enterprise (pp. 153-180). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
185. Stern, R. N., & Barley, S. R. (1996). Organizations and social systems: Organization theory's neglected mandate. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 146-162. doi: 10.2307/2393989
186. Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142-193). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
187. Teasdale, S. (2012). Negotiating tensions: How do social enterprises in the homelessness field balance social and commercial considerations? Housing Studies, 27(4), 514-532. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2012.677015
188. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
189. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801-843. doi: 10.1086/210361
190. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: Foundations, research, and theoretical elaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
191. Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60-80. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0522
192. Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 8-30. doi: 10.2307/41165852
193. Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (2002). Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
194. VanSandt, C. V., Sud, M., & Marme, C. (2009). Enabling the original intent: Catalysts for social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 419-428. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0419-z
195. Weber, K. (2005). A toolkit for analyzing corporate cultural tookits. Poetics, 33, 227-252. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2005.09.011
196. Weber, K., & Dacin, T. (2011). The cultural construction of organizational life. Organization Science, 22(2), 286-298. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0632
197. Weisbrod, B. (1998). To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit section. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
198. Weisbrod, B. (2004). The pitfalls of profits. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2, 40-47.
199. Westall, A. (2009). Value and the third sector. TSRC Working Paper 25, Birmingham.
200. Wry, T., Cobb, J. A., & Aldrich, H. E. (2013). More than a metaphor: Assessing the historical legacy of resource dependence and its contemporary promise as a theory of environmental complexity. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 439-486. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2013.781862
201. Wry, T., Lounsbury, M., & Jennings, P. D. (2013). Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Academy of Management Journal. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0588
202. Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43, 308-325. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005
203. Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519-532. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
204. Zilber, T. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 234-254. doi: 10.2307/3069294
205. Zuckerman, E. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398-1438. doi: 10.1086/210178