Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review

Journal of Management

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 637-664

  Etzion, Dror ^a  

^a IESE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Spain)

Author keywords

Environmental strategy; Industry dynamics; Natural environment; Organizations and environment; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447647514     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: 15571211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0149206307302553     Document Type: Review

References (150)

1. Arora, S., & Cason, T.N. 1996. Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? Understanding participation in EPA's 33/50 program. Land Economics, 72 (4): 413-432.
2. Arora, S., & Gangopadhyay, S. 1995. Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 28: 289-309.
3. Ashby, S., Chuah, S.H., & Hoffmann, R. 2004. Industry self-regulation: A game-theoretic typology of strategic voluntary compliance. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 11 (1): 91-106.
4. Banerjee, S.B. 2001. Managerial implications of corporate environmentalism: Interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38 (4): 489-513.
5. Banerjee, S.B., Iyer, E.S., & Kashyap, R.K. 2003. Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67: 106-122.
6. Bansal, P. 2003. From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14 (5): 510-527.
7. Bansal, P. 2005. Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 197-218.
8. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. 2004. Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (1): 93-103.
9. Bansal, P., & Hunter, T. 2003. Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001. Journal of Business Ethics, 46: 289-299.
10. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4): 717-736.
11. Barney, J.B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99-120.
12. Boiral, O. 2002. Tacit knowledge and environmental management. Long Range Planning, 35: 291-317.
13. Bowen, F.E. 2000. Environmental visibility: A trigger of green organizational response? Business Strategy and the Environment, 9: 92-107.
14. Bowen, F.E. 2002a. Does size matter? Organizational slack and visibility as alternative explanations for environmental responsiveness. Business & Society, 41 (1): 118-124.
15. Bowen, F.E. 2002b. Organizational slack and corporate greening: Broadening the debate. British Journal of Management, 13: 305-316.
16. Bowen, F.E., & Sharma, S. 2005. Resourcing corporate environmental strategy: Behavioral and resource-based perspectives. Paper presented at the conference of the Academy of Management, Honolulu, HI.
17. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. 2003. Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 453-470.
18. Chatterji, A., & Levine, D. 2006. Breaking down the wall of codes: Evaluating non-financial performance measurement. California Management Review, 48 (2): 29-51.
19. Christmann, P. 2000. Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost competitiveness: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4): 663-680.
20. Christmann, P. 2004. Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (5): 747-760.
21. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. 2001. Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3): 439-458.
22. Cole, M.A., Elliott, R.J.R., & Shimamoto, K. 2005. Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: An analysis of the UK manufacturing sector. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50: 121-143.
23. Coombs, J.E., & Gilley, K.M. 2005. Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 827-840.
24. Darnall, N. 2003. Why firms adopt ISO 14001: An institutional and resource based view. Paper presented at the conference of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA.
25. Darnall, N., & Carmin, J. 2005. Greener and cleaner? The signaling accuracy of U.S. voluntary environmental programs. Policy Sciences, 38: 71-90.
26. Delmas, M.A., & Terlaak, A.K. 2002. The institutional context of environmental voluntary agreements. In A. J. Hoffman &M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 346-366. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27. Delmas, M.A. & Toffel, M.W. 2004. Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13: 209-222.
28. Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. 2005. The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61 (2): 51-63.
29. Doh, J.P., & Guay, T.R. 2006. Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (1): 47-73.
30. Dooley, R.S., & Fryxell, G.E. 1999. Are conglomerates less environmentally responsible? An empirical examination of diversification strategy and subsidiary pollution in the U.S. chemical industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 21: 1-14.
31. Eesley, C., & Lenox, M.J. 2006. Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 765-781.
32. Elkington, J., Emerson, J., & Beloe, S. 2006. The value palette: A tool for full spectrum strategy. California Management Review, 48 (2): 6-28.
33. Fineman, S., & Clarke, K. 1996. Green stakeholders: Industry interpretations and response. Journal of Management Studies, 33 (6): 715-730.
34. Florida, R. 1996. Lean and green: The move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. California Management Review, 39 (1): 80-105.
35. Forbes, L.C., & Jermier, J.M. 2002. The institutionalization of voluntary organizational greening and the ideals of environmentalism: Lessons about official culture from symbolic organization theory. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 194-213. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36. Foster, C., & Green, K. 2000. Greening the innovation process. Business Strategy and the Environment, 9: 287-303.
37. Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2): 191-205.
38. Geffen, C.A., & Rothenberg, S. 2000. Suppliers and environmental innovation: The automotive paint process. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20 (2): 166-186.
39. Gladwin, T.N., Kennelly, J.J., & Krause, T.-S. 1995. Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20 (4): 874-907.
40. Goldman, M., & Schurman, R.A. 2000. Closing the "great divide": New social theory on society and nature. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 563-584.
41. Grant, D.S.I., Bergesen, A.J., & Jones, A.W. 2002. Organizational size and pollution: The case of the U.S. chemical industry. American Sociological Review, 67 (3): 389 - 407.
42. Guenster, N., Derwall, J., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. 2005. The economic value of corporate eco-efficiency. Paper presented at the conference of the Academy of Management, Honolulu, HI.
43. Harrison, K. 2002. Ideas and environmental standard-setting: A comparative study of regulation of the pulp and paper industry. Governance, 15 (1): 65-96.
44. Hart, S.L. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20 (4): 986-1014.
45. Hart, S.L. 1997. Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75 (1): 66-76.
46. Hart, S.L., & Milstein, M.B. 1999. Global sustainability and the creative destruction of industries. Sloan Management Review, 41 (1): 23-33.
47. Hawken, P., Lovins, A., & Lovins, L.H. 2000. Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution. Boston: Back Bay.
48. Hendry, J.R. 2006. Taking aim at business: What factors lead environmental non-governmental organizations to target particular firms? Business & Society, 45 (1): 47-86.
49. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. 1996. The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30: 381-395.
50. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. 1999. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (1): 87-99.
51. Hillman, A.J., & Keim, G.D. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22: 125-129.
52. Hillman, A.J., Keim, G.D., & Luce, R.A. 2001. Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference? Business & Society, 40 (3): 295-314.
53. Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E. 2002. Decoupling in the environmental arena: The case of environmental impact assessments. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 214-231. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
54. Hoffman, A.J. 1999. Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (4): 351-371.
55. Hoffman, A.J. 2001. From heresy to dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56. Hoffman, A.J. 2005. Climate change strategy: The business logic behind voluntary greenhouse gas reductions. California Management Review, 47 (3): 21-46.
57. Hoffman, A.J., & Ocasio, W. 2001. Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organization Science, 12 (4): 414-434.
58. Hoffman, A.J., Riley, H.C., Troast, J.G.J., & Bazerman, M.H. 2002. Cognitive and institutional barriers to new forms of cooperation on environmental protection. American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (5): 820-845.
59. Hoffman, A.J., & Ventresca, M.J. 1999. The institutional framing of policy debates: Economics versus the environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (8): 1368-1392.
60. Hoffman, A.J., & Ventresca, M.J. 2002. Introduction. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 1-38. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
61. Howard-Grenville, J.A. 2002. Institutional evolution: The case of the semiconductor industry voluntary PFC emissions reduction agreements. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 291-308. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
62. Hunt, C.B.,& Auster, E.R. 1990. Proactive environmental management: Avoiding the toxic trap. Sloan Management Review, 31 (2): 7-18.
63. Hutchinson, C. 1996. Integrating environment policy with business strategy. Long Range Planning, 29 (1): 11-23.
64. Jennings, P.D., & Zandbergen, P.A. 1995. Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20 (4): 1015-1052.
65. Jennings, P.D., Zandbergen, P.A., & Martens, M.L. 2002. Complications in compliance: Variation in environmental enforcement in British Columbia's Lower Fraser Basin, 1985-1996. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 57-89. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
66. Jiang, R.J., & Bansal, P. 2003. Seeing the need for ISO 14001. Journal of Management Studies, 40 (4): 1047-1067.
67. Johnson, R.A., & Greening, D.W. 1999. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5): 564-576.
68. Judge, W.Q.J., & Douglas, T.J. 1998. Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Journal of Management Studies, 35 (2): 241-262.
69. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. 2002. Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 399-415.
70. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. 2006. Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1): 145-159.
71. Khanna, M., & Anton, W.R.Q. 2002. Corporate environmental management: Regulatory and market-based incentives. Land Economics, 78 (4): 539-558.
72. King, A.A., & Lenox, M.J. 2000. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's Responsible Care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4): 698-716.
73. King, A.A., & Lenox, M.J. 2001. Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Production and Operations Management, 10 (3): 244-256.
74. King, A.A., & Lenox, M.J. 2002. Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48 (2): 289-299.
75. King, A.A., Lenox, M.J., & Barnett, M.L. 2002. Strategic responses to the reputation commons problem. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 393-406. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
76. King, A.A., Lenox, M.J., & Terlaak, A.K. 2005. The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6): 1091-1106.
77. King, A.A., & Shaver, J.M. 2001. Are aliens green? Assessing foreign establishments' environmental conduct in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 1069-1085.
78. Klassen, R.D., & Whybark, D.C. 1999. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (6): 599-615.
79. Kleiner, A. 1991. What does it mean to be green ? Harvard Business Review, 69 (4): 38-47.
80. Kollman, K., & Prakash, A. 2002. EMS-based environmental regimes as club goods: Examining variations in firm-level adoption of ISO 14001 and EMAS in U.K., U.S. and Germany. Policy Sciences, 35: 43-67.
81. Konar, S., & Cohen, M.A. 1997. Information as regulation: The effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32: 109-124.
82. Lenox, M.J., & King, A.A. 2004. Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 331-345.
83. Lenox, M.J., King, A.A., & Ehrenfeld, J.R. 2000. An assessment of design-for-environment practices in leading U.S. electronics firms. Interfaces, 30 (3): 83-94.
84. Lenox, M.J., & Nash, J. 2003. Industry self-regulation and adverse selection: A comparison across four trade association programs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12: 343-356.
85. Levy, D.L. 1997. Environmental management as political sustainability. Organization & Environment, 10 (2): 126-147.
86. Levy, D.L., & Newell, P. 2000. Oceans apart? Business responses to the environment in Europe and North America. Environment, 42 (9): 8-20.
87. Levy, D.L., & Rothenberg, S. 2002. Heterogeneity and change in environmental strategy: Technological and political responses to climate change in the global automobile industry. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 173-193. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
88. Lewin, A.Y.,& Koza, M. 2001. Empirical research in co-evolutionary processes of strategic adaptation and change: The promise and the challenge. Organization Studies, 22 (6): I-xii.
89. Love, E.G., & Nohria, N. 2005. Reducing slack: The performance consequences of downsizing by large industrial firms, 1977-93. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 1087-1108.
90. Majumdar, S.K., & Marcus, A.A. 2001. Rules versus discretion: The productivity consequences of flexible regulation. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (1): 170-179.
91. Marcus, A.A., & Anderson, M.H. 2006. A general dynamic capability: Does it propagate business and social competencies in the retail food industry? Journal of Management Studies, 43 (1): 19-46.
92. Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 268-305.
93. Martin, R.L. 2002. The virtue matrix: Calculating the return on corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 80 (3): 68-75.
94. Mattingly, J.E., & Berman, S.L. 2006. Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45 (1): 20-46.
95. Maxwell, J., Rothenberg, S., Briscoe, F., & Marcus, A.A. 1997. Green schemes: Corporate environmental strategies and their implementation. California Management Review, 39 (3): 118 -134.
96. Maxwell, J.W., Lyon, T.P., & Hackett, S.C. 2000. Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. Journal of Law & Economics, 18: 583-617.
97. McGee, J. 1998. Commentary on corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework by A. M. Rugman and A. Verbeke. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 377-387.
98. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 603-609.
99. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26 (1): 117-127.
100. Mendel, P.J. 2002. International standardization and global governance: The spread of quality and environmental management standards. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 407-431. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
101. Meyer, J.W. 2002. Foreword. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: Xiii-xvii. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
102. Milstein, M.B., Hart, S.L., & Ilinitch, A. 2002. Coercion breeds variation: The differential impact of isomorphic pressures on environmental strategies. In A. J. Hoffman& M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 151-172. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
103. Mirvis, P.H. 1994. Environmentalism in progressive businesses. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 7: 82-100.
104. Mylonadis, Y. 2002. Open-sourcing environmental regulation: How to make firms compete for the natural environment. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 369-392. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
105. Nehrt, C. 1996. Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (7): 535-547.
106. Nehrt, C. 1998. Maintainability of first mover advantages when environmental regulations differ between countries. Academy of Management Review, 23 (1): 77-97.
107. Newton, T., & Harte, G. 1997. Green business: Technicist kitsch ? Journal of Management Studies, 34 (1): 75-98.
108. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L.,& Rynes, S.L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24 (3): 403-441.
109. Orsato, R.J., den Hond, F., & Clegg, S.R. 2002. The political ecology of automobile recycling in Europe. Organization Studies, 23 (4): 639-665.
110. Pedersen, E.R., & Neergaard, P. 2006. Caveat emptor-Let the buyer beware! Environmental labelling and the limitations of "green" consumerism. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15: 15-29.
111. Porter, M.E. 1981. The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 6 (4): 609-620.
112. Porter, M.E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68 (2): 73-93.
113. Porter, M.E. 1996. What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74 (6): 61-78.
114. Porter, M.E., & van der Linde, C. 1995a. Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73 (5): 120-134.
115. Porter, M.E., & van der Linde, C. 1995 b. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4): 97-118.
116. Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. 2004. The regulation dilemma: Cooperation and conflict in environmental governance. Public Administration Review, 64 (2): 152-163.
117. Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. 2005. Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms' regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49 (2): 235-248.
118. Prakash, A. 1999. A new-institutionalist perspective on ISO 14000 and Responsible Care. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8: 322-335.
119. Prakash, A., & Kollman, K. 2004. Policy modes, firms and the natural environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13: 107-128.
120. Prasad, P., & Elmes, M. 2005. In the name of the practical: Unearthing the hegemony of pragmatics in the discourse of environmental management. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (4): 845-867.
121. Ramus, C.A., & Montiel, I. 2005. When are corporate environmental policies a form of greenwashing ? Business & Society, 44 (4): 377-414.
122. Reinhardt, F.L. 1998. Environmental product differentiation: Implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review, 40 (4): 43-73.
123. Reinhardt, F.L. 1999. Market failure and the environmental policies of firms: Economic rationales for "beyond compliance" behavior. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3 (3): 9-21.
124. Ricart, J.E., Rodríguez, M.A., & Sánchez, P. 2005. Sustainability in the boardroom: An empirical examination of Dow Jones Sustainability World Index leaders. Corporate Governance, 5 (3): 24-41.
125. Rugman, A.M., & Verbeke, A. 1998. Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 363-375.
126. Russo, M.V. 2003. The emergence of sustainable industries: Building on natural capital. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 317-331.
127. Russo, M.V., & Fouts, P.A. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3): 534-559.
128. Russo, M.V., & Harrison, N.S. 2006. Internal organization and environmental performance: Clues from the electronics industry. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (4): 582-593.
129. Saiia, D.H., & Cyphert, D. 2003. The public discourse of the corporate citizen. Corporate Reputation Review, 6 (1): 47-57.
130. Sastry, M.A., Bernicke, J.W., & Hart, S.L. 2002. Changing shades of green: Coupling and decoupling in Monsanto's environmental orientations, 1991-1997. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 262-290. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
131. Senge, P.M., & Carstedt, G. 2001. Innovating our way to the next industrial evolution. Sloan Management Review, 42 (2): 24-38.
132. Sharma, S. 2000. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4): 681-697.
133. Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. 2005. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 159-180.
134. Sharma, S., Pablo, A.L., &; Vredenburg, H. 1999. Corporate environmental responsiveness strategies: The importance of issue interpretation and organizational context. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35 (1): 87-108.
135. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 729-753.
136. Smith, N.C. 2003. Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how? California Management Review, 45 (4): 52-76.
137. Sroufe, R. 2003. Effects of environmental management systems on environmental management practices and operations. Production and Operations Management, 12 (3): 416-431.
138. Sroufe, R., Curkovic, S., Montabon, F., & Melnyk, S.A. 2000. The new product design process and design for environment: "Crossing the chasm. " International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20 (2): 267-291.
139. Starik, M., & Marcus, A.A. 2000. Introduction to the special research forum on the management of organizations in the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4): 539-546.
140. Starik, M., & Rands, G.P. 1995. Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20 (4): 908-935.
141. Starkey, K., & Crane, A. 2003. Toward green narrative: Management and the evolutionary epic. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2): 220-237.
142. Taylor, B. 2005. Consumption: It is time for economists and scientists to talk. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9 (1-2): 14-17.
143. Tenbrunsel, A.E., Wade-Benzoni, K.A., Messick, D.M., & Bazerman, M.H. 2000. Understanding the influence of environmental standards on judgments and choices. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 854-866.
144. Theyel, G. 2000. Management practices for environmental innovation and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20 (2): 249-266.
145. Thornton, D., Kagan, R.A., & Gunningham, N. 2003. Sources of corporate environmental performance. California Management Review, 46 (1): 127-141.
146. Tilley, F. 1999. The gap between the environmental attitudes and the environmental behaviour of small firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8: 238-248.
147. Vastag, G., Kerekes, S., & Rondinelli, D.A. 1996. Evaluation of corporate environmental management approaches: A framework and application. International Journal of Production Economics, 43: 193-211.
148. Waddock, S.A., & Graves, S.B. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4): 303-319.
149. Wade-Benzoni, K.A., Hoffman, A.J., Thompson, L.L., Moore, D.A., Gillespie, J.J., &Bazerman, M.H. 2002. Barriers to resolution in ideologically based negotiations: The role of values and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 27 (1): 41-57.
150. Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. 1994. It's not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72 (3): 46-52.