Adaptability of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts to wine fermentation conditions relies on their strong ability to consume nitrogen

PLoS ONE

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2018, Pages

  Brice, Claire ^a   Cubillos, Francisco A ^a,b   Dequin, Sylvie ^c   Camarasa, Carole ^c   Martínez, Claudio ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE SANTIAGO DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b Millennium Institute for Integrative Systems and Synthetic Biology (MII SSB)   (Chile)

^c MONTPELLIER SUPAGRO   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NITROGEN; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL STRESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE LIBRARY; NITROGEN UPTAKE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; RNA EXTRACTION; RNA SEQUENCE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE 59A; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE A390D2; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE DBVPG6044; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE Y12; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE YPS128; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STARVATION; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; WINE; FUNGAL GENE; GENETICS; METABOLISM; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VALIDATION STUDY;

FERMENTATION; GENES, FUNGAL; NITROGEN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRIPTOME; WINE;

EID: 85042102724     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192383     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Querol A, Fernández-Espinar MT, del Olmo M, Barrio E. Adaptive evolution of wine yeast. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003; 86: 3–10. PMID: 12892918
2. Legras JL, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet JM, Karst F. Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. MolEcol. 2007; 16: 2091–2102.
3. Sicard D, Legras JL. Bread, beer and wine: yeast domestication in the Saccharomyces sensustricto complex. C R Biol. 2001; 334: 229–236.
4. Cubillos FA, Billi E, Zorgo E, Parts L, Fargier P, Omholt S, et al. Assessing the complex architecture of polygenic traits in diverged yeast populations. Mol Ecol. 2001; 20:1401–1413.
5. Landry CR, Townsend JP, Hartl DL, Cavalieri D. Ecological and evolutionary genomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Ecol. 2006; 15: 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02778.x PMID: 16499686
6. Hittinger CT. Saccharomyces diversity and evolution: a budding model genus. Trends Genet. 2013; 29: 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2013.01.002 PMID: 23395329
7. Mortimer RK. Evolution and variation of the yeast (Saccharomyces) genome. Genome Res. 2000; 10: 403–409. PMID: 10779481
8. Martini A. Origin and domestication of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Wine Res. 1993; 4: 165–176.
9. Naumov GI. Genetic identification of biological species in the Saccharomyces sensustricto complex. J Ind Appl Microbiol. 1996; 17: 295–302.
10. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, Warringer J, Parts L, James SA, et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature.2009; 458: 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07743 PMID: 19212322
11. Fay JC, Benavides JA. Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2005; 1: 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0010005 PMID: 16103919
12. Ibstedt S, Stenberg S, Bagés S, Gjuvsland AB, Salinas F, Kourtchenko O, et al. Concerted evolution of life stage performances signals recent selection on yeast nitrogen use. Mol Biol Evol. 2015; 32: 153–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu285 PMID: 25349282
13. Shen F, Niu X, Yang D, Ying Y, Li B, Zhu G, et al. Determination of amino acids in Chinese rice wine by Fourier transform near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2010; 58: 9809–9816. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf1017912 PMID: 20707307
14. Yu H, Zhang Y, Xu C, Tian H. Discrimination of wine age of Chinese rice wine by electronic tongue based on amino acid profiles. Transactions of Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. 2017; 33: 297–301.
15. Baker HG, Baker I. Amino acids in nectar and their evolutionary significance. Nature. 1973; 241: 543–545.
16. Gardener MC, Gillman MP. Analyzing variability in nectar amino acids: composition is less variable than concentration. J Chem Ecol. 2001; 27: 2545–2558. PMID: 11789958
17. Belly M, Sablayrolles JM. Barre P. Description of alcoholic fermentation kinetics: its variability and significance. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1990; 159: 25–32.
18. Crépin L, Sanchez I, Nidelet T, Dequin S, Camarasa C. Efficient ammonium uptake and mobilization of vacuolar arginine by Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains during wine fermentation. Microb. Cell Factories. 2014; 13: 109.
19. Bisson LF. Stuck and sluggish fermentations. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1999; 50: 107–119.
20. Brice C, Sanchez I, Tesnière C, Blondin B. Assessing the mechanisms responsible for differences in nitrogen requirements between Saccharomyces cerevisiaewine yeasts in alcoholic fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014a; 80: 1330–1339.
21. Freese S, Vogts T, Speer F, Schäfer B, Passoth V, Klinner U. C- and N-catabolic utilization of tricarboxylic acid cycle-related amino acids by Scheffersomycesstipitis. Yeast. 2011; 28: 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1845 PMID: 21360752
22. Rollero S, Bloem A, Camarasa C, Sanchez I, Ortiz-Julien A, Sablayrolles JM, et al. Combined effects of nutrients and temperature on the production of fermentative aromas by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015; 99: 2291–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6210-9 PMID: 25412578
23. Swiegers JH, Bartowsky EJ, Henschke PA, Pretorius IS. Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour. AUST J GRAPE WINE R. 2005; 11: 139–173.
24. Blateyron L, Sablayrolles JM. Stuck and slow fermentations in enology: statistical study of causes and effectiveness of combined additions of oxygen and diammonium phosphate. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2001; 91: 184–189. PMID: 16232972
25. Magasanik B, Kaiser CA. Nitrogen regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 2002; 290: 1–18. PMID: 12062797
26. Crépin L, Nidelet T, Shanchez I, Dequin S, Camarasa C. Sequential use of nitrogen compounds by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation: a model based on kinetic and regulation characteristics of nitrogen permeases. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012; 78: 8102–8111. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02294-12 PMID: 22983966
27. Marini AM, Vissers S, Urrestarazu A, André B. Cloning and expression of the MEP1 gene encoding an ammonium transporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1994; 13: 3456–3463. PMID: 8062822
28. Marini AM, Soussi-Boudekou S, Vissers S, André B. A family of ammonium transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997; 17: 4282–4293. PMID: 9234685
29. Grenson M, Mousset M, Wiame JM, Bechet J. Multiplicity of the amino acid permeases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Evidence for a specific arginine-transporting system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996; 127: 325–338.
30. Godard P, Urrestarazu A, Vissers S, Kontos K, Bontempi G, van Helden J, et al. Effect of 21 different nitrogen sources on global gene expression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 27: 3065–86. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01084-06 PMID: 17308034
31. Broach JR. Nutritional control of growth and development in yeast. Genetics. 2012; 192: 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.135731 PMID: 22964838
32. Forsberg H, Ljungdahl PO. Genetic and biochemical analysis of the yeast plasma membrane Ssy1p-Ptr3p-Ssy5p sensor of extracellular amino acids. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001a; 21: 814–826.
33. Ljungdahl PO. Amino-acid-induced signaling via the SPS-sensing pathway in yeast. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2009; 37: 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0370242 PMID: 19143640
34. Forsberg H, Ljungdahl PO. Sensors of extracellular nutrients in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 2001b; 40: 91–109.
35. Beltran G, Novo M, Rozès N, Mas A, Guillamón JM. Nitrogen catabolite repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentations. FEMS Yeast Res. 2004; 4:625–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsyr.2003.12.004 PMID: 15040951
36. Hinnebusch AG. Translational regulation of GCN4 and the general amino acid control of yeast. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2005; 59: 407–450. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.59.031805.133833 PMID: 16153175
37. Tesnière C, Brice C, Blondin B. Responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to nitrogen starvation in wine alcoholic fermentation. ApplMicrobiolBiotechnol. 2015; 99: 7025–34.
38. Gutiérrez A, Chiva R, Sancho M, Beltran G, Arroyo-López FN, Guillamon JM. Nitrogen requirements of commercial wine yeast strains during fermentation of a synthetic grape must. Food Microbiol. 2012; 31: 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2012.02.012 PMID: 22475939
39. Jara M, Cubillos FA, García V, Salinas F, Aguilera O, Liti G, et al. Mapping genetic variants underlying differences in the central nitrogen metabolism in fermenter yeasts. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e86533. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086533 PMID: 24466135
40. Valero E, Millan C, Ortega JM, Mauricio JC. Concentration of amino acids in wine after the end of fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. J Sci Food Agric. 2003; 83: 830–835.
41. Ough CS, Huang Z, An Dand, Stevens D. Amino acid uptake by four commercial yeasts at two different temperatures of growth and fermentation: effects on urea excretion and reabsorption. Am J Enol Vitic. 1991; 42: 26–40.
42. Jiranek V, Langridge P, Henschke PA. Amino acid and ammonium utilization by Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts from a chemically defined medium. Am J Enol Vitic. 1995; 46: 75–83.
43. Gutiérrez A, Beltran G, Warringer J, Guillamón JM. Genetic basis of variations in nitrogen source utilization in four wine commercial yeast strains. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6): e67166. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067166 PMID: 23826223
44. Brice C, Sanchez I, Bigey F, Legras JL, Blondin B. A genetic approach of wine yeast fermentation capacity in nitrogen-starvation reveals the key role of nitrogen signaling. BMC Genomics. 2014b; 15: 495.
45. Cubillos FA, Brice C, Molinet J, Tisné S, Abarca V, Tapia S, et al. Identification of nitrogen consumption genetic variants in yeast through QTL mapping and Bulk segregant RNA-seq analyses. G3 (Bethesda). 2017; 7: 1693–1705.
46. Cubillos FA, Louis EJ, Liti G. Generation of a large set of genetically tractable haploid and diploid Saccharomyces strains. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009; 9: 1217–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00583.x PMID: 19840116
47. Cubillos FA, Parts L, Salinas F, Bergström A, Scovacricchi E, Zia A, et al. High-resolution mapping of complex traits with a four-parent advanced intercross yeast population. Genetics. 2013; 195: 1141–55. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.155515 PMID: 24037264
48. Ambroset A, Petit M, Brion C, Sanchez I, Delobel P, Guérin C, et al. Deciphering the molecular basis of wine yeast fermentation traits using a combined genetic and genomic approach. G3 (Bethesda). 2011; 1: 263–281.
49. Marsit S, Mena A, Bigey F, Sauvage FX, Couloux A, Guy J, et al. Evolutionary advantage conferred by an eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer event in wine yeasts. Mol Biol Evol. 2015; 32: 1695–1707. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv057 PMID: 25750179
50. Bely M, Sablayrolles JM, Barre P. Automatic detection of assimilable nitrogen deficiencies during alcoholic fermentation in oenological conditions. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1990b; 70: 246–252.
51. Sablayrolles JM, Barre P, Grenier P. Design of laboratory automatic system for studying alcoholic fermentations in anisothermal oenological conditions. Biotechnol Tech. 1987; 1: 181–184.
52. Bezenger M, Navarro JM, Abbal P, Sablayrolles JM. Suivi de fermentation à l’aide d’un micro-ordinateur personnel. Application à la fermentation alcoolique en œnologie. Ind.Agr. Aliment. 1985; 102: 1283–1291.
53. Colombié S, Latrille E, Sablayrolles JM. Online estimation of assimilable nitrogen by electrical conductivity measurement during alcoholic fermentation in ecological conditions. J Biosci Bioeng. 2007; 103: 229–35. https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.103.229 PMID: 17434425
54. Nissen T, Schulze U, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. Flux distributions in anaerobic, glucose-limited continuous cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology. 1997; 143: 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-143-1-203 PMID: 9025295
55. Gómez-Alonso S, Hermosín-Gutiérrez I, García-Romero E. Simultaneous HPLC analysis of biogenic amines, amino acids, and ammonium ion as aminoenonederivatives in wine and beer samples. J Agric Food Chem. 2007; 55: 608–613. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062820m PMID: 17263449
56. Ingledew WM, Magnus CA, Sosulski FW. Influence of oxygen on proline utilization during the wine fermentation. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1987; 38: 246–248.
57. Bergstrom A, Simpson JT, Salinas F, Barré B, Parts L, Zia A, et al. A high-definition view of functional genetic variation from natural yeast genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014; 31: 872–888. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu037 PMID: 24425782
58. Guldener U, Heck S, Fielder T, Beinhauer J, Hegemann JH. A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996; 24: 2519–2524. PMID: 8692690
59. Salinas F, Cubillos FA, Soto D, Garcia V, Bergstrom A, Warringer J, et al. The genetic basis of natural variation in oenological traits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e49640. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049640 PMID: 23185390
60. Huxley C, Green ED, Dunham I. Rapid assessment of S. cerevisiae mating type by PCR. Trends Genet. 1990; 6: 236. PMID: 2238077
61. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 1987; 162: 156–159. PMID: 2440339
62. Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25: 1105–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120 PMID: 19289445
63. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25: 2078–2079. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352PMID: 19505943
64. Anders S, Pyl PT, Hubert W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31: 166–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 PMID: 25260700
65. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. “edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.” Bioinformatics. 2010; 26: 139–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 PMID: 19910308
66. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B. 1995; 85: 289–300.
67. Smyth GK, Speed TP. Normalization of cDNA microarray data. Methods. 2003; 31: 265–273. PMID: 14597310
68. Camarasa C, Sanchez I, Brial P, Bigey F, Dequin S. Phenotypic landscape of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation: evidence for origin-dependent metabolic traits. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e25147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025147 PMID: 21949874
69. Bataillon M, Rico A, Sablayrolles JM, Salmon JM, Barre P. Early thiamin assimilation by yeasts under enological conditions: impact on alcoholic fermentation kinetics. Journal of Fermentation Bioengineering. 1996; 82: 145–150.
70. Rosenfeld E, Beauvoit B, Blondin B, Salmon JM. Oxygen consumption by aerobic Saccharomyces cerevisiae under conditions: effect on fermentation kinetics. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003; 69: 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.1.113-121.2003 PMID: 12513985
71. Grauslund M, Didion T, Kielland-Brandt MC, Andersen HA. BAP2, a gene encoding a permease for branched-chain amino acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995; 1269: 275–80. PMID: 7495881
72. Schmidt A, Hall MN, Koller A. Two FK506 resistance-conferring genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, TAT1 and TAT2, encode amino acid permeases mediating tyrosine and tryptophan uptake. Mol Cell Biol. 1994; 14: 6597–606. PMID: 7523855
73. Lahtvee PJ, Kumar R, Hallström BM, Nielsen J. Adaptation to different types of stress converge on mitochondrial metabolism. Mol Biol Cell. 2016; 27: 2505–2145. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-03-0187PMID: 27307591
74. Puria R, Mannan MA, Chopra-Dewasthaly R, Ganesan K. Critical role of RPI1 in the stress tolerance of yeast during ethanolic fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009; 9: 1161–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00549.x PMID: 19678848
75. Ganou-Parfait B, Fahrasmane L, Galzy P, Parfait A. Les bactéries anaérobies des milieux fermentaire à base de jus de canne à sucre. I.A.A. 1989; 6: 579–585.
76. Kitamoto K, Yoshizawa K, Ohsumi Y, Anraku Y. Mutants of Sacharomyces cerevisiae with defective vacuolar function. J Bacteriol. 1988; 170: 2687–2691. PMID: 3131305
77. Tan SZ, Manchester S, Prather KL. Controlling central carbon metabolism for improved pathway yields in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol. 2016; 19: 116–24.
78. Crépin L, Sanchez I, Nidelet T, Dequin S, Camarasa C. Efficient ammonium uptake and mobilization of vacuolar arginine by Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains during wine fermentation. Microb Cell Fact. 2014; 13: 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-014-0109-0 PMID: 25134990
79. Regenberg B, Holmberg S, Olsen LD, Kielland-Brandt MC. Dip5p mediates high-affinity and high-capacity transport of L-glutamate and L-aspartate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 1998; 33: 171–7. PMID: 9508791
80. Ibáñez C, Pérez-Torrado R, Chiva R, Guillamón JM, Barrio E, Querol A. Comparative genomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts isolated from fermentations of traditional beverages unveils different adaptive strategies. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014; 171: 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.10.023 PMID: 24334254
81. Pérez-Torrado R, Carrasco P, Aranda A, Gimeno-Alcañiz J, Pérez-Ortín JE, Matallana E,et al. Study of the first hours of microvinification by the use of osmotic stress-response genes as probes. Systematic and Applied Microbiology.2002; 25: 153–161. PMID: 12086182
82. Bauer FF, Pretorius IS. Yeast stress response and fermentation efficiency: how to survive the making of wine—a review. S Afr J Enol Vitic. 2000; 21:2751.
83. Gedvilaite A, Sasnauskas K. Control of the expression of the ADE gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 1994; 25: 475–9. PMID: 8082196
84. Ljungdahl Per O, Daignan-Fornier B. Regulation of amino acid, nucleotide, and phosphate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2012; 190: 885–929. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.133306 PMID: 22419079
85. Manginot C, Roustan JL, Sablayrolles JM. Nitrogen demand of different yeast strains during alcoholic fermentation. Importance of the stationary phase. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1998; 23: 511–517
86. Bell SJ, Henschke PA. Implications of nitrogen nutrition for grapes, fermentation and wine. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 2005; 11: 242–295.
87. Goddard MR, Greig D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a nomadic yeast with no niche? FEMS Yeast Res. 2015; 15: fov009. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fov009 PMID: 25725024
88. Boynton PJ, Greig D. The ecology and evolution of non-domesticated Saccharomyces species. Yeast. 2014; 31: 449–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.3040 PMID: 25242436
89. Gallone B, Steensels J, Prahl T, et al. Domestication and divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae beer yeasts. Cell. 2016; 166: 1397–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.020 PMID: 27610566