Assessing the mechanisms responsible for differences between nitrogen requirements of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts in alcoholic fermentation

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1330-1339

  Brice, Claire ^a,b,c   Sanchez, Isabelle ^a,b,c   Tesnière, Catherine ^a,b,c   Blondin, Bruno ^a,b,c  

^a SPO   (France)

^b MONTPELLIER SUPAGRO   (France)

^c UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLIC FERMENTATION; BIOSYNTHETIC GENE; ESSENTIAL NUTRIENTS; EXPRESSION PATTERNS; FERMENTATION RATE; NITROGEN DEFICIENCY; NITROGEN REQUIREMENTS; PHYSIOLOGICAL TRAIT;

FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION; YEAST;

NITROGEN;

ALCOHOL; ASSESSMENT METHOD; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION; NITROGEN; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN; SIGNALING; YEAST;

ALCOHOL; NITROGEN;

FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WINE;

ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; NITROGEN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WINE;

EID: 84893346250     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03856-13     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bely M, Sablayrolles JM, Barre P. 1990. Automatic detection of assimilable nitrogen deficiencies during alcoholic fermentation in oenological conditions. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 70:246-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0922-338X(90)90057-4.
2. Bely M, Sablayrolles JM, Barre P. 1990. Description of alcoholic fermentation kinetics: its variability and significance. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 159:25-32.
3. Lafon-Lafourcade S, Peynaud E. 1959. Dosage microbiologique des acides aminés des moûts de raisins et de vins. Vitis 2:45-46.
4. Bezenger MC, Navarro JM. 1987. Influence de l'azote sur la fermentation alcoolique en milieu modèle simulant les conditions de l'oenologie. Sci. Alim. 7:41-60.
5. Blateyron L, Sablayrolles JM. 2001. Stuck and slow fermentations in enology: statistical study of causes and effectiveness of combined additions of oxygen and diammonium phosphate. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 91:184-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(01)80063-3.
6. Kunkee RE. 1991. Relationship between nitrogen content in must and sluggish fermentation, p 148-155. In Rantz JM (ed), Proceedings of the international symposium on nitrogen in grapes and wine. American Society for Enology and Viticulture, Davis, CA.
7. Maisonnave P, Sanchez I, Moine V, Dequin S, Galeote V. 2013. Stuck fermentation: development of a synthetic stuck wine and study of a restart procedure. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 163:239-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.03.004.
8. Monk PR. 1982. Effect of nitrogen and vitamin supplements on yeast growth and rate of fermentation of Rhine Riesling grape juice. Food Technol. 34:328-332.
9. Rozes N, Cuzange B, Larue F, Ribéreau-Gayon P. 1988. Incidence sur la fermentation alcoolique d'une supplémentation du moût de raisin en sulfate d'ammonium. Conn. Vigne Vin 22:163-167.
10. Salmon JM. 1989. Effect of sugar transport inactivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae on sluggish and stuck oenological fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:933-958.
11. Agenbach WA. 1977. A study of must nitrogen content in relation to incomplete fermentations, yeast production and fermentation activity, p 66-68. In Beukman EF (ed), Proceedings of the South African Society of Enology and Viticulture. South African Society of Enology and Viticulture, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
12. Gutiérrez A, Chiva R, Sancho M, Beltran G, Arroyo-López FN, Guillamon JM. 2012. Nitrogen requirements of commercial wine yeast strains during fermentation of a synthetic grape must. Food Microbiol. 31:25-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2012.02.012.
13. Manginot C, Sablayrolles JM, Roustan JL, Barre P. 1997. Use of constant rate alcoholic fermentations to compare the effectiveness of different nitrogen sources added during the stationary phase. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 20:373-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(96)00158-5.
14. Manginot C, Roustan JL, Sablayrolles JM. 1998. Nitrogen demand of different yeast strains during alcoholic fermentation. Importance of the stationary phase. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 23:511-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(98)00080-5.
15. Rossignol T, Dulau L, Julien A, Blondin B. 2003. Genome-wide monitoring of wine yeast gene expression during alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 20:1369-1385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.1046.
16. Rossignol T, Kobi D, Jacquet-Gutfreud L, Blondin B. 2009. The proteome of a wine yeast strain during fermentation, correlation with the transcriptome. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107:47-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04156.x.
17. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, Botstein D, Brown PO. 2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11:4241-4257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.11.12.4241.
18. Jia MH, Larossa RA, Lee JM, Rafalski A, Derose E, Gonye G, Xue Z. 2000. Global expression profiling of yeast treated with an inhibitor of amino acid biosynthesis, sulfometuron methyl. Physiol. Genomics 3:83-92.
19. Natarajan K, Meyer MR, Jackson BM, Slade D, Roberts C, Hinnebusch AG, Marton MJ. 2001. Transcriptional profiling shows that Gcn4p is a master regulator of gene expression during amino acid starvation in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:4347-4368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.13.4347-4368.2001.
20. Cardenas ME, Cutler NS, Lorenz MC, Di Como CJ, Heitman J. 1999. The TOR signaling cascade regulates gene expression in response to nutrients. Genes Dev. 13:3271-3279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.24.3271.
21. Hardwick JS, Kuruvilla FG, Tong JK, Shamji AF, Schreiber SL. 1999. Rapamycin-modulated transcription defines the subset of nutrientsensitive signaling pathways directly controlled by the Tor proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:14866-14870. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.26.14866.
22. Piggott N, Cook MA, Tyers M, Measday V. 2011. Genome-wide fitness profiles reveal a requirement for autophagy during yeast fermentation. G3 (Bethesda, MD) 1:353-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.111.000836.
23. White TJ, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, p 315-322. In MA Innis, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (ed), PCR protocols. A guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
24. Novo M, Bigey F, Beyne E, Galeote V, Gavory Mallet FS, Cambon B, Legras JL, Wincker P, Casaregola S, Dequin S. 2009. Eukaryote-toeukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:16333-16338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904673106.
25. Guillaume C, Delobel P, Sablayrolles JM, Blondin B. 2007. Molecular basis of fructose utilization by the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a mutated HXT3 allele enhances fructose fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:2432-2439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02269-06.
26. Sablayrolles JM, Barre P, Grenier P. 1987. Design of laboratory automatic system for studying alcoholic fermentations in an isothermal oenological condition. Biotechnol. Tech. 1:181-184.
27. Scheiner D. 1976. Determination of ammonia and Kjeldahl nitrogen by endophenol method. Water Res. 10:31-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(76)90154-8.
28. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. 1987. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 162:156-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/abio.1987.9999.
29. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
30. Lê S, Josse J, Husson F. 2008. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Software 25:1-18.
31. Smyth GK. 2004. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 3:Article 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1027.
32. Smyth GK, Michaud J, Scott H. 2005. The use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarrays experiments. Bioinformatics 21:2067-2075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti270.
33. Smyth GK, Speed TP. 2003. Normalization of cDNA microarray data. Methods 31:265-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00155-5.
34. Benjamini Y, Dray D, Elmer G, Kafkafi N, Golani I. 2001. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav. Brain Res. 125:279-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00297-2.
35. de Hoon MJ, Imoto S, Nolan J, Miyano S. 2004. Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics 20:1453-1454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth078.
36. Saldanha AJ. 2004. Java Treeview extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20:3246-3248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth349.
37. Varela C, Pizarro F, Agosin E. 2004. Biomass content governs fermentation rate in nitrogen-deficient wine musts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:3392-3400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.6.3392-3400.2004.
38. Damon C, Vallon L, Zimmermann S, Haider MZ, Galeote V, Dequin S, Luis P, Fraissinet-Tachet L, Marmeisse R. 2011. A novel fungal family of oligopeptide transporters identified by functional metatranscriptomics of soil eukaryotes. ISME J. 5:1871-1880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.67.
39. Novo MT, Beltran G, Rozes N, Guillamon JM, Mas A. 2005. Effect of nitrogen limitation and surplus upon trehalose metabolism in wine yeast. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 66:560-566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1676-5.
40. Julien A, Roustan JL, Dulau L, Sablayrolles JM. 2000. Comparison of nitrogen and oxygen demands of enological yeasts: technological consequences. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 51:215-222.
41. Watanabe D, Araki Y, Zhou Y, Maeya N, Akao T, Shimoi H. 2012. A loss-of-function mutation in the PAS kinase Rim15p is related to defective quiescence entry and high fermentation rates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae sake yeast strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:4008-4016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00165-12.
42. Pedruzzi I, Dubouloz F, Cameroni E, Wanke V, Roosen J, Winderickx J, De Virgilio C. 2003. TOR and PKA signaling pathways converge on the protein kinase Rim15 to control entry into G0. Mol. Cell 12:1607-1613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00485-4.
43. Swinnen E, Wanke V, Roosen J, Smets B, Dubouloz F, Pedruzzi I, Cameroni E, De Virgilio C, Winderickx J. 2006. Rim15 and the crossroads of nutrient signalling pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Div. 1:3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-1-3.
44. Klosinska MM, Crutchfield CA, Bradley PH, Rabinowitz JD, Broach JR. 2011. Yeast cells can access distinct quiescent states. Genes Dev. 25:336-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2011311.
45. Noguchi C, Watanabe D, Zhou Y, Akao T, Shimoi H. 2012. Association of constitutive hyperphosphorylation of Hsf1p with a defective ethanol stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae sake yeast strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:385-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06341-11.
46. Watanabe D, Wu H, Noguchi C, Zhou Y, Akao T, Shimoi H. 2011. Enhancement of the initial rate of ethanol fermentation due to dysfunction of yeast stress response components Msn2p and/or Msn4p. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:934-941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01869-10.