Pursuing a Low Meat Diet to Improve Both Health and Sustainability: How Can We Use the Frames that Shape Our Meals?

Ecological Economics

Volumn 142, Issue , 2017, Pages 238-248

  de Boer, Joop ^a   Aiking, Harry ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Frame; Health; Meat consumption; Plant protein; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

DIET; FOOD CONSUMPTION; HEALTH IMPACT; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; LITERATURE REVIEW; MEAT; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; PROTEIN; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 85030537997     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.037     Document Type: Review

References (142)

1. Aiking, H., Protein production: planet, profit, plus people?. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 100:suppl (2014), 483S–489S.
2. Allievi, F., Vinnari, M., Luukkanen, J., Meat consumption and production-analysis of efficiency, sufficiency and consistency of global trends. J. Clean. Prod. 92 (2015), 142–151.
3. Anderson, E.C., Barrett, L.F., Affective beliefs influence the experience of eating meat. PLoS One, 11(8), 2016, e0160424.
4. Apostolidis, C., McLeay, F., Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution. Food Policy 65 (2016), 74–89.
5. Avnet, T., Laufer, D., Higgins, E.T., Are all experiences of fit created equal? Two paths to persuasion. J. Consum. Psychol. 23:3 (2013), 301–316.
6. Bacon, T., Framing the family meal: a comparison of social marketing campaigns and parents’ views. J. Fam. Issues, 2015, 10.1177/0192513X15596196.
7. Barsalou, L.W., Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22:4 (1999), 577–660.
8. Bastian, B., Loughnan, S., Resolving the meat-paradox: a motivational account of morally troublesome behavior and its maintenance. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev., 2016, 10.1177/1088868316647562.
9. Baudry, J., Méjean, C., Allès, B., Péneau, S., Touvier, M., Hercberg, S., Kesse-Guyot, E., Contribution of organic food to the diet in a large sample of French adults (the NutriNet-Santé cohort study). Nutrients 7:10 (2015), 8615–8632.
10. Bech-Larsen, T., Mørk, T., Kolle, S., New Nordic cuisine: is there another back to the future? An informed viewpoint on NNC value drivers and market scenarios. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 50 (2016), 249–253.
11. Bednarek, M.A., Frames revisited - the coherence-inducing function of frames. J. Pragmat. 37:5 (2005), 685–705.
12. Benford, R.D., Snow, D.A., Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 26 (2000), 611–639.
13. Bourdieu, P., Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. (R. Nice, Trans). 1984, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (Original work published in 1979).
14. Bradbury, J., Nicolaou, M., Men Eating Female/Healthy Foods are Judged as More Feminine than Men Eating Male/Unhealthy Foods, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 71, 2012, E148 (OCE2).
15. Bratanova, B., Loughnan, S., Bastian, B., The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals. Appetite 57 (2011), 193–196.
16. Bratanova, B., Vauclair, C.M., Kervyn, N., Schumann, S., Wood, R., Klein, O., Savouring morality. Moral satisfaction renders food of ethical origin subjectively tastier. Appetite 91 (2016), 137–149.
17. Brockriede, W., Where is argument?. Benoit, W.L., Hample, D., Benoit, P.J., (eds.) Readings in Argumentation, 1992, Foris Publications, Berlin, 73–78.
18. Buder, F., Feldmann, C., Hamm, U., Why regular buyers of organic food still buy many conventional products: product-specific purchase barriers for organic food consumers. Br. Food J. 116:3 (2014), 390–404.
19. Byrkjeflot, H., Pedersen, J.S., Svejenova, S., From label to practice: the process of creating New Nordic Cuisine. J. Culinary Sci. Technol. 11:1 (2013), 36–55.
20. Callon, M., An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology. Callon, M., (eds.) The Laws of the Markets, 1998, Blackwell Publishers, London, 244–269.
21. Camilleri, G., Verger, M., Huneau, E.O., Carpentier, J.F., Dubuisson, F., Mariotti, F., Plant and animal protein intakes are differently associated with nutrient adequacy of the diet of French adults. J. Nutr. 143:9 (2013), 1466–1473.
22. Castellini, C., Berri, C., Le Bihan-Duval, E., Martino, G., Qualitative attributes and consumer perception of organic and free-range poultry meat. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 64:4 (2008), 500–512.
23. Clayton, S., Myers, G., Conservation Psychology: Understanding and Promoting Human Care for Nature. 2009, John Wiley & Sons.
24. Clonan, A., Wilson, P., Swift, J.A., Leibovici, D.G., Holdsworth, M., Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability. Public Health Nutr. 18:13 (2015), 2446–2456.
25. Combet, E., Jarlot, A., Aidoo, K.E., Lean, M., E., Development of a nutritionally balanced pizza as a functional meal designed to meet published dietary guidelines. Public Health Nutr. 17:1 (2014), 2577–2586.
26. Cook, T.M., Russell, J.M., Barker, M.E., Dietary advice for muscularity, leanness and weight control in Men's health magazine: a content analysis. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 2014, 1062.
27. de Bakker, E., Dagevos, H., Reducing meat consumption in today's consumer society: questioning the citizen-consumer gap. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 25 (2012), 877–894.
28. de Boer, J., Boersema, J.J., Aiking, H., Consumers’ motivational associations favoring free-range meat or less meat. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 850–860.
29. de Boer, J., de Witt, A., Aiking, H., Help the climate, change your diet: a cross-sectional study on how to involve consumers in a transition to a low-carbon society. Appetite 98 (2016), 19–27.
30. de Boer, J., Schösler, H., Aiking, H., Towards a reduced meat diet: mindset and motivation of young vegetarians, low, medium and high meat-eaters. Appetite 113 (2017), 387–397.
31. de Boer, J., Schösler, H., Boersema, J.J., Motivational differences in food orientation and the choice of snacks made from lentils, locusts, seaweed or “hybrid” meat. Food Qual. Prefer. 28:1 (2013), 32–35.
32. de France, S.D., Zooarchaeology in complex societies: political economy, status, and ideology. J. Archaeol. Res. 17:2 (2009), 105–168.
33. Douglas, M., Deciphering a meal. Daedalus 101 (1972), 61–81.
34. Douglas, M., Nicod, M., Taking the biscuit: the structure of British meals. New Soc. 19 (1974), 744–747.
35. Enax, L., Krapp, V., Piehl, A., Weber, B., Effects of social sustainability signaling on neural valuation signals and taste-experience of food products. Front. Behav. Neurosci., 9, 2015, 247.
36. Ensaff, H., Coan, S., Sahota, P., Braybrook, D., Akter, H., McLeod, H., Adolescents’ food choice and the place of plant-based foods. Nutrients 7:6 (2015), 4619–4637.
37. Fiddes, N., Meat. A Natural Symbol. 1991, Routledge, London.
38. Fillmore, C., F., Frame semantics and the nature of language. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 280:1 (1976), 20–32.
39. Fillmore, C., F., & Atkins, B., T., Toward a frame-based lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors. Lehrer, A., Kittay, E.F., (eds.) Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, 1992, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 75–102.
40. Fischer, C.G., Garnett, T., Plates, Pyramids, Planet: Developments in National Healthy and Sustainable Dietary Guidelines: A State of Play Assessment. 2016, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and The Food Climate Research Network at The University of Oxford, Rome.
41. Fogel, A., Theoretical and applied dynamic systems research in developmental science. Child Dev. Perspect. 5:4 (2011), 267–272.
42. GfK EU3C, Final Report - Consumer Market Study on the Functioning of the Meat Market for Consumers in the European Union SANCO/2009/B1/010. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumer_evidence/market_studies/meat_market/index_en.htm, 2012 (Accessed January, 26 2016).
43. Gilead, M., Liberman, N., Maril, A., From mind to matter: neural correlates of abstract and concrete mindsets. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9:5 (2014), 638–645.
44. Glowka, W., Melancon, M., Wyckoff, D.C., Among the new words. Am. Speech 79:2 (2004), 194–200.
45. Goffman, E., Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. 1974, Penguin, Harmondsworth, UK.
46. Graça, J., Calheiros, M., M., & Oliveira, A., Situating moral disengagement: motivated reasoning in meat consumption and substitution. Personal. Individ. Differ. 90 (2016), 353–364.
47. Graça, J., Calheiros, M.M., Oliveira, A., Attached to meat? (un)willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet. Appetite 95 (2015), 113–125.
48. Graça, J., Oliveira, A., Calheiros, M.M., Meat, beyond the plate: data-driven hypotheses for understanding consumer willingness to adopt a more plant-based diet. Appetite 90:1 (2015), 80–90.
49. Greenebaum, J.B., Managing impressions: “face-saving” strategies of vegetarians and vegans. Humanit. Soc. 36:4 (2012), 309–325.
50. Griffioen-Roose, S., Mars, M., Siebelink, E., Finlayson, G., Tomé, D., de Graaf, C., Protein status elicits compensatory changes in food intake and food preferences. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 95:1 (2012), 32–38.
51. Grigg, D., The changing geography of world food consumption in the second half of the twentieth century. Geogr. J. 165 (1999), 1–11.
52. Hartmann, C., Siegrist, M., Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: a systematic review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 61 (2017), 11–25.
53. Haverstock, K., Forgays, D.K., To eat or not to eat. A comparison of current and former animal product limiters. Appetite 58:3 (2012), 1030–1036.
54. Heerwagen, L.R., Andersen, L.M., Christensen, T., Sandøe, P., Can increased organic consumption mitigate climate changes?. Br. Food J. 116:8 (2014), 1314–1329.
55. Heller, M.C., Keoleian, G.A., Willett, W.C., Toward a life cycle-based, diet-level framework for food environmental impact and nutritional quality assessment: a critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47:22 (2013), 12632–12647.
56. Higgins, E.T., Beyond Pleasure and Pain: How Motivation Works. 2012, Oxford University Press, New York.
57. Hoek, A.C., Pearson, D., James, S.W., Lawrence, M.A., Friel, S., Shrinking the food-print: a qualitative study into consumer perceptions, experiences and attitudes towards healthy and environmentally friendly food behaviours. Appetite 108 (2017), 117–131.
58. Hoogland, C.T., de Boer, J., Boersema, J.J., Transparency of the meat chain in the light of food culture and history. Appetite 45 (2005), 15–23.
59. Hyland, J.J., Henchion, M., McCarthy, M., McCarthy, S.N., The climatic impact of food consumption in a representative sample of Irish adults and implications for food and nutrition policy. Public Health Nutr. 20:4 (2016), 726–738.
60. Jallinoja, P., Niva, M., Latvala, T., Future of sustainable eating? Examining the potential for expanding bean eating in a meat-eating culture. Futures 83 (2016), 4–14.
61. Kahneman, D., Frederick, S., Frames and brains: elicitation and control of response tendencies. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11:2 (2007), 45–46.
62. Kollmuss, A., Agyeman, J., Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environ. Educ. Res. 8:3 (2002), 239–260.
63. Kopetz, C.E., Kruglanski, A.W., Arens, Z.G., Etkin, J., Johnson, H.M., The dynamics of consumer behavior: a goal systemic perspective. J. Consum. Psychol. 22:2 (2012), 208–223.
64. Korzen, S., Lassen, J., Meat in context. On the relation between perceptions and contexts. Appetite 54:2 (2010), 274–281.
65. Kunst, J.R., Hohle, S.M., Meat eaters by dissociation: how we present, prepare and talk about meat increases willingness to eat meat by reducing empathy and disgust. Appetite 105 (2016), 758–774.
66. Laestadius, L.I., Neff, R.A., Barry, C.L., Frattaroli, S., “We don't tell people what to do”: an examination of the factors influencing NGO decisions to campaign for reduced meat consumption in light of climate change. Glob. Environ. Chang. 29 (2014), 32–40.
67. Lang, T., Rayner, G., Beyond the golden era of public health: charting a path from sanitarianism to ecological public health. Public Health 129:10 (2015), 1369–1382.
68. Latvala, T., Niva, M., Mäkelä, J., Pouta, E., Heikkilä, J., Kotro, J., Forsman-Hugg, S., Diversifying meat consumption patterns: consumers’ self-reported past behaviour and intentions for change. Meat Sci. 92:1 (2012), 71–77.
69. Lazzarini, G.A., Zimmermann, J., Visschers, V.H., Siegrist, M., Does environmental friendliness equal healthiness? Swiss consumers’ perception of protein products. Appetite 105 (2016), 663–673.
70. Lea, E.J., Crawford, D., Worsley, A., Consumers’ readiness to eat a plant-based diet. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 60 (2006), 342–351.
71. Lea, E.J., Worsley, A., Australian consumers’ food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours. Appetite 50:2–3 (2008), 207–214.
72. Leonard, W.R., The global diversity of eating patterns: human nutritional health in comparative perspective. Physiol. Behav. 134 (2014), 5–14.
73. Leschziner, V., Epistemic foundations of cuisine: a socio-cognitive study of the configuration of cuisine in historical perspective. Theory Soc. 35:4 (2006), 421–443.
74. Lewin, K., Psychological Ecology. Lewin, G.W., Cartwright, D., (eds.) Resolving Social Conflicts & Field Theory in Social Science, 1997, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 289–300.
75. Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Bastian, B., The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite 55:1 (2010), 156–159.
76. Luomala, H., Jokitalo, M., Karhu, H., Hietaranta-Luoma, H.L., Hopia, A., Hietamäki, S., Perceived health and taste ambivalence in food consumption. J. Consum. Mark. 32:4 (2015), 290–301.
77. Macdiarmid, J.I., Douglas, F., Campbell, J., Eating like there's no tomorrow: public awareness of the environmental impact of food and reluctance to eat less meat as part of a sustainable diet. Appetite 96 (2016), 487–493.
78. Macdiarmid, J.I., Loe, J., Kyle, J., McNeill, G., “It was an education in portion size”. Experience of eating a healthy diet and barriers to long term dietary change. Appetite 71 (2013), 411–419.
79. Mai, R., Hoffmann, S., How to combat the unhealthy = tasty intuition: the influencing role of health consciousness. J. Publ. Policy Mark. 34:1 (2015), 63–83.
80. Markham, W.T., van Koppen, C., Nature protection organizations and climate change in the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Nat. Cult. 9:3 (2014), 238–265.
81. Masset, G., Vieux, F., Verger, E.O., Soler, L.G., Touazi, D., Darmon, N., Reducing energy intake and energy density for a sustainable diet: a study based on self-selected diets in French adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 99:6 (2014), 1460–1469.
82. Mathijs, E., Exploring future patterns of meat consumption. Meat Sci. 109 (2015), 112–116.
83. Meiselman, H.L., (eds.) Meals in Science and Practice: Interdisciplinary Research and Business Applications, 2009, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Inc., Oxford.
84. Mertens, E., van Veer, P., Hiddink, G.J., Steijns, J.M., Kuijsten, A., Operationalising the health aspects of sustainable diets: a review. Public Health Nutr. 20:4 (2017), 739–757.
85. Micheelsen, A., Havn, L., Poulsen, S.K., Larsen, T.M., Holm, L., The acceptability of the new Nordic diet by participants in a controlled six-month dietary intervention. Food Qual. Prefer. 36 (2014), 20–26.
86. Micheelsen, A., Holm, L., Jensen, K.O.D., Consumer acceptance of the new Nordic diet. An exploratory study. Appetite 70 (2013), 14–21.
87. Mithril, C., Dragsted, L.O., Meyer, C., Blauert, E., Holt, M.K., Astrup, A., Guidelines for the new Nordic diet. Public Health Nutr. 15:10 (2012), 1941–1947.
88. Morrison, C.D., Reed, S.D., Henagan, T.M., Homeostatic regulation of protein intake: in search of a mechanism. Am. J. Phys. Regul. Integr. Comp. Phys. 302:8 (2012), R917–R928.
89. Mróz, L.W., Chapman, G.E., Oliffe, J.L., Bottorff, J.L., Men, food, and prostate cancer: gender influences on men's diets. Am. J. Mens Health 5:2 (2011), 177–187.
90. Nagpal, A., Lei, J., Khare, A., To choose or to reject: the effect of decision frame on food customization decisions. J. Retail. 91:3 (2015), 422–435.
91. Onwezen, M.C., van der Weele, C.N., When indifference is ambivalence: strategic ignorance about meat consumption. Food Qual. Prefer. 52 (2016), 96–105.
92. Paquette, M.C., Perceptions of healthy eating: state of knowledge and research gaps. Can. J. Publ. Health 96:3 (2005), S15–S19.
93. Piazza, J., Ruby, M.B., Loughnan, S., Luong, M., Kulik, J., Watkins, H.M., Seigerman, M., Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns. Appetite 91 (2015), 114–128.
94. Pohjolainen, P., Tapio, P., Vinnari, M., Jokinen, P., Räsänen, P., Consumer consciousness on meat and the environment - exploring differences. Appetite 101 (2016), 37–45.
95. Pohjolainen, P., Vinnari, M., Jokinen, P., Consumers’ perceived barriers to following a plant-based diet. Br. Food J. 117:3 (2015), 1150–1167.
96. Reckwitz, A., Toward a theory of social practices a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 5:2 (2002), 243–263.
97. Reynolds, C.J., Buckley, J.D., Weinstein, P., Boland, J., Are the dietary guidelines for meat, fat, fruit and vegetable consumption appropriate for environmental sustainability? A review of the literature. Nutrients 6:6 (2014), 2251–2265.
98. Romo, L.K., Donovan-Kicken, E., “Actually, I don't eat meat”: a multiple-goals perspective of communication about vegetarianism. Commun. Stud. 63:4 (2016), 405–420.
99. Ronteltap, A., Sijtsema, S.J., Dagevos, H., de Winter, M.A., Construal levels of healthy eating. Exploring consumers’ interpretation of health in the food context. Appetite 59:2 (2012), 333–340.
100. Rothgerber, H., Efforts to overcome vegetarian-induced dissonance among meat eaters. Appetite 79 (2014), 32–41.
101. Rothgerber, H., Can you have your meat and eat it too? Conscientious omnivores, vegetarians, and adherence to diet. Appetite 84 (2015), 196–203.
102. Sahakian, M., Wilhite, H., Making practice theory practicable: towards more sustainable forms of consumption. J. Consum. Cult. 14:1 (2014), 25–44.
103. Säll, S., Gren, M., Effects of an environmental tax on meat and dairy consumption in Sweden. Food Policy 55 (2015), 41–53.
104. Saxe, H., The new Nordic diet is an effective tool in environmental protection: it reduces the associated socioeconomic cost of diets. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 99:5 (2014), 1117–1125.
105. Schäfer, M., Jaeger-Erben, M., Bamberg, S., Life events as windows of opportunity for changing towards sustainable consumption patterns?. J. Consum. Policy 35:1 (2012), 65–84.
106. Schein, E., H., Kurt Lewin's change theory in the field and in the classroom: notes toward a model of managed learning. Syst. Pract. 9 (1996), 27–47.
107. Schneider, A.V., Overview of the market and consumption of pulses in Europe. Br. J. Nutr. 88:S3 (2002), 243–250.
108. Scholliers, P., Novelty and tradition. The new landscape for gastronomy. Freedman, P., (eds.) Food. The History of Taste, 2007, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 332–357.
109. Schön, D.A., Rein, M., Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. 1994, Basic Books, New York.
110. Schösler, H., de Boer, J., Boersema, J.J., Can we cut out the meat of the dish? Constructing consumer-oriented pathways towards meat substitution. Appetite 58:1 (2012), 39–47.
111. Schösler, H., de Boer, J., Boersema, J.J., Fostering more sustainable food choices: can self-determination theory help?. Food Qual. Prefer. 35 (2014), 59–69.
112. Schösler, H., de Boer, J., Boersema, J.J., Aiking, H., Meat and masculinity among young Chinese, Turkish and Dutch adults in the Netherlands. Appetite 89 (2015), 152–159.
113. Sellaeg, K., Chapman, G.E., Masculinity and food ideals of men who live alone. Appetite 51 (2008), 120–128.
114. Siegrist, M., Visschers, V., H.M., & Hartmann, C., Factors influencing changes in sustainability perception of various food behaviors: results of a longitudinal study. Food Qual. Prefer. 46 (2015), 33–39.
115. Skamp, K., Boyes, E., Stanisstreet, M., Beliefs and willingness to act about global warming: where to focus science pedagogy?. Sci. Educ. 97:2 (2013), 191–217.
116. Sloan, C., Gough, B., Conner, M., Healthy masculinities? How ostensibly healthy men talk about lifestyle, health and gender. Psychol. Health 25:7 (2010), 783–803.
117. Snow, D.A., Worden, S.K., Rochford, E.B., Benford, R.D., Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51 (1986), 464–481.
118. Spiegel, S., Grant-Pillow, H., Higgins, E.T., How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 34 (2004), 39–54.
119. Stoll-Kleemann, S., Schmidt, U.J., Reducing meat consumption in developed and transition countries to counter climate change and biodiversity loss: a review of influence factors. Reg. Environ. Chang. 17:5 (2017), 1261–1277.
120. Swatland, H.J., Meat products and consumption culture in the west. Meat Sci. 86:1 (2010), 80–85.
121. Tannen, D., Wallat, C., Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction - examples from a medical-examination interview. Soc. Psychol. Q. 50:2 (1987), 205–216.
122. Tian, Q., Hilton, D., Becker, M., Confronting the meat paradox in different cultural contexts: reactions among Chinese and French participants. Appetite 96 (2016), 187–194.
123. Tobler, C., Visschers, V.H.M., Siegrist, M., Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite 57:3 (2011), 674–682.
124. Troy, D.J., Kerry, J.P., Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry. Meat Sci. 86:1 (2010), 214–226.
125. Turmo, I.G., The Mediterranean diet: Consumption, cuisine and food habits. Mombiela, F., (eds.) Mediterra 2012: The Mediterranean Diet for Sustainable Regional Development, 2012, Presses de Sciences Po, Paris, 115–132.
126. Umberger, W.J., Boxall, P.C., Lacy, R.C., Role of credence and health information in determining US consumers’ willingness-to-pay for grass-finished beef. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 53:4 (2009), 603–623.
127. Vainio, A., Niva, M., Jallinoja, P., Latvala, T., From beef to beans: eating motives and the replacement of animal proteins with plant proteins among Finnish consumers. Appetite 106 (2016), 92–100.
128. Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., Keizer, K., I am what I am, by looking past the present: the influence of biospheric values and past behavior on environmental self-identity. Environ. Behav. 46 (2014), 626–657.
129. van Dooren, C., Aiking, H., Defining a nutritionally healthy, environmentally friendly, and culturally acceptable low lands diet. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21:5 (2016), 688–700.
130. van Dooren, C., Douma, A., Aiking, H., Vellinga, P., Proposing a novel index reflecting both climate impact and nutritional impact of food products. Ecol. Econ. 131 (2017), 389–398.
131. Vanhonacker, F., Van Loo, E.J., Gellynck, X., Verbeke, W., Flemish consumer attitudes towards more sustainable food choices. Appetite 62 (2013), 7–16.
132. Verain, M.C., Dagevos, H., Antonides, G., Sustainable food consumption: product choice or curtailment?. Appetite 91 (2015), 375–384.
133. Vialles, N., Animal to Edible (Le sang et la chair: les abattoirs des pays de l'Adour). (J.A. Underwood, Trans). 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Original work published in 1987).
134. Visschers, V.H., Siegrist, M., Does better for the environment mean less tasty? Offering more climate-friendly meals is good for the environment and customer satisfaction. Appetite 95 (2015), 475–483.
135. Wansink, B., Changing eating habits on the home front: lost lessons from World War II research. J. Publ. Policy Mark. 21 (2002), 90–99.
136. Warde, A., Consumption, Food and Taste: Culinary Antinomies and Commodity Culture. 1997, SAGE, London, UK.
137. Weber, K., Heinze, K.L., DeSoucey, M., Forage for thought: mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Adm. Sci. Q. 53:3 (2009), 529–567.
138. Westhoek, H., Lesschen, J.P., Rood, T., Wagner, S., De Marco, A., Murphy-Bokern, D., Oenema, O., Food choices, health and environment: effects of cutting Europe's meat and dairy intake. Glob. Environ. Chang. 26 (2014), 196–205.
139. Whitley, C.T., Gunderson, R., Charters, M., Public receptiveness to policies promoting plant-based diets: framing effects and social psychological and structural influences. J. Environ. Policy Plan., 2017, 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1304817.
140. Xue, H., Mainville, D., You, W., Nayga, R.M., Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for grass-fed beef: empirical evidence from in-store experiments. Food Qual. Prefer. 21:7 (2010), 857–866.
141. Yamaguchi, S., Ninomiya, K., Umami and food palatability. J. Nutr. 130:4 (2000), 921S–926S.
142. Yiridoe, E.K., Bonti-Ankomah, S., Martin, R.C., Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: a review and update of the literature. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 20:4 (2005), 193–205.