When indifference is ambivalence: Strategic ignorance about meat consumption

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 52, Issue , 2016, Pages 96-105

  Onwezen, Marleen C ^a   van der Weele, Cor N ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognitive dissonance; Emotions; Ignorance; Meat; Wilful blindness

Indexed keywords

EID: 84963752760     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Aronson E. The return of the repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry 1992, 3(4):303-311.
2. Bagozzi R.P., Dholakia U.M., Basuroy S. How effortful decisions get enacted: The motivating role of decision processes, desires, and anticipated emotions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2003, 16(4):273-295.
3. Bandura A. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1999, 3(3):193-209.
4. Bastian B., Loughnan S., Haslam N., Radke H.R.M. Don't mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2012, 38:247-256.
5. Beauvois J.L., Joule R.V., Joule R. A radical dissonance theory 1996, Vol. 748404732. Taylor & Francis.
6. Bénabou R., Tirole J. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Review of Economic Studies 2003, 70(3):489-520.
7. Bijmolt T.H.A., Paas L.J., Vermunt J.K. Country and consumer segmentation: Multi-level latent class analysis of financial product ownership. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2004, 21:323-340.
8. Carrillo J.D., Mariotti T. Strategic ignorance as a self-disciplining device. The Review of Economic Studies 2000, 67(3):529-544.
9. Cerjak M., Karolyi D., Mesić Ž. Consumers' attitudes towards farm animal welfare and their influence on meat consumption. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus 2011, 76(4):283-286.
10. Cleaver G., Wedel M. Identifying random-scoring respondents in sensory research using finite regression models. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:373-384.
11. Clonan A., Wilson P., Swift J.A., Leibovici D.G., Holdsworth M. Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: Impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability. Public Health Nutrition 2015, 1-11.
12. Dagevos H., Voordouw J. Sustainability and meat consumption: Is reduction realistic. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 2013, 9(2):60-69.
13. Dana J. Conflicts of interest and strategic ignorance of harm. Conflicts of interest: Problems and solutions from law, medicine and organizational settings 2005, 206-223.
14. Dana J., Weber R., Kuang J.X. Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory 2007, 33(1):67-80.
15. De Groot J.I., Steg L. Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior 2008, 40(3):330-354.
16. Dunlap R.E., McCright A.M. Climate change denial: Sources, actors and strategies. Routledge handbook of climate change and society 2010.
17. Elkin R.A., Leippe M.R. Physiological arousal, dissonance, and attitude change: Evidence for a dissonance-arousal link and a "Don't remind me" effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51(1):55.
18. Elliot A.J., Devine P.G. On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 67(3):382.
19. Ehrich K.R., Irwin J.R. Willful ignorance in the request for product attribute information. Journal of Marketing Research 2005, 42(3):266-277.
20. Erdem S., Rigby D., Wossink A. Using best-worst scaling to explore perceptions of relative responsibility for ensuring food safety. Food Policy 2012, 37(6):661-670.
21. FAO (2013). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: <>. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/themes/en/meat/background.html.
22. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance 1962, Vol. 2. Stanford University Press.
23. Gellynck X., Verbeke W. Consumer perception of traceability in the meat chain. Agrarwirtschaft 2001, 50(6):368-373.
24. Gosling P., Denizeau M., Oberlé D. Denial of responsibility: A new mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 90(5):722.
25. Grandin T. Animal welfare and society concerns finding the missing link. Meat Science 2014, 98(3):461-469.
26. Grossman, Van der Weele Self image and strategic ignorance in moral dilemma's (preprints) 2013, University of Amsterdam, .
27. Harmon-Jones E., Harmon-Jones C. Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 2007, 38(1):7-16.
28. Harmon-Jones E.E., Mills J.E. Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Scientific conferences program, 1997, U Texas, Arlington, TX, US; This volume is based on papers presented at a 2-day conference at the University of Texas at Arlington, winter 1997 1999, American Psychological Association.
29. Heffernan M. Wilful blindness. Why we ignore the obvious at our peril 2011, Simon and Schuster, London.
30. Larson T., Capra C.M. Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment. Judgment and Decision Making 2009, 4(6):467-474.
31. Lindeman M., Väänänen M. Measurement of ethical food choice motives. Appetite 2000, 34(1):55-59.
32. Loughnan S., Haslam N., Bastian B. The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite 2010, 55(1):156-159.
33. Loughnan S., Haslam N., Murnane T., Vaes J., Reynolds C., Suitner C. Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology 2010, 40(5):709-717.
34. Mackinnon A., Jorm A.F., Christensen H., Korten A.E., Jacomb P.A., Rodgers B. A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences 1999, 27(3):405-416.
35. Matthey A., Regner T. Do I really want to know? A cognitive dissonance-based explanation of other-regarding behavior. Games 2011, 2(1):114-135.
36. Moody-Adams M. Culture, responsibility and affected ignorance. Ethics 1994, 104:291-309.
37. Onwezen M.C. I did good, and we did bad: The impact of collective versus private emotions on pro-environmental food consumption. Food Research International 2015.
38. Onwezen M.C., Bartels J. Which perceived characteristics make product innovations appealing to the consumer? A study on the acceptance of fruit innovations using cross-cultural consumer segmentation. Appetite 2011, 57(1):50-58.
39. Onwezen M.C., Bartels J., Antonides G. The self-regulatory function of anticipated pride and guilt in a sustainable and healthy consumption context. European Journal of Social Psychology 2014, 44(1):53-68.
40. Onwezen M.C., Bartels J., Antonides G. Environmentally friendly consumer choices: Cultural differences in the self-regulatory function of anticipated pride and guilt. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2014, 40:239-248.
41. Onwezen M.C., Reinders M.J., van der Lans I.A., Sijtsema S.J., Jasiulewicz A., Guardia M.D., et al. A cross-national consumer segmentation based on food benefits: The link with consumption situations and food perceptions. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24(2):276-286.
42. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.Y., Podsakoff N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88(5):879.
43. Priester J.R., Petty R.E. The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 71(3):431.
44. Redmond E.C., Griffith C.J. Consumer perceptions of food safety risk, control and responsibility. Appetite 2004, 43(3):309-313.
45. Safran Foer J. Eating animals. The Peterson field guide series (EUA) 2010, Vol. 29.
46. Schwartz S.H. Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1973, 9(4):349-364.
47. Smith W. Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing 1956, 21:3-8.
48. Speedy A.W. Global production and consumption of animal source foods. The Journal of Nutrition 2003, 133(11):4048S-4053S.
49. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., Ter Hofstede F. International market segmentation: Issues and perspective. Journal of Research in Marketing 2002, 19:185-213.
50. Steinfeld H., Gerber P., Wassenaar T., Castel V., Rosales M., Haan C.D. Livestock's long shadow: Environmental issues and options 2006, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
51. Steptoe A., Pollard T.M., Wardle J. Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: The food choice questionnaire. Appetite 1995, 25(3):267-284.
52. Sweeney J.C., Hausknecht D., Soutar G.N. Cognitive dissonance after purchase: A multidimensional scale. Psychology and Marketing 2000, 17(5):369-385.
53. Te Velde H., Aarts N., Van Woerkum C. Dealing with ambivalence: Farmers' and consumers' perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2002, 15(2):203-219.
54. Thompson M.M., Zanna M.P., Griffin D.W. Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences 1995, 4:361-386.
55. Thunström L., Nordström J., Shogren J., Ehmke M., van't Veld K. Strategic self-ignorance 2013, unpublished work: .
56. Ungar S. Ignorance as an under-identified social problem1. The British Journal of Sociology 2008, 59(2):301-326.
57. Van der Weele C. Meat and the benefits of ambivalence. The ethics of consumption; the citizen, the market and the law 2013, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. H. Röcklinsberg, P. Sandin (Eds.).
58. Verain M.C., Bartels J., Dagevos H., Sijtsema S.J., Onwezen M.C., Antonides G. Segments of sustainable food consumers: A literature review. International Journal of Consumer Studies 2012, 36(2):123-132.
59. Verbeke W., Vackier I. Profile and effects of consumer involvement in fresh meat. Meat Science 2004, 67(1):159-168.
60. Vermunt J.K. Multilevel latent class models. Sociological Methodology 2003, 33:213-239.
61. Vermunt J.K., Magidson J. Latent class cluster analysis. Applied Latent Class Analysis 2002, 11:89-106.
62. Vining J., Ebreo A. Emerging theoretical and methodological perspectives on conservation behaviour. Urbana 2002, 51:61801.
63. Walker P., Rhubart-Berg P., McKenzie S., Kelling K., Lawrence R.S. Public health implications of meat production and consumption. Public Health Nutrition 2005, 8(04):348-356.
64. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 54(6):1063.
65. Wedel M., DeSarbo W.S. Market segment derivation and profiling via a finite mixture model framework. Marketing Letters 2002, 13(1):17-25.
66. Wedel M., Kamakura W.A. Editorial: Introduction to the special issue on market segmentation. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2002, 19:181-183.
67. Williams N.M. Affected ignorance and animal suffering: Why our failure to debate factory farming puts us at moral risk. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2008, 21(4):371-384.
68. Zanna M.P., Cooper J. Dissonance and the pill: An attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1974, 29(5):703.
69. Zanna M.P., Higgins E.T., Taves P.A. Is dissonance phenomenologically aversive?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1976, 12(6):530-538.