Understanding nucleosome dynamics and their links to gene expression and DNA replication

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 548-562

  Lai, William K M ^a   Pugh, B Franklin ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMATIN; NUCLEOSOME;

ANIMAL; CHROMATIN; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HISTONE CODE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; NUCLEOSOME; PROTEIN PROCESSING;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HISTONE CODE; HUMANS; NUCLEOSOMES; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 85026913454     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: 14710080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm.2017.47     Document Type: Review

References (178)

1. Luger, K., Mader, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F., Richmond, T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature 389, 251-260 (1997).
2. Kornberg, R. D., Lorch, Y. Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome. Cell 98, 285-294 (1999).
3. Richmond, T. J., Davey, C. A. The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core. Nature 423, 145-150 (2003).
4. Narlikar, G. J., Sundaramoorthy, R., Owen-Hughes, T. Mechanisms and functions of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes. Cell 154, 490-503 (2013).
5. Zhou, C. Y., Johnson, S. L., Gamarra, N. I., Narlikar, G. J. Mechanisms of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling motors. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 45, 153-181 (2016).
6. Rhee, H. S., Bataille, A. R., Zhang, L., Pugh, B. F. Subnucleosomal structures and nucleosome asymmetry across a genome. Cell 159, 1377-1388 (2014).
7. Strahl, B. D., Allis, C. D. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403, 41-45 (2000).
8. Pokholok, D. K. et al. Genome-wide map of nucleosome acetylation and methylation in yeast. Cell 122, 517-527 (2005).
9. Weber, C. M., Henikoff, S. Histone variants: Dynamic punctuation in transcription. Genes Dev. 28, 672-682 (2014).
10. Rando, O. J., Ahmad, K. Rules and regulation in the primary structure of chromatin. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, 250-256 (2007).
11. Jiang, C., Pugh, B. F. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: Advances through genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 161-172 (2009).
12. Jiang, C., Pugh, B. F. A compiled and systematic reference map of nucleosome positions across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Genome Biol. 10, R109 (2009).
13. Cui, F., Cole, H. A., Clark, D. J., Zhurkin, V. B. Transcriptional activation of yeast genes disrupts intragenic nucleosome phasing. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 10753-10764 (2012).
14. Shivaswamy, S. et al. Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation. PLoS Biol. 6, e65 (2008).
15. Kulaeva, O. I., Hsieh, F. K., Chang, H. W., Luse, D. S., Studitsky, V. M. Mechanism of transcription through a nucleosome by RNA polymerase II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1829, 76-83 (2013).
16. Weber, C. M., Ramachandran, S., Henikoff, S. Nucleosomes are context-specific, H2A.Z-modulated barriers to RNA polymerase. Mol. Cell 53, 819-830 (2014).
17. Reja, R., Vinayachandran, V., Ghosh, S., Pugh, B. F. Molecular mechanisms of ribosomal protein gene coregulation. Genes Dev. 29, 1942-1954 (2015).
18. Krietenstein, N. et al. Genomic nucleosome organization reconstituted with pure proteins. Cell 167, 709-721.e12 (2016).
19. Clark, D. J. Nucleosome positioning, nucleosome spacing and the nucleosome code. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 27, 781-793 (2010).
20. Whitehouse, I., Rando, O. J., Delrow, J., Tsukiyama, T. Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription. Nature 450, 1031-1035 (2007).
21. Zhang, L., Ma, H., Pugh, B. F. Stable and dynamic nucleosome states during a meiotic developmental process. Genome Res. 21, 875-884 (2011).
22. Henikoff, S. Nucleosome destabilization in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 15-26 (2008).
23. Cairns, B. R. Chromatin remodeling complexes: Strength in diversity, precision through specialization. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15, 185-190 (2005).
24. Gkikopoulos, T. et al. A role for Snf2-related nucleosome-spacing enzymes in genome-wide nucleosome organization. Science 333, 1758-1760 (2011).
25. Yen, K., Vinayachandran, V., Batta, K., Koerber, R. T., Pugh, B. F. Genome-wide nucleosome specificity and directionality of chromatin remodelers. Cell 149, 1461-1473 (2012).
26. Yen, K., Vinayachandran, V., Pugh, B. F. SWR-C and INO80 chromatin remodelers recognize nucleosome-free regions near +1 nucleosomes. Cell 154, 1246-1256 (2013).
27. Gurard-Levin, Z. A., Quivy, J. P., Almouzni, G. Histone chaperones: Assisting histone traffic and nucleosome dynamics. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83, 487-517 (2014).
28. Lipford, J. R., Bell, S. P. Nucleosomes positioned by ORC facilitate the initiation of DNA replication. Mol. Cell 7, 21-30 (2001).
29. Eaton, M. L., Galani, K., Kang, S., Bell, S. P., MacAlpine, D. M. Conserved nucleosome positioning defines replication origins. Genes Dev. 24, 748-753 (2010).
30. Wang, G. G., Allis, C. D., Chi, P. Chromatin remodeling and cancer, part II: ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Trends Mol. Med. 13, 373-380 (2007).
31. Burgess, R. J., Zhang, Z. Histone chaperones in nucleosome assembly and human disease. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 14-22 (2013).
32. Skene, P. J., Henikoff, S. Histone variants in pluripotency and disease. Development 140, 2513-2524 (2013).
33. Tessarz, P., Kouzarides, T. Histone core modifications regulating nucleosome structure and dynamics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 703-708 (2014).
34. Talbert, P. B., Henikoff, S. Histone variants on the move: Substrates for chromatin dynamics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 115-126 (2017).
35. Buschbeck, M., Hake, S. B. Variants of core histones and their roles in cell fate decisions, development and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.166 (2017).
36. Segal, E. et al. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 442, 772-778 (2006).
37. Kaplan, N. et al. Nucleosome sequence preferences influence in vivo nucleosome organization. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 918-920 (2010).
38. Struhl, K., Segal, E. Determinants of nucleosome positioning. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 267-273 (2013).
39. Hughes, A. L., Rando, O. J. Mechanisms underlying nucleosome positioning in vivo. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 43, 41-63 (2014).
40. Mardis, E. R. ChIP-seq: Welcome to the new frontier. Nat. Methods 4, 613-614 (2007).
41. O'Geen, H., Echipare, L., Farnham, P. J. Using ChIP-seq technology to generate high-resolution profiles of histone modifications. Methods Mol. Biol. 791, 265-286 (2011).
42. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57-74 (2012).
43. Meyer, C. A., Liu, X. S. Identifying and mitigating bias in next-generation sequencing methods for chromatin biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 709-721 (2014).
44. Tsompana, M., Buck, M. J. Chromatin accessibility: A window into the genome. Epigenetics Chromatin 7, 33 (2014).
45. Zhou, X., Blocker, A. W., Airoldi, E. M., O'Shea, E. K. A computational approach to map nucleosome positions and alternative chromatin states with base pair resolution. eLife 5, e16970 (2016).
46. Annunziato, A. T. Split decision: What happens to nucleosomes during DNA replication J. Biol. Chem. 280, 12065-12068 (2005).
47. Zhang, Z. et al. A packing mechanism for nucleosome organization reconstituted across a eukaryotic genome. Science 332, 977-980 (2011).
48. Venkatesh, S., Workman, J. L. Histone exchange, chromatin structure and the regulation of transcription. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 178-189 (2015).
49. Wade, J. T., Hall, D. B., Struhl, K. The transcription factor Ifh1 is a key regulator of yeast ribosomal protein genes. Nature 432, 1054-1058 (2004).
50. Ioshikhes, I. P., Albert, I., Zanton, S. J., Pugh, B. F. Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics. Nat. Genet. 38, 1210-1215 (2006).
51. Segal, E., Widom, J. From DNA sequence to transcriptional behaviour: A quantitative approach. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 443-456 (2009).
52. Kaplan, N. et al. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 458, 362-366 (2009).
53. Zhang, Y. et al. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 847-852 (2009).
54. Albert, I. et al. Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 446, 572-576 (2007).
55. Tosi, A. et al. Structure and subunit topology of the INO80 chromatin remodeler and its nucleosome complex. Cell 154, 1207-1219 (2013).
56. Watanabe, S., Radman-Livaja, M., Rando, O. J., Peterson, C. L. A histone acetylation switch regulates H2A.Z deposition by the SWR-C remodeling enzyme. Science 340, 195-199 (2013).
57. Wang, F., Ranjan, A., Wei, D., Wu, C. Comment on "A histone acetylation switch regulates H2A.Z deposition by the SWR-C remodeling enzyme". Science 353, 358 (2016).
58. Vassileva, I., Yanakieva, I., Peycheva, M., Gospodinov, A., Anachkova, B. The mammalian INO80 chromatin remodeling complex is required for replication stress recovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 9074-9086 (2014).
59. Peterson, C. L., Almouzni, G. Nucleosome dynamics as modular systems that integrate DNA damage and repair. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012658 (2013).
60. Green, C. M., Almouzni, G. When repair meets chromatin. First in series on chromatin dynamics. EMBO Rep. 3, 28-33 (2002).
61. Dion, M. F. et al. Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science 315, 1405-1408 (2007).
62. Deal, R. B., Henikoff, J. G., Henikoff, S. Genome-wide kinetics of nucleosome turnover determined by metabolic labeling of histones. Science 328, 1161-1164 (2010).
63. Ray-Gallet, D. et al. Dynamics of histone H3 deposition in vivo reveal a nucleosome gap-filling mechanism for H3.3 to maintain chromatin integrity. Mol. Cell 44, 928-941 (2011).
64. Kraushaar, D. C. et al. Genome-wide incorporation dynamics reveal distinct categories of turnover for the histone variant H3.3. Genome Biol. 14, R121 (2013).
65. Yildirim, O. et al. A system for genome-wide histone variant dynamics in ES cells reveals dynamic MacroH2A2 replacement at promoters. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004515 (2014).
66. Svensson, J. P. et al. A nucleosome turnover map reveals that the stability of histone H4 Lys20 methylation depends on histone recycling in transcribed chromatin. Genome Res. 25, 872-883 (2015).
67. Keppler, A. et al. A general method for the covalent labeling of fusion proteins with small molecules in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 86-89 (2003).
68. Deaton, A. M. et al. Enhancer regions show high histone H3.3 turnover that changes during differentiation. eLife 5, e15316 (2016).
69. Belotserkovskaya, R. et al. FACT facilitates transcription-dependent nucleosome alteration. Science 301, 1090-1093 (2003).
70. Jansen, A., Verstrepen, K. J. Nucleosome positioning in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 75, 301-320 (2011).
71. Goldmark, J. P., Fazzio, T. G., Estep, P. W., Church, G. M., Tsukiyama, T. The Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex represses early meiotic genes upon recruitment by Ume6p. Cell 103, 423-433 (2000).
72. Hughes, A. L., Jin, Y., Rando, O. J., Struhl, K. A functional evolutionary approach to identify determinants of nucleosome positioning: A unifying model for establishing the genome-wide pattern. Mol. Cell 48, 5-15 (2012).
73. Zhang, Y. et al. Evidence against a genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Reply to "Nucleosome sequence preferences influence in vivo nucleosome organization". Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 920-923 (2010).
74. Ioshikhes, I., Hosid, S., Pugh, B. F. Variety of genomic DNA patterns for nucleosome positioning. Genome Res. 21, 1863-1871 (2011).
75. Fenouil, R. et al. CpG islands and GC content dictate nucleosome depletion in a transcription-independent manner at mammalian promoters. Genome Res. 22, 2399-2408 (2012).
76. de Dieuleveult, M. et al. Genome-wide nucleosome specificity and function of chromatin remodellers in ES cells. Nature 530, 113-116 (2016).
77. Radman-Livaja, M., Rando, O. J. Nucleosome positioning: How is it established, and why does it matter Dev. Biol. 339, 258-266 (2010).
78. Hartley, P. D., Madhani, H. D. Mechanisms that specify promoter nucleosome location and identity. Cell 137, 445-458 (2009).
79. Zentner, G. E., Henikoff, S. Regulation of nucleosome dynamics by histone modifications. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 259-266 (2013).
80. de la Serna, I. L., Ohkawa, Y., Imbalzano, A. N. Chromatin remodelling in mammalian differentiation: Lessons from ATP-dependent remodellers. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 461-473 (2006).
81. Mitra, D., Parnell, E. J., Landon, J. W., Yu, Y., Stillman, D. J. SWI/SNF binding to the HO promoter requires histone acetylation and stimulates TATA-binding protein recruitment. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 4095-4110 (2006).
82. Roberts, C. W., Orkin, S. H. The SWI/SNF complex-chromatin and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 133-142 (2004).
83. Ryan, M. P., Jones, R., Morse, R. H. SWI-SNF complex participation in transcriptional activation at a step subsequent to activator binding. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1774-1782 (1998).
84. Dutta, A. et al. Swi/Snf dynamics on stress-responsive genes is governed by competitive bromodomain interactions. Genes Dev. 28, 2314-2330 (2014).
85. de La Serna, I. L. et al. Mammalian SWI-SNF complexes contribute to activation of the hsp70 gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 2839-2851 (2000).
86. Kadoch, C., Crabtree, G. R. Mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes and cancer: Mechanistic insights gained from human genomics. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500447 (2015).
87. Tolstorukov, M. Y. et al. Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling/tumor suppressor complex establishes nucleosome occupancy at target promoters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10165-10170 (2013).
88. Cairns, B. R. et al. RSC, an essential, abundant chromatin-remodeling complex. Cell 87, 1249-1260 (1996).
89. Parnell, T. J., Huff, J. T., Cairns, B. R. RSC regulates nucleosome positioning at Pol II genes and density at Pol III genes. EMBO J. 27, 100-110 (2008).
90. Kubik, S. et al. Nucleosome stability distinguishes two different promoter types at all protein-coding genes in yeast. Mol. Cell 60, 422-434 (2015).
91. Lorch, Y., Maier-Davis, B., Kornberg, R. D. Role of DNA sequence in chromatin remodeling and the formation of nucleosome-free regions. Genes Dev. 28, 2492-2497 (2014).
92. de Boer, C. G., Hughes, T. R. Poly-dA:dT tracts form an in vivo nucleosomal turnstile. PLoS ONE 9, e110479 (2014).
93. Marfella, C. G., Imbalzano, A. N. The Chd family of chromatin remodelers. Mutat. Res. 618, 30-40 (2007).
94. Kari, V. et al. Loss of CHD1 causes DNA repair defects and enhances prostate cancer therapeutic responsiveness. EMBO Rep. 17, 1609-1623 (2016).
95. Torigoe, S. E., Patel, A., Khuong, M. T., Bowman, G. D., Kadonaga, J. T. ATP-dependent chromatin assembly is functionally distinct from chromatin remodeling. eLife 2, e00863 (2013).
96. Nodelman, I. M. et al. The Chd1 chromatin remodeler can sense both entry and exit sides of the nucleosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 7580-7591 (2016).
97. McKnight, J. N., Tsukiyama, T., Bowman, G. D. Sequence-targeted nucleosome sliding in vivo by a hybrid Chd1 chromatin remodeler. Genome Res. 26, 693-704 (2016).
98. Lee, J. S. et al. Codependency of H2B monoubiquitination and nucleosome reassembly on Chd1. Genes Dev. 26, 914-919 (2012).
99. Park, D., Shivram, H., Iyer, V. R. Chd1 co-localizes with early transcription elongation factors independently of H3K36 methylation and releases stalled RNA polymerase II at introns. Epigenetics Chromatin 7, 32 (2014).
100. Zofall, M., Persinger, J., Kassabov, S. R., Bartholomew, B. Chromatin remodeling by ISW2 and SWI/SNF requires DNA translocation inside the nucleosome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 339-346 (2006).
101. Dang, W., Bartholomew, B. Domain architecture of the catalytic subunit in the ISW2-nucleosome complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 8306-8317 (2007).
102. Hota, S. K. et al. Nucleosome mobilization by ISW2 requires the concerted action of the ATPase and SLIDE domains. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 222-229 (2013).
103. Corona, D. F., Tamkun, J. W. Multiple roles for ISWI in transcription, chromosome organization and DNA replication. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1677, 113-119 (2004).
104. Aydin, O. Z., Vermeulen, W., Lans, H. ISWI chromatin remodeling complexes in the DNA damage response. Cell Cycle 13, 3016-3025 (2014).
105. Cairns, B. R. Chromatin remodeling: Insights and intrigue from single-molecule studies. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 989-996 (2007).
106. Langst, G., Becker, P. B. Nucleosome mobilization and positioning by ISWI-containing chromatin-remodeling factors. J. Cell Sci. 114, 2561-2568 (2001).
107. Hopfner, K. P., Gerhold, C. B., Lakomek, K., Wollmann, P. Swi2/Snf2 remodelers: Hybrid views on hybrid molecular machines. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 22, 225-233 (2012).
108. Deuring, R. et al. The ISWI chromatin-remodeling protein is required for gene expression and the maintenance of higher order chromatin structure in vivo. Mol. Cell 5, 355-365 (2000).
109. Strohner, R. et al. NoRC-a novel member of mammalian ISWI-containing chromatin remodeling machines. EMBO J. 20, 4892-4900 (2001).
110. Mellor, J., Morillon, A. ISWI complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1677, 100-112 (2004).
111. Stockdale, C., Flaus, A., Ferreira, H., Owen-Hughes, T. Analysis of nucleosome repositioning by yeast ISWI and Chd1 chromatin remodeling complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 16279-16288 (2006).
112. Li, M. et al. Dynamic regulation of transcription factors by nucleosome remodeling. eLife 4, e06249 (2015).
113. Kornberg, R. D. Chromatin structure: A repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science 184, 868-871 (1974).
114. Weintraub, H., Palter, K., Van Lente, F. Histones H2a, H2b, H3, and H4 form a tetrameric complex in solutions of high salt. Cell 6, 85-110 (1975).
115. Weintraub, H., Worcel, A., Alberts, B. A model for chromatin based upon two symmetrically paired half-nucleosomes. Cell 9, 409-417 (1976).
116. Zlatanova, J., Bishop, T. C., Victor, J. M., Jackson, V., van Holde, K. The nucleosome family: Dynamic and growing. Structure 17, 160-171 (2009).
117. Black, B. E., Cleveland, D. W. Epigenetic centromere propagation and the nature of CENP-A nucleosomes. Cell 144, 471-479 (2011).
118. Anderson, J. D., Widom, J. Sequence and position-dependence of the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites. J. Mol. Biol. 296, 979-987 (2000).
119. Hondele, M. et al. Structural basis of histone H2A-H2B recognition by the essential chaperone FACT. Nature 499, 111-114 (2013).
120. Aguilar-Gurrieri, C. et al. Structural evidence for Nap1-dependent H2A-H2B deposition and nucleosome assembly. EMBO J. 35, 1465-1482 (2016).
121. Adams, C. C., Workman, J. L. Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1405-1421 (1995).
122. Polach, K. J., Widom, J. A model for the cooperative binding of eukaryotic regulatory proteins to nucleosomal target sites. J. Mol. Biol. 258, 800-812 (1996).
123. Koerber, R. T., Rhee, H. S., Jiang, C., Pugh, B. F. Interaction of transcriptional regulators with specific nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces genome. Mol. Cell 35, 889-902 (2009).
124. Harada, B. T. et al. Stepwise nucleosome translocation by RSC remodeling complexes. eLife 5, e10051 (2016).
125. Dalal, Y., Furuyama, T., Vermaak, D., Henikoff, S. Structure, dynamics, and evolution of centromeric nucleosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15974-15981 (2007).
126. Ramachandran, S., Henikoff, S. Nucleosome dynamics during chromatin remodeling in vivo. Nucleus 7, 20-26 (2016).
127. Xi, Y., Yao, J., Chen, R., Li, W., He, X. Nucleosome fragility reveals novel functional states of chromatin and poises genes for activation. Genome Res. 21, 718-724 (2011).
128. Knight, B. et al. Two distinct promoter architectures centered on dynamic nucleosomes control ribosomal protein gene transcription. Genes Dev. 28, 1695-1709 (2014).
129. Chereji, R. V., Ocampo, J., Clark, D. J. MNase-sensitive complexes in yeast: Nucleosomes and non-histone barriers. Mol. Cell 65, 565-577.e3 (2017).
130. Fei, J. et al. The prenucleosome, a stable conformational isomer of the nucleosome. Genes Dev. 29, 2563-2575 (2015).
131. Henikoff, S. et al. The budding yeast centromere DNA element II wraps a stable Cse4 hemisome in either orientation in vivo. eLife 3, e01861 (2014).
132. Krassovsky, K., Henikoff, J. G., Henikoff, S. Tripartite organization of centromeric chromatin in budding yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 243-248 (2012).
133. Hasson, D. et al. The octamer is the major form of CENP-A nucleosomes at human centromeres. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 687-695 (2013).
134. Furuyama, T., Codomo, C. A., Henikoff, S. Reconstitution of hemisomes on budding yeast centromeric DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 5769-5783 (2013).
135. Rhee, H. S., Pugh, B. F. ChIP-exo method for identifying genomic location of DNA-binding proteins with near-single-nucleotide accuracy. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb2124s100 (2012).
136. Ramachandran, S., Zentner, G. E., Henikoff, S. Asymmetric nucleosomes flank promoters in the budding yeast genome. Genome Res. 25, 381-390 (2015).
137. Arimura, Y., Tachiwana, H., Oda, T., Sato, M., Kurumizaka, H. Structural analysis of the hexasome, lacking one histone H2A/H2B dimer from the conventional nucleosome. Biochemistry 51, 3302-3309 (2012).
138. Workman, J. L. Nucleosome displacement in transcription. Genes Dev. 20, 2009-2017 (2006).
139. Studitsky, V. M., Nizovtseva, E. V., Shaytan, A. K., Luse, D. S. Nucleosomal barrier to transcription: Structural determinants and changes in chromatin structure. Biochem. Mol. Biol. J. 2, 8 (2016).
140. Eaton, M. L. et al. Chromatin signatures of the Drosophila replication program. Genome Res. 21, 164-174 (2011).
141. MacAlpine, D. M., Almouzni, G. Chromatin and DNA replication. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a010207 (2013).
142. Rhee, H. S., Pugh, B. F. Genome-wide structure and organization of eukaryotic pre-initiation complexes. Nature 483, 295-301 (2012).
143. Jonkers, I., Lis, J. T. Getting up to speed with transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 167-177 (2015).
144. Stunkel, W., Kober, I., Seifart, K. H. A nucleosome positioned in the distal promoter region activates transcription of the human U6 gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4397-4405 (1997).
145. Zhao, X., Pendergrast, P. S., Hernandez, N. A positioned nucleosome on the human U6 promoter allows recruitment of SNAPc by the Oct-1 POU domain. Mol. Cell 7, 539-549 (2001).
146. Tramantano, M. et al. Constitutive turnover of histone H2A.Z at yeast promoters requires the preinitiation complex. eLife 5, e14243 (2016).
147. Brickner, D. G. et al. H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state. PLoS Biol. 5, e81 (2007).
148. Grimaldi, Y., Ferrari, P., Strubin, M. Independent RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex dynamics and nucleosome turnover at promoter sites in vivo. Genome Res. 24, 117-124 (2014).
149. Sclafani, R. A., Holzen, T. M. Cell cycle regulation of DNA replication. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41, 237-280 (2007).
150. Duzdevich, D. et al. The dynamics of eukaryotic replication initiation: Origin specificity, licensing, and firing at the single-molecule level. Mol. Cell 58, 483-494 (2015).
151. Bell, S. P., Labib, K. Chromosome duplication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 203, 1027-1067 (2016).
152. Franco, A. A., Lam, W. M., Burgers, P. M., Kaufman, P. D. Histone deposition protein Asf1 maintains DNA replisome integrity and interacts with replication factor C. Genes Dev. 19, 1365-1375 (2005).
153. Huang, H. et al. A unique binding mode enables MCM2 to chaperone histones H3-H4 at replication forks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 618-626 (2015).
154. Yang, J. et al. The histone chaperone FACT contributes to DNA replication-coupled nucleosome assembly. Cell Rep. 14, 1128-1141 (2016).
155. Deniz, O., Flores, O., Aldea, M., Soler-Lopez, M., Orozco, M. Nucleosome architecture throughout the cell cycle. Sci. Rep. 6, 19729 (2016).
156. Bar-Ziv, R., Voichek, Y., Barkai, N. Chromatin dynamics during DNA replication. Genome Res. 26, 1245-1256 (2016).
157. Annunziato, A. T. The fork in the road: Histone partitioning during DNA replication. Genes (Basel) 6, 353-371 (2015).
158. Katan-Khaykovich, Y., Struhl, K. Splitting of H3-H4 tetramers at transcriptionally active genes undergoing dynamic histone exchange. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1296-1301 (2011).
159. Xu, M. et al. Partitioning of histone H3-H4 tetramers during DNA replication-dependent chromatin assembly. Science 328, 94-98 (2010).
160. Tran, V., Lim, C., Xie, J., Chen, X. Asymmetric division of Drosophila male germline stem cell shows asymmetric histone distribution. Science 338, 679-682 (2012).
161. Nekrasov, M. et al. Histone H2A.Z inheritance during the cell cycle and its impact on promoter organization and dynamics. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1076-1083 (2012).
162. Greaves, I. K., Rangasamy, D., Ridgway, P., Tremethick, D. J. H2A.Z contributes to the unique 3D structure of the centromere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 525-530 (2007).
163. Margueron, R. et al. Role of the polycomb protein EED in the propagation of repressive histone marks. Nature 461, 762-767 (2009).
164. Dumesic, P. A. et al. Product binding enforces the genomic specificity of a yeast polycomb repressive complex. Cell 160, 204-218 (2015).
165. Sirbu, B. M., Couch, F. B., Cortez, D. Monitoring the spatiotemporal dynamics of proteins at replication forks and in assembled chromatin using isolation of proteins on nascent DNA. Nat. Protoc. 7, 594-605 (2012).
166. Vasseur, P. et al. Dynamics of nucleosome positioning maturation following genomic replication. Cell Rep. 16, 2651-2665 (2016).
167. Ramachandran, S., Henikoff, S. Transcriptional regulators compete with nucleosomes post-replication. Cell 165, 580-592 (2016).
168. Aird, D. et al. Analyzing and minimizing PCR amplification bias in Illumina sequencing libraries. Genome Biol. 12, R18 (2011).
169. Landt, S. G. et al. ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia. Genome Res. 22, 1813-1831 (2012).
170. Rizzo, J. M., Bard, J. E., Buck, M. J. Standardized collection of MNase-seq experiments enables unbiased dataset comparisons. BMC Mol. Biol. 13, 15 (2012).
171. Mieczkowski, J. et al. MNase titration reveals differences between nucleosome occupancy and chromatin accessibility. Nat. Commun. 7, 11485 (2016).
172. Wal, M., Pugh, B. F. Genome-wide mapping of nucleosome positions in yeast using high-resolution MNase ChIP-Seq. Methods Enzymol. 513, 233-250 (2012).
173. Kelly, T. K. et al. Genome-wide mapping of nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation within individual DNA molecules. Genome Res. 22, 2497-2506 (2012).
174. Ishii, H., Kadonaga, J. T., Ren, B. MPE-seq, a new method for the genome-wide analysis of chromatin structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E3457-E3465 (2015).
175. Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y., Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213-1218 (2013).
176. Schep, A. N. et al. Structured nucleosome fingerprints enable high-resolution mapping of chromatin architecture within regulatory regions. Genome Res. 25, 1757-1770 (2015).
177. Brogaard, K., Xi, L., Wang, J. P., Widom, J. A map of nucleosome positions in yeast at base-pair resolution. Nature 486, 496-501 (2012).
178. Hsieh, T. H. et al. Mapping nucleosome resolution chromosome folding in yeast by Micro-C. Cell 162, 108-119 (2015).