The Chd family of chromatin remodelers

Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis

Volumn 618, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 30-40

  Marfella, Concetta G A ^a   Imbalzano, Anthony N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

ATPase; Chromatin remodeling; Chromodomain helicase DNA binding (CHD) family; Development, differentiation and disease; SNF2 family; Transcription elongation

Indexed keywords

CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING PROTEIN 1; CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING PROTEIN 2; CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING PROTEIN 3; CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING PROTEIN 4; CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING PROTEIN 9; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; DNA BINDING; DNA REPAIR; GENE REPLICATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN MOTIF;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIGENE FAMILY; MUTATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 34147158728     PISSN: 00275107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Khorasanizadeh S. The nucleosome: from genomic organization to genomic regulation. Cell 116 (2004) 259-272
2. Bork P., and Koonin E.V. An expanding family of helicases within the 'DEAD/H' superfamily. Nucl. Acid Res. 21 (1993) 751-752
3. Eisen J.A., Sweder K.S., and Hanawalt P.C. Evolution of the SNF2 family of proteins: subfamilies with distinct sequences and functions. Nucl. Acid Res. 23 (1995) 2715-2723
4. de la Cruz X., Lois S., Sanchez-Molina S., and Martinez-Balbas M.A. Do protein motifs read the histone code?. Bioessays 27 (2005) 164-175
5. Hassan A.H., Prochasson P., Neely K.E., Galasinski S.C., Chandy M., Carrozza M.J., and Workman J.L. Function and selectivity of bromodomains in anchoring chromatin-modifying complexes to promoter nucleosomes. Cell 111 (2002) 369-379
6. Boyer L.A., Latek R.R., and Peterson C.L. The SANT domain: a unique histone-tail-binding module?. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5 (2004) 158-163
7. Lusser A., and Kadonaga J.T. Chromatin remodeling by ATP-dependent molecular machines. Bioessays 25 (2003) 1192-1200
8. Tsukiyama T. The in vivo functions of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling factors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3 (2002) 422-429
9. Delmas V., Stokes D.G., and Perry R.P. A mammalian DNA-binding protein that contains a chromodomain and an SNF2/SWI2-like helicase domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90 (1993) 2414-2418
10. Woodage T., Basrai M.A., Baxevanis A.D., Hieter P., and Collins F.S. Characterization of the CHD family of proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94 (1997) 11472-11477
11. Smith C.L., and Peterson C.L. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 65 (2005) 115-148
12. de la Serna I.L., Ohkawa Y., and Imbalzano A.N. Chromatin remodelling in mammalian differentiation: lessons from ATP-dependent remodellers. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7 (2006) 461-473
13. Eissenberg J.C. Molecular biology of the chromo domain: an ancient chromatin module comes of age. Gene 275 (2001) 19-29
14. Jones D.O., Cowell I.G., and Singh P.B. Mammalian chromodomain proteins: their role in genome organisation and expression. Bioessays 22 (2000) 124-137
15. Koonin E.V., Zhou S., and Lucchesi J.C. The chromo superfamily: new members, duplication of the chromo domain and possible role in delivering transcription regulators to chromatin. Nucl. Acid Res. 23 (1995) 4229-4233
16. Brehm A., Tufteland K.R., Aasland R., and Becker P.B. The many colours of chromodomains. Bioessays 26 (2004) 133-140
17. Paro R., and Hogness D.S. The Polycomb protein shares a homologous domain with a heterochromatin-associated protein of Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88 (1991) 263-267
18. Kelley D.E., Stokes D.G., and Perry R.P. CHD1 interacts with SSRP1 and depends on both its chromodomain and its ATPase/helicase-like domain for proper association with chromatin. Chromosoma 108 (1999) 10-25
19. Bouazoune K., Mitterweger A., Langst G., Imhof A., Akhtar A., Becker P.B., and Brehm A. The dMi-2 chromodomains are DNA binding modules important for ATP-dependent nucleosome mobilization. EMBO J. 21 (2002) 2430-2440
20. Akhtar A., Zink D., and Becker P.B. Chromodomains are protein-RNA interaction modules. Nature 407 (2000) 405-409
21. Fischle W., Wang Y., Jacobs S.A., Kim Y., Allis C.D., and Khorasanizadeh S. Molecular basis for the discrimination of repressive methyl-lysine marks in histone H3 by Polycomb and HP1 chromodomains. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 1870-1881
22. Flanagan J.F., Mi L.Z., Chruszcz M., Cymborowski M., Clines K.L., Kim Y., Minor W., Rastinejad F., and Khorasanizadeh S. Double chromodomains cooperate to recognize the methylated histone H3 tail. Nature 438 (2005) 1181-1185
23. Min J., Zhang Y., and Xu R.M. Structural basis for specific binding of Polycomb chromodomain to histone H3 methylated at Lys 27. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 1823-1828
24. Pray-Grant M.G., Daniel J.A., Schieltz D., Yates III J.R., and Grant P.A. Chd1 chromodomain links histone H3 methylation with SAGA- and SLIK-dependent acetylation. Nature 433 (2005) 434-438
25. Sims III R.J., Chen C.F., Santos-Rosa H., Kouzarides T., Patel S.S., and Reinberg D. Human but not yeast CHD1 binds directly and selectively to histone H3 methylated at lysine 4 via its tandem chromodomains. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 41789-41792
26. Kim J., Daniel J., Espejo A., Lake A., Krishna M., Xia L., Zhang Y., and Bedford Tudor M.T. MBT and chromo domains gauge the degree of lysine methylation. EMBO Rep. 7 (2006) 397-403
27. Bernstein B.E., Kamal M., Lindblad-Toh K., Bekiranov S., Bailey D.K., Huebert D.J., McMahon S., Karlsson E.K., Kulbokas III E.J., Gingeras T.R., Schreiber S.L., and Lander E.S. Genomic maps and comparative analysis of histone modifications in human and mouse. Cell 120 (2005) 169-181
28. Liang G., Lin J.C., Wei V., Yoo C., Cheng J.C., Nguyen C.T., Weisenberger D.J., Egger G., Takai D., Gonzales F.A., and Jones P.A. Distinct localization of histone H3 acetylation and H3-K4 methylation to the transcription start sites in the human genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (2004) 7357-7362
29. Schubeler D., MacAlpine D.M., Scalzo D., Wirbelauer C., Kooperberg C., van Leeuwen F., Gottschling D.E., O'Neill L.P., Turner B.M., Delrow J., Bell S.P., and Groudine M. The histone modification pattern of active genes revealed through genome-wide chromatin analysis of a higher eukaryote. Genes Dev. 18 (2004) 1263-1271
30. Zhang L., Schroeder S., Fong N., and Bentley D.L. Altered nucleosome occupancy and histone H3K4 methylation in response to 'transcriptional stress'. EMBO J. 24 (2005) 2379-2390
31. Sims III R.J., Nishioka K., and Reinberg D. Histone lysine methylation: a signature for chromatin function. Trends Genet. 19 (2003) 629-639
32. Stokes D.G., and Perry R.P. DNA-binding and chromatin localization properties of CHD1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15 (1995) 2745-2753
33. Khattak S., Lee B.R., Cho S.H., Ahnn J., and Spoerel N.A. Genetic characterization of Drosophila Mi-2 ATPase. Gene 293 (2002) 107-114
34. Bienz M. The PHD finger, a nuclear protein-interaction domain. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31 (2006) 35-40
35. Eberharter A., Vetter I., Ferreira R., and Becker P.B. ACF1 improves the effectiveness of nucleosome mobilization by ISWI through PHD-histone contacts. EMBO J. 23 (2004) 4029-4039
36. Ragvin A., Valvatne H., Erdal S., Arskog V., Tufteland K.R., Breen K., OYan A.M., Eberharter A., Gibson T.J., Becker P.B., and Aasland R. Nucleosome binding by the bromodomain and PHD finger of the transcriptional cofactor p300. J. Mol. Biol. 337 (2004) 773-788
37. Pena P.V., Davrazou F., Shi X., Walter K.L., Verkhusha V.V., Gozani O., Zhao R., and Kutateladze T.G. Molecular mechanism of histone H3K4me3 recognition by plant homeodomain of ING2. Nature 442 (2006) 100-103
38. Shi X., Hong T., Walter K.L., Ewalt M., Michishita E., Hung T., Carney D., Pena P., Lan F., Kaadige M.R., Lacoste N., Cayrou C., Davrazou F., Saha A., Cairns B.R., Ayer D.E., Kutateladze T.G., Shi Y., Cote J., Chua K.F., and Gozani O. ING2 PHD domain links histone H3 lysine 4 methylation to active gene repression. Nature 442 (2006) 96-99
39. Shur I., and Benayahu D. Characterization and functional analysis of CReMM, a novel chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein. J. Mol. Biol. 352 (2005) 646-655
40. Schuster E.F., and Stoger R. CHD5 defines a new subfamily of chromodomain-SWI2/SNF2-like helicases. Mamm. Genome 13 (2002) 117-119
41. Chiba H., Muramatsu M., Nomoto A., and Kato H. Two human homologues of Saccharomyces cerevisiae SWI2/SNF2 and Drosophila brahma are transcriptional coactivators cooperating with the estrogen receptor and the retinoic acid receptor. Nucl. Acid Res. 22 (1994) 1815-1820
42. Khavari P.A., Peterson C.L., Tamkun J.W., Mendel D.B., and Crabtree G.R. BRG1 contains a conserved domain of the SWI2/SNF2 family necessary for normal mitotic growth and transcription. Nature 366 (1993) 170-174
43. Muchardt C., and Yaniv M. A human homologue of Saccharomyces cerevisiae SNF2/SWI2 and Drosophila brm genes potentiates transcriptional activation by the glucocorticoid receptor. EMBO J. 12 (1993) 4279-4290
44. Daubresse G., Deuring R., Moore L., Papoulas O., Zakrajsek I., Waldrip W.R., Scott M.P., Kennison J.A., and Tamkun J.W. The Drosophila kismet gene is related to chromatin-remodeling factors and is required for both segmentation and segment identity. Development 126 (1999) 1175-1187
45. Aasland R., Stewart A.F., and Gibson T. The SANT domain: a putative DNA-binding domain in the SWI-SNF and ADA complexes, the transcriptional co-repressor N-CoR and TFIIIB. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21 (1996) 87-88
46. Stokes D.G., Tartof K.D., and Perry R.P. CHD1 is concentrated in interbands and puffed regions of Drosophila polytene chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (1996) 7137-7142
47. Marfella C.G., Ohkawa Y., Coles A.H., Garlick D.S., Jones S.N., and Imbalzano A.N. Mutation of the SNF2 family member Chd2 affects mouse development and survival. J. Cell. Physiol. 209 (2006) 162-171
48. Kim J., Sif S., Jones B., Jackson A., Koipally J., Heller E., Winandy S., Viel A., Sawyer A., Ikeda T., Kingston R., and Georgopoulos K. Ikaros DNA-binding proteins direct formation of chromatin remodeling complexes in lymphocytes. Immunity 10 (1999) 345-355
49. von Zelewsky T., Palladino F., Brunschwig K., Tobler H., Hajnal A., and Muller F. The C. elegans Mi-2 chromatin-remodelling proteins function in vulval cell fate determination. Development 127 (2000) 5277-5284
50. Thompson P.M., Gotoh T., Kok M., White P.S., and Brodeur G.M. CHD5, a new member of the chromodomain gene family, is preferentially expressed in the nervous system. Oncogene 22 (2003) 1002-1011
51. Vissers L.E., van Ravenswaaij C.M., Admiraal R., Hurst J.A., de Vries B.B., Janssen I.M., van der Vliet W.A., Huys E.H., de Jong P.J., Hamel B.C., Schoenmakers E.F., Brunner H.G., Veltman J.A., and van Kessel A.G. Mutations in a new member of the chromodomain gene family cause CHARGE syndrome. Nat. Genet. 36 (2004) 955-957
52. Marom R., Shur I., Hager G.L., and Benayahu D. Expression and regulation of CReMM, a chromodomain helicase-DNA-binding (CHD), in marrow stroma derived osteoprogenitors. J. Cell. Physiol. 207 (2006) 628-635
53. Shur I., Socher R., and Benayahu D. In vivo association of CReMM/CHD9 with promoters in osteogenic cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 207 (2006) 374-378
54. Tran H.G., Steger D.J., Iyer V.R., and Johnson A.D. The chromo domain protein chd1p from budding yeast is an ATP-dependent chromatin-modifying factor. EMBO J. 19 (2000) 2323-2331
55. Robinson K.M., and Schultz M.C. Replication-independent assembly of nucleosome arrays in a novel yeast chromatin reconstitution system involves antisilencing factor Asf1p and chromodomain protein Chd1p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23 (2003) 7937-7946
56. Stockdale C., Flaus A., Ferreira H., and Owen-Hughes T. Analysis of nucleosome repositioning by yeast ISWI and CHD1 chromatin remodeling complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006) 16279-16288
57. Lusser A., Urwin D.L., and Kadonaga J.T. Distinct activities of CHD1 and ACF in ATP-dependent chromatin assembly. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12 (2005) 160-166
58. Brehm A., Langst G., Kehle J., Clapier C.R., Imhof A., Eberharter A., Muller J., and Becker P.B. dMi-2 and ISWI chromatin remodelling factors have distinct nucleosome binding and mobilization properties. EMBO J. 19 (2000) 4332-4341
59. Wang H.B., and Zhang Y. Mi2, an auto-antigen for dermatomyositis, is an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling factor. Nucl. Acid Res. 29 (2001) 2517-2521
60. Tong J.K., Hassig C.A., Schnitzler G.R., Kingston R.E., and Schreiber S.L. Chromatin deacetylation by an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling complex. Nature 395 (1998) 917-921
61. Xue Y., Wong J., Moreno G.T., Young M.K., Cote J., and Wang W. NURD, a novel complex with both ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling and histone deacetylase activities. Mol. Cell 2 (1998) 851-861
62. Zhang Y., LeRoy G., Seelig H.P., Lane W.S., and Reinberg D. The dermatomyositis-specific autoantigen Mi2 is a component of a complex containing histone deacetylase and nucleosome remodeling activities. Cell 95 (1998) 279-289
63. Bowen N.J., Fujita N., Kajita M., and Wade P.A. Mi-2/NuRD: multiple complexes for many purposes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1677 (2004) 52-57
64. Wade P.A., Jones P.L., Vermaak D., and Wolffe A.P. A multiple subunit Mi-2 histone deacetylase from Xenopus laevis cofractionates with an associated Snf2 superfamily ATPase. Curr. Biol. 8 (1998) 843-846
65. Fujita N., Jaye D.L., Kajita M., Geigerman C., Moreno C.S., and Wade P.A. MTA3, a Mi-2/NuRD complex subunit, regulates an invasive growth pathway in breast cancer. Cell 113 (2003) 207-219
66. Kehle J., Beuchle D., Treuheit S., Christen B., Kennison J.A., Bienz M., and Muller J. dMi-2, a hunchback-interacting protein that functions in polycomb repression. Science 282 (1998) 1897-1900
67. Solari F., and Ahringer J. NURD-complex genes antagonise Ras-induced vulval development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 10 (2000) 223-226
68. Tai H.H., Geisterfer M., Bell J.C., Moniwa M., Davie J.R., Boucher L., and McBurney M.W. CHD1 associates with NCoR and histone deacetylase as well as with RNA splicing proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 308 (2003) 170-176
69. Belotserkovskaya R., and Reinberg D. Facts about FACT and transcript elongation through chromatin. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14 (2004) 139-146
70. Krogan N.J., Kim M., Ahn S.H., Zhong G., Kobor M.S., Cagney G., Emili A., Shilatifard A., Buratowski S., and Greenblatt J.F. RNA polymerase II elongation factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a targeted proteomics approach. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22 (2002) 6979-6992
71. Krogan N.J., Kim M., Tong A., Golshani A., Cagney G., Canadien V., Richards D.P., Beattie B.K., Emili A., Boone C., Shilatifard A., Buratowski S., and Greenblatt J. Methylation of histone H3 by Set2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is linked to transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23 (2003) 4207-4218
72. Srinivasan S., Armstrong J.A., Deuring R., Dahlsveen I.K., McNeill H., and Tamkun J.W. The Drosophila trithorax group protein Kismet facilitates an early step in transcriptional elongation by RNA Polymerase II. Development 132 (2005) 1623-1635
73. Tsukiyama T., Palmer J., Landel C.C., Shiloach J., and Wu C. Characterization of the imitation switch subfamily of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 13 (1999) 686-697
74. Fujita N., Jaye D.L., Geigerman C., Akyildiz A., Mooney M.R., Boss J.M., and Wade P.A. MTA3 and the Mi-2/NuRD complex regulate cell fate during B lymphocyte differentiation. Cell 119 (2004) 75-86
75. O'Neill D.W., Schoetz S.S., Lopez R.A., Castle M., Rabinowitz L., Shor E., Krawchuk D., Goll M.G., Renz M., Seelig H.P., Han S., Seong R.H., Park S.D., Agalioti T., Munshi N., Thanos D., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., and Bank A. An ikaros-containing chromatin-remodeling complex in adult-type erythroid cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000) 7572-7582
76. Williams C.J., Naito T., Arco P.G., Seavitt J.R., Cashman S.M., De Souza B., Qi X., Keables P., Von Andrian U.H., and Georgopoulos K. The chromatin remodeler Mi-2beta is required for CD4 expression and T cell development. Immunity 20 (2004) 719-733
77. Ge Q., Nilasena D.S., O'Brien C.A., Frank M.B., and Targoff I.N. Molecular analysis of a major antigenic region of the 240 kDa protein of Mi-2 autoantigen. J. Clin. Invest. 96 (1995) 1730-1737
78. Seelig H.P., Moosbrugger I., Ehrfeld H., Fink T., Renz M., and Genth E. The major dermatomyositis-specific Mi-2 autoantigen is a presumed helicase involved in transcriptional activation. Arthritis Rheum. 38 (1995) 1389-1399
79. Seelig H.P., Renz M., Targoff I.N., Ge Q., and Frank M.B. Two forms of the major antigenic protein of the dermatomyositis-specific Mi-2 autoantigen. Arthritis Rheum. 39 (1996) 1769-1771
80. Airio A., Pukkala E., and Isomaki H. Elevated cancer incidence in patients with dermatomyositis: a population based study. J. Rheumatol. 22 (1995) 1300-1303
81. Lemos T.A., Passos D.O., Nery F.C., and Kobarg J. Characterization of a new family of proteins that interact with the C-terminal region of the chromatin-remodeling factor CHD-3. FEBS Lett. 533 (2003) 14-20
82. Schwab U., Stein H., Gerdes J., Lemke H., Kirchner H., Schaadt M., and Diehl V. Production of a monoclonal antibody specific for Hodgkin and Sternberg-Reed cells of Hodgkin's disease and a subset of normal lymphoid cells. Nature 299 (1982) 65-67
83. Law M.E., Templeton K.L., Kitange G., Smith J., Misra A., Feuerstein B.G., and Jenkins R.B. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosomes 1 and 19 in glioma cell lines. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 160 (2005) 1-14
84. White P.S., Thompson P.M., Gotoh T., Okawa E.R., Igarashi J., Kok M., Winter C., Gregory S.G., Hogarty M.D., Maris J.M., and Brodeur G.M. Definition and characterization of a region of 1p36.3 consistently deleted in neuroblastoma. Oncogene 24 (2005) 2684-2694
85. Williams M.S. Speculations on the pathogenesis of CHARGE syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 133 (2005) 318-325