Mechanisms underlying nucleosome positioning in vivo

Annual Review of Biophysics

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 41-63

  Hughes, Amanda L ^a   Rando, Oliver J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromatin; Nucleosome positioning; Transcription

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CIS ACTING ELEMENT; DNA; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; GAMMA INTERFERON; HISTONE H2A; HISTONE H2B; HISTONE H3; HISTONE H4; IMMUNOGLOBULIN ENHANCER BINDING PROTEIN; INTERFERON REGULATORY FACTOR 1; INTERFERON REGULATORY FACTOR 3; INTERFERON REGULATORY FACTOR 7; RNA POLYMERASE; TRANS ACTING FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GAL4; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CELL SHAPE; CELLULAR, SUBCELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DNA BINDING; DNA HISTONE INTERACTION; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA TEMPLATE; EUKARYOTE; GC RICH SEQUENCE; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE REPRESSION; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; LANDSCAPE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; NUCLEOSOME POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; TATA BOX; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION;

CHROMATIN; NUCLEOSOME POSITIONING; TRANSCRIPTION;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA; EUKARYOTA; HUMANS; NUCLEOSOMES;

EID: 84901980324     PISSN: 1936122X     EISSN: 19361238     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-051013-023114     Document Type: Article

References (122)

1. Almer A, Horz W. 1986. Nuclease hypersensitive regions with adjacent positioned nucleosomes mark the gene boundaries of the PHO5/PHO3 locus in yeast. EMBO J. 5:2681-877
2. Almer A, Rudolph H, Hinnen A, Horz W. 1986. Removal of positioned nucleosomes from the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction releases additional upstream activating DNA elements. EMBO J. 5:2689-966
3. Anderson JD, Widom J. 2000. Sequence and position-dependence of the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites. J. Mol. Biol. 296:979-877
4. Anderson JD, Widom J. 2001. Poly(dA-dT) promoter elements increase the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:3830-399
5. Badis G, Chan ET, van Bakel H, Pena-Castillo L, Tillo D, et al. 2008. A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. Mol. Cell 32:878-877
6. Bai L, Charvin G, Siggia ED, Cross FR. 2010. Nucleosome-depleted regions in cell-cycle-regulated promoters ensure reliable gene expression in every cell cycle. Dev. Cell 18:544-555
7. BaiL,OndrackaA,Cross FR. 2011. Multiple sequence-specific factors generate the nucleosome-depleted region on CLN2 promoter. Mol. Cell 42:465-766
8. Basehoar AD, Zanton SJ, Pugh BF. 2004. Identification and distinct regulation of yeast TATA boxcontaining genes. Cell 116:699-7099
9. Bell O, Schwaiger M, Oakeley EJ, Lienert F, Beisel C, et al. 2010. Accessibility of the Drosophila genome discriminates PcG repression, H4K16 acetylation and replication timing. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17:894-9000
10. Bernstein BE, Liu CL, Humphrey EL, Perlstein EO, Schreiber SL. 2004. Global nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Genome Biol. 5:R622
11. BintuL,Kopaczynska M, HodgesC, LubkowskaL,Kashlev M, Bustamante C. 2011. The elongation rate of RNA polymerase determines the fate of transcribed nucleosomes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18:1394-999
12. Boeger H, Griesenbeck J, Kornberg RD. 2008. Nucleosome retention and the stochastic nature of promoter chromatin remodeling for transcription. Cell 133:716-266
13. Bondarenko VA, Steele LM, Ujvai A, Gaykalova DA, Kulaeva OI, et al. 2006. Nucleosomes can form a polar barrier to transcript elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell 24:469-799
14. BouazouneK,Miranda TB, Jones PA,Kingston RE. 2009. Analysis of individual remodeled nucleosomes reveals decreased histone-DNA contacts created by hSWI/SNF. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:5279-944
15. Brogaard K, Xi L, Wang J-P, Widom J. 2012. A map of nucleosome positions in yeast at base-pair resolution. Nature 486:496-5011
16. Clapier CR, Cairns BR. 2009. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78:273-3044
17. Deal RB, Henikoff S. 2010. Capturing the dynamic epigenome. Genome Biol. 11:2188
18. Dion MF, Kaplan T, Kim M, Buratowski S, Friedman N, Rando OJ. 2007. Dynamics of replicationindependent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science 315:1405-88
19. Drew HR, Travers AA. 1985. DNA bending and its relation to nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 186:773-900
20. Field Y, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Moore IK, Mieczkowski P, Kaplan N, et al. 2009. Gene expression divergence in yeast is coupled to evolution of DNA-encoded nucleosome organization. Nat. Genet. 41:438-455
21. Field Y,Kaplan N, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y,Moore IK, Sharon E, et al. 2008. Distinct modes of regulation by chromatin encoded through nucleosome positioning signals. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4:e10002166
22. Fu Y, Sinha M, Peterson CL,Weng Z. 2008. The insulator binding protein CTCF positions 20 nucleosomes around its binding sites across the human genome. PLoS Genet. 4:e10001388
23. Gaffney DJ, McVicker G, Pai AA, Fondufe-Mittendorf YN, Lewellen N, et al. 2012. Controls of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 8:e10030366
24. Gilchrist DA, Dos Santos G, Fargo DC, Xie B, Gao Y, et al. 2010. Pausing of RNA polymerase II disrupts DNA-specified nucleosome organization to enable precise gene regulation. Cell 143:540-511
25. Gkikopoulos T, Schofield P, Singh V, Pinskaya M, Mellor J, et al. 2011. A role for Snf2-related nucleosome-spacing enzymes in genome-wide nucleosome organization. Science 333:1758-600
26. Gossett AJ, Lieb JD. 2012. In vivo effects of histone H3 depletion on nucleosome occupancy and position in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 8:e10027711
27. HanM,GrunsteinM.1988. Nucleosome loss activates yeast downstream promoters in vivo. Cell 55:1137-455
28. HaoN,O'Shea EK. 2012. Signal-dependent dynamics of transcription factor translocation controls gene expression. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19:31-399
29. Heintzman ND, Stuart RK, Hon G, Fu Y, Ching CW, et al. 2007. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 39:311-188
30. Henikoff S, Furuyama T. 2012. The unconventional structure of centromeric nucleosomes. Chromosoma 121:341-522
31. Hesselberth JR, Chen X, Zhang Z, Sabo PJ, Sandstrom R, et al. 2009. Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting. Nat. Methods 6:283-899
32. Hodges C, Bintu L, Lubkowska L, Kashlev M, Bustamante C. 2009. Nucleosomal fluctuations govern the transcription dynamics of RNA polymerase II. Science 325:626-288
33. HornungG,OrenM, BarkaiN. 2012. Nucleosome organization affects the sensitivity of gene expression to promoter mutations. Mol. Cell 46:362-688
34. Horz W, Altenburger W. 1981. Sequence specific cleavage of DNA by micrococcal nuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 9:2643-588
35. Hughes AL, Jin Y, Rando OJ, Struhl K. 2012.Afunctional evolutionary approach to identify determinants of nucleosome positioning: a unifying model for establishing the genome-wide pattern. Mol. Cell 48:5-155
36. Huisinga KL, Pugh BF. 2004. A genome-wide housekeeping role for TFIID and a highly regulated stress-related role for SAGA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 13:573-855
37. Ihmels J, Bergmann S, Gerami-Nejad M, Yanai I, McClellan M, et al. 2005. Rewiring of the yeast transcriptional network through the evolution of motif usage. Science 309:938-400
38. Ioshikhes I, Bolshoy A, DerenshteynK, BorodovskyM,Trifonov EN. 1996. NucleosomeDNAsequence pattern revealed by multiple alignment of experimentally mapped sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 262:129-399
39. Ioshikhes IP, Albert I, Zanton SJ, Pugh BF. 2006. Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics. Nat. Genet. 38:1210-155
40. Iyer V, Struhl K. 1995. Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure. EMBO J. 14:2570-799
41. Jessen WJ, Hoose SA, Kilgore JA, Kladde MP. 2006. Active PHO5 chromatin encompasses variable numbers of nucleosomes at individual promoters. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13:256-633
42. Jin J, Bai L, Johnson DS, Fulbright RM, Kireeva ML, et al. 2010. Synergistic action of RNA polymerases in overcoming the nucleosomal barrier. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17:745-522
43. Kaplan N, Moore IK, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Gossett AJ, Tillo D, et al. 2009. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 458:362-666
44. Korber P, Hörz W. 2004. In vitro assembly of the characteristic chromatin organization at the yeast PHO5 promoter by a replication-independent extract system. J. Biol. Chem. 279:35113-200
45. Kornberg RD, Lorch Y. 1999. Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome. Cell 98:285-944
46. Kornberg RD, StryerL. 1988. Statistical distributions of nucleosomes: nonrandom locations by a stochastic mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:6677-900
47. Kulaeva OI, Hsieh F-K, Studitsky VM. 2010. RNA polymerase complexes cooperate to relieve the nucleosomal barrier and evict histones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:11325-300
48. Lam FH, Steger DJ, O'Shea EK. 2008. Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic range. Nature 453:246-500
49. Lee K, Kim SC, Jung I, Kim K, Seo J, et al. 2013. Genetic landscape of open chromatin in yeast. PLoS Genet. 9:e10032299
50. Lee S-I, Pe'er D, Dudley AM, Church GM, Koller D. 2006. Identifying regulatory mechanisms using individual variation reveals key role for chromatin modification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:14062-677
51. Lee W, Tillo D, Bray N, Morse RH, Davis RW, et al. 2007. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat. Genet. 39:1235-444
52. Li B, Pattenden SG, Lee D, Gutiérrez J, Chen J, et al. 2005. Preferential occupancy of histone variant H2AZ at inactive promoters influences local histonemodifications and chromatin remodeling. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:18385-900
53. Lidor Nili E, Field Y, Lubling Y,Widom J, Oren M, Segal E. 2010. p53 binds preferentially to genomic regions with high DNA-encoded nucleosome occupancy. Genome Res. 20:1361-688
54. Lomvardas S, Thanos D. 2002. Modifying gene expression programs by altering core promoter chromatin architecture. Cell 110:261-711
55. Lowary PT, Widom J. 1998. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 276:19-422
56. Lu Q, Wallrath LL, Elgin SC. 1995. The role of a positioned nucleosome at the Drosophila melanogaster hsp26 promoter. EMBO J. 14:4738-466
57. Luger K, Mader AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ. 1997. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Åresolution. Nature 389:251-600
58. Martens JA, Laprade L,Winston F. 2004. Intergenic transcription is required to repress the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SER3 gene. Nature 429:571-744
59. Mavrich TN, Ioshikhes IP, Venters BJ, Jiang C, Tomsho LP, et al. 2008. A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res. 18:1073-833
60. McKnight JN, Jenkins KR, Nodelman IM, Escobar T, Bowman GD. 2011. Extranucleosomal DNA binding directs nucleosome sliding by Chd1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31:4746-599
61. McPherson CE, Shim EY, Friedman DS, Zaret KS. 1993. An active tissue-specific enhancer and bound transcription factors existing in a precisely positioned nucleosomal array. Cell 75:387-988
62. Mito Y, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S. 2005. Genome-scale profiling of histone H3.3 replacement patterns. Nat. Genet. 37:1090-977
63. Mobius W, GerlandU. 2010. Quantitative test of the barrier nucleosomemodel for statistical positioning of nucleosomes up-and downstream of transcription start sites. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6:e10008911
64. Moshkin YM, Chalkley GE, Kan TW, Reddy BA, Ozgur Z, et al. 2012. Remodelers organize cellular chromatin by counteracting intrinsic histone-DNA sequence preferences in a class-specificmanner. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32:675-888
65. Nagy PL, Cleary ML, Brown PO, Lieb JD. 2003. Genomewide demarcation of RNA polymerase II transcription units revealed by physical fractionation of chromatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:6364-699
66. Newman JRS, Ghaemmaghami S, Ihmels J, Breslow DK, Noble M, et al. 2006. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441:840-466
67. Olson WK, Zhurkin VB. 2011. Working the kinks out of nucleosomal DNA. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21:348-577
68. Orphanides G, LeRoy G, Chang CH, Luse DS, Reinberg D. 1998. FACT, a factor that facilitates transcript elongation through nucleosomes. Cell 92:105-166
69. Perales R, Zhang L, BentleyD. 2011. Histone occupancy in vivo at the 601 nucleosome binding element is determined by transcriptional history. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31:3485-966
70. Polach KJ, Widom J. 1995. Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 254:130-499
71. Radman-Livaja M, Ruben G, Weiner A, Friedman N, Kamakaka R, Rando OJ. 2011. Dynamics of Sir3 spreading in budding yeast: secondary recruitment sites and euchromatic localization. EMBO J. 30:1012-266
72. Raisner RM, Hartley PD, Meneghini MD, Bao MZ, Liu CL, et al. 2005. Histone variant H2A.Z marks the 5′ ends of both active and inactive genes in euchromatin. Cell 123:233-488
73. Ramirez-Carrozzi VR, Braas D, Bhatt DM, Cheng CS, Hong C, et al. 2009. A unifying model for the selective regulation of inducible transcription by CpG islands and nucleosome remodeling. Cell 138:114-288
74. Rando OJ. 2012. Combinatorial complexity in chromatin structure and function: revisiting the histone code. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 22:148-555
75. Rando OJ, Winston F. 2012. Chromatin and transcription in yeast. Genetics 190:351-877
76. Raser JM, O'Shea EK. 2004. Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science 304:1811-144
77. Rhee HS, Pugh BF. 2012. Genome-wide structure and organization of eukaryotic pre-initiation complexes. Nature 483:295-3011
78. Rosin D, Hornung G, Tirosh I, Gispan A, Barkai N. 2012. Promoter nucleosome organization shapes the evolution of gene expression. PLoS Genet. 8:e10025799
79. Rufiange A, Jacques PE, Bhat W, Robert F, Nourani A. 2007. Genome-wide replication-independent histone H3 exchange occurs predominantly at promoters and implicates H3 K56 acetylation and Asf1. Mol. Cell 27:393-4055
80. Sasaki S, Mello CC, Shimada A, Nakatani Y, Hashimoto S, et al. 2009. Chromatin-associated periodicity in genetic variation downstream of transcriptional start sites. Science 323:401-44
81. Satchwell SC, Drew HR, Travers AA. 1986. Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 191:659-755
82. Schones DE, Cui K, Cuddapah S, Roh TY, Barski A, et al. 2008. Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 132:887-988
83. Schwartz S, Meshorer E, Ast G. 2009. Chromatin organization marks exon-intron structure. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16:990-955
84. Segal E, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Chen L, Thåström A, Field Y, et al. 2006. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 442:772-788
85. Sekinger EA, Moqtaderi Z, Struhl K. 2005. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast. Mol. Cell 18:735-488
86. Sharon E, Kalma Y, Sharp A, Raveh-Sadka T, Levo M, et al. 2012. Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters. Nat. Biotechnol. 30:521-300
87. Shivaswamy S, Bhinge A, Zhao Y, Jones S, Hirst M, Iyer VR. 2008. Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation. PLoS Biol. 6:e655
88. Simpson RT, Stafford DW. 1983. Structural features of a phased nucleosome core particle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:51-555
89. Stockdale C, Flaus A, FerreiraH, Owen-Hughes T. 2006. Analysis of nucleosome repositioning by yeast ISWI and Chd1 chromatin remodeling complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 281:16279-888
90. StuditskyVM,Clark DJ, Felsenfeld G. 1994.Ahistone octamer can step around a transcribing polymerase without leaving the template. Cell 76:371-822
91. St ünkelW, Kober I, Seifart KH. 1997. A nucleosome positioned in the distal promoter region activates transcription of the human U6 gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:4397-4055
92. Tilgner H, Nikolaou C, Althammer S, Sammeth M, Beato M, et al. 2009. Nucleosome positioning as a determinant of exon recognition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16:996-10011
93. Tillo D, Hughes TR. 2009.G+Ccontent dominates intrinsic nucleosome occupancy.BMCBioinformatics 10:4422
94. Tims HS,GurunathanK,LevitusM,Widom J. 2011. Dynamics of nucleosome invasion byDNAbinding proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 411:430-488
95. Tirosh I, Barkai N. 2008. Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. Genome Res. 18:1084-911
96. Tirosh I, Sigal N, Barkai N. 2010. Divergence of nucleosome positioning between two closely related yeast species: genetic basis and functional consequences. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6:3655
97. Tirosh I, Weinberger A, CarmiM, BarkaiN. 2006. A genetic signature of interspecies variations in gene expression. Nat. Genet. 38:830-344
98. Tolkunov D, Zawadzki KA, Singer C, Elfving N, Morozov AV, Broach Jr. 2011. Chromatin remodelers clear nucleosomes from intrinsically unfavorable sites to establish nucleosome-depleted regions at promoters. Mol. Biol. Cell 22:2106-188
99. Tomar RS, Psathas JN, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Reese JC. 2009. A novel mechanism of antagonism between ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes regulates RNR3 expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:3255-655
100. Tsankov A, Yanagisawa Y, Rhind N, Regev A, Rando OJ. 2011. Evolutionary divergence of intrinsic and trans-regulated nucleosome positioning sequences reveals plastic rules for chromatin organization. Genome Res. 21:1851-622
101. Tsankov AM, Thompson DA, Socha A, Regev A, Rando OJ. 2010. The role of nucleosome positioning in the evolution of gene regulation. PLoS Biol. 8:e10004144
102. Vaillant C, Palmeira L, Chevereau G, Audit B, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, et al. 2010. A novel strategy of transcription regulation by intragenic nucleosome ordering. Genome Res. 20:59-677
103. Valouev A, Johnson SM, Boyd SD, Smith CL, Fire AZ, Sidow A. 2011. Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells. Nature 474:516-200
104. van Bakel H, Tsui K, Gebbia M, Mnaimneh S, Hughes TR, Nislow C. 2013. A compendium of nucleosome and transcript profiles reveals determinants of chromatin architecture and transcription. PLoS Genet. 9:e10034799
105. Van Holde KE. 1989. Chromatin. New York: Springer-Verlag. 497 pp..
106. Vavouri T, Lehner B. 2012. Human genes with CpG island promoters have a distinct transcriptionassociated chromatin organization. Genome Biol. 13:R1100
107. Vinces MD, Legendre M, Caldara M, Hagihara M, Verstrepen KJ. 2009. Unstable tandem repeats in promoters confer transcriptional evolvability. Science 324:1213-166
108. Wang J, Zhuang J, Iyer S, Lin X,Whitfield TW, et al. 2012. Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors. Genome Res. 22:1798-8122
109. Weiner A, Hughes A, Yassour M, Rando OJ, Friedman N. 2010. High-resolution nucleosome mapping reveals transcription-dependent promoter packaging. Genome Res. 20:90-1000
110. Weintraub H, Groudine M. 1976. Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science 193:848-566
111. West SM, Rohs R,Mann RS, Honig B. 2010. Electrostatic interactions between arginines and theminor groove in the nucleosome. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 27:861-666
112. Whitehouse I,Rando OJ, Delrow J, TsukiyamaT. 2007. Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription. Nature 450:1031-355
113. Whitehouse I, Tsukiyama T. 2006. Antagonistic forces that position nucleosomes in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13:633-400
114. Workman JL, Kingston RE. 1992. Nucleosome core displacement in vitro via a metastable transcription factor-nucleosome complex. Science 258:1780-844
115. Yarragudi A, Miyake T, Li R, Morse RH. 2004. Comparison of ABF1 and RAP1 in chromatin opening and transactivator potentiation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:9152-644
116. Yen K, Vinayachandran V, Batta K, Koerber RT, Pugh BF. 2012. Genome-wide nucleosome specificity and directionality of chromatin remodelers. Cell 149:1461-733
117. Yu L, Morse RH. 1999. Chromatin opening and transactivator potentiation by RAP1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:5279-888
118. Yuan G-C, Liu JS. 2008. Genomic sequence is highly predictive of local nucleosome depletion. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4:e133
119. Yuan G-C, LiuY-J,DionMF, SlackMD,WuLF, et al. 2005. Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae. Science 309:626-300
120. Zentner GE, Tsukiyama T, Henikoff S. 2013. ISWI and CHD chromatin remodelers bind promoters but act in gene bodies. PLoS Genet. 9:e10033177
121. Zhang Y, Moqtaderi Z, Rattner BP, Euskirchen G, Snyder M, et al. 2009. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not themajor determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16:847-522
122. Zhang Z,Wippo CJ,Wal M, Ward E, Korber P, Pugh BF. 2011. A packing mechanism for nucleosome organization reconstituted across a eukaryotic genome. Science 332:977-800