A System for Genome-Wide Histone Variant Dynamics In ES Cells Reveals Dynamic MacroH2A2 Replacement at Promoters

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 10, Issue 8, 2014, Pages

  Yildirim, Ozlem ^a,c   Hung, Jui Hung ^a,d   Cedeno, Ryan J ^b   Weng, Zhiping ^a   Lengner, Christopher J ^b   Rando, Oliver J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H2A; HISTONE MACROH2A2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CHROMATIN; HISTONE; MACROH2A HISTONE; NUCLEOSOME;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PLURIPOTENCY; CELLULAR PARAMETERS; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CHROMOSOME 1; CHROMOSOME 15; CHROMOSOME 5; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC FIBROBLAST; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EPIGENETICS; FIBROBLAST; GENOMICS; HISTONE VARIANT DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; TISSUE SPECIFICITY; TURNOVER TIME; VALIDATION PROCESS; ANIMAL; CHROMATIN; CPG ISLAND; CYTOLOGY; GENETICS; GENOME; METABOLISM; NUCLEOSOME;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; CPG ISLANDS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; EPIGENOMICS; GENOME; HISTONES; MICE; NUCLEOSOMES; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC;

EID: 84930962818     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004515     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Kimura H, Cook PR, (2001) Kinetics of core histones in living human cells: little exchange of H3 and H4 and some rapid exchange of H2B. J Cell Biol 153: 1341–1353.
2. Ahmad K, Henikoff S, (2002) Epigenetic consequences of nucleosome dynamics. Cell 111: 281–284.
3. Ahmad K, Henikoff S, (2002) Histone H3 variants specify modes of chromatin assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99 Suppl 4: 16477–16484.
4. Ahmad K, Henikoff S, (2002) The histone variant H3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly. Mol Cell 9: 1191–1200.
5. Dion MF, Kaplan T, Kim M, Buratowski S, Friedman N, et al. (2007) Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science 315: 1405–1408.
6. Mito Y, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S, (2005) Genome-scale profiling of histone H3.3 replacement patterns. Nat Genet 37: 1090–1097.
7. Mito Y, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S, (2007) Histone replacement marks the boundaries of cis-regulatory domains. Science 315: 1408–1411.
8. Rufiange A, Jacques PE, Bhat W, Robert F, Nourani A, (2007) Genome-wide replication-independent histone H3 exchange occurs predominantly at promoters and implicates H3 K56 acetylation and Asf1. Mol Cell 27: 393–405.
9. Goldberg AD, Banaszynski LA, Noh KM, Lewis PW, Elsaesser SJ, et al. (2010) Distinct factors control histone variant H3.3 localization at specific genomic regions. Cell 140: 678–691.
10. Stroud H, Otero S, Desvoyes B, Ramirez-Parra E, Jacobsen SE, et al. (2012) Genome-wide analysis of histone H3.1 and H3.3 variants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 5370–5375.
11. Jin C, Zang C, Wei G, Cui K, Peng W, et al. (2009) H3.3/H2A.Z double variant-containing nucleosomes mark ‘nucleosome-free regions’ of active promoters and other regulatory regions. Nat Genet 41: 941–945.
12. Aygun O, Mehta S, Grewal SI, (2013) HDAC-mediated suppression of histone turnover promotes epigenetic stability of heterochromatin. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20: 547–554.
13. Xu M, Long C, Chen X, Huang C, Chen S, et al. (2010) Partitioning of histone H3-H4 tetramers during DNA replication-dependent chromatin assembly. Science 328: 94–98.
14. Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X, Kamal M, Huebert DJ, et al. (2006) A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125: 315–326.
15. Fazzio TG, Huff JT, Panning B, (2008) An RNAi screen of chromatin proteins identifies Tip60-p400 as a regulator of embryonic stem cell identity. Cell 134: 162–174.
16. Christophersen NS, Helin K, (2010) Epigenetic control of embryonic stem cell fate. J Exp Med 207: 2287–2295.
17. Boyer LA, Plath K, Zeitlinger J, Brambrink T, Medeiros LA, et al. (2006) Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 441: 349–353.
18. Creyghton MP, Markoulaki S, Levine SS, Hanna J, Lodato MA, et al. (2008) H2AZ is enriched at polycomb complex target genes in ES cells and is necessary for lineage commitment. Cell 135: 649–661.
19. Kaji K, Caballero IM, MacLeod R, Nichols J, Wilson VA, et al. (2006) The NuRD component Mbd3 is required for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 8: 285–292.
20. Meshorer E, Yellajoshula D, George E, Scambler PJ, Brown DT, et al. (2006) Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev Cell 10: 105–116.
21. Creppe C, Posavec M, Douet J, Buschbeck M, (2012) MacroH2A in stem cells: a story beyond gene repression. Epigenomics 4: 221–227.
22. Changolkar LN, Costanzi C, Leu NA, Chen D, McLaughlin KJ, et al. (2007) Developmental changes in histone macroH2A1-mediated gene regulation. Mol Cell Biol 27: 2758–2764.
23. Changolkar LN, Pehrson JR, (2006) macroH2A1 histone variants are depleted on active genes but concentrated on the inactive X chromosome. Mol Cell Biol 26: 4410–4420.
24. Chang CC, Gao S, Sung LY, Corry GN, Ma Y, et al. (2010) Rapid elimination of the histone variant MacroH2A from somatic cell heterochromatin after nuclear transfer. Cell Reprogram 12: 43–53.
25. Gaspar-Maia A, Qadeer ZA, Hasson D, Ratnakumar K, Leu NA, et al. (2012) MacroH2A histone variants act as a barrier upon reprogramming towards pluripotency. Nat Commun 4: 1565.
26. Pasque V, Gillich A, Garrett N, Gurdon JB, (2011) Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming. Embo J 30: 2373–2387.
27. Pasque V, Radzisheuskaya A, Gillich A, Halley-Stott RP, Panamarova M, et al. (2012) Histone variant macroH2A marks embryonic differentiation in vivo and acts as an epigenetic barrier to induced pluripotency. J Cell Sci 6094–6104.
28. Barrero MJ, Sese B, Kuebler B, Bilic J, Boue S, et al. (2013) Macrohistone Variants Preserve Cell Identity by Preventing the Gain of H3K4me2 during Reprogramming to Pluripotency. Cell Rep 3: 1005–1011.
29. Costanzi C, Pehrson JR, (1998) Histone macroH2A1 is concentrated in the inactive X chromosome of female mammals. Nature 393: 599–601.
30. Chadwick BP, Willard HF, (2001) Histone H2A variants and the inactive X chromosome: identification of a second macroH2A variant. Hum Mol Genet 10: 1101–1113.
31. Csankovszki G, Panning B, Bates B, Pehrson JR, Jaenisch R, (1999) Conditional deletion of Xist disrupts histone macroH2A localization but not maintenance of X inactivation. Nat Genet 22: 323–324.
32. Creppe C, Janich P, Cantarino N, Noguera M, Valero V, et al. (2012) MacroH2A1 regulates the balance between self-renewal and differentiation commitment in embryonic and adult stem cells. Mol Cell Biol 32: 1442–1452.
33. Deal RB, Henikoff S, (2010) Capturing the dynamic epigenome. Genome Biol 11: 218.
34. Schermer UJ, Korber P, Horz W, (2005) Histones are incorporated in trans during reassembly of the yeast PHO5 promoter. Mol Cell 19: 279–285.
35. Jamai A, Imoberdorf RM, Strubin M, (2007) Continuous Histone H2B and Transcription-Dependent Histone H3 Exchange in Yeast Cells outside of Replication. Mol Cell 25: 345–355.
36. Kraushaar DC, Jin W, Maunakea A, Abraham B, Ha M, et al. (2013) Genome-wide incorporation dynamics reveal distinct categories of turnover for the histone variant H3.3. Genome Biol 14: R121.
37. Deal RB, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S, (2010) Genome-wide kinetics of nucleosome turnover determined by metabolic labeling of histones. Science 328: 1161–1164.
38. Beard C, Hochedlinger K, Plath K, Wutz A, Jaenisch R, (2006) Efficient method to generate single-copy transgenic mice by site-specific integration in embryonic stem cells. Genesis 44: 23–28.
39. Hu G, Cui K, Northrup D, Liu C, Wang C, et al. (2013) H2A.Z facilitates access of active and repressive complexes to chromatin in embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 12: 180–192.
40. Gamble MJ, Frizzell KM, Yang C, Krishnakumar R, Kraus WL, (2010) The histone variant macroH2A1 marks repressed autosomal chromatin, but protects a subset of its target genes from silencing. Genes Dev 24: 21–32.
41. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S, (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126: 663–676.
42. Yildirim O, Li R, Hung JH, Chen PB, Dong X, et al. (2011) Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 147: 1498–1510.
43. Yang F, Kemp CJ, Henikoff S, (2013) Doxorubicin enhances nucleosome turnover around promoters. Curr Biol 23: 782–787.
44. Core LJ, Lis JT, (2008) Transcription regulation through promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II. Science 319: 1791–1792.
45. Kim J, Woo AJ, Chu J, Snow JW, Fujiwara Y, et al. (2010) A Myc network accounts for similarities between embryonic stem and cancer cell transcription programs. Cell 143: 313–324.