Evaluating the effect of open student models on self-assessment

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 121-144

  Mitrovic, Antonija ^a   Martin, Brent ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Constraint based tutors; Meta cognitive skills; Open student models

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013584658     PISSN: 15604292     EISSN: 15604306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. (2000). Limitations of student control: do students know when they need help? In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson & K. VanLehn (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 5th International Conference, ITS 2000 (pp. 292-303). Berlin: Springer.
2. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K., & Cross, K. (1999). Tutoring answer explanation fosters learning with understanding. In S. P. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Open Learning Environments: New Computational Technologies to Support Learning, Exploration and Collaboration (pp. 199-206). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
3. Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2004). Towards tutoring help seeking. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 7th International Conference, ITS 2004 (pp. 227-239). Berlin: Springer.
4. Baghaei, N., & Mitrovic, A. (2005). COLLECT-UML: Supporting individual and collaborative learning of UML class diagrams in a constraint-based tutor. In R. Khosla, R. J. Howlett & L. C. Jain (Eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Knowledge-based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems KES 2005 (pp. 458-464). LCNS 3684. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
5. Baghaei, N., Mitrovic, A., & Irvin, W. (2006). Problem-solving support in a constraint-based intelligent tutoring system for UML. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 4(2), 113-137.
6. Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P., & Brown, A.L. (1993) Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem-solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13(2), 221-252.
7. Brusilovsky, P., & Sosnovsky, S. (2005). Engaging students to work with self-assessment questions: a study of two approaches. In J. Cunha, W. Fleischman, V. K. Proulx & J. Lourenço (Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 251-255). ACM Press.
8. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., & Weber, G. (1996). ELM-ART: an Intelligent Tutoring System on World Wide Web. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier & A. Lesgold (Eds.) Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS-96 (pp. 261-269). Berlin: Springer
9. Verlag Bull, S. (1997). See yourself write: a simple student model to make students think. In A. Jameson, C. Paris & C. Tasso (Eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 315-326). Berlin: Springer.
10. Bull, S., & Brna, P. (1997). What does Susan know that Paul doesn’t? (and vice versa): Contributing to each other’s student model. In B. du Boulay & R. Mizoguchi (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education, Proceedings of AI-ED 97 World Conference (pp. 568-570). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
11. Bull, S., & Brna, P. (1999). Enhancing peer interaction in the Solar system. In P. Brna, M. Baker & K. Stenning (Eds.) Roles of communicative interaction in learning to model in Mathematics and Science. Proc. CLEMMAS, Ajaccio, Corsica.
12. Bull, S., & Pain, H. (1995). Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me? Inspecting and Questioning the Student Model. In J. Greer (Ed.) Proceedings of AI-ED’95, 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 501-508). Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
13. Bull, S., & Smith, M. (1997). A pair of student models to encourage collaboration. In A. Jameson, C. Paris & C. Tasso (Eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 339-341). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
14. Bull, S., Brna, P., & Pain, H. (1995). Extending the scope of the student model. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 5(1), 45-65.
15. Bull, S., Abu-Issa, A.S., Ghag, H., & Lloyd, T. (2005). Some unusual open learner models. In C-K Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg & J. Breuker (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology (pp. 104-111). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
16. Bunt, A., Conati, C., & Muldner, K. (2004). Scaffolding Self-Explanation to Improve Learning in Exploratory Learning Environments. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 7th International Conference, ITS 2004 (pp. 656-667). Berlin: Springer.
17. Conati, C., & VanLehn, K. (2000) Further results from the evaluation of an intelligent computer tutor to coach self-explanation. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson & K. VanLehn (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 5th International Conference, ITS 2000 (pp. 304-313).
18. Czarkowski, M., Kay, J., & Potts, S. (2005). Scrutability as a core interface element. In C-K Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg & J. Breuker (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology (pp. 783-785). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
19. Dimitrova, V. (2003). STyLE-OLM: Interactive open learner modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 35-78.
20. Dimitrova, V., Self, J., & Brna, P. (2001). Applying interactive open learner models to learning technical terminology. In M. Bauer, P. J. Gmytrasiewics & J. Vassileva (Eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 148-157). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
21. Greer, J., McCalla, G., Collins, J., Kumar, V., Meagher, P., & Vassileva, J. (1998). Supporting peer help and collaboration in distributed workplace environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 159-177.
22. Hartley, D., & Mitrovic, A. (2002). Supporting learning by opening the student model. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouardères & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 6th International Conference, ITS 2002 (pp. 453-462). LCNS 2363. Berlin: Springer.
23. Kay, J. (1995). The UM toolkit for cooperative student modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 149-196.
24. Martin, B., & Mitrovic, A. (2003). Domain modeling: art or science? In U. Hoppe, F. Verdejo & J. Kay (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Shaping the Future of Learning through Intelligent Technologies (pp. 183-190). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
25. Martin, B., & Mitrovic, A. (2005). Using learning curves to mine student models. In L. Ardissono, P. Brna & A.Mitrovic (Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 79-88). LNAI 3538. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
26. Martin, B., & Mitrovic, A. (2006). The effect of adapting feedback generality in ITS. In V. Wade, H. Ashman & B. Smyth (Eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Adaptive Multimedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems (pp. 192-202). LNCS 4018. Berlin: Springer.
27. Mayo, M., & Mitrovic, A. (2001). Optimising ITS behaviour with Bayesian networks and decision theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(2), 124-153.
28. McCalla, G., Vassileva, J., Greer, J., & Bull, S. (2000). Active learner modeling. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson & K. VanLehn (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 5th International Conference, ITS 2000 (pp. 53-62). Berlin: Springer.
29. Mitrovic, A. (1998). Learning SQL with a computerized tutor. 29th ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium (pp. 307-311). New York: ACM Press.
30. Mitrovic, A. (2001). Investigating students’ self-assessment skills. In M. Bauer, P. J. Gmytrasiewicz & J. Vassileva (Eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 247-250). LNAI 2109. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
31. Mitrovic, A. (2003). An Intelligent SQL Tutor on the Web. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(2-4), 173-197.
32. Mitrovic, A. (2005). The effect of explaining on learning: a case study with a data normalization tutor. In C-K Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg & J. Breuker (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology (pp. 499-506). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
33. Mitrovic, A., & Martin, B. (2003). Scaffolding and fading problem selection in SQL-Tutor. In U. Hoppe, F. Verdejo & J. Kay (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Shaping the Future of Learning through Intelligent Technologies (pp. 479-481). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
34. Mitrovic, A., & Ohlsson, S. (1999). Evaluation of a constraint-based tutor for a database language. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(3-4), 238-256.
35. Mitrovic, A., Suraweera, P., Martin, B., & Weerasinghe, A. (2004). DB-suite: experiences with three intelligent, Web-based database tutors. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 15(4), 409-432.
36. Morales, R., Pain, H., & Conlon, T. (2001). Effects of inspecting learner models on learners’ abilities. In J. D.Moore, C. L. Redfield & W. L. Johnson (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future (pp. 434-445). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
37. Ohlsson, S. (1994). Constraint-based student modeling. In J. E. Greer & G. McCalla (Eds.) Student modeling: the key to individualized knowledge-based instruction (pp. 167-189). NATO ASI Series F, Vol. 125. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
38. Paiva, A., & Self, J. (1995). TAGUS-a user and learner modeling workbench. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 197-226.
39. Person, N.K., Graesser, A.C., Magliano, J.P., & Kreuz, R.J. (1994). Inferring what the student knows in one-toone tutoring: The role of student questions and answers. Learning and Individual Differences, 6, 205-229.
40. Self, J. (1995). Computational Mathetics http://www.cbl.leeds.ac.uk/-jas/cm.html
41. Suraweera, P., & Mitrovic, A. (2002). KERMIT: a constraint-based tutor for database modeling. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouardères & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 6th International Conference, ITS 2002 (pp. 377-387). LCNS 2363. Berlin: Springer.
42. Suraweera, P., & Mitrovic, A. (2004). An intelligent tutoring system for Entity-Relationship modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(3-4), 375-417.
43. Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 306-314.
44. VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J.A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., Treacy, D., Weinstein, A., & Wintersgill, M. (2005). The Andes physics tutoring system: lessons learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(3), 147-204.
45. White, B.Y., Shimoda, T. A., & Frederiksen, J.R. (1999). Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: computer support for metacognitive development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 151-182.
46. Zakharov, K., Mitrovic, A., & Ohlsson, S. (2005). Feedback micro-engineering in EER-Tutor. In C-K Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg & J. Breuker (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology (pp. 718-725). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
47. Zapata-Rivera, J-D. (2001). Supporting negotiated assessment using open student models. In M. Bauer, P. J. Gmytrasiewicz and J. Vassileva (Eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 295-297). Berlin: Springer.
48. Zapata-Rivera, J-D., & Greer, J.E. (2004). Interacting with inspectable Bayesian models. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 127-163.