Applying interactive open learner models to learning technical terminology

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2109, Issue , 2001, Pages 148-157

  Dimitrova, Vania ^a   Self, John ^a   Brna, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Intelligent tutoring systems; Meta cognitive skills; Student modelling

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; STUDENTS; TERMINOLOGY;

CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING; EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; METACOGNITIVES; OPEN LEARNER MODELS; REFLECTIVE THINKING; STUDENT MODELLING; TECHNICAL TERMINOLOGY;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053118630     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44566-8_15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Angelova, G., Nenkova, A., Boycheva, Sv., & Nikolov T. (2000). CGs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment. In B. Ganter & G. W. Mineau (eds.), Proc. of int. conference on conceptual structures. Shaker Verlag, 45-58
2. Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1996). What is reflection in learning. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (eds.), Reflection: turning experience into learning. Kogan Page,7-17
3. Boytcheva S., Kalaydgjiev O., Nenkova, A. & Angelova G. (2000). Integration of resources and components in a knowledge-based web environment for terminology learning. In S. Cerri & D. Dochev (eds.), AI: methodology, systems and applications. Springer, 210-220
4. Bull, S. (1997). Collaborative student modelling in foreign language learning. PhD Thesis. University of Edinburgh
5. Chanier, T. (1996). Learning a second language for specific purposes within a hypermedia framework. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 9 (1), 3-43
6. Dewey, J. (1960). How we think-a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educational process. D.C. Heath and Company
7. Dimitrova, V. (in preparation). Interactive open learner modelling. PhD Thesis. Computer Based Learning Unit, Leeds University, expected submission in April 2001
8. Dimitrova, V., Self, J.A. & Brna, P. (1999). The interactive maintenance of open learner models. In S.Lajoie & M.Vivet (eds.),Artificial intelligence in education. IOS Press, 405-412
9. Dimitrova, V., Self, J.A. & Brna, P. (2000). Maintaining a jointly constructed student model. In S.Cerri & D.Dochev (eds.), AI: Methodology, Systems and Applications, Springer, 221-231
10. Kay J. (1999). A scrutable user modelling shell for user-adapted interaction. Ph.D. Thesis, Basser Department of Computer Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
11. Morales, R., Pain, H., & Conlon, T. (2000). Understandable learner models for a sensorimotor control task. In G.Gauthier & C.Frasson, ITS’2000, Berlin: Springer, 222-231
12. Morales, R., Pain, H., Bull, S., & Kay, J. (1999). Workshop on open, interactive, and other overt approaches to learner modelling. AIED’99, Le Mans, France
13. Paiva, A. & Self, J.A. (1995). TAGUS-a user and learner modelling workbench, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 197-226
14. Self, J.A. (1990). Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling. In C. Frasson & G. Gauthier (eds.),ITS: At the crossroad of artificial intelligence and education, NJ:Ablex
15. Singer, M. (1990). Psychology of language: An introduction of sentence and discourse processes, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc
16. Smith, J. (1998). Everyone’s ABC of accounting language www.soc.staffs.ac.uk/~cmrjs/agloss.htm
17. Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton University Press.