Interacting with inspectable bayesian student models

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 127-163

  Zapata Rivera, Juan Diego ^a   Greer, Jim E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013584559     PISSN: 15604292     EISSN: 15604306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bishop A. (1998). A Case Study of System-Generated Help Responses for the Cooperative Peer Response System. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Saskatchewan, Department of Computer Science.
2. Brna, P., Self, J., Bull, S., & Pain, H. (1999). Negotiated Collaborative Assessment through Collaborative Student Modelling. In Proceedings of the workshop ‘Open, Interactive, and other Overt Approaches to Student Modelling’ (pp. 35-44). AIED’99. Le Mans, France.
3. Bull, S., & Pain, H. (1995). ‘Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me?': Inspecting and questioning the student model, In J. Greer (Ed.) Proceedings of AI-ED’95-7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 501-508). Virginia: AACE.
4. Bull, S., & Shurville, S. (1999). Cooperative Writer Modelling: Facilitating Reader-Based Writing with Scrawl. In Proceedings of the workshop ‘Open, Interactive, and other Overt Approaches to Student Modelling’ at AIED’99 (pp. 1-8). Le Mans, France.
5. Burton, M. (1998). Computer modelling of dialogue roles in collaborative learning activities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Computer Based Learning Unit, The University of Leeds.
6. Collins, J. A., Greer, J. E., & Huang, S. X. (1996). Adaptive Assessment using Granularity Hierarchies and Bayesian Nets. In C. Frason, G. Gauthier, & A. Lesgold (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 569-577). Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1086. Berlin: Springer.
7. Conati, C., Gertner, A.S., VanLehn, K., & Druzdzel, M.J. (1997). Online student modeling for coached problem solving using Bayesian networks. In A. Jameson, C. Paris, and C. Tasso, (Eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 231-242). New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Conati C., Larkin J., & VanLehn K., (1997). A Computer Framework to Support Self-Explanation. In B. du Boulay, & R. Mizoguchi (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 279-286). Amsterdam: IOS.
9. Conati, C., Gertner, A.S., & VanLehn, K. (2002). Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12, 371-417.
10. Dimitrova, V., Self, J., & Brna, P. (1999) The interactive maintenance of open student models. In S. P. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 405-412). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
11. Dimitrova, V., Self, J., & Brna, P. (1999). STyLE-OLM-an interactive diagnosis tool in a terminology learning environment. In Proceedings of the workshop ‘Open, Interactive, and other Overt Approaches to Student Modelling’ at AIED’99 (pp. 25-34). Le Mans, France.
12. Dimitrova, V., Self, J., & Brna, P. (2001). Applying Interactive Open Learner Models to Learning Technical Terminology. In M. Bauer, P.J. Gmytrasiewicz & J. Vassileva (Eds.) User Modeling 2001: 8th International Conference (pp. 148-157). Berlin: Springer.
13. Druzdzel, M. J. & Henrion, M. (1993). Efficient Reasoning in Qualitative Probabilistic Networks. AAAI(pp. 548-553).
14. Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish and T. Power (Eds.) The Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (pp. 45-60). Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley.
15. Hyerle, D. (1996). Visual Tools for constructing knowledge. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD Press.
16. Hoppe, H. U. (1995). The use of multiple student modeling to parameterize group learning. In J. Greer (Ed.) Proceedings of AI-ED’95-7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 234-241). Virginia:AACE.
17. Horvitz, E., Breese, J.S., Heckerman, D., Hovel, D., & Rommelse, K. (1998). The Lumiere Project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users. Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 256-265). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
18. Jonassen, D., Beissner, K., & M., Yacci. (1993). STRUCTURAL KNOWLEDGE. Technique for Representing, Conveying, and Acquiring Structural Knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Jonassen, D., Wilson, B., & Cole. P. (1993). Cognitive Approaches to Instructional Design. In G.M. Piskurich (Ed.) The ASTD handbook of instructional technology (pp. 21.1-21.22). McGraw-Hill. New York,. Also available on-line:http://www.cudenver.edu/-bwilson.
20. Jonassen, D., (2000). Computers as Mindtools for Schools. Engaging in critical thinking. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Kay, J. (1999). A Scrutable User Modelling Shell for User-Adapted Interaction. Ph.D. Thesis, Basser Department of Computer Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
22. Kumar V.S., & Yellanki L. (1997). Dogmatix: A constraints-based online generative testing system on WWW. Version-1: http://www.cs.usask.ca/grads/vsk719/dogmatix/FinalReport.
23. Lacave, C. and Diez, F. J. (2002). Explanation for causal Bayesian networks in Elvira. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Data Analysis in Medicine and Pharmacology (IDAMAP-2002), Lyon, France.
24. Martin, J. & VanLehn, K. (1995). Student assessment using Bayesian nets. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 42, 575-591. Also available on-line: http://www.pitt.edu/-vanlehn/distrib/journal/HCS95.pdf.
25. Morales, R., Pain, H., & Conlon, T. (1999). From Behaviour to Understandable Presentation of Student Models: A Case Study. In Proceedings of the workshop ‘Open, Interactive, and other Overt Approaches to Student Modelling’ (pp. 15-24). AIED’99, Le Mans, France.
26. Morales, R., Pain, H., & Conlon, T. (2001). Effects of Inspecting Learner Models on Learners’ Abilities. In J. D. Moore, C. L. Redfield, & W. L. Johnson (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future, Proceedings of AI-ED 2001 (pp. 434-445). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
27. Muehlenbrock, M., Tewissen, F. and Hoppe, H.U. (1998). A framework system for intelligent support in open distributed learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 9, 256-274.
28. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, Creating, and using Knowledge. Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Novak, J. D., & Gowinn, B. D. (1984). Learning how to Learn. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
30. Paiva, A., Self. J. & Hartley, R. (1995). Externalising student models. In J. Greer (Ed.) Proceedings of AIED’ 95-7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 509-516). Virginia: AACE.
31. Paul, B. (1998). Mesa 3.0. OpenGL libraries. Copyright (C) 1995-1998.
32. Paul, B., & Bederson, B. (1998). Togl-a Tk OpenGL widget Version 1.5. Copyright (C) 1996-1998.
33. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
34. Pearl, J. (1997). Graphical Models for Probabilistic and Causal Reasoning. In A. Tucker (Ed.) The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook (pp. 699-711). Boca Raton, FL: CRCPress.
35. Reye, J. (1996). A Belief Net Backbone for student modelling. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, & A. Lesgold (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 596-604). Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1086. Berlin: Springer-Verlag,.
36. Reye, J. (1998). Two-phase updating of student models based on dynamic belief networks. In B. P. Goettl, H. M. Halff, C. L. Redfield, & V. J. Shute (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 274-283). Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1452. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
37. Shachter, R. (1986), Evaluating Influence Diagrams. Operations Research, 34, 871-882.
38. SMILE version 1.0. (1998). Structural Modeling, Inference, and Learning Engine. Decision System Laboratory. University of Pittsburgh.
39. Soller, A. (2001). Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 40-62.
40. Suthers, D. (2001). Towards a Systematic Study of Representational Guidance for Collaborative Learning Discourse. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 7, 3, 254-277.
41. Tedesco, P., & Self, J. A. (2000). Using meta-cognitive conflicts in a collaborative problem solving environment. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier & K. VanLenh (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 232-241). Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1839. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
42. VanLehn, K. & Martin, J. (1997). Evaluation on an assessment system based on Bayesian student modeling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8. 179-221.
43. Vassileva, J., Greer J., McCalla, G., Deters, R., Zapata, D., Mudgal, C., & Grant, S. (1999). A Multi-Agent Approach to the Design of Peer-Help Environments. In S. P. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 38-45). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
44. Villano, M. (1992). Probabilistic Student Models: Bayesian Belief Networks and Knowledge Space Theory. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier & G. McCalla (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Second International Conference, ITS '92 (pp. 491-498). Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 608. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
45. Wellman, M. P. (1990). Fundamental concepts of qualitative probabilistic networks. Artificial Intelligence, 44, 257-303.
46. Zapata-Rivera, J. D. (2003). Learning Environments based on Inspectable Student Models. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Saskatchewan. Department of Computer Science.
47. Zapata-Rivera, J. D., & Greer, J. (1999). Collaborative learning environments based on "Acting Coach" agents. Poster presented at CSCL '99, Stanford, CA.
48. Zapata-Rivera, J. D., & Greer, J. (2001). SMODEL Server: Student Modelling in Distributed Multi-Agent Tutoring Systems. In J. D. Moore, C. L. Redfield, & W. L. Johnson (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future, Proceedings of AI-ED 2001 (pp. 446-455). Amsterdam: IOS.
49. Zapata-Rivera, J. D., & Greer, J. (2002). Exploring Various Guidance Mechanisms to Support Interaction with Inspectable Learner Models. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouardères, F. Paraguaçu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 6th International Conference, ITS 2002 (pp. 442-452). Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol 2363. Berlin: Springer.
50. Zapata-Rivera, J. D., Greer, J.E., & Cooke, J. (2000). An XML-Based Tool for Building and Using Conceptual Maps in Education and Training Environments. In Proceedings of Eighth International Conference on Computers in Education/International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction, ICCE 2000 (pp. 755-762). AACE-APC/National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan.
51. Zapata-Rivera, J. D., Neufeld, E., & Greer, J. (1999). Visualization of Bayesian Belief Networks. IEEE Visualization 1999 Late Breaking Hot Topics Proceedings (pp. 85-88). San Francisco, CA.