Limitations of student control: Do students know when they need help?

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1839, Issue , 2000, Pages 292-303

  Aleven, Vincent ^a   Koedinger, Kenneth R ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; GEOMETRY; INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

COGNITIVE MODEL; COGNITIVE TUTORS; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; LEARNER CONTROL; METACOGNITIVE SKILLS; METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES; PRODUCTION RULES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84944328316     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45108-0_33     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Aleven, V., K. R. Koedinger, and K. Cross, 1999. Tutoring Answer Explanation Fosters Learning with Understanding. In Artificial Intelligence in Education, Proceedings of AIED- 99, edited by S. P. Lajoie and M. Vivet, 199-206. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
2. Anderson, J. R., F. G. Conrad, and A. T. Corbett, 1989. Skill Acquisition and the LISP Tutor. Cognitive Science, 13, 467-505.
3. Anderson, J. R., A. T. Corbett, K. R. Koedinger, and R. Pelletier, 1995. Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 167-207.
4. Burton, R. R., and J. S. Brown. An Investigation of Computer Coaching for Informal Learning Activities, 1982. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, edited by D. H. Sleeman and J. S. Brown, New York: Academic Press.
5. Chi, M. T. H., M. Bassok, M. W. Lewis, P. Reimann, and R. Glaser, 1989. Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
6. Conati, C., and K. VanLehn, 1999. Teaching Meta-Cognitive Skills: Implementation and Evaluation of a Tutoring System to Guide Self-Explanation While Learning from Examples. In Artificial Intelligence in Education, Proceedings of AIED-99, edited by S. P. Lajoie and M. Vivet, 297-304. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
7. Katz, S., A. Lesgold, E. Hughes, D. Peters, G. Eggan, M. Gordin, and L. Greenberg, 1998. Sherlock II: An Intelligent Tutoring System Built Upon the LRDC Tutor Framework. In Facilitating the Development and Use of Interactive Learning Environments, edited by C. P. Bloom and R. B. Loftin. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. McKendree, J., 1990. Effective Feedback Content for Tutoring Complex Skills. Human Computer Interaction, 5, 381-413.
9. NCTM, 1989. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: The Council.
10. Paolucci, M., Suthers, D., and A. Weiner, 1996. Automated Advice-Giving Strategies for Scientific Inquiry. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS'96), edited by C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, and A. Lesgold, 372-381. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
11. Recker, M. M., and P. Pirolli, 1992. Student Strategies for Learning Programming from a Computational Environment. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS '92, edited by C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, and G. I. McCalla, 382-394. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12. Ritter, S., 1997. Communication, Cooperation and Competition among Multiple Tutor Agents. In Artificial Intelligence in Education, Proceedings of AI-ED 97 World Conference, edited by B. du Boulay and R. Mizoguchi, 31-38. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
13. Shute, V. J., and K. A. Cluck, 1996. Individual Differences in Patterns of Spontaneous Online Tool Use. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5 (4), 329-355.
14. VanLehn, K., R. M. Jones, and M. T. Chi, 1992. A Model of the Self-Explanation Effect. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (1), 1-59.
15. Wood, H. A., and D. J. Wood, in press. Help Seeking, Learning and Contingent Tutoring. To appear in Computers and Education (special edition, 2000).