Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 427-453

  Lee, Jihyun ^a   Lim, Cheolil ^a   Kim, Hyeonsu ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Flipped learning; Flipped learning design model; Higher education; Inverted learning; Model development methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007473619     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Newburyport, MA: Sloan Consortium.
2. Arum, R., Cho, E., Kim, J., & Roska, J. (2012). Documenting uncertain times: post- graduate transitions of the academically adrift cohort. New York: Social Science Research Council.
3. Arum, R., & Roska, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Baker, J. W. (2000). The classroom flipped: Using web course management tools to become the guide on the side. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, FL.
5. Barlas, Y. (1994). Model validation in system dynamics. Paper presented at the International System Dynamics Conference.
6. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education
7. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2013). Flipping for mastery. Educational Leadership, 71(4), 24–29.
8. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
9. Bland, L. (2006). Applying flip/inverted classroom model in electrical engineering to establish life-long learning. Paper presented at 113th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL.
10. Branch, R. M., & Kopcha, T. J. (2014). Instructional design models. In M. J. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 77–87). New York: Springer.
11. Bush, M. D. (2013). Educational technology points of inflection: what MOOCs, flipped classrooms, and OLPC teach us about individualization of learning. Educational Technology, 53(6), 60–63.
12. Carlson, M. (1999). The mathematical behavior of six successful mathematics graduate students: influences leading to mathematical success. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(3), 237–258.
13. Collins, B., de Boer, W., & van der Veen, J. (2001). Building on learner contributions: a web-supported pedagogic strategy. Educational Media International, 38(4), 229–240.
14. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.
15. Covil, D., Patel, B. A., & Gill, D. S. (2013). Flipping the classroom to support learning: an overview of flipped class from science, engineering and product design. School Science Review, 95(350), 73–80.
16. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 191–233). Greenwich: JAI Press.
17. Daly, S. R., Adams, R. S., & Bodner, G. M. (2012). What does it mean to design? A qualitative investigation of design professionals’ experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 187–219.
18. Davies, I. K. (1996). Educational technology: Archetypes, paradigms and models. In D. P. Ely & T. Plomp (Eds.), Classic writings on instructional technology (pp. 15–30). Englewood. CO: Libraries Unlimited Inc.
19. Davis, L. (1992). Instrument review: getting the most from your panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5, 194–197.
20. Dennis, A., & Valacich, J. (1999). Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. Paper presented at the 32th Hawaii International Conference of Systems Sciences, Maui, HI.
21. Dick, W. (1997). A model for the systematic design of instruction. In R. D. Tennyson, E. Schott, N. M. Seel, & S. Dijkstras (Eds.), Instructional design: international perspectives (pp. 361–369). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Downes, S. (2003). Design and reusability of learning objects in an academic context: a new economy of education? Journal of the United States Distance Learning Association, 17(1), 3–22.
23. Gannod, G. C., Burge, J. E., & Helmick, M. T. (2008). Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. Paper presented at the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, Leipzig, Germany.
24. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.
25. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Gedik, N., Kiraz, E., & Ozden, M. Y. (2013). Design of a blended learning environment: considerations and implementation issues. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 1–19.
27. Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 53–64.
28. Goodwin, B., & Miller, K. (2013). Evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 78–80.
29. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.
30. Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18(3), 4–14.
31. Gustafson, K., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse: Eric Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
32. Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S., & Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. The Internet and Higher Education, 20(1), 20–34.
33. Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K. & Arfstrom, K.M. (2013). A review of flipped learning. http://flippedlearning.org/review.Retrieved 18 Feb 2014
34. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
35. Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.
36. Higgins, K. M. (1997). The effect of year-long instruction in mathematical problem solving on middle-school student’s attitude, beliefs, and abilities. Journal of Experimental Education, 66(1), 5–28.
37. Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a meta-cognitive process: thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43–55.
38. Hofmann, J. (2002). Blended learning case study. In A. Rossett (Ed.), The ASTD e-learning handbook: Best practices, strategies, and case studies for an emerging field (pp. 516–519). New York: McGraw-Hill.
39. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). The rank-order effect in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 181–193.
40. Huon, G., Spehar, B., Adam, P., & Rifkin, W. (2007). Resource use and academic performance among first year psychology students. Higher Education, 53(1), 1–27.
41. Jung, I., & Rha, I. (1989). Instructional design theories. Seoul: Educational Science.
42. Kellogg, S. (2009). Developing online materials to facilitate and inverted classroom approach. Paper presented at the 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX.
43. Kember, D., McNaught, C., Chong, F. C. Y., Lam, P., & Cheng, K. F. (2010). Understanding the ways in which design features of educational websites impact upon student learning outcomes in blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1183–1192.
44. Kerres, M., & de Witt, C. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2–3), 101–113.
45. Khan, S. (2012). The one world schoolhouse: Education re-imagined. London: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd.
46. Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.
47. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York: Routledge.
48. Lee, J., & Jang, S. (2014). A methodological framework for instructional design model development: critical dimensions and synthesized procedures. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(6), 743–765.
49. López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & Argente-Linares, E. (2013). The influence of the use of technology on student outcomes in a blended learning context. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 625–638.
50. Lou, Y., Bernard, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Media and pedagogy in undergraduate distance education: a theory-based meta-analysis of empirical literature. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(2), 141–176.
51. Lynn, M. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382–385.
52. Mason, G., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430–435.
53. McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C. A., Griffin, L. M., et al. (2014). The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236–243.
54. Mezirow, J. (Ed.). (1990a). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55. Mezirow, J. (1990b). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: a guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56. Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A. B., & Fink, L. D. (Eds.). (2004). Team-based learning: a transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.
57. Milman, N. B. (2013). The flipped classroom strategy: what is it and how can it best be used? Distance Learning, 9(3), 85–87.
58. Molenda, M., & Boling, E. (2008). Creating. Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (Eds.). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York, NY: Routledge.
59. Muis, K. R. (2008). Epistemic profiles and self-regulated learning: examining relations in the context of mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(2), 177–208.
60. Orton-Johnson, K. (2009). ‘I’ve stuck to the path I’m afraid’: exploring student non-use of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 837–847.
61. Overmyer, J. (2012). Flipped classrooms 101. Principal, 9–10, 46–47.
62. Papadopoulos, C., & Roman, S.A. (2010). Implementing and inverted classroom model in engineering statics: Initial results. Paper presented at the 117th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY.
63. Rasmussen, C., Kwon, O. N., Allen, K., Marrongelle, K., & Burtch, M. (2006). Capitalizing on advances in mathematics and K-12 mathematics education in undergraduate mathematics: an inquiry-oriented approach to differential equations. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 85–93.
64. Reigeluth, C. M. (1992). Elaborating the elaboration theory. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 80–86.
65. Rice, R. (1992). Task analysability, use of new media and effectiveness—A multisite exploration of media richness. Organization Science, 3(3), 475–500.
66. Richey, R. C. (1986). The theoretical and conceptual bases of instructional design. New York: Kogan Page.
67. Richey, R. C. (2005). Validating instruction design and development models. In: Spector J. M. and Wiley D. A. (Eds.), Innovations in instructional technology: Essays in honor of M. David Merrill (pp. 171–185.) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
69. Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: an opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44–49.
70. Rowland, T. (2008). The purpose, design and use of examples in the teaching of elementary mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 149–163.
71. Rubinstein, M. (1975). Patterns of problem solving. New York: Prentice Hall.
72. Seels, B. A., & Glasgow, Z. (1998). Making instructional design decisions (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
73. Shim, H. (2013). A commentary on the flipped classroom instructional model. Paper presented at the 30th Symposium on Mathematics Education. Seoul, Korea.
74. Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.
75. Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51–54.
76. Slomanson, W. R. (2014). Blended learning: a flipped classroom experiment. Journal of Legal Education, 64, 1–10.
77. Smith, K. M., & Boling, E. (2009). What do we make of design? Design as a concept in educational technology. Educational Technology, 49(4), 3–17.
78. Smith, C. M., & McDonald, K. (2013). The flipped classroom for professional development (Part II): making podcasts and videos. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 44(11), 486–487.
79. Stannard, R. (2012). The flipped classroom or the connected classroom? Looks at the benefits of putting more input online. Modern English Teacher, 21(1), 35–37.
80. Strayer, J. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193.
81. Talbert, R. (2012). Learning matlab in the inverted classroom. Paper presented at 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX.
82. Tracey, M.W., (2001). The construction and validation of an instructional systems design model incorporating multiple intelligences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Detroit: Wayne State University.