The influence of the use of technology on student outcomes in a blended learning context

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 625-638

  López Pérez, María V ^a   Pérez López, María C ^a   Rodríguez Ariza, Lázaro ^a   Argente Linares, Eva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Learning outcomes; Undergraduate students; Web environment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879728584     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-013-9303-8     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Brothen, T., & Wambach, C. (2001). Effective student use of computerized quizzes. Teaching of Psychology, 28(4), 292-294.
2. Brothen, T., & Wambach, C. (2004). The value of time limits on internet quizzes. Teaching of Psychology, 31(1), 62-64.
3. Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-32.
4. Carle, A. C., Jaffee, D., & Miller, D. (2009). Engaging college science students and changing academic achievement with technology: A quasi-experimental preliminary investigation. Computers and Education, 52(2), 376-380.
5. Chen, P.-S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers and Education, 54(4), 1222-1232.
6. Cooner, T. S. (2010). Creating opportunities for students in large cohorts to reflect in and on practice: Lessons learnt from a formative evaluation of students' experiences of a technology-enhanced blended learning design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 271-286.
7. De George-Walker, L., & Keeffe, M. (2010). Self-determined blended learning: A case study of blended learning design. Higher Education Research and Development, 29(1), 1-13.
8. Drennan, L. G., & Rohde, F. H. (2002). Determinants of performance in advanced undergraduate management accounting: An empirical investigation. Accounting and Finance, 42(1), 27-40.
9. Du, J., Havard, B., Yu, C., & Adams, J. (2004). The impact of technology use on low-income and minority students' academic achievement: Educational longitudinal study of 2002. Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies, 4(2), 21-38.
10. Forsyth, D. R., & Archer, C. R. (1997). Technologically assisted instruction and student mastery, motivation, and matriculation. Teaching of Psychology, 24(3), 207-212.
11. Freeman, M. A., & Capper, J. M. (1999). Exploiting the web for education: An anonymous asynchronous role simulation. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 95-116.
12. Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2009). Evaluating the quality of e-learning at the degree level in the student experience of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 652-663.
13. Goldenberg, E. P. (2000). Thinking (and talking) about technology in math classrooms. Newton: Education Development Center, Inc.
14. Grimstad, K., & Grabe, M. (2004). Are online study questions beneficial? Teaching of Psychology, 31(2), 143-146.
15. Huon, G., Spehar, B., Adam, P., & Rifkin, W. (2007). Resource use and academic performance among first year psychology students. Higher Education, 53(1), 1-27.
16. Johnson, B. C., & Kiviniemi, M. T. (2009). The effect of online chapter quizzes on exam performance in an undergraduate social psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 36(1), 33-37.
17. Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The relationships between computer and information technology use, selected learning and personal development outcomes, and other college experiences. Journal of College Student Development, 42(3), 217-232.
18. Lei, J. (2010). Quantity versus quality: A new approach to examine the relationship between technology use and student outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 455-472.
19. Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Computers and Education, 49(2), 284-296.
20. Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 282-293.
21. Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers and Education, 56(3), 818-826.
22. Macdonald, J. (2008). Blended learning and online tutoring: Planning learner support and activity design (2nd ed.). Aldershot: Gower.
23. McKenzie, K., & Schweitzer, R. (2001). Who succeeds at university? Factors predicting academic performance in first year Australian university students. Higher Education Research and Development, 20(1), 21-33.
24. McNaught, C., Lam, P., & Cheng, K. F. (2012). Investigating relationships between features of learning designs and student learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(2), 271-286.
25. O'Toole, J. M., & Absalom, D. J. (2003). The impact of blended learning on student outcomes: Is there room on the horse for two? Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 179-190.
26. Orton-Johnson, K. (2009). 'I've stuck to the path I'm afraid': Exploring student non-use of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 837-847.
27. Osguthorpe, T. R., & Graham, R. C. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227-233.
28. Paisey, C., & Paisey, N. J. (2004). Student attendance in an accounting module-reasons for non-attendance and the effect on academic performance at a Scottish university. Accounting Education, 13(Suppl. 1), 39-53.
29. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426.
30. Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83.
31. Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101-108.
32. Rohde, F. H., & Kavanagh, M. (1996). Performance in first year university accounting: Quantifying the advantage of secondary school accounting. Accounting and Finance, 36(2), 275-285.
33. Ryan, T. E. (2006). Motivating novice students to read their textbooks. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(2), 135-140.
34. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498-504.
35. Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 623-664.
36. Sugahara, S., & Boland, G. (2006). The effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in the accounting classroom. Accounting Education, 15(4), 391-403.
37. Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4-28.
38. Ward, L., & Parr, J. M. (2010). Revisiting and reframing use: Implications for the integration of ICT. Computers and Education, 54(1), 113-122.
39. Zhao, Y., & Conway, P. (2001). What's in, what's out-An analysis of state educational technology plans. Teachers College Record. Retrieved from http://www. tcrecord. org/Content. asp?ContentID=10717. Accessed 3 Dec 2012.