Instructional design models

Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 77-87

  Branch, Robert Maribe ^a   Kopcha, Theodore J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Design models; Educational technology; Instruction; Instructional design; Learning; Teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 85028039345     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 3 (4), 2-16. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ 228 351.
2. Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1977). Educational technology definition and glossary of terms. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
3. Barson, J. (1967). Instructional systems development: A demonstration and evaluation project: Final report. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 020 673.
4. Bichelmeyer, B., Boling, E., & Gibbons, A. (2006). Instructional design and technology models: Their impact on research, practice and teaching in IDT. In M. Orey, J. McLendon, & R. Branch (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook 2006. Westport, CT:Libraries Unlimited (SERVICE).
5. Boehm, B. (1988). A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer, 21 (2), 61-72.
6. Branch, R. (1997). Perceptions of instructional design process models. In R. E. Griffin, D. G. Beauchamp. J. M. Hunter, & C. B. Schiffman (Eds.), Selected Readings of the 28th Annual Convention of the International Visual Literacy Association. Cheyenne, Wyoming.
7. Branch, R. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York, NY: Springer.
8. Branch, R., & Merrill, M. D. (2011). Characteristics of instructional design models. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
9. Branson, R. K. (1975). Interservice procedures for instructional systems development: Executive summary and model. Tallahassee, FL: Center for Educational Technology, Florida State University. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 122 022.
10. Cennamo, K., & Kalk, D. (2005). Real world instructional design. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
11. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, L. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
12. Dills, C. R., & Romiszowski, A. J. (Eds.). (1997). Instructional development paradigms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
13. Dorsey, L., Goodrum, D., & Schwen, T. (1997). Rapid collaborative prototyping as an instructional development paradigm. In C. Dills & A. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional development paradigms (pp. 445-465). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
14. Edmonds, G., Branch, R., & Mukherjee, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42 (4), 55-72.
15. Ely, D. (1973). Defining thefield of educational technology. Audiovisual Instruction, 8 (3), 52-53.
16. Ely, D. (1983). The definition of educational technology: An emerging stability. Educational Considerations, 10 (2), 2-4.
17. Ertmer, P., & Quinn, J. (2006). The ID casebook: Case studies in instructional design (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
18. Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
19. Goodyear, P. (1997). Instructional design environments: Methods and tools for the design of complex instructional systems. In S. Dijkstra, N. Seel, F. Schott, & R. Tennyson (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspectives (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Gustafson, K. L. (1981). Survey of instructional development models. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology, Syracuse University.
21. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology, Syracuse University.
22. Hamreus, D. (1968). The systems approach to instructional development. In The contribution of behavioral science to instructional technology. Monmouth, Oregon: Oregon State System of Higher Education, Teaching Research Division.
23. Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (Eds.). (2008). Educational technology:A definition with commentary. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Markle, S. (1964). Good frames and bad-A grammar of frame writing. New York, NY: Wiley. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 019 867.
25. Markle, S. (1978). Designs for instructional designers. Champaign, IL:Stipes Publishing Co.
26. Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology, part II: A history of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49 (2), 57-67. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ 629 874.
27. Richey, R. C. (2005). Validating instructional design and development models. In J. M. Spector, C. Ohrazda, A. Van Schaack, & D. A. Wiley (Eds.), Innovations in instructional technology (pp. 171-185). Mahwah, NR: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2000). Instructional design competencies: The standards (3rd ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology, Syracuse University.
29. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research. Mahwah, NR: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5 (2), 65-86. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ 446 270.
31. Salisbury, D. (1990). General systems theory and instructional systems design. Performance and Instruction, 29 (2), 1-11. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ 408 935.
32. Seel, N. (1997). Models of instructional design: Introduction and overview. In R. Tennyson, F. Schott, N. Seel, & S. Dijkstra (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspectives (Vol. 1). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Seels, B., & Richey, R. (1994). Instructional technology: The definitions and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
34. Silvern, L. C. (1965). Basic analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Education and Training Consultants Company.
35. Stamas, S. (1972). A descriptive study of a synthesized model, reporting its effectiveness, efficiency, and cognitive and affective in fl uence of the development process on a client. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34. (University Micro films No. 74-6139).
36. Stokes, T., & Richey, R. (2000). Rapid prototyping methodology in action: A developmental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48 (2), 63-80.
37. Tennyson, R. D. (1997). Planning and decision making: Introduction and overview. In S. Dijkstra, N. Seel, F. Schott, & R. D. Tennyson (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspectives (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Tessmer, M., & Wedman, J. (1995). Context-sensitive instructional design models: A response to design research studies and criticism. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8 (3), 38-54.
39. Tripp, S., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38 (1), 31-44.
40. Twelker, P. A. (1972). The systematic development of instruction: An overview and basic guide to the literature. Stanford, CA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Media and Technology, Stanford University.
41. van den Akker, J., Branch, R., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (1999). Design approaches and tools in education and training. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
42. Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational design research. London: Routledge.
43. Visscher-Voerman, I. (1999). Design approaches: A reconstructive study in training and education. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
44. Visscher-Voerman, I., & Gustafson, K. L. (2004). Paradigms in the theory and practice of education and training design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52 (2), 69-89.
45. Wedman, J., & Tessmer, M. (1991). Adapting instructional design to project circumstance: The layers of necessity model. Educational Technology, 21, 48-52.