A methodological framework for instructional design model development: Critical dimensions and synthesized procedures

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 743-765

  Lee, Jihyun ^a   Jang, Seonyoung ^b  

^a Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

^b University of Seoul   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Critical dimensions; Instructional design model; Methodological framework; Model development methodology; Synthesized procedures

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920417791     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-014-9352-7     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. *Adamski, A. D. (1998). The development of a systems design model for job performance aids: A qualitative developmental study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
2. *Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D. & Viñes, J. M. (2005). An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 217–235.
3. Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development,3(4), 2–16.
4. Archer, B. (1965). Systematic method for designers. London: The Design Council.
5. Bagdonis, A., & Salisbury, D. (1994). Development and validation of models in instructional design. Educational Technology,34(4), 26–32.
6. Bergman, R. E., & Moore, T. V. (1990). Managing interactive video/multimedia projects. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
7. Bichelmeyer, B., Boling, E., & Gibbons, A. (2006). Instructional design and technology models: Their impact on research, practice and teaching in IDT. In M. Orey, J. McLendon, & R. Branch (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook 2006 (pp. 33–49). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
8. Boling, E., Easterling, W., Hardré, P., Howard, R., & Roman, T. (2011). ADDIE: Perspectives in transition. Educational Technology,51(5), 34–38.
9. Braden, R. A. (1996). The case for linear instructional design and development: A commentary on models, challenges, and myths. Educational Technology,36(2), 5–23.
10. Branch, R., & Merrill, M. D. (2011). Characteristics of instructional design models. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 8–16). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
11. Branch, R. M., & Kopcha, T. J. (2014). Instructional design models. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 77–87). New York: Springer.
12. Branson, R. K. (1978). The interservice procedures for instructional systems development. Educational Technology,18(3), 11–14.
13. Briggs, L. J. (1970). Handbook of procedures for the design of instruction. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
14. *Chang, K. (2011). A model of action learning program design in higher education. Korean Journal of Educational Technology, 27(3), 475–505.
15. Christensen, T. K., & Osguthorpe, R. T. (2004). How do instructional-design practitioners make instructional-strategy decisions? Performance Improvement Quarterly,17(3), 45–65.
16. *Clifford, M. A. (2009). Dissecting local design; instructional leadership, curriculum and science education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
17. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage.
18. *Crawford, C. (2004). Non-linear instructional design model: eternal, synergistic design and development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 413–420.
19. Davies, I. K. (1996). Educational technology: Archetypes, paradigms and models. In D. P. Ely & T. Plomp (Eds.), Classic writings on instructional technology (pp. 15–30). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited Inc.
20. Dewey, J. (1900). Psychology and social practice. The Psychological Review,7(2), 105–124.
21. Dick, W. (1996). The Dick and Carey model: Will it survive the decade? Educational Technology Research and Development,44(3), 55–63.
22. Dick, W., & Carey, L. M. (1978). The systemic design of instruction. New York: Harper Collins.
23. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systemic design of instruction (6th ed.). New York: Pearson.
24. Edmonds, G., Branch, R., & Mukherjee, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models. Educational Technology Research and Development,42(4), 55–62.
25. Ertmer, P. A., Stepich, D. A., York, C. S., Stickman, A., Wu, X., & Zurek, S. (2008). How instructional design experts use knowledge and experience to solve ill-structured problems. Performance Improvement Quarterly,21(1), 17–42.
26. Ertmer, P. A., York, C. S., & Gedik, N. (2009). Learning from the pros: How experienced designers translate instructional design models into practice. Educational Technology,49(1), 19–26.
27. *Forsyth, J. E. (1997). The construction and validation of an instructional systems design model for community-based train-the-trainer instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
28. Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning (1st ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
29. Gibbons, A., & Rogers, P. (2009). The architecture of instructional theory. In C. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. III, pp. 305–326). New York: Routledge.
30. Gibbons, A. S., Boling, E., & Smith, K. M. (2014). Instructional design models. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 607–616). New York: Springer.
31. Gustafson, K., & Branch, R. M. (1997). Survey of instructional development models (3rd ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
32. Gustafson, K., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
33. Hart, C. (2001). Doing a literature search. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
34. *Hegstad, C. D. (2002). Development and maintenance of exemplary formal mentoring programs in fortune 500 companies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
35. *Jones, T. S., & Richey, R. C. (2000). Rapid prototyping methodology in action: A developmental study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(2), 63–80.
36. Jung, I., & Rha, I. (1989). Instructional design theories. Seoul: Educational Science.
37. *Kang, J., & Lee, S. S. (2009). The development of blended instructional design model for scaffolding: Applying design-based research. Korean Journal of Educational Information and Media, 15(2), 89–121.
38. Kirschner, P., Carr, C., van Merriёnboer, J., & Sloep, P. (2002). How expert designers design. Performance Improvement Quarterly,15(4), 86–104.
39. Landa, L. N. (1976). Instructional regulation and control: Cybernetics, algorithmatization and heuristics in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
40. *Laverde, A. C., Cifuentes, Y. S., & Rodriguez, H. Y. R. (2007). Toward an instructional design model based on learning objects. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55 (3), 671–681.
41. Lee, J. (2012). Development of a visual summarizer design model for digital learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
42. *Lee, J., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2009). Formative research on the heuristic task analysis process. Educational Technology Research & Development, 51(4), 5–24.
43. Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum? Journal of Research in Science Teaching,43, 255–281.
44. *Lim, C., Youn, S., Park, K., & Hong, M. (2009). A study of an integrated instructional model in a college course for creative problem-solving with online support system. Korean Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 171–203.
45. Linn, M. C., Songer, N. B., & Eylon, B. (2004). Shifts and convergences in science learning and instruction. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Caffee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 438–490). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. *Moallem, M. (2003). An interactive online course: A collaborative design model. Educational Technology Research & Development, 51(4), 85–103.
47. *Olsafsky, B. L. (2006). Rethinking learner-centered instructional design in the context of “No child left behind”. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
48. *Park, K. (2010). Designing contexts for the introductory learning activities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
49. Pearl, J. (1984). Heuristics: Intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
50. *Peterson, B. J. (2007). An instructional design model for heuristics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
51. *Rha, I., & Chung, H. (2001). Developing an action model for WBI design. KoreanJournal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 27–52.
52. Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (Vol. I, pp. 3–36). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Some thoughts about theories, perfection, and instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. II, pp. 31–47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
54. Reigeluth, C. M., & An, Y. (2009). Theory building. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. III, pp. 365–386). New York: Routledge.
55. Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2009). Instructional design theories and models (Vol. III). New York: Routledge.
56. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. New York: Routledge.
57. Rubinstein, M. (1975). Patterns of problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
58. Seels, B. B., & Glasgow, Z. (1998). Making instructional design decisions (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
59. Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
60. Sheehan, M. D., & Johnson, R. B. (2012). Philosophical and methodological beliefs of instructional design faculty and professionals. Education Technology Research and Development,60(1), 131–153.
61. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
62. Silber, K. H. (2007). A principle-based model of instructional design: A new way of thinking about and teaching ID. Educational Technology,47(5), 5–19.
63. Silvern, L. C. (1968). Systems engineering of education I: Evolution of systems thinking in education. Los Angeles: Education and Training Consultants Company.
64. Smith, K., & Boling, E. (2009). What do we make of design? Design as a concept in educational technology. Educational Technology,49(4), 3–17.
65. *Spector, J. M., Muraida, D. J., & Marlino, M. R. (1992). Cognitively based models of courseware development. Educational Technology Research & Development,40(2), 45–54.
66. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
67. *Tracey, M. W. (2001). The construction and validation of an instructional systems design model incorporating multiple intelligences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
68. Van Merrìënboer, J. J. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for teaching training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
69. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development,53(4), 5–23.
70. Wedman, J., & Tessmer, M. (1993). Instructional designers’ decisions and priorities: A survey of design practices. Performance & Instruction,6(2), 43–57.
71. Willis, J. (1995). A recursive, reflective instructional design model based on constructivist-interpretivist theory. Educational Technology,35(6), 5–23.
72. Willis, J. (2009). Three trends in instructional design. In J. W. Willis (Ed.), Constructivist instructional design (C-ID); Foundations, models, and examples (pp. 11–45). Charlotte: IAP-information Age Publishing Inc.
73. Yanchar, S. C., South, J. B., Williams, D. D., Allen, S., & Wilson, B. G. (2010). Struggling with theory? A qualitative investigation of conceptual tool use in instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development,58(1), 39–60.
74. Yanchar, S. C., & Gabbitas, B. W. (2011). Between eclecticism and orthodoxy in instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development,59(3), 383–398.
75. York, C., & Ertmer, P. (2011). Towards an understanding of instructional design heuristics: An exploratory Delphi study. Educational Technology Research and Development,43(4), 60–70.
76. *You, Y. (2002). Toward a systemic interpretive model of ISD for understanding ill-structured problem situation. KoreanJournal of Educational Technology, 18(2), 249–295.