How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation

Learning Environments Research

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 171-193

  Strayer, Jeremy F ^a  

^a MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Classroom flip; Educational technology; Intelligent tutoring systems; Inverted classrooms; Mathematics education; Statistics education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865807813     PISSN: 13871579     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Albert, D., & Schrepp, M. (1999). Structure and design of an intelligent tutorial system based on skill assignments. In J. Lukas (Ed.), Knowledge spaces: Theories, empirical research and applications (pp. 179-196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Baker, J. W. (2000, April). The "classroom flip": Using web course management tools to become a guide by the side. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on college teaching and learning, Jacksonville, FL.
3. Bluic, A.-M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 231-244.
4. Buerck, J. P., Malmstrom, T., & Peppers, E. (2003). Learning environments and learning styles: Non-traditional student enrollment and success in an internet-based versus a lecture-based computer science course. Learning Environments Research, 6, 137-155.
5. Chandra, V., & Fisher, D. L. (2009). Students' perceptions of a blended web-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 12, 31-44.
6. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Collins, B., de Boer, W., & van der Veen, J. (2001). Building on learner contributions: A web-supported pedagogic strategy. Educational Media International, 38(4), 229-240.
8. Doignon, J. P., & Falmagne, J. C. (1999). Knowledge spaces. Berlin: Springer.
9. Donnelly, R. (2010). Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended problem-based learning. Computers & Education, 54, 350-359.
10. Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2001). An invasion in the classroom: Influence of an ill-structured innovation on instructional and epistemological beliefs. Learning Environments Research, 4, 87-105.
11. Falmagne, J. C. (1993). Stochastic learning paths in a knowledge structure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 489-512.
12. Falmagne, J. C., Cosyn, E., Doignon, J. P., & Thiery, N. (2006). The assessment of knowledge, in theory and in practice. In R. Missaoui & J. Schmid (Eds.), Formal concept analysis (pp. 61-79). Berlin: Springer.
13. Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7-34.
14. Fraser, B. J., Treagust, D. F., & Dennis, N. C. (1986). Development of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment at universities and colleges. Studies in Higher Education, 11(1), 43-54.
15. Frederickson, N., Reed, P., & Clifford, V. (2005). Evaluating web-supported learning versus lecture-based teaching: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Higher Education, 50, 645-664.
16. Gannod, G. C., Burge, J. E., & Helmick, M. T. (2008). Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. Proceedings of the 30th international conference on software engineering, Leipzig, Germany.
17. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
18. Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 53-64.
19. Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.
20. Lukas, J., & Albert, D. (1999). Knowledge structures: What they are and how they can be used in cognitive psychology, test theory, and the design of learning environments. In J. Lukas (Ed.), Knowledge spaces: Theories, empirical research, and applications (pp. 3-12). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Moos, R. H. (1974). The social climate scales: An overview. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
23. Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
24. Moss, R. H. (2003). Social contexts: Transcending their power and their fragility. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1/2), 1-13.
25. Nijhuis, J. F., Segers, M. S., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2005). Influence of redesigning a learning environment on student perceptions and learning strategies. Learning Environments Research, 8, 67-93.
26. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Pelto, P. J., & Pelto, G. H. (1978). Anthropological research: The structure of inquiry (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
29. So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51, 318-336.
30. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
31. Strayer, J. F. (2009). Inverting the classroom: A study of the learning environment when an intelligent tutoring system is used to help students learn. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
32. Weinstein, M. (2004). Randomized design and the myth of certain knowledge: Guinea pig narratives and cultural critique. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 246-260.
33. Wolcott, H. F. (2005). The art of fieldwork (2nd ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.