What Scales the T Cell Response?

Trends in Immunology

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 513-522

  Mayya, Viveka ^a   Dustin, Michael L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERLEUKIN 2; T LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR; ANTIGEN; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; LYMPHOCYTE ANTIGEN RECEPTOR;

CELL CLONE; CYTOKINE RELEASE; IMMUNE RESPONSE; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; T LYMPHOCYTE; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; IMMUNOMODULATION; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS; BIOMARKERS; HUMANS; IMMUNOMODULATION; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; T-LYMPHOCYTES;

EID: 84977644523     PISSN: 14714906     EISSN: 14714981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2016.06.005     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. 1 Blander, J.M., Sander, L.E., Beyond pattern recognition: five immune checkpoints for scaling the microbial threat. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12 (2012), 215–225.
2. + T cells: foot soldiers of the immune system. Immunity 35 (2011), 161–168.
3. 3 Obst, R., The timing of T cell priming and cycling. Front. Immunol., 6, 2015, 563.
4. + T Cells in response to infection is markedly efficient. Science 325 (2009), 1265–1269.
5. 5 Corse, E., et al. Strength of TCR–peptide/MHC interactions and in vivo T cell responses. J. Immunol. 186 (2011), 5039–5045.
6. + T cell response. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15 (2015), 705–716.
7. 7 Tkach, K.E., et al. T cells translate individual, quantal activation into collective, analog cytokine responses via time-integrated feedbacks. Elife, 3, 2014, e01944.
8. 8 Zehn, D., et al. Complete but curtailed T-cell response to very low-affinity antigen. Nature 458 (2009), 211–214.
9. 9 King, Carolyn, G., et al. T cell affinity regulates asymmetric division, effector cell differentiation, and tissue pathology. Immunity 37 (2012), 709–720.
10. 10 Marchingo, J.M., et al. Antigen affinity, costimulation, and cytokine inputs sum linearly to amplify T cell expansion. Science 346 (2014), 1123–1127.
11. 11 Enouz, S., et al. Autoreactive T cells bypass negative selection and respond to self-antigen stimulation during infection. J. Exp. Med. 209 (2012), 1769–1779.
12. + T cell response to infection and memory T cell formation. Nat. Immunol. 14 (2013), 404–412.
13. 13 Cantrell, D., Signaling in lymphocyte activation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 7, 2015, a018788.
14. 14 Tkach, K., Altan-Bonnet, G., T cell responses to antigen: hasty proposals resolved through long engagements. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 25 (2013), 120–125.
15. 15 Jenkins, M.K., Moon, J.J., The role of naive T cell precursor frequency and recruitment in dictating immune response magnitude. J. Immunol. 188 (2012), 4135–4140.
16. 16 Lanzavecchia, A., Sallusto, F., Antigen decoding by T lymphocytes: from synapses to fate determination. Nat. Immunol. 2 (2001), 487–492.
17. 17 Finetti, F., et al. Specific recycling receptors are targeted to the immune synapse by the intraflagellar transport system. J. Cell Sci. 127 (2014), 1924–1937.
18. 18 Willinger, T., et al. Dynamin 2-dependent endocytosis sustains T-cell receptor signaling and drives metabolic reprogramming in T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 (2015), 4423–4428.
19. 19 Becker, V., et al. Covering a broad dynamic range: information processing at the erythropoietin receptor. Science 328 (2010), 1404–1408.
20. 20 Das, J., et al. Digital signaling and hysteresis characterize ras activation in lymphoid cells. Cell 136 (2009), 337–351.
21. 21 Celli, S., et al. CD4 T cells integrate signals delivered during successive DC encounters in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 202 (2005), 1271–1278.
22. 22 Clark, C.E., et al. A role for the Immediate early gene product c-Fos in imprinting T cells with short-term memory for signal summation. PLoS One, 6, 2011, e18916.
23. 23 Marangoni, F., et al. The transcription factor NFAT exhibits signal memory during serial T cell interactions with antigen-presenting cells. Immunity 38 (2013), 237–249.
24. 24 Rosette, C., et al. The impact of duration versus extent of TCR occupancy on T cell activation: a revision of the kinetic proofreading model. Immunity 15 (2001), 59–70.
25. 25 Holst, J., et al. Scalable signaling mediated by T cell antigen receptor–CD3 ITAMs ensures effective negative selection and prevents autoimmunity. Nat. Immunol. 9 (2008), 658–666.
26. 26 Guy, C.S., et al. Distinct TCR signaling pathways drive proliferation and cytokine production in T cells. Nat. Immunol. 14 (2013), 262–270.
27. 27 Dang, C.V., MYC, metabolism, cell growth, and tumorigenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med., 3, 2013, a014217.
28. 28 Nie, Z., et al. c-Myc is a universal amplifier of expressed genes in lymphocytes and embryonic stem cells. Cell 151 (2012), 68–79.
29. 29 Wang, R., et al. The transcription factor Myc controls metabolic reprogramming upon T lymphocyte activation. Immunity 35 (2011), 871–882.
30. 30 Palomero, T., et al. NOTCH1 directly regulates c-MYC and activates a feed-forward-loop transcriptional network promoting leukemic cell growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (2006), 18261–18266.
31. + T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 15 (2014), 1143–1151.
32. + effector and memory T-cell differentiation. Nat. Commun., 6, 2015, 6301.
33. 33 Man, K., et al. The transcription factor IRF4 is essential for TCR affinity-mediated metabolic programming and clonal expansion of T cells. Nat. Immunol. 14 (2013), 1155–1165.
34. + T cell differentiation and expansion, but not attrition, in response to acute virus infection. J. Immunol. 192 (2014), 5881–5893.
35. + T cells. Nat. Immunol. 15 (2014), 373–383.
36. + T-cell effector differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 (2015), 512–517.
37. + T cell expansion and effector differentiation. Immunity 39 (2013), 833–845.
38. 38 Kaern, M., et al. Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6 (2005), 451–464.
39. 39 Buchholz, V.R., et al. T cell fate at the single-cell level. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 34 (2014), 66–92.
40. 40 Duffy, K.R., Hodgkin, P.D., Intracellular competition for fates in the immune system. Trends Cell Biol. 22 (2012), 457–464.
41. 41 Murphy, K.M., Stockinger, B., Effector T cell plasticity: flexibility in the face of changing circumstances. Nat. Immunol. 11 (2010), 674–680.
42. 42 Plumlee, C.R., et al. Early effector CD8 T cells display plasticity in populating the short-lived effector and memory-precursor pools following bacterial or viral infection. Sci. Rep., 5, 2015, 12264.
43. 43 Handly, L.N., et al. Paracrine communication maximizes cellular response fidelity in wound signaling. Elife, 4, 2015, e09652.
44. 44 Waysbort, N., et al. Coupled IL-2-dependent extracellular feedbacks govern two distinct consecutive phases of CD4 T cell activation. J. Immunol. 191 (2013), 5822–5830.
45. 45 Busse, D., et al. Competing feedback loops shape IL-2 signaling between helper and regulatory T lymphocytes in cellular microenvironments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 (2010), 3058–3063.
46. 46 Chung, J., et al. STAT3 serine phosphorylation by ERK-dependent and -independent pathways negatively modulates its tyrosine phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17 (1997), 6508–6516.
47. 47 Vanhatupa, S., et al. MAPK-induced Ser727 phosphorylation promotes SUMOylation of STAT1. Biochem. J. 409 (2008), 179–185.
48. 48 Verdeil, G., et al. STAT5-mediated signals sustain a TCR-initiated gene expression program toward differentiation of CD8 T cell effectors. J. Immunol. 176 (2006), 4834–4842.
49. 49 Wang, C.J., et al. Diverse sensitivity thresholds in dynamic signaling responses by social amoebae. Sci. Signal., 5, 2012, ra17.
50. 50 Xue, Q., et al. Analysis of single-cell cytokine secretion reveals a role for paracrine signaling in coordinating macrophage responses to TLR4 stimulation. Sci. Signal., 8, 2015, ra59.
51. 51 Sabatos, C.A., et al. A synaptic basis for paracrine interleukin-2 signaling during homotypic T cell interaction. Immunity 29 (2008), 238–248.
52. 52 Voisinne, G., et al. T cells integrate local and global cues to discriminate between structurally similar antigens. Cell Rep. 11 (2015), 1208–1219.
53. + T cell differentiation but is dispensable for memory generation. J. Immunol. 194 (2015), 5654–5662.
54. 54 Preston, G.C., et al. Single cell tuning of Myc expression by antigen receptor signal strength and interleukin-2 in T lymphocytes. EMBO J. 34 (2015), 2008–2024.
55. 55 Starbeck-Miller, G.R., et al. IL-12 and type I interferon prolong the division of activated CD8 T cells by maintaining high-affinity IL-2 signaling in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 211 (2014), 105–120.
56. 56 Murphy, L.O., et al. A network of immediate early gene products propagates subtle differences in mitogen-activated protein kinase signal amplitude and duration. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 (2004), 144–153.
57. 57 Torii, S., et al. ERK MAP kinase in G cell cycle progression and cancer. Cancer Sci. 97 (2006), 697–702.
58. 58 Mangan, S., Alon, U., Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (2003), 11980–11985.
59. + T cells. Nat. Immunol. 15 (2014), 884–893.
60. 60 Wolf, E., et al. Taming of the beast: shaping Myc-dependent amplification. Trends Cell Biol. 25 (2015), 241–248.
61. 61 Levens, D., Cellular MYCro economics: balancing MYC function with MYC expression. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med., 3, 2013, a014233.
62. 62 Kalir, S., et al. A coherent feed-forward loop with a SUM input function prolongs flagella expression in Escherichia coli. Mol. Syst. Biol., 1, 2005 2005.0006.
63. 63 English, J.G., et al. MAPK feedback encodes a switch and timer for tunable stress adaptation in yeast. Sci. Signal., 8, 2015, ra5.
64. 64 Tay, S., et al. Single-cell NF-kappaB dynamics reveal digital activation and analogue information processing. Nature 466 (2010), 267–271.
65. 65 Lopez, J.M., Digital kinases: a cell model for sensing, integrating and making choices. Commun. Integr. Biol. 3 (2010), 146–150.
66. 66 Behar, M., et al. Dose-to-duration encoding and signaling beyond saturation in intracellular signaling networks. PLoS Comput. Biol., 4, 2008, e1000197.
67. + T cell-dendritic cell interaction kinetics and memory fate decisions. Immunity 39 (2013), 496–507.
68. 68 Moreau, H.D., et al. Dynamic in situ cytometry uncovers T cell receptor signaling during immunological synapses and kinapses in vivo. Immunity 37 (2012), 351–363.
69. + T cell polarization In Vivo. Immunity 41 (2014), 63–74.
70. 70 Dustin, M.L., Stop and go traffic to tune T cell responses. Immunity 21 (2004), 305–314.
71. 71 Jang, I.K., Gu, H., Negative regulation of TCR signaling and T-cell activation by selective protein degradation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 15 (2003), 315–320.
72. + T cells imprints a cell-intrinsic, transient low-motility pattern independent of chemokine receptor expression levels, or microtubular network, integrin, and protein kinase C activity. Front. Immunol., 6, 2015, 297.
73. 73 Daniel, R., et al. Synthetic analog computation in living cells. Nature 497 (2013), 619–623.
74. 74 Sung, M.H., et al. Switching of the relative dominance between feedback mechanisms in lipopolysaccharide-induced NF-kappaB signaling. Sci. Signal., 7, 2014, ra6.
75. 75 Bhalla, U.S., et al. MAP kinase phosphatase as a locus of flexibility in a mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling network. Science 297 (2002), 1018–1023.
76. 76 Grigoryev, Y.A., et al. MicroRNA regulation of molecular networks mapped by global microRNA, mRNA, and protein expression in activated T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 187 (2011), 2233–2243.
77. + T-cell differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110 (2013), 18608–18613.
78. + T-cell activation, migration, and survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 (2010), 21629–21634.
79. 79 Marcais, A., et al. microRNA-mediated regulation of mTOR complex components facilitates discrimination between activation and anergy in CD4 T cells. J. Exp. Med. 211 (2014), 2281–2295.
80. 80 Yui, M.A., Rothenberg, E.V., Developmental gene networks: a triathlon on the course to T cell identity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14 (2014), 529–545.
81. + T cell differentiation controlled by transcription factors Blimp-1 and T-bet. Nat. Immunol. 17 (2016), 422–432.