Paracrine communication maximizes cellular response fidelity in wound signaling

eLife

Volumn 4, Issue OCTOBER2015, 2015, Pages

  Naomi Handly, L ^a   Pilko, Anna ^a   Wollman, Roy ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^c University of California San Diego   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CELLULAR IMMUNITY; GENE EXPRESSION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; NONHUMAN; PARACRINE SIGNALING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; WOUND; WOUND HEALING; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CALCIUM SIGNALING; CELL LINE; HUMAN; INJURY; LAB ON A CHIP; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

CALCIUM SIGNALING; CELL LINE; HUMANS; LAB-ON-A-CHIP DEVICES; MAP KINASE SIGNALING SYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PARACRINE COMMUNICATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84949845518     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.09652     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Akerboom J, Carreras Calderón N, Tian L, Wabnig S, Prigge M, Tolö J, Gordus A, Orger MB, Severi KE, Macklin JJ, Patel R, Pulver SR, Wardill TJ, Fischer E, Schüler C, Chen T-W, Sarkisyan KS, Marvin JS, Bargmann CI, Kim DS, Kügler S, Lagnado L, Hegemann P, Gottschalk A, Schreiter ER, Looger LL. 2013. Genetically encoded calcium indicators for multi-color neural activity imaging and combination with optogenetics. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 6:2 doi:10.3389/fnmol.2013.00002
2. Albeck JG, Mills GB, Brugge JS. 2013. Frequency-modulated pulses of ERK activity transmit quantitative proliferation signals. Molecular Cell 49:249-261. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.002
3. Altschuler SJ, Wu LF. 2010. Cellular heterogeneity: do differences make a difference? Cell 141:559-563. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.033
4. Armbruster BN, Li X, Pausch MH, Herlitze S, Roth BL. 2007. Evolving the lock to fit the key to create a family of g protein-coupled receptors potently activated by an inert ligand. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:5163-5168. doi:10.1073/pnas.0700293104
5. Bar-Even A, Paulsson J, Maheshri N, Carmi M, O’Shea E, Pilpel Y, Barkai N. 2006. Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance. Nature Genetics 38:636-643. doi:10.1038/ng1807
6. Batsilas L, Berezhkovskii AM, Shvartsman SY. 2003. Stochastic model of autocrine and paracrine signals in cell culture assays. Biophysical Journal 85:3659-3665. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74783-3
7. Ben-Shlomo I, Rauch R, Avsian-Kretchmer O, Hsueh AJW. 2007. Matching receptome genes with their ligands for surveying Paracrine/Autocrine signaling systems. Molecular Endocrinology 21:2009-2014. doi:10.1210/me.2007-0087
8. Ben-Shlomo I, Yu Hsu S, Rauch R, Kowalski HW, Hsueh AJW, et al. 2003. Signaling receptome: a genomic and evolutionary perspective of plasma membrane receptors involved in signal transduction. Science Signaling 2003:re9. doi:10.1126/stke.2003.187.re9
9. Berg HC. 1993. Random Walks in Biology.: PrincetonPrinceton University Press.
10. Chen J, Weiss WA, Kumagai Y, et al. 2015. Alternative splicing in cancer: implications for biology and therapy2014. Heterogeneity in ERK activity as visualized by in vivo FRET imaging of mammary tumor cells developed in MMTV-neu mice. Oncogene 34:1-7. doi:10.1038/onc.2013.570
11. Cheong R, Rhee A, Wang CJ, Nemenman I, Levchenko A. 2011. Information transduction capacity of noisy biochemical signaling networks. Science 334:354-358. doi:10.1126/science.1204553
12. Cordeiro João V., Jacinto António. 2013. The role of transcription-independent damage signals in the initiation of epithelial wound healing. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 14:249-262. doi:10.1038/nrm3541
13. Debnath J, Muthuswamy SK, Brugge JS. 2003. Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures. Methods 30:256-268. doi:10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00032-X
14. Dong S, Allen JA, Farrell M, Roth BL. 2010. A chemical-genetic approach for precise spatio-temporal control of cellular signaling. Molecular BioSystems 6:1376-1380. doi:10.1039/c002568m
15. Dubuis JO, Tkacik G, Wieschaus EF, Gregor T, Bialek W. 2013. Positional information, in bits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:16301-16308. doi:10.1073/pnas.1315642110
16. Edelstein A, Amodaj N, Hoover K, Vale R, Stuurman N. 2010. Computer control of microscopes using mManager. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology Chapter 14. 20 doi:10.1002/0471142727.mb1420s92
17. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS. 2002. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297:1183-1186. doi:10.1126/science.1070919
18. Ferry MS, Razinkov IA, Hasty J. 2011. Microfluidics for synthetic biology: from design to execution. Methods in Enzymology 497:295-372.
19. Gregor T, Tank DW, Wieschaus EF, Bialek W. 2007. Probing the limits to positional information. Cell 130:153-164. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.025
20. Hansen AS, O’Shea EK. 2015. Limits on information transduction through amplitude and frequency regulation of transcription factor activity. eLife 4. doi:10.7554/eLife.06559
21. Hiratsuka T, Fujita Y, Naoki H, Aoki K, Kamioka Y, Matsuda M. 2015. Intercellular propagation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation revealed by in vivo imaging of mouse skin. eLife 4:1350-18. doi:10.7554/eLife.05178
22. Hoare DJ, Couzin ID, Godin J-GJ, Krause J, et al. 2004. Context-dependent group size choice in fish. Animal Behaviour 67:155-164. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.04.004
23. Hughey JJ, Gutschow MV, Bajar BT, Covert MW. 2015. Single-cell variation leads to population invariance in NF-kB signaling dynamics. Molecular Biology of the Cell 26:583-590. doi:10.1091/mbc.E14-08-1267
24. Junker JP, van Oudenaarden A. 2014. Every cell is special: genome-wide studies add a new dimension to single-cell biology. Cell 157:8-11. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.010
25. Kao AB, Couzin ID. 2014. Decision accuracy in complex environments is often maximized by small group sizes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281:20133305. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.3305
26. Kellogg RA, Tay S. 2015. Noise facilitates transcriptional control under dynamic inputs. Cell 160:381-392. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.013
27. Komatsu N, Aoki K, Yamada M, Yukinaga H, Fujita Y, Kamioka Y, Matsuda M. 2011. Development of an optimized backbone of FRET biosensors for kinases and GTPases. Molecular Biology of the Cell 22:4647-4656. doi:10.1091/mbc.E11-01-0072
28. Kreuz le, Levy ah. 1965. Physical properties of chick interferon. Journal of Bacteriology 89:462-469.
29. Mardones P, Martínez G, Hetz C. 2015. Control of systemic proteostasis by the nervous system. Trends in Cell Biology 25:1-10. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2014.08.001
30. Newman JRS, Ghaemmaghami S, Ihmels J, Breslow DK, Noble M, DeRisi JL, Weissman JS. 2006. Single-cell proteomic analysis of s. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441:840-846. doi:10.1038/nature04785
31. Piras V, Selvarajoo K. 2015. The reduction of gene expression variability from single cells to populations follows simple statistical laws. Genomics 105:137-144. doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2014.12.007
32. Polacheck WJ, Charest JL, Kamm RD. 2011. Interstitial flow influences direction of tumor cell migration through competing mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108:11115-11120. doi:10.1073/pnas.1103581108
33. Pribyl M, Muratov CB, Shvartsman SY. 2003a. Discrete models of autocrine cell communication in epithelial layers. Biophysical Journal 84:3624-3635. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75093-0
34. Pribyl M, Muratov CB, Shvartsman SY. 2003b. Long-range signal transmission in autocrine relays. Biophysical Journal 84:883-896. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74906-6
35. Rand U, Rinas M, Schwerk J, Nöhren G, Linnes M, Kröger A, Flossdorf M, Kály-Kullai K, Hauser H, Höfer T, Köster M. 2012. Multi-layered stochasticity and paracrine signal propagation shape the type-i interferon response. Molecular Systems Biology 8:584. doi:10.1038/msb.2012.17
36. Ross WN. 2012. Understanding calcium waves and sparks in central neurons. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13: 157-168. doi:10.1038/nrn3168
37. Sanchez A, Golding I. 2013. Genetic determinants and cellular constraints in noisy gene expression. Science 342: 1188-1193. doi:10.1126/science.1242975
38. Sasaki T, Granovskiy B, Mann RP, Sumpter DJT, Pratt SC, et al. 2013. Ant colonies outperform individuals when a sensory discrimination task is difficult but not when it is easy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:13769-13773. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304917110
39. Selimkhanov J, Taylor B, Yao J, Pilko A, Albeck J, Hoffmann A, Tsimring L, Wollman R. 2014. Accurate information transmission through dynamic biochemical signaling networks. Science 346:1370-1373. doi:10.1126/science.1254933
40. Shalek AK, Satija R, Shuga J, Trombetta JJ, Gennert D, Lu D, Chen P, Gertner RS, Gaublomme JT, Yosef N, Schwartz S, Fowler B, Weaver S, Wang J, Wang X, Ding R, Raychowdhury R, Friedman N, Hacohen N, Park H, May AP, Regev A. 2014. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic paracrine control of cellular variation. Nature 509:363-369. doi:10.1038/nature13437
41. Sholley MM, Gimbrone MA, Cotran RS. 1977. Cellular migration and replication in endothelial regeneration: a study using irradiated endothelial cultures. Laboratory Investigation 36:18-25.
42. Sigal A, Milo R, Cohen A, Geva-Zatorsky N, Klein Y, Liron Y, Rosenfeld N, Danon T, Perzov N, Alon U. 2006. Variability and memory of protein levels in human cells. Nature 444:643-646. doi:10.1038/nature05316
43. Sonnemann KJ, Bement WM. 2011. Wound repair: toward understanding and integration of single-cell and multicellular wound responses. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 27:237-263. doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154251
44. Spencer SL, Gaudet S, Albeck JG, Burke JM, Sorger PK. 2009. Non-genetic origins of cell-to-cell variability in TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Nature 459:428-432. doi:10.1038/nature08012
45. Sueur Cédric, Deneubourg J-L, Petit O, Couzin ID. 2011. Group size, grooming and fission in primates: a modeling approach based on group structure. Journal of Theoretical Biology 273:156-166. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.035
46. Uda S, Saito TH, Kudo T, Kokaji T, Tsuchiya T, Kubota H, Komori Y, Ozaki Y.-I., Kuroda S. 2013. Robustness and compensation of information transmission of signaling pathways. Science 341:558-561. doi:10.1126/science.1234511
47. Voliotis M, Perrett RM, Mcwilliams C, Mcardle CA, Bowsher CG. 2014. Information transfer by leaky, heterogeneous, protein kinase signaling systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111:E326-E333. doi:10.1073/pnas.1314446111
48. Wetzker R, Böhmer F-D. 2003. Opinion: transactivation joins multiple tracks to the ERK/MAPK cascade. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 4:651-657. doi:10.1038/nrm1173
49. Yin J, Xu K, Zhang J, Kumar A, Yu F-SX. 2007. Wound-induced ATP release and EGF receptor activation in epithelial cells. Journal of Cell Science 120:815-825. doi:10.1242/jcs.03389
50. Zhao Y, Araki S, Wu J, Teramoto T, Chang Y-F, Nakano M, Abdelfattah AS, Fujiwara M, Ishihara T, Nagai T, Campbell RE. 2011. An expanded palette of genetically encoded Ca2+ indicators. Science 333:1888-1891. doi:10.1126/science.1208592