Intracellular competition for fates in the immune system

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 457-464

  Duffy, Ken R ^a   Hodgkin, Philip D ^b,c  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b WALTER AND ELIZA HALL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adaptive immune response; Autonomous competition hypothesis; Stochastic fate determination

Indexed keywords

CYTOKINE;

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY; ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS; AUTONOMOUS COMPETITION HYPOTHESIS; B LYMPHOCYTE; CELL FATE; CELL HETEROGENEITY; CELL INTERACTION; CELLULAR IMMUNITY; CYTOKINE RELEASE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LYMPHOCYTE; LYMPHOCYTE DIFFERENTIATION; LYMPHOCYTE PROLIFERATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; T LYMPHOCYTE;

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY; ANIMALS; AUTOIMMUNITY; CELL LINEAGE; HUMANS; IMMUNE SYSTEM; INTRACELLULAR SPACE;

EID: 84865607726     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.05.004     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Sallusto F., et al. Central memory and effector memory T cell subsets: function, generation, and maintenance. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2004, 22:745-763.
2. MacLennan I.C., et al. Extrafollicular antibody responses. Immunol. Rev. 2003, 194:8-18.
3. Jenkins M.R., et al. Heterogeneity of effector phenotype for acute phase and memory influenza A virus-specific CTL. J. Immunol. 2007, 179:64-70.
4. Seder R.A., et al. T-cell quality in memory and protection: implications for vaccine design. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8:247-258.
5. Goodnow C.C., et al. Control systems and decision making for antibody production. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11:681-688.
6. Garcia S., et al. Following the development of a CD4 T cell response in vivo: from activation to memory formation. Immunity 1999, 11:163-171.
7. Jenkins M.K., et al. In vivo activation of antigen-specific CD4 T cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2001, 19:23-45.
8. + T cell responses during and after acute lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection. J. Immunol. 2003, 171:3928-3935.
9. Strasser A., Pellegrini M. T-lymphocyte death during shutdown of an immune response. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25:610-615.
10. + T cell repertoire in the transition from effector to memory. Immunity 2008, 28:533-545.
11. Kalia V., et al. Differentiation of memory B and T cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2006, 18:255-264.
12. Oracki S.A., et al. Plasma cell development and survival. Immunol. Rev. 2010, 237:140-159.
13. Stavnezer J., et al. Mechanism and regulation of class switch recombination. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 26:261-292.
14. + effector and memory T cell generation. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4:835-842.
15. Kaech S.M., Wherry E.J. Heterogeneity and cell-fate decisions in effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation during viral infection. Immunity 2007, 27:393-405.
16. + T-cell differentiation regulated by networks of cytokines and transcription factors. Immunol. Rev. 2010, 238:247-262.
17. + T cell precursor can develop into diverse effector and memory subsets. Immunity 2007, 27:985-997.
18. Schepers K., et al. Dissecting T cell lineage relationships by cellular barcoding. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205:2309-2318.
19. + T cell differentiation. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207:1235-1246.
20. Rieger M.A., et al. Hematopoietic cytokines can instruct lineage choice. Science 2009, 325:217-218.
21. Rieger M.A., Schroeder T. Analyzing cell fate control by cytokines through continuous single cell biochemistry. J. Cell. Biochem. 2009, 108:343-352.
22. Hawkins E.D., et al. A single-cell pedigree analysis of alternative stochastic lymphocyte fates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:13457-13462.
23. Day D., et al. A method for prolonged imaging of motile lymphocytes. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2009, 87:154-158.
24. + effector T cells supports the idea that lower TCR/epitope avidity may be advantageous for target cell killing. Cell Death Differ. 2009, 16:537-542.
25. Chang J.T., et al. Asymmetric proteasome segregation as a mechanism for unequal partitioning of the transcription factor T-bet during T lymphocyte division. Immunity 2011, 34:492-504.
26. Oliaro J., et al. Asymmetric cell division of T cells upon antigen presentation uses multiple conserved mechanisms. J. Immunol. 2010, 185:367-375.
27. Mittelbrunn M., et al. Imaging of plasmacytoid dendritic cell interactions with T cells. Blood 2009, 113:75-84.
28. Guldevall K., et al. Imaging immune surveillance of individual natural killer cells confined in microwell arrays. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e15453.
29. Gett A.V., Hodgkin P.D. A cellular calculus for signal integration by T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2000, 1:239-244.
30. Hawkins E.D., et al. A model of immune regulation as a consequence of randomized lymphocyte division and death times. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:5032-5037.
31. Huang H.C., et al. Stochastic competition between mechanistically independent slippage and death pathways determines cell fate during mitotic arrest. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e15724.
32. Kuchina A., et al. Temporal competition between differentiation programs determines cell fate choice. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7:557.
33. Duffy K.R., et al. Activation-induced B cell fates are selected by intracellular stochastic competition. Science 2012, 335:338-341.
34. + T cells. Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 1999, 21:231-248.
35. Murphy K.M., et al. Signaling and transcription in T helper development. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2000, 18:451-494.
36. Guo L., et al. Probabilistic regulation of IL-4 production. J. Clin. Immunol. 2005, 25:573-581.
37. Hodgkin P.D., et al. B cell differentiation and isotype switching is related to division cycle number. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 184:277-281.
38. Gett A.V., Hodgkin P.D. Cell division regulates the T cell cytokine repertoire, revealing a mechanism underlying immune class regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95:9488-9493.
39. Bird J.J., et al. Helper T cell differentiation is controlled by the cell cycle. Immunity 1998, 9:229-237.
40. Tangye S.G., et al. A division-linked mechanism for the rapid generation of Ig-secreting cells from human memory B cells. J. Immunol. 2003, 170:261-269.
41. Hasbold J., et al. Evidence from the generation of immunoglobulin G-secreting cells that stochastic mechanisms regulate lymphocyte differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5:55-63.
42. Tangye S.G., Hodgkin P.D. Divide and conquer: the importance of cell division in regulating B-cell responses. Immunology 2004, 112:509-520.
43. + T cells. J. Immunol. 2008, 181:3818-3822.
44. Nolz J.C., et al. Division-linked generation of death-intermediates regulates the numerical stability of memory CD8 T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:6199-6204.
45. Yates A., et al. Reconstruction of cell population dynamics using CFSE. BMC Bioinform. 2007, 8:196.
46. Zilman A., et al. Stochastic models of lymphocyte proliferation and death. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e12775.
47. Nordon R.E., et al. Multi-type branching models to describe cell differentiation programs. J. Theor. Biol. 2011, 277:7-18.
48. Cantrell D.A., Smith K.A. The interleukin-2 T-cell system: a new cell growth model. Science 1984, 224:1312-1316.
49. Deenick E.K., et al. Stochastic model of T cell proliferation: a calculus revealing IL-2 regulation of precursor frequencies, cell cycle time, and survival. J. Immunol. 2003, 170:4963-4972.
50. + T cell expansion by regulating survival. J. Immunol. 2007, 179:2250-2260.
51. Tangye S.G., et al. Intrinsic differences in the proliferation of naive and memory human B cells as a mechanism for enhanced secondary immune responses. J. Immunol. 2003, 170:686-694.
52. Kelso A., Gough N.M. Coexpression of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, gamma interferon, and interleukins 3 and 4 is random in murine alloreactive T-lymphocyte clones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1988, 85:9189-9193.
53. Deenick E.K., et al. Switching to IgG3, IgG2b, and IgA is division linked and independent, revealing a stochastic framework for describing differentiation. J. Immunol. 1999, 163:4707-4714.
54. Subramanian V.G., et al. Determining the expected variability of immune responses using the cyton model. J. Math. Biol. 2008, 56:861-892.
55. Markham J.F., et al. A minimum of two distinct heritable factors are required to explain correlation structures in proliferating lymphocytes. J. R. Soc. Interface 2010, 7:1049-1059.
56. Kallies A., et al. Plasma cell ontogeny defined by quantitative changes in blimp-1 expression. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 200:967-977.
57. Duffy K.R., Subramanian V.G. On the impact of correlation between collaterally consanguineous cells on lymphocyte population dynamics. J. Math. Biol. 2009, 59:255-285.
58. Wellard C., et al. The effect of correlations on the population dynamics of lymphocytes. J. Theor. Biol. 2010, 264:443-449.
59. Rieger M.A., et al. Improved prospective identification of megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitor cells. Br. J. Haematol. 2009, 144:448-451.
60. Rieger M.A., Schroeder T. Exploring hematopoiesis at single cell resolution. Cells Tissues Organs 2008, 188:139-149.
61. Gomes F.L., et al. Reconstruction of rat retinal progenitor cell lineages in vitro reveals a surprising degree of stochasticity in cell fate decisions. Development 2011, 138:227-235.
62. Snippert H.J., et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 2010, 143:134-144.
63. Hyrien O., et al. Stochastic modeling of oligodendrocyte generation in cell culture: model validation with time-lapse data. Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 2006, 3:21.
64. Rowat A.C., et al. Tracking lineages of single cells in lines using a microfluidic device. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:18149-18154.
65. Falconnet D., et al. High-throughput tracking of single yeast cells in a microfluidic imaging matrix. Lab Chip 2011, 11:466-473.