Enacting feedback utilization from a task-specific perspective

Curriculum Journal

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 266-282

  Lam, Ricky ^a  

^a HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

assessment tasks; Feedback; feedback utilization; higher education; socio constructivist paradigm

Indexed keywords

EID: 84975109085     PISSN: 09585176     EISSN: 14693704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09585176.2016.1187185     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adcroft, A., (2011). The mythology of feedback. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(4), 405–419.
2. Beaumont, C., O'Doherty, M., & Shannon, L., (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback:A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 671–687.
3. Black, P., (2015). Formative assessment–an optimistic but incomplete vision. Assessment in Education:Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(1), 161–177.
4. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D., (2004). Working inside the black box:Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8–21.
5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D., (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
6. Boud, D., & Molloy, E., (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning:The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712.
7. Boud, D., & Soler, R., (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413.
8. Burke, D., (2009). Strategies for using feedback students bring to higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 41–50.
9. Carless, D., (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.
10. Carless, D., (2011). From testing to productive student learning:Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. New York, NY:Routledge.
11. Carless, D., (2013). Sustainable feedback and the development of student self-evaluative capacities. In S., Merry, M., Price, D., Carless, & M., Taras (Eds.), Reconceptualising feedback in higher education:Developing dialogue with students (pp. 113–122). London:Routledge.
12. Carless, D., (2015). Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education, 69(6), 963–976.
13. Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J., (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395–407.
14. Ellis, R., (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107.
15. Evans, C., (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120.
16. Fulcher, G., (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132.
17. Hargreaves, E., (2012). Teachers’ classroom feedback:Still trying to get it right. Pedagogies:An International Journal, 7(1), 1–15.
18. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H., (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
19. Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K., (2012). Formative assessment and feedback:Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38, 21–27.
20. Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A., (2001). Getting the message across:The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 269–274.
21. Lam, R., (2013). Formative use of summative tests:Using test preparation to promote performance and self-regulation. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(1), 69–78.
22. Lam, R., (2014a). Promoting self-regulated learning through portfolio assessment:Testimony and recommendations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(6), 699–714.
23. Lam, R., (2014b). Can student-generated test materials support learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 95–108.
24. Lam, R., (2015a). Feedback about self-regulation:Does it remain an ‘unfinished business’ in portfolio assessment of writing? TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 402–413.
25. Lam, R., (2015b). Language assessment training in Hong Kong:Implications for language assessment literacy. Language Testing, 32(2), 169–197.
26. Lave, J., & Wenger, E., (1991). Situated learning:Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
27. Lee, I., (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69–85.
28. Lee, I., (2014). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 201–213.
29. McGarrell, H., & Verbeem, J., (2007). Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback. ELT Journal, 61(3), 228–236.
30. Mutch, A., (2003). Exploring the practice of feedback to students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4(1), 24–38.
31. Nicol, D., (2010). From monologue to dialogue:Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517.
32. Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D., (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning:A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
33. Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C., (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education:A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122.
34. O'Donovan, B., Rust, C., & Price, M., (2015). A scholarly approach to solving the feedback dilemma in practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1052774
35. Price, M., Rust, C., O'Donovan, B., Handley, K., & Bryant, R., (2012). Assessment Literacy:The foundation for improving student learning. Oxford:Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
36. Rust, C., O'Donovan, B., & Price, M., (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model:How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 233–241.
37. Sadler, D. R., (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
38. Sadler, D. R., (2010). Beyond feedback:Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550.
39. Sadler, D. R., (2013). Opening up feedback:Teaching learners to see. In S., Merry, M., Price, D., Carless, & M., Taras (Eds.), Reconceptualising feedback in higher education:Developing dialogue with students (pp. 54–63). London:Routledge.
40. Sadler, D. R., (2015a). Backwards assessment explanations:Implications for teaching and assessment practice. In D., Lebler, G., Carey, & S.D., Harrison (Eds.), Assessment in music education:From policy to practice (pp. 9–19). Cham:Springer.
41. Sadler, D. R., (2015b). Three in-course assessment reforms to improve higher education learning outcomes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1064858
42. Shute, V. J., (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.
43. Sutton, P., (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy:Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 31–40.
44. Taras, M., (2005). Assessment–summative and formative–some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466–478.
45. Taras, M., (2013). Feedback on feedback:Uncrossing wires across sectors. In S., Merry, M., Price, D., Carless, & M., Taras (Eds.), Reconceptualising feedback in higher education:Developing dialogue with students (pp. 30–40). London:Routledge.
46. Vardi, I., (2012). The impact of iterative writing and feedback on the characteristics of tertiary students’ written texts. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(2), 167–179.
47. Weaver, M. R., (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379–394.
48. Wiliam, D., (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3–14.